Guys, we don't need YOUR interest clashing against each other. This is for Derek's interest. Plz help Derek. tl;dr: get over yourselves nerds
ffff I knew I forgot something, ram depends on the cpu you choose though.Derekku Chan wrote:
Ph0X, I believe you forgot RAM :V
Eh. For any CPU reasonably good, specific applications probably won't matter for Derekku. As long as it works.blissfulyoshi wrote:
Derekku Chan: May you please tell us but else you will be doing with this PC? I don't think the processor debate can be handled very well without some further information such as how often you try to encode movies, do photoshop, and various other processes.
Pretty much. :V I'm not looking for the proest build, I'm just looking for a standard/decently-good/budget build xd.strager wrote:
Eh. For any CPU reasonably good, specific applications probably won't matter for Derekku. As long as it works.blissfulyoshi wrote:
Derekku Chan: May you please tell us but else you will be doing with this PC? I don't think the processor debate can be handled very well without some further information such as how often you try to encode movies, do photoshop, and various other processes.
Which is why the CPU war is irrelevant; just pickAMDone.
No comment.IppE602 wrote:
slightly better instructions set of the Intel CPU's.
Loginer wrote:
How does $490.88 sound?
http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/Publi ... r=11843031
None of what you just said made any sense at all. It didn't further your argument and it just made you look like you lash out at people when you're wrong about something. I stated the facts in depth, and if you're incapable of understanding this then I feel sorry for you.In my first post:
You may look cool to some of the kids online coming back at me with this pile of garbage, but anyone with sense will see what I posted above for what it really is. You didn't further your argument at all and only succeeded in making yourself look even more like a fanboy/girl.
If you had bothered reading what I said, then you'd know that the link to your benchmarks was unnecessary and redundant because I already stated as much. Once again re: Multithreaded processing. These benchmarks do not take advantage of all 6 cores, so the comparison between a 4 and 6 core processor is a waste of time.
AMD Phenom x4 (there is batch which is unlockable to six cores) or Intel I5blind remains blind
I5 did better in terms of gaming despite of being a dual core proc
additional cores can be crucial as normal app runs based on cores, not threads (unless apps are optimized to do so)
appreciate that, in return:Daru wrote:
Stenut- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethos#Rhetoric
stenut wrote:
None of what you just said made any sense at all. It didn't further your argument and it just made you look like you lash out at people when you're wrong about something. I stated the facts in depth, and if you're incapable of understanding this then I feel sorry for you.In my first post:
You may look cool to some of the kids online coming back at me with this pile of garbage, but anyone with sense will see what I posted above for what it really is. You didn't further your argument at all and only succeeded in making yourself look even more like a fanboy/girl.
If you had bothered reading what I said, then you'd know that the link to your benchmarks was unnecessary and redundant because I already stated as much. Once again re: Multithreaded processing. These benchmarks do not take advantage of all 6 cores, so the comparison between a 4 and 6 core processor is a waste of time.AMD Phenom x4 (there is batch which is unlockable to six cores) or Intel I5blind remains blind
I5 did better in terms of gaming despite of being a dual core proc
additional cores can be crucial as normal app runs based on cores, not threads (unless apps are optimized to do so)
a deep bow from me for acknowledge your idiocy
at the same time, I've realize how bad you're at reading those benchiesappreciate that, in return:Daru wrote:
Stenut- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethos#Rhetoric
http://zh.wikisource.org/zh-hans/%E5%AD ... 1%E4%B8%8B
Now I see some constructive suggestions
Unlike those google-able spams (no comment - should have shut up
refrain myself from posting, have fun
How did I miss this?stenut wrote:
In my first post:AMD Phenom x4 (there is batch which is unlockable to six cores) or Intel I5
I5 did better in terms of gaming despite of being a dual core proc
additional cores can be crucial as normal app runs based on cores, not threads (unless apps are optimized to do so)
IppE602 wrote:
Metroids one is good too though the PSU is a overkill, 500W would suffice mighty fine.
Being very redundant here, but again, for 10$ less, you can get spinpointF3 which is quite a bit better than caviar blue, and again, this combo: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDeal ... mbo.418941Ketchup wrote:
Loginers suggestion is almost exactly what I would have suggested.Loginer wrote:
How does $490.88 sound?
http://secure.newegg.com/WishList/Publi ... r=11843031
Just 10$?Ph0X wrote:
Any other suggestion on the ram?
I got pretty the same ram 2-3years ago for 10$ less
Yea, that was last year though. I remember it got really low, not sure why it went back up like this.strager wrote:
Just 10$?Ph0X wrote:
Any other suggestion on the ram?
I got pretty the same ram 2-3years ago for 10$ less
I remember when that set (though the light blue version, whatever the difference is (it was 800 though)) was 40$. =[
When I'm not so lazy I'll post one here and in the "post your setup" thread. (maybe tonight xp)Xanek wrote:
Post Pic of completed computer when your done
Pix or it didn't happen
No, I just went to allll this trouble for nothing. :vstrager wrote:
fff I was about to postPix or it didn't happen
Derekku Chan wrote:
Expected another"where are the goddamn pics"post. :v
x2Ph0X wrote:
5970
I don't know, don't you think the disc would kind of get in the way?strager wrote:
Shoulda ordered one of these.
YMMV on price ... 50$ to 500$ to 2000$ new.
It doesn't bother me, really.adam2046 wrote:
I don't know, don't you think the disc would kind of get in the way?