Haneii wrote:

animask wrote:

@ above post

I suggest

Timing Don't you think that's a bit too technical?

Ekaru wrote:

If you can tell with the naked ear at 100% speed that they're off with virtually no doubt for a significant portion of the song without comparing to the original version of the song. That's a pretty big margin for error if you think about it.

• Voice: The quality of the performer's voice. Did they sing clearly? Could you understand the lyrics (annunciation)? Did their voice flow? Was the performer on key?
  Entertainment Value: How you enjoyed the performance. Think about song choice, how it was performed, did it make you feel an emotion?
  Creativity: Specifics about the performance. Did the performer "make the song their own"? Did the performer take risks (and did they work ;D )?
  Timing: If timing is off then they should be deducted points for that.
  (note: not “you can tell if you slow it down” off or “1/100 of a second” off. Refers to when you can tell, with the naked ear, at 100% speed that they're off with virtually no doubt for a significant portion of the song without comparing to the original version. That's a pretty big margin for error if you think about it.)
  Overall: Sum of all scores from all four categories

animask wrote:

I also suggest you avoid judging based on...
BGM quality
Disliked voice
Song Choice (how the song sounds instead of the singer)

Haneii wrote:

silly dtk- there are unlimited slots

KoromoAmae wrote:

I think that creativity and entertainment value should be rolled into one category because they're subjective and difficult to gauge accurately, while voice should be split into pitch accuracy and enunciation clarity to give more objective measures and keep the number of categories at 4.

Agent Spin Here wrote:

I thought this was a singing contest not a composing contest... How are we supposed to be creative, just bastardise the song?

Agent Spin Here wrote:

Timing also is impossible when audacity decides to fuck up your timing even when you sing in time to the instrumental.

Ekaru wrote:

Timing is one of the biggest parts of singing, it's like half of what creates the melody (the rest being the singer's voice singing to the correct pitch). Without correct the melody can be horrendous. If you can tell that their timing is off then they should be deducted points for that.

And I don't mean 'you can tell if you slow it down' off or '1/100 of a second' off, I mean if you can tell with the naked ear at 100% speed that they're off with virtually no doubt for a significant portion of the song without comparing to the original version of the song. That's a pretty big margin for error if you think about it.

JarJarJacob wrote:

I think it would be best to not judge like that at all. Each judge should arrange their votes on their entries from best to worst.

Haneii wrote:

There are 20+ contestants for the first round. Don't you think it'll be a little difficult for them to list/arrange entries from best to worst?

Todesengal wrote:

the first two aren't being creative, that's just making sure you don't ruin the song. A lot of the time your voice will naturally do that (or try to fall in the range you need to sing). The third's just whatevvv

animask wrote:

Creativity could also mean...

1 ) Changing the notes in the song to fit your voice.
2 ) This could also mean changing the lyrics a little
3 ) Any vocal additions can also be added to improve ( sometimes ruin ) the song
You don't have to absolutely change the song but just sing it in a way that only your voice can achieve.
A.K.A Singing Style

Haneii wrote:

Plus what if the judges don't know the original song. They wouldn't really know if you we're being creative or not

JarJarJacob wrote:

No, I think it's better to do it like that. Giving someone a 7 out of 10 would mean something different to every judge, in a way, you know what I mean? Just seems more reliable to do it like this so votes are all weighted the same.

Death_the_kid wrote:

Why don't we do it like American idol >.<

Powerdrone311 wrote:

For the first round the judges could collectively choose the top 16 (or whatever number) together

rust45 wrote:

I might as well try this.

If I don't cough up an entry (which is what my singing will sound like) just disqualify me.

Danny9513 wrote:

@ That judge top 16 thingy...
What if the judges make their own top 16, wouldnt it be a possibility to use something like a "race" system or whatever its called.
#1 gets 10 points
#2 gets 8 points
#3 gets 9 points etc...

Then the contestents get an amount of points that may differ for each judge. You could simply count all the points the judges have given.
(Sorry if it wasnt too clear xD)

Danny9513 wrote:

@ That judge top 16 thingy...
What if the judges make their own top 16, wouldnt it be a possibility to use something like a "race" system or whatever its called.
#1 gets 10 points
#2 gets 8 points
#3 gets 9 points etc...

Then the contestents get an amount of points that may differ for each judge. You could simply count all the points the judges have given.
(Sorry if it wasnt too clear xD)

Ekaru wrote:

I dislike my microphone. It is a piece of crap. Therefore I withdraw.

Haneii wrote:

Danny, can you ( or anyone else ) further explain this. I'm not too sure I get it yet.

Haneii wrote:

Thanks KoromoAmae ^_^. Seems like a good plan.

Here's what we have so far:

Judges choose their top (for instance) 15. And from their lists we add up all the scores and take the top 15.


Is this okay with everyone?

Poll wrote:

Poll runs till -691405 seconds ago

Poll wrote:

Poll runs till -691405 seconds ago

Haneii wrote:

Thanks KoromoAmae ^_^. Seems like a good plan.

Here's what we have so far:

Judges choose their top (for instance) 15. And from their lists we add up all the scores and take the top 15.


Is this okay with everyone?

Harris73 wrote:

Perhaps you just made it a million years into the future and that screwed it? Whenever positive numbers get too big, they become negative.

Haneii wrote:

Thanks KoromoAmae ^_^. Seems like a good plan.

Here's what we have so far:

Judges choose their top (for instance) 15. And from their lists we add up all the scores and take the top 15.


Is this okay with everyone?

animask wrote:

btw I don't really agree with elimination.

If someone fails the first round they don't get to participate anymore and that wouldn't be very fun.
If everyone accumulates a score they could get a ranking at the end instead.

loser101 wrote:

Hyguys123123132 wrote:

Cool but my voice is stupid , i sing like an kid

It's ok just sing
if anyone laffs at least you tried
right

Hyguys123123132 wrote:

okay so sign me up

Hyguys123123132 wrote:

okay so sign me up

Pyro Jack wrote:

Hyguys123123132 wrote:

okay so sign me up

REGISTRATION IS NOW CLOSED!

you didn't saw this, Hyguys?

Hyguys123123132 wrote:

Pyro Jack wrote:

REGISTRATION IS NOW CLOSED!

you didn't saw this, Hyguys?

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU

awp wrote:

Oh, I'm not on the registration list but once I get a few drinks in me I'll submit something anyway!

Haneii wrote:

11. Touko88
...
18. Touko88

Pyro Jack wrote:

in the end only 11 of the 20 contestants sent the .mp3?

Lemon Water wrote:

There must be some really shy people.

animask wrote:

Aww do you mind if I do a late submission?

You didn't tell me there was a due date till it was too late for me...

0_0

Mashley wrote:

Waiting for results

Haneii wrote:

(Its Monday morning for me now)

Rukarioman wrote:

It's almost Tuesday here lol.

Xgor wrote:

Rukarioman wrote:

It's almost Tuesday here lol.

Krisom wrote:

I got to hear all of these recordings before. Now that I see the names, most of them doesn't make any sense to me.

anyway, good job for the ones who will stay, and for the others, well, keep trying!

Powerdrone wrote:

I thought Larto sang An Cafe too...