Yeah i wrote it might require some adjustments.
Here's an update, but i'm still not sure at all, because the timing keeps changing (offsets especially).
324,337.457817772778,4,1,0,100,1,0
11126,338.028169014084,4,2,0,80,1,0
27347,336.511497476164,4,2,0,80,1,1
30039,334.261838440111,4,2,0,80,1,0
32714,336.889387984279,4,1,0,80,1,1
54281,337.362946303064,4,1,0,80,1,1
83954,336.794835812518,4,1,0,80,1,1
ztrot wrote:
Still it's not right plus the bpm is wrong and doubled I got 89 flat for the bpm
Using 89 Flat i get an average going from -8ms to +25ms <.<
There are some parts when i'm sure the timing is not stable.