Nyquill should really make an appearance, we don't have much time left, and I def don't want today to be a sLaiNi lynch with how things are looking right now.
This is so scummy as fuck. Reminder that he did the same thing to disprove points before.Zexion wrote:
"My scumreads are both of the same wagon so they must surely be scum! How about we propose a Sakura+Drezi scumteam now?"
This is just me but if I were to pick between someone who is doing nothing and someone who is being suspicious, I would choose the latter. Yes, the former seems suspicious too but the latter is worse. Using someone's experience is a weak excuse.Zexion wrote:
Because you accuse me of "not even scumhunting" and yet you're totally OK at Hika keeping ideas to themselves and Jess and Slaini not saying anything useful. That attitude sounds pretty inconsistent. You wanted my reads, if you feel "scared" by looking at them, its your fault, but yeah, I should not have put that "you're" there.
Let's go back to that point in the game. Besides you, who was another lynch candidate? May I remind you of your "heh" post?Navizel wrote:
This is so scummy as fuck. Reminder that he did the same thing to disprove points before.Zexion wrote:
"My scumreads are both of the same wagon so they must surely be scum! How about we propose a Sakura+Drezi scumteam now?"
You can reference it then?Navizel wrote:
This is so scummy as fuck. Reminder that he did the same thing to disprove points before.Zexion wrote:
"My scumreads are both of the same wagon so they must surely be scum! How about we propose a Sakura+Drezi scumteam now?"
There is good reason for waiting for tangibles, though more-so for you than slaini, and that's why a slaini lynch is the best right now. Hika would have been the kind of player dealt with after Night 1, and now that you replace her and adopt an entirely different play-style, it only adds to the case.rEdo wrote:
@everyone: Please tell me why a Hika/rEdo lynch is better than a sLaiNi lynch. Do you get any information from this except for actually checking Hika''s alignment? I don't think she talked with anyone, I believe there's just no links that you connect with her.
If you meant You and Slaini,Zexion wrote:
Kek no. I still think Hika/rEdo should eat rope. rEdo bringing up an old theory makes me think he's just being oportunist of Sakura's earlier posts.Ace Timing wrote:
wat? The proposed Scum team was you and Zexion. As Zexion has not responded recently, I am certainly not the most suspicious one here.
Slaini has obviously given up at this point. Are we waiting for Zexion to make a return to hammer the nail into the coffin?
He wasn't even pushing her theory.rEdo wrote:
My thoughts so far:
[list][*]If sLaiNi would be today's lynch and he would flip scum, very most likely his scumpartner would be Zexion. I haven't seen any exchange of words at all until just recently, when the Hika wagon got more attention. That's weird. This is even weirder, I mean the way sLaiNi's trying to discredit someone for voting Zexion. I'm really close to thinking this is a sLaiNi & Zexion scumteam, but I really need information to work with. That information being sLaiNi's alignment.
?????Zexion wrote:
Let's go back to that point in the game. Besides you, who was another lynch candidate? May I remind you of your "heh" post?
Btw that phrase should be read as entirely situational, maybe I shouldn't have worded it that way but voting you at that point seemed like the best choice to be honest.
Elaborate?Drezi wrote:
You can reference it then?
It goes both ways.Nyquill wrote:
Scumhunting/townreading off the Hika wagon is going to be a lot harder than doing the same with the slaini wagon because of how the wagon started.
It's not.rEdo wrote:
@everyone: Please tell me why a Hika/rEdo lynch is better than a sLaiNi lynch.
So basicaly you wouldn't read anything out of me being town. But the chance that I am scum, and that I'm in this case easier to read than redo would be if he/she turned scum, is worth a try?Nyquill wrote:
It goes both ways.Nyquill wrote:
Scumhunting/townreading off the Hika wagon is going to be a lot harder than doing the same with the slaini wagon because of how the wagon started.
Hey Drezi, if we go by rEdo only, his actions are solidly reflecting his posts. I'd like to know why you think he deserves the rOpe based on his actions only.
Sakura proposed the same based on our interactions. I don't mean he's pushing the exact same theory (Sakura based it on me defending Slaini, but it seems rEdo is basing over our lack of comunication until that point), but rather, that me being scum with Slaini is not even an original idea of rEdo.Nyquill wrote:
If you meant You and Slaini,Zexion wrote:
Kek no. I still think Hika/rEdo should eat rope. rEdo bringing up an old theory makes me think he's just being oportunist of Sakura's earlier posts.He wasn't even pushing her theory.rEdo wrote:
My thoughts so far:
[list][*]If sLaiNi would be today's lynch and he would flip scum, very most likely his scumpartner would be Zexion. I haven't seen any exchange of words at all until just recently, when the Hika wagon got more attention. That's weird. This is even weirder, I mean the way sLaiNi's trying to discredit someone for voting Zexion. I'm really close to thinking this is a sLaiNi & Zexion scumteam, but I really need information to work with. That information being sLaiNi's alignment.
What part wasn't clear?Navizel wrote:
?????Zexion wrote:
Let's go back to that point in the game. Besides you, who was another lynch candidate? May I remind you of your "heh" post?
Btw that phrase should be read as entirely situational, maybe I shouldn't have worded it that way but voting you at that point seemed like the best choice to be honest.Elaborate?Drezi wrote:
You can reference it then?
Slaini, if you flip town, we still win information. By taking someone out of the pool of possible scum we earn a lot. (Because, among other things, we can also confirm/develop/discard previous theories based on interactions/posts/stuff of/with the lynched or killed player)sLaiNi wrote:
So basicaly you wouldn't read anything out of me being town. But the chance that I am scum, and that I'm in this case easier to read than redo would be if he/she turned scum, is worth a try?Nyquill wrote:
It goes both ways.
Hey Drezi, if we go by rEdo only, his actions are solidly reflecting his posts. I'd like to know why you think he deserves the rOpe based on his actions only.
Was more directed at Nyquill's "It's easier to read from you than from Hika". But above standing explains it pretty well.sLaiNi wrote:
So basicaly you wouldn't read anything out of me being town. But the chance that I am scum, and that I'm in this case easier to read than redo would be if he/she turned scum, is worth a try?
Zexion wrote:
What part wasn't clear?
Navizel wrote:
Seriously, I was talking about your posts and then you shift the topic to mine. Nice logical fallacy.
err.. I quoted it in the previous page...Zexion wrote:
I think Drezi is looking for a quote or something to validate your claim of me "doing the same".
The way Zexion attacks the posts is by shifting the topic to another. Like in the examples above, when I attacked him, he shifted the topic to my "heh" post. I don't even know why he did that cause my "heh" post is directed to Sakura when she asked Zexion to pressure me. Also, when Sakura attacked Zexion iirc, he then mentioned Hika, Jess, and Slaini to disprove her points.Zexion wrote:
Because you accuse me of "not even scumhunting" and yet you're totally OK at Hika keeping ideas to themselves and Jess and Slaini not saying anything useful. That attitude sounds pretty inconsistent. You wanted my reads, if you feel "scared" by looking at them, its your fault, but yeah, I should not have put that "you're" there.
What where?Navizel wrote:
err.. I quoted it in the previous page...Zexion wrote:
I think Drezi is looking for a quote or something to validate your claim of me "doing the same".
I think you're pretty paranoid right now, or are still mad because I don't buy 100% your JK claim. On the post that initiated your response (p/4302068) I wasn't even attacking you or switching the attention towards you, I was merely stating that at that point of the game voting for you was the most logical thing. So WHY are you accusing me AGAIN of switching points?Navizel wrote:
Zexion wrote:
What part wasn't clear?Navizel wrote:
Seriously, I was talking about your posts and then you shift the topic to mine. Nice logical fallacy.err.. I quoted it in the previous page...Zexion wrote:
I think Drezi is looking for a quote or something to validate your claim of me "doing the same".The way Zexion attacks the posts is by shifting the topic to another. Like in the examples above, when I attacked him, he shifted the topic to my "heh" post. I don't even know why he did that cause my "heh" post is directed to Sakura when she asked Zexion to pressure me. Also, when Sakura attacked Zexion iirc, he then mentioned Hika, Jess, and Slaini to disprove her points.Zexion wrote:
Because you accuse me of "not even scumhunting" and yet you're totally OK at Hika keeping ideas to themselves and Jess and Slaini not saying anything useful. That attitude sounds pretty inconsistent. You wanted my reads, if you feel "scared" by looking at them, its your fault, but yeah, I should not have put that "you're" there.
I'm aware we can. However, your replies were shifted the topics to another one. You deflected the previous topic and created another one. We only have one topic. You didn't want the heat to be on you so you looked for another situation to disprove their claims/reasonings.Zexion wrote:
I think you're pretty paranoid right now, or are still mad because I don't buy 100% your JK claim. On the post that initiated your response (p/4302068) I wasn't even attacking you or switching the attention towards you, I was merely stating that at that point of the game voting for you was the most logical thing. So WHY are you accusing me AGAIN of switching points?
Also Navi, we can talk of two separate things at the same time. Maybe you're confused and think I only want to talk about one topic at a time. Your "heh" post was scummy as hell, but that's another point we will discuss the following day or so, if someone even remembers it.
So basically, you have the same feeling in the complete opposite direction.Drezi wrote:
I'm rereading the thread will detail rEdo posts, but I'll throw this out here. I think if sLaiNi is scum, he'll get lynched tomorrow no problem. Right now he's simply getting votes because of smaller questionable things, wordings etc, which COULD indicate scum, but it can just easily be attributed to being inexperienced, which makes the lynch weak overall.
I don't think the flip would give much information, because these reasions for wanting him lynched are pretty neutral, easy things to pick on, scum doesn't have to commit much "oh he did stupid stuff, he worded things badly I thought he was scum duh", and usually this is how town mislynches D1 go down, weaker town are happy that they can point at "suspicious" stuff and place their vote, and scum happily join.
rEdo scum going a day longer on the other hand, could cause a mess, especially if I'm not around anymore, with their partner being the louder voices in town, getting town to go for some Jess or Ace lynch or whatever, the path of least resistance again.
Ace... I don't know, actually. Haven't really digged into this guy yet. I don't really think he should be dealt with in this stage of the game as he could be goddamn anything, like Jess.Zexion wrote:
Sakura already said that theory and so far if your reason to suspect me being scum is a lack of comunication, then you're really lost. If you're accusing me for that then why not partner me with Ace or Jess? AFAIK I haven't had direct discussions with both of them so they may be well my scumparterns? (as I assume you're using that point because we try to "distance each other") Discrediting a vote towards someone its hardly proof that those two players have conections, or do we have to suspect you being someone's partner because Slaini's vote to Hika (now you) was really shady and someone (doesn't matter who now) pointed it was scummy?
Bah, not confirming that yet.Zexion wrote:
@rEdo: Before you claim "yeah Slaini/Zexion confirmed beacuse Zexion's deflecting votes or asdf", take a look at Hika's posting. You can't tell me there's nothing wrong there. Now that I meantion it, I remember saying the same to SNB...
That there will be a high possibility that SNB is scum. I mean, the way he (she?) just hoped on your wagon was hilarious.sLaiNi wrote:
What are you going to learn if I flip town?
I figured it out in the middle of reading the whole thing, a few pages before Sakura posted it. And even if it didn't, I justified it with the votecounts, and they do matter in this case.Zexion wrote:
Sakura proposed the same based on our interactions. I don't mean he's pushing the exact same theory (Sakura based it on me defending Slaini, but it seems rEdo is basing over our lack of comunication until that point), but rather, that me being scum with Slaini is not even an original idea of rEdo.
omgusDrezi wrote:
I'm rereading the thread will detail rEdo posts, but I'll throw this out here. I think if sLaiNi is scum, he'll get lynched tomorrow no problem. Right now he's simply getting votes because of smaller questionable things, wordings etc, which COULD indicate scum, but it can just easily be attributed to being inexperienced, which makes the lynch weak overall.
I don't think the flip would give much information, because these reasions for wanting him lynched are pretty neutral, easy things to pick on, scum doesn't have to commit much "oh he did stupid stuff, he worded things badly I thought he was scum duh", and usually this is how town mislynches D1 go down, weaker town are happy that they can point at "suspicious" stuff and place their vote, and scum happily join.
Now that's interesting how you know Jess and Ace's alignment.Drezi wrote:
rEdo scum going a day longer on the other hand, could cause a mess, especially if I'm not around anymore, with their partner being the louder voices in town, getting town to go for some Jess or Ace lynch or whatever, the path of least resistance again.
When you look at other Hika's games, she's always been the type of person that keeps people paranoid because of lack of actual content.rEdo wrote:
Bah, not confirming that yet.Zexion wrote:
@rEdo: Before you claim "yeah Slaini/Zexion confirmed beacuse Zexion's deflecting votes or asdf", take a look at Hika's posting. You can't tell me there's nothing wrong there. Now that I meantion it, I remember saying the same to SNB...
This is EXACTLY what I'm talking about wrt the sLaiNi case. After I read my own post, I suspected someone might try to find fault with this, and of course it's rEdorEdo wrote:
Now that's interesting how you know Jess and Ace's alignment.Drezi wrote:
rEdo scum going a day longer on the other hand, could cause a mess, especially if I'm not around anymore, with their partner being the louder voices in town, getting town to go for some Jess or Ace lynch or whatever, the path of least resistance again.
This again, I don't claim that pointing at stuff like this is scummy in itself or useless, but it's certainly not something I'd base a day's lynch on, and it's sort of an easy risk free tactic scum can resort to (since you use objective facts, not your opinion/reads so it can't really backfire, like making a shitty forced subjective read could).rEdo wrote:
Am I missing something or is this a fucking scumclaim?sLaiNi wrote:
That's so right. That is something I should definitly change. But that has nothing to do with me being scum, [...]
This as been mentioned before, and has been explained. Bringing it up again just shows he hasn't really made an honest effort to read the thread, he just looked for things he could point fingers at.rEdo wrote:
So you said it'd be better to wait for a replacement, yet you voted her, okay.sLaiNi wrote:
I have to say that Jess' didn't contribute a lot. Still, I don't think we should vote her just now.
So I will vote Hika for known reasons. But as we aren't in a hurry it might be a good idea to wait for her replacement, wouldn't it?
Again, this tells me he hasn't really read the thread, only looked for stuff he can attack OR he's just lazily dismissing everything I pointed out about Hika and is trying to shift stuff to sLaiNi instead.rEdo wrote:
Like honestly, I don't really see a case against Hika except for being lurky as fuck and voting people for shiggles, but isn't that the same thing sLaiNi's been doing?
Except for actually checking Hika's alignment? Really? That's the laziest defense argument ever (and the explanation is VERY bland and generic), especially given that sLaiNi is the other option, and I think that would be the lynch with less information due to reasons I stated a post or two before. If you try to make a point like this you'd better prove that you sincerely believe it to be the case, and support it with good explanations.rEdo wrote:
@everyone: Please tell me why a Hika/rEdo lynch is better than a sLaiNi lynch. Do you get any information from this except for actually checking Hika''s alignment? I don't think she talked with anyone, I believe there's just no links that you connect with her.
After the previous stuff, this is just bad, why would he appear to disregard the several things I pointed out before, if he needs information as much as he'd like us to believe? Looks fake.rEdo wrote:
I'm really close to thinking this is a sLaiNi & Zexion scumteam, but I really need information to work with.
Wow so you're setting up lynches too, HOW NICE, if we lynch town, than you'll tell us who we should lynch next, this is something scum is happy to do that's for sure.rEdo wrote:
That there will be a high possibility that SNB is scum. I mean, the way he (she?) just hoped on your wagon was hilarious.sLaiNi wrote:
What are you going to learn if I flip town?
I don't think you know what that means.rEdo wrote:
omgusDrezi wrote:
I'm rereading the thread will detail rEdo posts, but I'll throw this out here...
and then he's just pointing out everything that might be a flaw in my process of thought, tellling me I'm scum. Fucking hypocrite.Drezi wrote:
If anything scum is more likely to eliminate any misunderstandable stuff from their posts.
You addressed my points quite nicely.rEdo wrote:
Drezi just sucks balls.
sLaiNi wrote:
But that's not what I was asking, try again.Sakura wrote:
I can tell you didnt read his ISO, otherwise you'd have read this:
[quo.te="Navizel"]Heck, I could even claim right now that I am a jailkeeper.
Pretty suspicious imo...sLaiNi wrote:
I guess we have a big misscommunication there.
So just forget it. It won't bring us any further.
Expressed intent to vote Hika but later:Sakura wrote:
I think i should stay off this game until i wake up tomorrow, coz right now i feel like i want to hit someone.
I mean that reads posts was so bad im at a loss for words.
Unvote
Vote: Ace
Back here.
Maybe i'll sheep you again on Hika tomorrow or not, pending on Ace's replies.
Just voicing intent to vote again, and:Sakura wrote:
Oh >_>Ace Timing wrote:
You still seem to think that I thought that Slaini was town BECAUSE of the fact that he was being suspected. I didn't think that those were justified, so I used him.
Ok now i feel like a derp
Actually the more i talk with you the less convinced you're scum, but i had to make sure.
Unvote
Normally i'd sheep Drezi onto Hika here, but if she's getting replaced soon i want to hear from the replacement first, besides, we're not in a rush.
Voting someone else based on more of a whim yet again, over actually voting Hika.Sakura wrote:
I could care less what alignment Navizel is right now, i mentioned this several times but you seem intent in misreping me.
Vote: Slaini
There's no way this person's town.
and haven't voted rEdo as of (pre-)writing this post, he appears to have liked rEdo's posts (p/4302364/), which I don't really understand and he didn't really elaborate since.Nyquill wrote:
Hika's the best lynch via PoE, but I'm not moving Sakura's vote because sLaini's move onto the Hika wagon felt paranoid.
Navizel wrote:
We have plurality lynch in this game amirite
So yeah we're lyching today.Mod wrote:
2.7) If deadline is reached without anyone ever hitting the lynch threshold, then a lynch will only occur if someone is at one vote below the lynch threshold. If multiple, then the first one to hit it will be lynched.
Of course it's suspicious. I don't plan to forget anytime soon Slaini's actions, but right now the best course of action seems to be the other lynch. Personally I would like to see how Slaini plays the following day in order to make a strong conclusion.Ace Timing wrote:
Pretty suspicious imo...sLaiNi wrote:
I guess we have a big misscommunication there.
So just forget it. It won't bring us any further.
Another thing, assuming that rEdo and Slaini are both town, do you honestly expect that Slaini will be a great help in finding scum?
Pretty good for a mobile post eh?
It will be confirmed only when it works better for you. I love that logic.rEdo wrote:
Bah, not confirming that yet.Zexion wrote:
@rEdo: Before you claim "yeah Slaini/Zexion confirmed beacuse Zexion's deflecting votes or asdf", take a look at Hika's posting. You can't tell me there's nothing wrong there. Now that I meantion it, I remember saying the same to SNB...
I freaking hate meta as an argument. It seems like a poor excuse for everyone to justify some really bad playstyles. Sure, go on believing players will behave exactly the same way acording to their alignement.rEdo wrote:
When you look at other Hika's games, she's always been the type of person that keeps people paranoid because of lack of actual content.rEdo wrote:
Bah, not confirming that yet.
Some information has become useless now.sLaiNi wrote:
Will take some time thinking about all and reading a bit and post my results when I am back home.
I want to see his action in this situation.If he can't give a reason why he is town,we will lynch him soon.Navizel wrote:
@Jess, why did you let Slaini live?
Too many reason of why his lynch is better than slaini lynch.Navizel wrote:
but what about rEdo? Pretty sure he gave not just reason but reasons as to why he is town.
maybe scum has Roleblocker,they can use Strongarm.Ace Timing wrote:
...seeing as there is no doctor in the case of Navi being JK.
Maybe the scum actually took what I said seriously. That I should let everyone interpret my claim however they want. And by the way, I only know one person who did just that.Ace Timing wrote:
My biggest question is, why did both scum pick Drezi? It seems sort of counter intuitive, seeing as there is no doctor in the case of Navi being JK.
-[Jess]- wrote:
maybe scum has Roleblocker,they can use Strongarm.Ace Timing wrote:
...seeing as there is no doctor in the case of Navi being JK.
What are you mean?Ace Timing wrote:
All the more reason that two people should've died. The strongarm ability is separate of the brutality ability, so two people should have died.
The chance is 50/50 or something.Ace Timing wrote:
Most probable thing that happened was one scum was inactive during the 48 hour period.
So in mafiascum each mafia member can commit one kill? So two mafia members = two kills per night? I thought they could only kill one person together in a night (Ace Timing wrote:
All the more reason that two people should've died. The strongarm ability is separate of the brutality ability, so two people should have died.
)CalignoBot wrote:
Each night, you and your partner may kill someone in that game.
I checked the previous game on this forum (mostly like 10 months ago)sLaiNi wrote:
So in mafiascum each mafia member can commit one kill? So two mafia members = two kills per night? I thought they could only kill one person together in a nightAce Timing wrote:
All the more reason that two people should've died. The strongarm ability is separate of the brutality ability, so two people should have died.
Why am I a liar, if someone claims that mafia can kill one person at night and I say that I thought that mafia could actually kill only one person at night. Your post rather confirms my assumption that only one person can be killed at night.-[Jess]- wrote:
I checked the previous game on this forum (mostly like 10 months ago)
It seen the mafia members only can kill one at night.
You liar.
you can always check the information in [ur=http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Matrix6]here[/url]sLaiNi wrote:
Why am I a liar, if someone claims that mafia can kill one person at night and I say that I thought that mafia could actually kill only one person at night. Your post rather confirms my assumption that only one person can be killed at night.-[Jess]- wrote:
I checked the previous game on this forum (mostly like 10 months ago)
It seen the mafia members only can kill one at night.
You liar.
So the person that claimed the "2 kills at night" thing would be a liar.
So why calling me one?
*if someone claims that mafia can kill two person at nightsLaiNi wrote:
Why am I a liar, if someone claims that mafia can kill one person at night and I say that I thought that mafia could actually kill only one person at night. Your post rather confirms my assumption that only one person can be killed at night.-[Jess]- wrote:
I checked the previous game on this forum (mostly like 10 months ago)
It seen the mafia members only can kill one at night.
You liar.
So the person that claimed the "2 kills at night" thing would be a liar.
So why calling me one?
Ace Timing claimed there, that it was strange how mafia killed only one person while they could kill two. Your answer indicates, that you thought the same. All the way through until my post NOONE put Ace's assumption into question, so I thought it would be like this. So I didn't believe Ace, instead I believed all of you. It's not even pure believing, as I put it in question before my "1-shot-bullet-proof"-assumption-[Jess]- wrote:
What are you mean?Ace Timing wrote:
All the more reason that two people should've died. The strongarm ability is separate of the brutality ability, so two people should have died.The chance is 50/50 or something.Ace Timing wrote:
Most probable thing that happened was one scum was inactive during the 48 hour period.
I already checked the Matrix6 thing. Theres no way I would've gotten to this conclusion without checking the Matrix:-[Jess]- wrote:
you can always check the information in [ur=http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Matrix6]here[/url]
sLaiNi wrote:
If Navizel actually is a Jailor AND the mafia has a strongarm, then we have a 1-shot-bulletproof town.
Sorry,I didn't though the same though on him,I am curious about his word.And why cause you think I and Ace has same though?sLaiNi wrote:
Ace Timing claimed there, that it was strange how mafia killed only one person while they could kill two. Your answer indicates, that you thought the same. All the way through until my post NOONE put Ace's assumption into question, so I thought it would be like this. So I didn't believe Ace, instead I believed all of you. It's not even pure believing, as I put it in question before my "1-shot-bullet-proof"-assumption
Try to check this forum,there have tons of Matrix6 gameplaysLaiNi wrote:
I already checked the Matrix6 thing. Theres no way I would've gotten to this conclusion without checking the Matrix:-[Jess]- wrote:
you can always check the information in [ur=http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Matrix6]here[/url]
And make sure to check the QTwhat?
tfw QT is quicktopic-[Jess]- wrote:
And make sure to check the QT
Navizel wrote:
It would be great if people would stop posting for a while until Jess answers my question. I mean just post a prod dodge instead of contributing to the game.
Oh,I mean the surm Quicktopic of the past game.Navizel wrote:
And make sure to check the QTwhat?
No,Dead people can also use QuicktopicAce Timing wrote:
tfw QT is quicktopic-[Jess]- wrote:
And make sure to check the QT
tfw only scum can use said quick topic
tfw vote Jess
What?You want to wait me for 10 hours?sLaiNi wrote:
Wait until she answeres, as Navi said.
What?-[Jess]- wrote:
Oh,I mean the surm Quicktopic of the past game
But you are not dead, so that's irrelevant.-[Jess]- wrote:
No,Dead people can also use Quicktopic