o yey <З
arigatou >.>caren_sk wrote:
congratz ENN!!!!!!!!!
byesukiNathan wrote:
hello
감사합니다 ㅠㅠW h i t e wrote:
ㅊㅋ드려요~~
good map good BGVINXIS wrote:
btw do u have bg source cuz that'd be pretty nice imo
sameegas00 wrote:
good map good BG
look at that all korean (+1 japanese) mapper
very op!
You can search the song on google or youtube (:Mistaspiffy wrote:
Anyone wanna link me the song?
Okoratu wrote:
enon stop.
when your cursor reaches reverse of previous 00:11:131 - slider, (4) becomes fully visible so it shouldnt be confusing or any hard to read i thinkEnon wrote:
Hard
00:10:662 (2) - is overlap 00:11:443 (4) -
but i think it's able to read 00:11:443 (4) -
having it on a blue tick would be a pretty strange idea and go totally out of the whole rhythm in this part. 01:25:245 (2,3,4,5) - 01:26:495 (6,1,2,3,4) - 01:28:162 (2,3) - 01:30:558 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this whole part is filled with 1/3 stuff so for sure this circle should stand on 1/3Enon wrote:
Extra
01:27:771 (5) - some people said it should be 1/3 or 1/2.
i'd like to agree with this. also 00:30:975 (1) - 00:35:975 (1) - with a sudden 2.0х change is way too hard to control, easy to get lost in sliderpath and sliderbreakYauxo wrote:
On the topic of 0108;00:30:975 (1) - 00:35:975 (1) -
Can you please reconsider these? I (personally) dont think that they add any value to the diff itself, it's just a sudden speedup that skips some more important beats (00:31:131 - 00:31:287 - and 00:36:131 - 00:36:287 -). Things like you mapped on 00:33:475 (1,2) - work much better.
/w\Adore wrote:
Today i log on and see this map is dq so i told my mom and she cried
To be honest, I dont really like that section either, but comparing it to the round loop thing, it is an improvement. I just didnt want to throw his style away/out of consideration.Aka wrote:
though imo the flow 00:33:475 (1,2) - here isnt really good. such placement requires some very fast and harsh movements, it felt pretty awkward (at least for me, when i played it).
Fast wrote:
rip