포치코 랭크 축하합니당~
forum
NU-KO - Pochiko no Shiawase na Nichijou
posted
Total Posts
468
o yey <З
Topic Starter
thank you everyone <3
올ㅋ
finally \o/
gratz your 1st rank!
gratz your 1st rank!
축하합니다!!!! 경축!!!!
Topic Starter
thanks T_T!!
hello
Topic Starter
arigatou >.>caren_sk wrote:
congratz ENN!!!!!!!!!
byesukiNathan wrote:
hello
congratulations!
Cool BG on Startrick's diff is cool
ㅊㅋ드려요~~
Topic Starter
thank you 
D
D감사합니다 ㅠㅠW h i t e wrote:
ㅊㅋ드려요~~
sikh
btw do u have bg source cuz that'd be pretty nice imo
btw do u have bg source cuz that'd be pretty nice imo
good map good BGVINXIS wrote:
btw do u have bg source cuz that'd be pretty nice imo
look at that all korean (+1 japanese) mapper
very op!
sameegas00 wrote:
good map good BG
look at that all korean (+1 japanese) mapper
very op!
YES !!! <3<3<3
Gratz Enon !
Gratz Enon !
Topic Starter
\:D/ i love everyone
Anyone wanna link me the song?
You can search the song on google or youtube (:Mistaspiffy wrote:
Anyone wanna link me the song?
long long long long long time.
おめでとう～
おめでとう～
Hello Enon,
After some internal discussion, we decided to pull your map out of qualified for the following reasons:
[Hard]
Please keep in mind that the above listed examples are just examples for the mentioned issues so that this generally applies to more than just these mentioned ones.
For further assistance, please contact BNG members. Best of luck with the re-qualification!
###EM
After some internal discussion, we decided to pull your map out of qualified for the following reasons:
[Hard]
- 00:07:146 (1) - The spinner is way too short for such a difficulty. Please keep the length of the spinners appropriate for each difficulty level, since this is very hard to clear and catch properly.
- There are plenty of overmapped streams, triplets and notes in general in this difficulty that do not follow the music appropriately. Make sure that you follow the song more closely, because this causes some of your patterns to have jerky momvements. Here are few examples of the said issue:
- 00:12:303 (2) -
- 00:13:084 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) -
- 00:22:303 (5) -
- 00:22:850 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) -
- 00:44:490 (2) -
Please keep in mind that the above listed examples are just examples for the mentioned issues so that this generally applies to more than just these mentioned ones.
For further assistance, please contact BNG members. Best of luck with the re-qualification!
###EM
rip
On the topic of 0108;
00:30:975 (1) - 00:35:975 (1) -
Can you please reconsider these? I (personally) dont think that they add any value to the diff itself, it's just a sudden speedup that skips some more important beats (00:31:131 - 00:31:287 - and 00:36:131 - 00:36:287 -). Things like you mapped on 00:33:475 (1,2) - work much better.
Can you please reconsider these? I (personally) dont think that they add any value to the diff itself, it's just a sudden speedup that skips some more important beats (00:31:131 - 00:31:287 - and 00:36:131 - 00:36:287 -). Things like you mapped on 00:33:475 (1,2) - work much better.
just a thing on Extra:
01:27:771 (5) -
looks very random to be on 1/4 instead of 1/3 like......... the whole rest of the section
01:27:771 (5) -
looks very random to be on 1/4 instead of 1/3 like......... the whole rest of the section
uhhhhhhhhhhhh ;w;w;w;w;
enon stop.
Okoratu wrote:
enon stop.
Today i log on and see this map is dq so i told my mom and she cried
Topic Starter
Hard
00:10:662 (2) - is overlap 00:11:443 (4) -
but i think it's able to read 00:11:443 (4) -
what do everyone think about it?
Extra
01:27:771 (5) - some people said it should be 1/3 or 1/2.
what should i do?
00:10:662 (2) - is overlap 00:11:443 (4) -
but i think it's able to read 00:11:443 (4) -
what do everyone think about it?
Extra
01:27:771 (5) - some people said it should be 1/3 or 1/2.
what should i do?
when your cursor reaches reverse of previous 00:11:131 - slider, (4) becomes fully visible so it shouldnt be confusing or any hard to read i thinkEnon wrote:
Hard
00:10:662 (2) - is overlap 00:11:443 (4) -
but i think it's able to read 00:11:443 (4) -
having it on a blue tick would be a pretty strange idea and go totally out of the whole rhythm in this part. 01:25:245 (2,3,4,5) - 01:26:495 (6,1,2,3,4) - 01:28:162 (2,3) - 01:30:558 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - this whole part is filled with 1/3 stuff so for sure this circle should stand on 1/3Enon wrote:
Extra
01:27:771 (5) - some people said it should be 1/3 or 1/2.
i'd like to agree with this. also 00:30:975 (1) - 00:35:975 (1) - with a sudden 2.0х change is way too hard to control, easy to get lost in sliderpath and sliderbreakYauxo wrote:
On the topic of 0108;00:30:975 (1) - 00:35:975 (1) -
Can you please reconsider these? I (personally) dont think that they add any value to the diff itself, it's just a sudden speedup that skips some more important beats (00:31:131 - 00:31:287 - and 00:36:131 - 00:36:287 -). Things like you mapped on 00:33:475 (1,2) - work much better.
though imo the flow 00:33:475 (1,2) - here isnt really good. such placement requires some very fast and harsh movements, it felt pretty awkward (at least for me, when i played it).
something with more linear transition would work better. a poor eхample. that doesnt looks as nice as it could be but still
Topic Starter
/w\Adore wrote:
Today i log on and see this map is dq so i told my mom and she cried
To be honest, I dont really like that section either, but comparing it to the round loop thing, it is an improvement. I just didnt want to throw his style away/out of consideration.Aka wrote:
though imo the flow 00:33:475 (1,2) - here isnt really good. such placement requires some very fast and harsh movements, it felt pretty awkward (at least for me, when i played it).
What I'd like to say is that simple, easy things are better than fancy, complicated things sometimes.