[General]
[Godcat]
But yes, I'll make sure not to make ambiguous sliders in future.
From what I understand, the intro time isn't counted. So even if I count the breaks, more than 80% of the song is mapped. But I think I should be able to do something about the intro time, so just treat this as fixed.streeteelf wrote:
-72.5% of audio file is used, make the audio shorter or map more to make at least 80% used in map. - unrankable
I'll see what others think; if they agree with you then I'll remove it.streeteelf wrote:
-I suggest to remove Kiai, it's unnecessary in this map.
[Godcat]
Fixed.streeteelf wrote:
-00:59:650 (6,7) - Use the same pattern as here: 00:58:850 (4,5) if you really want to be like this, but I suggest circle and beginning of slider to be on the same point with circle first like this:
Why not? Crossing sliders are only bad when you can't immediately tell which way it goes after the cross. In this case it's very clear that the slider ball should go through the loop before going down.streeteelf wrote:
-02:36:850 (1) - Avoid making sliders like this, crossed.
But yes, I'll make sure not to make ambiguous sliders in future.
Okay, I'll change it.streeteelf wrote:
-05:05:650 (3) - Also avoid like this, it's confusing.
Fixed.streeteelf wrote:
-07:03:050 (2) - 1/4 longer and 1/4 earlier.
Not exactly sure what you meant here, but if you meant that the circle was on the path of the slider, I fixed that.streeteelf wrote:
-07:07:050 (5,1) - Don't place notes in the middle of slider behind that circle.
Sure, I'll try to use more of those patterns.streeteelf wrote:
-Generally there are so many placed where notes are "randomly" for me placed, try to use more patterns, eg. from here: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/61
Well I guess I could break some of them up, but some parts of the song are just 1/1, so not much I can do about those.streeteelf wrote:
-Try not to make long sliders as I see in this map.
Okay, I'll work on it.streeteelf wrote:
-It's a little to easy for Marathon map, use more streams, short and fast sliders, etc.
Yeah I got that comment before, not sure if it's a good thing or bad thing though.streeteelf wrote:
-For me it's some kind of old-new map, like stylized as old map.
Thanks for the mod!streeteelf wrote:
Map is not bad, but still needs a lot of work to make it rankable.Good luck~