1. Easy (1.49 stars, 103 notes)
2. Extra (4.73 stars, 395 notes)
3. Habi's Insane (4.34 stars, 347 notes)
4. Hard (3.17 stars, 256 notes)
5. Insane (4.13 stars, 322 notes)
6. Normal (2.09 stars, 138 notes)

tutuhaha wrote:

Why I am so kind for player

Zagge64 wrote:

I could make a normal diff if you want.

tutuhaha wrote:

Why I am so kind for player

Yo~

Maybe fix the mods above up first, I don't want to mention stuff twice.

Will use this as a placeholder and send my post when you applied the rest.

1. Disable widescreen support (for SBs only) and letterboxes, you need none of them in your maps (also in GD).
2. I feel like Tick rate 2 would be the better option for this song, but oh well. Maybe just my opinion.
3. The harder diffs end at 01:28:687 - , while the easier (Easy&Normal) end at 01:29:013 - ? Please make it consistent through all your maps. Also HabiHolic's GD ends on a totally different point, so please find a compromise here.
4. You have no custom drumset or softset, but you use it in your maps(D:C1 and S:C1). You are going to add something?

1. I feel the NC's you are setting in this map is too short, as it mostly consists of doubles only. I recommend you go with NC after every two stanzas. Feel free to decline if you not like the idea (your NC is vocal-oriented i guess), I'll show the NC until the first break (the same way, the part after the break should be NC'd):
2. 00:02:274 (1) - Delete NC
3. 00:03:904 (2) - NC
4. 00:04:883 (1) - Delete NC
5. 00:07:491 (1) - ^
6. 00:15:317 (3) - Delete this NC? The previous and next combo have their NC's set with after every 2 stanzas as well.
7. 00:16:948 (1,2,3,4) - Shift this a bit to the left so 00:18:578 (4,1) - has a better transition: http://puu.sh/cYTsR/b0a2ee885e.jpg
8. 00:42:056 (2,1,2,1) - Think about repositioning the blue combo for better flow: http://puu.sh/cYTB6/73252d40c0.jpg
9. This is good to go already. Beginning is a bit hitsound-empty and will make it a bit dull for taiko-playing, but eh... just opinion.

1. Hmm, a tad to hard for a normal diff. Especially these triple 1/2 beats in your kiai part can throw up newer players.
2. 00:00:970 (1,2,1) - Hmm, flow is not so good here. Try to make it smoother: http://puu.sh/cYU7L/2a08121f7e.jpg
3. 00:42:056 (3,1) - Preference-only: You should make this 0.9xDS too to see the spacing consistency between this slider double and 00:43:361 (2,1) - . I might see the intenntion for this 'change of DS', so feel free to deny.
4. 00:48:578 (2,1) - If you don't mind, a blanket would be really neat here.
5. 00:55:426 (5,1) - 1.0xDS here? As you only use 0.9xDS for 1/2 beats and 1.0x for 1/1 beats.
6. 00:57:056 (4,1) - Make this parallel: http://puu.sh/cZ0Kl/a5fbf2ce1d.jpg
7. 01:00:969 (1,4) - This looks pretty close to each other, mind trying the following out? http://puu.sh/cZ1it/eb5abfe4e6.jpg Would also work great as it is parallel to 01:03:578 (1) -
8. 01:05:861 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Umm, you sure about this? Three triples in a row is pretty hard to play for a normal considering the high bpm. I suggest some the following to make it easier:
   01:07:491 (2,3,4,5,6) - Try the following here: http://puu.sh/cZ15k/996a8aa2f2.jpg
9. 01:12:056 (3,1,2,1) - Not really a fan of these whole overlaps, but okay...
10. 01:18:415 (3,1) - These could blanket for better aesthetics: http://puu.sh/cZ1u5/1e74b3fbb0.jpg
11. Nice.

1. 00:11:078 (4,1) - Setting a jump around here (and maybe 00:12:383 (4,1) - ) would be nice to indicate a new 'section' of the music, as it is getting more intense from now on.
2. 00:55:752 (1,2) - That jump is a bit too high-spaced, maybe lower the DS a bit down.
3. 01:06:187 (1,3) - If you could make this not overlap, that'd be great.
4. 01:08:469 (4,1) - No small jump here for the strong beat?
5. Looks good.

1. 00:10:426 (3,4) - Spacing between these circles is somewhat low imo, maybe increase it? http://puu.sh/cZ5e4/e8b86a631e.jpg
2. 00:11:730 (2,3) - Ctrl+g these, for both the jump on the strong drum on 00:11:241 (1,2) - and the guitar on 00:11:730 (2,3) -
3. 00:12:546 (1,2) - A jump here would be good.
4. 00:45:154 (7,1) - Maybe blanket here.
5. 00:50:535 (1,3) - Would look neater if not overlap http://puu.sh/cZ5RK/12b050f7b1.jpg
6. 01:17:111 (2,3) - Could need a bigger jump here: http://puu.sh/cZ65N/2bc16ab47a.jpg
7. Composing in this one is great

1. 00:04:883 (5) - NC here, you are setting NC per stanza. Same at: 00:07:491 (5) - 00:12:709 (5) - 00:15:317 (5) - 00:19:230 (5) -
2. 00:30:643 (5) - Ctrl+g?
3. 00:30:969 (6,1) - NC on 6 already.
4. 00:33:415 (6,1) - ^
5. 00:37:491 (8,1) - ^
6. 00:38:796 (7) - NC
7. 00:39:937 (1,3) - NC on 3 first?
8. 00:44:013 (5) - NC
9. 00:55:752 (7,1) - NC on 7 already.
10. 01:03:578 (6,1) - NC on 6 already.
11. 01:18:904 (1,5) - NC on 5 first?
12. 00:50:861 (4,5,1) - Jump between 5-1 would be stronger than between 4-5 http://puu.sh/cZ87r/8f7b2350fc.jpg
13. 01:04:067 (1,2) - This needs a proper blanket.
14. 01:16:622 (1) - I don't see a reason for increasing SV here to such an extent (if even needed) - looks more like a trap to me lol. At least tone the SV change down a bit.
15. 01:16:051 (4) - This feels additional to me, maybe delete it.
16. Sweet symmetry, I like it.

1. Get more opinions on this: HP8 is incredibly high for this diff and it's very hard to recover from a miss. I'd lower the HP by -0.5.
2. 00:31:948 (5) - There's no beat in the track on the blue tick here. Just make a 1/2 slider here:
3. 00:42:056 (5,6,7,8) - Push this a bit down so it doesn't overlap with 00:42:709 (1) -
4. 00:50:209 (5) - Umm, I'm pretty sure 1/6 beats are not the way to go here, have you tried a 1/4 backslider instead?
5. 00:53:469 (3,4) - Replace them with circles? I don't think you have to continue the 1/4 stream here, the scream's already over.
6. 01:01:948 (3,1) - Could need a slightly better blanket.
7. 01:05:861 (7,8) - Either make this blanket with 6 or make it overlay on 01:06:187 (1) - , but the inbetween solution looks weird imo. I prefer: http://puu.sh/cZaka/43a4958956.jpg
8. 01:11:241 (6,1) - Make this overlay exactly: http://puu.sh/cZanE/cbae017f73.jpg
9. A bit overmapped and unforgiving, but really fun to play nonetheless.

GGFFQQ55 wrote:

from m4m queue

Easy

01:27:219 (1) - maybe put the spinner start here: 01:27:383 这个就算了...其实spinner应该是要在长白线上开始的我习惯行拖了一个1/4

quite clean easy diff

Normal

00:48:578 (2,1) - maybe blanket these two?ok

01:14:013 (1,2,3) - may Ctrl+G on 2, and blanket on 2&3?真要进行调整就有点太挤了...算了吧..

01:27:138 (1) - same as ez diff same

Hard

Almost perfect hard diff orz, no suggestion here

Insane

00:14:013 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - long 1/2, maybe follow the vocal here? now it's little bit boring with the four 1/2 slider here 这个..跟歌词也是1/2啊..

00:53:143 (1,2) - kind of hard to read, the position of the 1/4 slider may be reconsideredNC搞到这里开始+分开了一丢丢

Extra

00:06:187 (1) - maybe shape this as 00:04:883 (1) - 啊...这个弧度的设计是为了和00:03:904 (2) - 相呼应哦so..

00:31:296 (1,2,3,4,5) - as an extra diff, consider higher the DS of those sliders, can be more fun不行我怎么这么善良

00:58:198 (4,1,2,3) - tricky spacing, it looks like a 1/4 slider with a 1/2 after it这个..目前test player没有在这个地方被坑的，而且是想用space来制造出一点不一样的效果这样

01:26:730 (3) - the SV of this can be higher...maybe 1.5你看我怎么这么善良(改成了1.2x)

nice map, great song especially ;w;... the spread is good, no big problem
sorry for the short mod, and hope something may help

Estellia- wrote:

Hey M4M

• 
  [Easy]

1. 00:08:469 (2,1) - Fix blanketok
2. 01:00:969 (1,2) - Maybe shift 2 lower to form circular flowok
3. 01:06:187 (1,2) - Try blanket? ...too hard to adjustment so..
4. 01:20:209 (2,1) - ^ ...too hard to adjustment so..
   
   Generally fine, but maybe try refining certain flows like this: 00:03:904 (2,1) - , 00:18:578 (4,1) - and 01:12:056 (2,3) - , where the notes don't directly lead into each other. ok I will think about that
   
   [Normal]
5. 00:48:578 (2,1) - Try blanketok
6. 01:11:078 (3,1) - Flow is too strongly broken here hmmm...give me time to think about that
   
   Your sliders are mostly very straight, which may cause problems when it comes to flow, such as: 00:03:089 (4,1) - , 00:42:546 (1,2) - and 00:49:230 (1,2) - , which is kinda the same problem in Easy. If you can't make them flow, try blanket, because that can replace flow effectively. ahahah...
   
   [Hard]
7. 00:17:437 (2,3,4) - Try 2,4,3 ok
8. 00:18:741 (2,3,4) - ^ hmmm..
9. 00:48:904 (1,2) - Blanket fix ..I already try my best orz
10. 00:51:513 (3,1,2) - Make sure distance for blanket from 3 to 1 and 3 to 2 is the sameok
11. 01:13:361 (3) - Curve this slider more ...I think is fine >-<
    
    I like this Hard I see a lot of improved flow, improved patterns as well. However, I still spot a lot of repetition, like: 01:19:230 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - and 00:19:230 (1,2,3,4) - , which may get pretty boring. But, still good diff overall Also, CS for Hard can be smaller, just an opinion.
    
    [Insane]
12. 00:09:774 (4,1) - Suggest having a jump from 3 to 4, shift 4 to blanket 1? ok
13. 00:10:100 (1,2,3,4) - Suggest 1,4,3,2 instead ok
14. 00:42:056 (3,4,5,6) - Suggest 3,5,4,6is fine <3
15. 01:02:600 (2,3) - Blanket fix ok
16. 01:12:056 (3) - Suggest Ctrl g, shift 4 after ok
17. 01:23:796 (3,4,5) - Suggest Ctrl g ok
    
    I like this Insane a lot But I still see some repetition, like: 00:14:013 (1,2,3,4) - and 00:34:883 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - . I also see some boring patterns like 00:19:230 (1,2,3,4) - and this slider: 00:30:154 (2) - is also overused a lot. But its still good overall
    
    [Extra]
18. 01:25:915 (2,3) - Fix blanket? ok
    
    Don't wanna mod your Extra too much, so I'll just give a general guideline.
    I'd say your Extra is great, but there are a lot of overly linear curve sliders, like around the beginning. I also see some weird DS bits which may be hard to just follow like: 00:06:187 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,1,2,1) - . Some repetition as well: 00:16:622 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - . I also spotted some of these: 00:21:187 (1,2,3) - , which I don't really like personally. The jumps at the chorus are amazing though, I like them . Try to still keep to the safer side of mapping, despite the fact that this diff is an Extra.

Thanks~
I love the mapset Good luck on rank

Hakurei Yoru wrote:

M4M

[Easy]
01:11:404 (1) - 下移一点并调整滑条方向 （其实这里下移 不改拉滑条也是美观的…… 这个..只是单纯的因为没空间了所以...我就让他往上走了这样
hmm..总觉得几个长滑条放一起有点扁扁的感觉...

[Normal]
00:01:622 (2) - 把中间的点往左边拉 至少我觉得会好看得多。当然后面两个点都往左拉是最好的…… ok

[Hard]
w...从各位角度上都找不出可以提出建议的地方了呢..

[Insane]
01:17:600 (3,4,5,6,1) - 会不会遮挡滑条有点多了……打的时候略奇怪，五连整体角度往上一点。 ok
01:04:719 (1,2,3) - 这里flow可以再缓和 不太懂你在说啥不过改了一下

[Extra]
要打这图我动作都大起来了……
但在EDIT看起来是非常不错的。
我的mod等级不够所以不敢对这图说什么了。
rank后我会凹FC的>w<(很难啦！

加油加油加油！！

eINess wrote:

It's really need ' ver , op ' in tag?

If I have time I'll try modding.



maybe not ' ㅅ'

Pho wrote:

Yo~

Maybe fix the mods above up first, I don't want to mention stuff twice.

Will use this as a placeholder and send my post when you applied the rest.

From my modding queue ~

[General]

1. Disable widescreen support (for SBs only) and letterboxes, you need none of them in your maps (also in GD). ok
2. I feel like Tick rate 2 would be the better option for this song, but oh well. Maybe just my opinion. hmmm...I always choose to use tick rate 1 because tr2 is too noise..also it will hurt my hitsound >_<
3. The harder diffs end at 01:28:687 - , while the easier (Easy&Normal) end at 01:29:013 - ? Please make it consistent through all your maps. Also HabiHolic's GD ends on a totally different point, so please find a compromise here. fix
4. You have no custom drumset or softset, but you use it in your maps(D:C1 and S:C1). You are going to add something?

I use the default hitsound ╮(╯▽╰)╭

[Easy]

1. I feel the NC's you are setting in this map is too short, as it mostly consists of doubles only. I recommend you go with NC after every two stanzas. Feel free to decline if you not like the idea (your NC is vocal-oriented i guess), I'll show the NC until the first break (the same way, the part after the break should be NC'd): maybe you are right, change some
2. 00:02:274 (1) - Delete NC
3. 00:03:904 (2) - NC
4. 00:04:883 (1) - Delete NC
5. 00:07:491 (1) - ^
6. 00:15:317 (3) - Delete this NC? The previous and next combo have their NC's set with after every 2 stanzas as well.
7. 00:16:948 (1,2,3,4) - Shift this a bit to the left so 00:18:578 (4,1) - has a better transition: http://puu.sh/cYTsR/b0a2ee885e.jpg ok
8. 00:42:056 (2,1,2,1) - Think about repositioning the blue combo for better flow: http://puu.sh/cYTB6/73252d40c0.jpg
9. This is good to go already. Beginning is a bit hitsound-empty and will make it a bit dull for taiko-playing, but eh... just opinion.

[Normal]

1. Hmm, a tad to hard for a normal diff. Especially these triple 1/2 beats in your kiai part can throw up newer players.
2. 00:00:970 (1,2,1) - Hmm, flow is not so good here. Try to make it smoother: http://puu.sh/cYU7L/2a08121f7e.jpg
3. 00:42:056 (3,1) - Preference-only: You should make this 0.9xDS too to see the spacing consistency between this slider double and 00:43:361 (2,1) - . I might see the intenntion for this 'change of DS', so feel free to deny.
4. 00:48:578 (2,1) - If you don't mind, a blanket would be really neat here.
5. 00:55:426 (5,1) - 1.0xDS here? As you only use 0.9xDS for 1/2 beats and 1.0x for 1/1 beats.
6. 00:57:056 (4,1) - Make this parallel: http://puu.sh/cZ0Kl/a5fbf2ce1d.jpg
7. 01:00:969 (1,4) - This looks pretty close to each other, mind trying the following out? http://puu.sh/cZ1it/eb5abfe4e6.jpg Would also work great as it is parallel to 01:03:578 (1) -
8. 01:05:861 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Umm, you sure about this? Three triples in a row is pretty hard to play for a normal considering the high bpm. I suggest some the following to make it easier:
   01:07:491 (2,3,4,5,6) - Try the following here: http://puu.sh/cZ15k/996a8aa2f2.jpg
9. 01:12:056 (3,1,2,1) - Not really a fan of these whole overlaps, but okay...
10. 01:18:415 (3,1) - These could blanket for better aesthetics: http://puu.sh/cZ1u5/1e74b3fbb0.jpg
11. Nice.

[Hard]

1. 00:11:078 (4,1) - Setting a jump around here (and maybe 00:12:383 (4,1) - ) would be nice to indicate a new 'section' of the music, as it is getting more intense from now on.
2. 00:55:752 (1,2) - That jump is a bit too high-spaced, maybe lower the DS a bit down.
3. 01:06:187 (1,3) - If you could make this not overlap, that'd be great.
4. 01:08:469 (4,1) - No small jump here for the strong beat?
5. Looks good.

[Insane]

1. 00:10:426 (3,4) - Spacing between these circles is somewhat low imo, maybe increase it? http://puu.sh/cZ5e4/e8b86a631e.jpg haaa...keep that
2. 00:11:730 (2,3) - Ctrl+g these, for both the jump on the strong drum on 00:11:241 (1,2) - and the guitar on 00:11:730 (2,3) - haaa...keep that
3. 00:12:546 (1,2) - A jump here would be good.haaa...keep that
4. 00:45:154 (7,1) - Maybe blanket here.fix
5. 00:50:535 (1,3) - Would look neater if not overlap http://puu.sh/cZ5RK/12b050f7b1.jpg fix
6. 01:17:111 (2,3) - Could need a bigger jump here: http://puu.sh/cZ65N/2bc16ab47a.jpg fix
7. Composing in this one is great

[Extra]

1. Get more opinions on this: HP8 is incredibly high for this diff and it's very hard to recover from a miss. I'd lower the HP by -0.5. I may think about that.
2. 00:31:948 (5) - There's no beat in the track on the blue tick here. Just make a 1/2 slider here: ok
3. 00:42:056 (5,6,7,8) - Push this a bit down so it doesn't overlap with 00:42:709 (1) - ok
4. 00:50:209 (5) - Umm, I'm pretty sure 1/6 beats are not the way to go here, have you tried a 1/4 backslider instead? ok
5. 00:53:469 (3,4) - Replace them with circles? I don't think you have to continue the 1/4 stream here, the scream's already over. ah...I may keep that idea so..
6. 01:01:948 (3,1) - Could need a slightly better blanket. ok
7. 01:05:861 (7,8) - Either make this blanket with 6 or make it overlay on 01:06:187 (1) - , but the inbetween solution looks weird imo. I prefer: http://puu.sh/cZaka/43a4958956.jpg ok
8. 01:11:241 (6,1) - Make this overlay exactly: http://puu.sh/cZanE/cbae017f73.jpg ok
9. A bit overmapped and unforgiving, but really fun to play nonetheless.

<3Thanks

Haven't checked the timing sections properly, but these should be fine. Really neat mapset, I like the insanes in this one a lot. Have a star and good luck for the ranks! o/°

P.S: Welcome back to the mapping community.

OblivioN wrote:

是2ha前辈:D
From Lazy modding team(¦3[____]

General

1. widescrean support 和 letterbox 需要关掉【extar/habi's insane/insane/hard】
   easy和normal关掉widescreen support搞掂
2. 标题要不要加上（TV size）呢……虽然tag 里面有……_(:з」∠)_

加了才有问题呢现在

Extra

1. 00:35:209 (4) - 这个blanket有些……修一下http://puu.sh/d0O6Q/08dadd701a.png我已经很努力了orz
2. 00:59:013 (7,8,1,2) - 间距统一成0.8吧.-.，test 头三遍我都挂在这里，我还没想到什么忽然增加00:59:176 (1,2) - ds的理由……啊....先这样吧
3. 01:00:317 -转盘end音量减小到20%，不然有些违和改成60%
4. 01:26:730 (3) - 处理好看一些:
   SPOILER

   
5. 01:27:138 (1) - 其实01:29:094 -以后还是有音的……end在01:29:339 -音量也减小一下
   
   开始一部分似乎没有音效？不过建议点缀一下:3
6. 00:04:883 -00:06:187 -00:10:100 -00:11:404 -finish
7. 又听了几遍bgm，觉得00:31:377 - 00:31:540 -这两个地方也drum clap好一些
   
   另外hp8好高啊…可不可以低一点……？【。】

这个可以有

Habi's Insane

1. hitsound should use normalhitsound or same with Extra will feel better_(:з」∠)_ softhitsound makes me feel……weak & soft lol
2. 01:27:138 (1) - end at 01:29:339 -

Insane

1. 00:07:491 (1) - 先把00:07:002 (4) - 的弧度调整一下，然后把它们00:05:535 (2,3,1) - stack吧 ，好看点
   SPOILER

   
2. 01:00:317 -建议音量减小……

改成60%

Hard

1. cs3是要闹哪样……;w;我看了看hard还是cs4合适一些为了满足我等手残...
2. 01:00:317 -也是音量的问题

ok

Normal

1. 00:51:839 (1,2,3,4,5) - 卧槽我柑橘对于nm来说太难了

准备重新搞搞，删点note好了

Easy

1. fine

good map & ☆

Sonnyc wrote:

[Normal]
00:12:546 (1) - Remove NC. fix

[Hard]
01:11:893 (2) - This jump feels too much for a [Hard]. fix

[Insane]
00:10:100 (1,2) - Consider ctrl+G for a better flow in 00:09:774 (4,1).ok

[Habi's Insane]
00:05:372 (6) - Personally stacking with (7) would play better.
00:59:665 (10) - Remove Whistle. It sounds redundant compared with the song.

[Extra]
00:31:948 (5) - Replace to a note. The beat at 00:32:029 feels overmapped.ahhh..I think should be fine

1. dark blue combo blends with the video at some parts, consider using a slightly lighter tune?
2. I'm a bit confused about some CS and AR settings. it just feels off when you have 3 diffs with CS3 and 3 more with CS4. I think you could improve the spread's balance if you change CS in Hard to 3.5 for example.. I'm not saying the spread is bad, but there's definitely room for improvement
   considering AR, it feels like your overdoing it a little. Lowest diff with AR4 and the 3 highest diffs each with AR9.. aah, up to you, but I'd prefer AR3 for Easy, 5.5 for Normal and 6.5-7 for Hard.

1. 00:02:274 (3) - I'd prefer different rhythm here, that matches with the vocals as well - http://puu.sh/d2iFa/a96d12c750.png
2. 00:08:469 (4,1) - //nitpicking here - middle of the slider slightly too close to 4
   to improve flow you could rotate 1 slightly (with cirlce as rotation centre), if it's tail gets to close to 00:07:491 (3) - and you want to avoid confusion try this? - http://puu.sh/d2iXW/035593016f.png
3. 00:15:969 (4) - how about using a wave slider instead of this? that improves movement slightly
4. 00:31:296 (1,2,1) - looks a bit crowded, maybe you could place 1+2 slightly differently? example - http://puu.sh/d2jdh/79123de31f.png
5. 00:42:709 (1,2,3,4) - symmetrical pattern might look better ;-; - http://puu.sh/d2jhO/3246067cd6.png
6. 00:46:622 (3,4,1) - triangle feels forced, consider using 3/4 square like you did previously and afterwards (like 00:50:535 (1,2,3) - )
7. 00:58:361 (1) - it might be hard for beginner players to clear the spinner, cause it's so short. a long slider works, too, imo.

1. 00:18:578 (4,1,2) - seems a little too confusing for Normal diff, imo, how about placing them like http://puu.sh/d2k4x/3167710683.png ?
2. 00:38:143 (3) - consider shortening this to emphasize the downbeat better? you could just adda cirlce at 00:39:122 then
   (It doesn't bother me at other parts, but caught my attention here, not sure why. D: )
3. 01:13:198 (2,1) - consider increasing the curve of 1 or place it differently, so the reverse arrow is 100% visible

1. 00:15:317 (1,2,3,4,1) - might be better to avoid the overlap, it looks pretty clutterd
2. 00:26:404 (3,4) - unstack them? the lively feeling of the song doen't match with stack + short reverse slider, cause the player's stuck at one point for a little too long
3. 00:41:078 (4,1,2) - improve blankets? .o.

1. Red - Unrankable issue, you must fixed
2. Purple - Highly recommended, consider to use it
3. Black - Suggestion, feel free to fixed or not
4. Gray - Personal preference

1. Fine

1. Fine

1. 我觉得高BPM Normal还是尽量减少1/2三连的比较好 特别是连续击打 感觉有点难
2. 00:18:578 (4,1,2) - 既然你都摆这个梗了 干脆搞成正三角形那样的吧
   像这样

   
3. 00:57:056 (4,1) - 包一下？

1. 给个建议 要不cs3.5吧 AR也可以减0.5或者1
   把前面几个mod改了就好 没啥问题

1. 00:52:817 (5,6) - 我觉得不要叠着比较好 太难打了 这样会比较舒服
   像这样

   

OniJAM wrote:

Mod request from OniJAM's SecKill Queue
其实我真不喜欢这种吼叫声太大的曲子xD

1. Red - Unrankable issue, you must fixed
2. Purple - Highly recommended, consider to use it
3. Black - Suggestion, feel free to fixed or not
4. Gray - Personal preference

[General]

1. Fine

[ Easy]

1. Fine

[ Normal]

1. 我觉得高BPM Normal还是尽量减少1/2三连的比较好 特别是连续击打 感觉有点难
2. 00:18:578 (4,1,2) - 既然你都摆这个梗了 干脆搞成正三角形那样的吧
   像这样

   
3. 00:57:056 (4,1) - 包一下？

[ Hard]

1. 给个建议 要不cs3.5吧 AR也可以减0.5或者1
   把前面几个mod改了就好 没啥问题

[ Insane]

1. 00:52:817 (5,6) - 我觉得不要叠着比较好 太难打了 这样会比较舒服
   像这样

   

GD和Extra没啥问题
感觉摸变水了……不过确实没啥问题啊 快去找狗泡了
star~ Good Luck

liangv587 wrote:

EN都没什么好说的
01:00:317 - 这个地方还是觉得用s好

[hard]
ar7就够了
01:06:676 (2) - 这应该包一下，加个红点做成瓢状
01:23:959 (4,1) - 这里flow不好，4的尾巴向下会好些

[Habi's Insane]
01:21:024 (3) - 2 notes will be better

[extra]
00:21:839 (1,2) - 移到48,168，第一次出现这种，三个头在直线上会不会好点

已经很完美了

Squirrel wrote:

hi there!
mod from my queue
just making suggestions, feel free to disagree!

General

1. dark blue combo blends with the video at some parts, consider using a slightly lighter tune?
2. I'm a bit confused about some CS and AR settings. it just feels off when you have 3 diffs with CS3 and 3 more with CS4. I think you could improve the spread's balance if you change CS in Hard to 3.5 for example.. I'm not saying the spread is bad, but there's definitely room for improvement
   considering AR, it feels like your overdoing it a little. Lowest diff with AR4 and the 3 highest diffs each with AR9.. aah, up to you, but I'd prefer AR3 for Easy, 5.5 for Normal and 6.5-7 for Hard.

Easy

1. 00:02:274 (3) - I'd prefer different rhythm here, that matches with the vocals as well - http://puu.sh/d2iFa/a96d12c750.png
2. 00:08:469 (4,1) - //nitpicking here - middle of the slider slightly too close to 4
   to improve flow you could rotate 1 slightly (with cirlce as rotation centre), if it's tail gets to close to 00:07:491 (3) - and you want to avoid confusion try this? - http://puu.sh/d2iXW/035593016f.png
3. 00:15:969 (4) - how about using a wave slider instead of this? that improves movement slightly
4. 00:31:296 (1,2,1) - looks a bit crowded, maybe you could place 1+2 slightly differently? example - http://puu.sh/d2jdh/79123de31f.png
5. 00:42:709 (1,2,3,4) - symmetrical pattern might look better ;-; - http://puu.sh/d2jhO/3246067cd6.png
6. 00:46:622 (3,4,1) - triangle feels forced, consider using 3/4 square like you did previously and afterwards (like 00:50:535 (1,2,3) - )
7. 00:58:361 (1) - it might be hard for beginner players to clear the spinner, cause it's so short. a long slider works, too, imo.

Normal

1. 00:18:578 (4,1,2) - seems a little too confusing for Normal diff, imo, how about placing them like http://puu.sh/d2k4x/3167710683.png ?
2. 00:38:143 (3) - consider shortening this to emphasize the downbeat better? you could just adda cirlce at 00:39:122 then
   (It doesn't bother me at other parts, but caught my attention here, not sure why. D: )
3. 01:13:198 (2,1) - consider increasing the curve of 1 or place it differently, so the reverse arrow is 100% visible

Hard
this diff is so much fun to play, great job! owo just some minor suggestions -

1. 00:15:317 (1,2,3,4,1) - might be better to avoid the overlap, it looks pretty clutterd
2. 00:26:404 (3,4) - unstack them? the lively feeling of the song doen't match with stack + short reverse slider, cause the player's stuck at one point for a little too long
3. 00:41:078 (4,1,2) - improve blankets? .o.

really short mod, sorry. ;-; and good luck, mapset looks awesome!

Squirrel wrote:

hi there!
mod from my queue
just making suggestions, feel free to disagree!

General

1. dark blue combo blends with the video at some parts, consider using a slightly lighter tune?
2. I'm a bit confused about some CS and AR settings. it just feels off when you have 3 diffs with CS3 and 3 more with CS4. I think you could improve the spread's balance if you change CS in Hard to 3.5 for example.. I'm not saying the spread is bad, but there's definitely room for improvement
   considering AR, it feels like your overdoing it a little. Lowest diff with AR4 and the 3 highest diffs each with AR9.. aah, up to you, but I'd prefer AR3 for Easy, 5.5 for Normal and 6.5-7 for Hard.

Easy

1. 00:02:274 (3) - I'd prefer different rhythm here, that matches with the vocals as well - http://puu.sh/d2iFa/a96d12c750.png
2. 00:08:469 (4,1) - //nitpicking here - middle of the slider slightly too close to 4
   to improve flow you could rotate 1 slightly (with cirlce as rotation centre), if it's tail gets to close to 00:07:491 (3) - and you want to avoid confusion try this? - http://puu.sh/d2iXW/035593016f.png
3. 00:15:969 (4) - how about using a wave slider instead of this? that improves movement slightly
4. 00:31:296 (1,2,1) - looks a bit crowded, maybe you could place 1+2 slightly differently? example - http://puu.sh/d2jdh/79123de31f.png
5. 00:42:709 (1,2,3,4) - symmetrical pattern might look better ;-; - http://puu.sh/d2jhO/3246067cd6.png
6. 00:46:622 (3,4,1) - triangle feels forced, consider using 3/4 square like you did previously and afterwards (like 00:50:535 (1,2,3) - )
7. 00:58:361 (1) - it might be hard for beginner players to clear the spinner, cause it's so short. a long slider works, too, imo.

Normal

1. 00:18:578 (4,1,2) - seems a little too confusing for Normal diff, imo, how about placing them like http://puu.sh/d2k4x/3167710683.png ?
2. 00:38:143 (3) - consider shortening this to emphasize the downbeat better? you could just adda cirlce at 00:39:122 then
   (It doesn't bother me at other parts, but caught my attention here, not sure why. D: )
3. 01:13:198 (2,1) - consider increasing the curve of 1 or place it differently, so the reverse arrow is 100% visible

Hard
this diff is so much fun to play, great job! owo just some minor suggestions -

1. 00:15:317 (1,2,3,4,1) - might be better to avoid the overlap, it looks pretty clutterd
2. 00:26:404 (3,4) - unstack them? the lively feeling of the song doen't match with stack + short reverse slider, cause the player's stuck at one point for a little too long
3. 00:41:078 (4,1,2) - improve blankets? .o.

really short mod, sorry. ;-; and good luck, mapset looks awesome!

1. 00:23:143 (1) - 이부분은 3/4슬라이더로 처리하기엔 빨간틱에 소리가 너무 강한 것 같아요, 1/2 슬라이더로 줄이시거나 노트 2개로 처리하시는걸 추천드려요
2. 00:25:752 (1) - ^
3. 00:31:051 - 이건 고치시거나 안고치시거나 크게 느낌에 차이는 없는데 여기에도 노트를 넣으시는게 어떨까요, 드럼 소리도 존재하고 넣으면 듣기에 더 나은거 같아요
4. 00:33:823 (2) - 전체적으로 1/2박자간 오브젝트들은 디스탠스를 넓게 두셨고 1/4박자 슬라이더들은 디스탠스를 그다지 크게 두시진 않았는데 이 부분도 그에 맞게 고치는게 좋을꺼 같아요, bpm이 그다지 빠른편이 아니라 이정도면 쉽게 넘어 갈 수는 있겠지만 그래도 헷갈리는 사람들이 있을 것 같아요. 디스탠스를 좀 줄이시는걸 추천드려요
   
   이렇게

   
5. 00:52:817 (4,5) - 노래 분위기를 보자면 여기에 점프를 넣는것보다 00:52:980 (5,1) - 여기 두 오브젝트 사이에 넣는게 더 어울릴꺼 같아요, 음이 이쪽이 더 강하기도 하고요. 아니면 이전 보라색 5번노트에 지금 빨강색 노트 5번을 스택 시키는 것도 한 방법이에요.
6. 00:59:013 (5) - 이 부분은 드럼하고 보컬 둘다 따라가려고 하신 것 같은데 이 슬라이더를 3/4길이로 조절 하는건 어떨까요? 드럼 소리에도 어울리고 보컬 소리에도 크게 어긋나지 않아요.
7. 01:26:730 (5) - 노트 하나만 두기엔 너무 빈 듯한 느낌이 들어서 그런데 3/4 슬라이더로 바꾸시면 더 어울리고 좋은 것 같아요

1. 00:16:296 (2) - is this clap intended on this slider's starting point? if yes, i'd rather delete this because there aren't any reasonable sounds for clap
2. 00:17:274 (1) - remove NC for consistency and i don't think it's really necessary
3. 00:18:578 (1) - ^
4. 00:21:839 (1) -
5. 00:31:948 (5) - it seems that you followed the drum sounds but current 1/4 slider feels kind of awkward (maybe because of the vocal sound). how about chaging this slider to a note or 1/2 slider? this is much better to hear
6. 00:50:209 (5) - since it is really hard to pass this part without any miss or confusion because of this i really don't recommend you to use kind of this slider while adding stream or rapid pattern. removing 00:50:127 (5) - this note or using this rhythm instead of current one can be a solution
7. 00:59:747 (1) - i'd prefer to mute this spinner's end by using 5% volume rather than 60%, it's too loud that sounds kind of annoying

HelloSCV wrote:

hihi~

[Extra]

1. 00:16:296 (2) - is this clap intended on this slider's starting point? if yes, i'd rather delete this because there aren't any reasonable sounds for clap
2. 00:17:274 (1) - remove NC for consistency and i don't think it's really necessary
3. 00:18:578 (1) - ^
4. 00:21:839 (1) -
5. 00:31:948 (5) - it seems that you followed the drum sounds but current 1/4 slider feels kind of awkward (maybe because of the vocal sound). how about chaging this slider to a note or 1/2 slider? this is much better to hear
6. 00:50:209 (5) - since it is really hard to pass this part without any miss or confusion because of this i really don't recommend you to use kind of this slider while adding stream or rapid pattern. removing 00:50:127 (5) - this note or using this rhythm instead of current one can be a solution
7. 00:59:747 (1) - i'd prefer to mute this spinner's end by using 5% volume rather than 60%, it's too loud that sounds kind of annoying

fix all
i'll finish this by tomorrow

1. what about adding audioleadin? 1000~2000ms leadin would be great because the beatmap starts too early

1. 00:59:665 - same opinion with Extra
2. 01:10:100 (1) - delete NC for consistency
3. 01:19:230 (1) - same opinion with Hard diff
4. 01:27:219 (1) - the spinner appears too fastly, what about moving this to 01:27:219 - here?

1. 00:04:719 (4) - add NC for consistency
2. 00:05:535 (1) - delete NC for consistency as well (based on 00:31:296 - this part)
3. 00:42:872 - maybe you forgot to add default slidertick sound here?
4. 01:19:230 (1) - same as Hard diff

1. 00:15:317 (1,2) - according to the song,i recommend you to add jump between these rather than 00:16:133 (2,3) - these
   
   examples

   
   
2. 00:16:296 (3) - same suggestion with Extra
3. 00:47:600 (1) - 1/1 slider with a repeat doesn't fit really well with the song imo, what about spliting it into a 1/1 slider, a note and a 1/2 slider? this sounds great
   
   example

   
4. 00:58:524 - , 00:58:850 - since this part has drum stream sounds, how about adding a note on each of these red ticks?
   
   example

   
5. 01:19:230 (1) - try adding a finish on the starting point, like you already did in higher diffs and this fits quite nicely

1. 00:16:292 (6) - same opinion with Extra diff
2. 00:30:643 (3,1) - what about adding jump here? current pattern feels little bit normal comparing with atmosphere of the song
   
   example

   
3. 01:01:459 (2) - since you added claps regularly, perhaps the clap on repeat arrow is a kind of mistake. try to fix it
4. 01:24:774 (2) - how about fliping this slider by using ctrl g? current patten plays totally fine but i think giving some jumps on these would be much better for the last part. you need to adjust latter sliders as well if you fix this
   
   example

   

HelloSCV wrote:

no kds ofc

[General]

1. what about adding audioleadin? 1000~2000ms leadin would be great because the beatmap starts too early

I'm waiting someone say this, finally ;w;b

HelloSCV wrote:

no kds ofc

[General]

1. what about adding audioleadin? 1000~2000ms leadin would be great because the beatmap starts too early

[Easy]

• 
  fix

1. 00:59:665 - same opinion with Extra
2. 01:10:100 (1) - delete NC for consistency
3. 01:19:230 (1) - same opinion with Hard diff
4. 01:27:219 (1) - the spinner appears too fastly, what about moving this to 01:27:219 - here?

[Normal]

1. 00:04:719 (4) - add NC for consistency
2. 00:05:535 (1) - delete NC for consistency as well (based on 00:31:296 - this part)
3. 00:42:872 - maybe you forgot to add default slidertick sound here?yep！fix
4. 01:19:230 (1) - same as Hard difffix

[Hard]

1. 00:15:317 (1,2) - according to the song,i recommend you to add jump between these rather than 00:16:133 (2,3) - these fix
   
   examples

   
   
2. 00:16:296 (3) - same suggestion with Extrafix
3. 00:47:600 (1) - 1/1 slider with a repeat doesn't fit really well with the song imo, what about spliting it into a 1/1 slider, a note and a 1/2 slider? this sounds great
   
   example

   
4. 00:58:524 - , 00:58:850 - since this part has drum stream sounds, how about adding a note on each of these red ticks?
   
   example

   
5. 01:19:230 (1) - try adding a finish on the starting point, like you already did in higher diffs and this fits quite nicelyfix

[Insane]

• 
  fix all

1. 00:16:292 (6) - same opinion with Extra diff
2. 00:30:643 (3,1) - what about adding jump here? current pattern feels little bit normal comparing with atmosphere of the song
   
   example

   
3. 01:01:459 (2) - since you added claps regularly, perhaps the clap on repeat arrow is a kind of mistake. try to fix it
4. 01:24:774 (2) - how about fliping this slider by using ctrl g? current patten plays totally fine but i think giving some jumps on these would be much better for the last part. you need to adjust latter sliders as well if you fix this
   
   example

   

good luck with it!

Flower wrote:

Hi

[Extra]
00:15:969 (1,2) - add body whistle? or just 2. it sounds cool 另外改成红色的combo color来提醒玩家？
00:40:426 (2) - blanket better

[Habi]
Fine.

[Insane]
00:32:111 (9) - move a bit higher? avoid touching
00:50:535 (1,3) - blanket better? also 00:51:431 (4,5) - make more xuanku
00:55:426 (3,4,1) - 三连改成五连？fit music better
01:26:730 (4) - curve more?

[Hard]
00:44:339 (2,3,4) - blanket better

[Normal]
01:14:013 (1) - reverse arrow 露出多一点比较保险

[Easy]
00:08:469 (4,1) - blanket better

no kds
做这么好图让我怎么骗kd啊

call me back when you are ready

appleeaterx wrote:

hello tutuhaha! from my queue

:idea: General

* aah sorry late late late

Easy

* 01:19:230 (1) - Move to (176,184) for a triangle?nope, too hard for me lol

Normal

* In this diff you keep switching from 0.8 to 1.0. I see how it may work, but I don't see a big difference/logic behind it. I recommend you to just keep 1.0x.
* 00:00:970 (1) - Is this 1.11x spacing intentional? You don't even have 1.1 in the KIAI section of the song.actually no one find that stupid issue！thankyou！

Hard

* Looks OK to me, I don't agree with some jumps but they fit OK I guess. Nice diff!

Insane

* 00:26:404 (4,5,6,7) - Shouldn't this be a 5-note stream? There's a really clear sound on the blue tick, and I don't think a gap now is appropiate. sure
* 00:58:035 (2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - I recommend you to make this easier. Now, this pattern is way more difficult than your Extra diff - and this is the easiest Insane diff. Suddenly high DS is not good here imo.well, insane you know~

2ha

* 00:01:948 (4) - I think you can move this a bit up to create a sort-of blanket with (2,3) well, i try
* 00:34:883 (3) - The vocals here are stronger so the NC should be here imo. ahh...looks stupid so nope
* 00:50:861 (3,5,2) - Move (2) a bit down to avoid the unneeded overlap? ok
* 00:58:605 - 00:58:931 - Why did you skip these? Nice of you that you didn't kill me with a long stream, but there are actual sounds here. Consider mapping these. You could also try reverse sliders if you want it more simple. try to stress
* 00:59:013 (9) - (all diffs) No clap? There's one in the song itself >_> ok~
* 01:06:839 (3) - This slider sound very odd. I guess that you are trying to follow the vocals with those sliders, but this one is too late. Try this rhythm (very similar/the same as 01:03:578 (1,2,3,4) - ) If you don't want to change this one, consider changing the one at 01:03:578 to have the same rhythm.

hmm...dont really like that rhythm so

Yay! More tutuhaha maps!

flower already checked dunno if my mod is still helpful

please more 2habi maps, i really liked noragami's op, and this mapset is nice as well =w=

OblivioN wrote:

好像还是要加tv size 来自hw的截图http://puu.sh/db7K9/6ba2142922.png

Flower wrote:

Recheck, no kd absolutely

[Normal]
00:40:426 (2,3) - This object is too far from the previous object. 我知道你这里是0.9x用在1/2上，然后完全没问题，但是最好挪动一下让狗没话说

另外最好也求证一下TV Size的问题，我在官网没有找到加TV的标题，网络音乐贩卖商的标题是不可靠的（我发pm给kshr和melo了）

neonat wrote:

Well since it's not bubbled yet
Just looking at your difficulties

Easy

00:32:274 (1) - have a hitsound at the start of the slider to go with the cymbals in the music?
00:42:709 (1) - ^
00:56:730 (2,3) - could blanket better
00:57:056 (3,4) - ^
01:10:100 (3) - add a whistle to the end of the slider for the not really too loud cymbal crashes here

Normal

00:16:459 (1) - drum addition whistle on start of slider?
00:32:274 (1) - same as easy
01:10:752 (2) - add some hitsounds to go with the cymbals in the music?

Hard

00:03:252 (4,1) - could blanket better
00:08:633 (1,2,3) - possible straight line?
00:32:274 (1) - same as Easy
00:42:709 (1) - same as Easy
00:48:904 (1,2) - if you shift slider 1 to check the blanket, you can see it's not very even:

SPOILER

01:10:426 (2) - the repeat end of the slider, has that cymbal crash, add a hitsound?

Insane

00:21:839 (1) - I honestly think a finish on the start of the slider would fit
00:48:904 (3) - placing it at x: 440 y: 148 would have this slider exactly at the turning point of 00:49:719 (2)
01:10:426 (3) - hitsound the end of the slider with that cymbal crash?

Extra

00:33:904 (3,5,6) - blanket is off, it's closer to one side
00:34:719 (1,2,3) - should be at x: 376 y: 148 to be in the middle of 00:35:209 (4) - you can delete 00:34:719 (1,2) temporarily to see that it's not covering properly
00:48:904 (5,1) - stack is off by 1 grid on both axis
00:51:513 (5,2) - it could look better if they didn't touch, the spacing like 00:52:165 (3,1) would be nice
01:07:817 (2,3) - stack off by 1 grid on y-axis
01:10:018 (5,1,3) - stack off by 1 grid on both axis


Good Luck

KSHR wrote:

I couldn't fine any official sources that say this song needs a label such as (TV Size).

According to the official web site, this song will be recorded in a CD which will be released on January 7th.

SPOILER

http://www.lasvegas-jp.com/topics/1694

SwordArtOnline wrote:

congratulations!

Andrea wrote:

Pretty nice map but the mp3 quality is terrible, you should totally find a better one.

Good luck with it :3

Andrea wrote:

I hope a QAT will get there before it's too late.

tutuhaha wrote:

Andrea wrote:

I hope a QAT will get there before it's too late.

I hope not

tutuhaha wrote:

Andrea wrote:

I hope a QAT will get there before it's too late.

I hope not

xxdeathx wrote:

It's happened before though p/3383257

xxdeathx wrote:

Yeah, if they do disqualify this I'll help with it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

xxdeathx wrote:

well it's been 5 days, probably they haven't noticed ：D

Garven wrote:

Crap, they are on to us!

p3n wrote:

Reasons for the disqualification:

MP3 quality is horrible. Out of the currently submitted versions the best one uploaded is this: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/228875
The boosted volume levels cut of all the details and it is unpleasant to listen to:


I think it is best to ask Kihhou to let you use his mp3.


Hitsounds do not follow the actual rhythm in some parts. This is really confusing and has to be fixed. Try to follow the actual drums in these parts: 00:21:839 - to 00:32:274 - and 00:53:143 - to 00:59:665 - . Improvements can also be made to the hitsounding during KIAI but this is only a small issue.

Hitsounds in Habi's Insane are fine as they are. They do follow the baseline and drums where necessary and appropriate for the note density of this difficulty.

Additional suggestions:

Please take a look at this post: p/3548727

[Extra]
00:46:622 (1,2) - please consider to follow the actual song here instead. The added note with the higher 1/4 spacing is unexpected and doesn't fit very well.
01:01:948 (3,4) - extended slider into 1/4 note with much higher spacing compared to all the other 1/4 jumps in the map.
01:08:306 (3,4) - if possible consider to use continuous spacing here without the jump. There is nothing in the drumroll that would indicate the (small) 1/4 jump.

Desperate-kun wrote:

Awesome song, but the map has huge quality issues imo ><
Sorry in advance for my bad English; I don't really know how to explain musical structures etc in English, but it should be understandable.

The hitsounding (use of claps, specifically) is completely out of any logic, in all diffs. In Habi's diff some things are a bit different but overall there are the same issues. If you listen closely to the song, you will recognize the following:
00:21:839 to 00:32:274 - In this section, it doesn't make sense to place claps on 2 and 4 in each measure. You don't follow any instrument with that. The loud and recognizable drums follow this rhythm instead, which shows where your claps should be:

00:53:143 to 00:58:361 - Same as the above section.
01:00:969 to 01:19:230 - In this section, the 2 and 4 pattern for claps seems even more wrong, sorry... The drummer makes it so that the beat of this section sounds more relaxed by using a lot of syncopations and other techniques, but you are destroying this feeling with your hitsounding.
01:19:230 to 01:27:056 - Here it is the opposite - there is the same loud drum sound at every white tick though, not just 2 and 4. Therefore, claps should be placed on every white tick as well to create the correct feeling when playing the map.

Secondly, the Extra has sections that are not sensible for me at all, and therefore play really forced.
00:00:970 to 00:11:404 - You will agree with me that the guitar and other instruments in this section are quite monotonous - In fact, these are building up during the verse until it reaches it's climax at 01:00:969 - This would logically imply to include a progression of difficulty/pace in the map, too. The problem is that the first section of your map has so fast sliders that don't fit here at all. 2.2x velocity might work later (00:11:404 - Here it starts to get kinda nice because of the new drum sounds) but in the first section it feels overdone to me and therefore plays not well.
01:00:969 to 01:19:230 - Here is the main problem I'm having with the Extra difficulty. Everything in this section, except the vocals, is so relaxed and calmed down compared to the section before and after this one, and even the vocals are long hold notes which don't call for a high SV. Personally I would have used a lower SV here, probably something like 0.75x and use big spacing, but that depends on style. But you even increased the SV, which seems totally against logic and feels very forced to play.
Otherwise, I also think some 1/4 plays bad, especially with patterns like 00:46:622 (1,2,3) - you put more emphasis on the blue ticks instead of the white/red ticks which makes no sense here to me, but w/e.

I don't know if people will agree with me, but I just wrote it down because I think the map has a lot of potential but some sections are disappointing to me... Good luck, whatever will happen to this mapset, maybe it'll just get ranked, but otherwise I'd like you to consider what I wrote down here.