sure its complaining but its pointing out flaws to make it a better event, not just empty baseless complaints to annoy you
Mahiro Yasaka wrote:
Seriously just drop this argument.
I have explained.
WE ARE DOING RANDOM FOR OUKT3, End off.
If this fails or is crap (Which it might be or not be) We will do something else for OUKT4, IE PP Seeding.
We did this in OUKT1 (pp seeding) and got complaints
So we did it in OUKT2 (random seeding) and hey presto, complaints still
I watched portal randomize everyone and sort it out for OUKT2. There was no fixing, so Raiku is wrong.
I UNDERSTAND full well that PP ranking seeding is the normal way of doing it. But we had way to many complaints of under-skilled players against skilled players. So in theory the only fair way of doing this is to randomize the whole thing. But apparently thats wrong.
Once again, to eliminate people saying, fixed!. We are streaming us picking people out randomly.
Thanks and stop complaining. The tournament is for fun, stop fucking tryharding
We understand, but us doing this seeding, is us listening to feedback.Shimatora wrote:
I was merely giving feedback on the setup. The frustration stems from PortalLife's lack of understanding. I tried explaining, he still does not understand. Not much else to it really.Mahiro Yasaka wrote:
Seriously just drop this argument.
I have explained.
WE ARE DOING RANDOM FOR OUKT3, End off.
If this fails or is crap (Which it might be or not be) We will do something else for OUKT4, IE PP Seeding.
We did this in OUKT1 (pp seeding) and got complaints
So we did it in OUKT2 (random seeding) and hey presto, complaints still
I watched portal randomize everyone and sort it out for OUKT2. There was no fixing, so Raiku is wrong.
I UNDERSTAND full well that PP ranking seeding is the normal way of doing it. But we had way to many complaints of under-skilled players against skilled players. So in theory the only fair way of doing this is to randomize the whole thing. But apparently thats wrong.
Once again, to eliminate people saying, fixed!. We are streaming us picking people out randomly.
Thanks and stop complaining. The tournament is for fun, stop fucking tryharding
Your the second person to say it was bad to me.ibecolours wrote:
Mahiro Yasaka wrote:
Seriously just drop this argument.
I have explained.
WE ARE DOING RANDOM FOR OUKT3, End off.
If this fails or is crap (Which it might be or not be) We will do something else for OUKT4, IE PP Seeding.
We did this in OUKT1 (pp seeding) and got complaints
So we did it in OUKT2 (random seeding) and hey presto, complaints still
I watched portal randomize everyone and sort it out for OUKT2. There was no fixing, so Raiku is wrong.
I UNDERSTAND full well that PP ranking seeding is the normal way of doing it. But we had way to many complaints of under-skilled players against skilled players. So in theory the only fair way of doing this is to randomize the whole thing. But apparently thats wrong.
Once again, to eliminate people saying, fixed!. We are streaming us picking people out randomly.
Thanks and stop complaining. The tournament is for fun, stop fucking tryharding
If you do it random its just going to be bad and pointless a little like last time.
Snookie wrote:
yo shibutora just let the organisers choose their own methods and stop complaining / giving negative feedback
if you dont like it then dont play, pretty simple. If the majority of people were complaining then yeah sure maybe it would be taken into consideration but if the majority is OK with either method then just let the organisers decide.
Unless you want to run a rival tournament andsomehowget sponsership from osu! as well
Fair game.PortalLife wrote:
Yeah well this is the last tournament until winter, because OWC will be Autumn time so, who's to complain.
Also, heres my compromise. Once signups have ended, i'll run a seeding method and see how the brackets look. If they are good, we can keep them. If not, I will randomize them.
Fair game?
I think Jesse hit the nail on the head with a huge arse hammerjesus1412 wrote:
The NA tournament is overruled because the OWC uses pp seeding. The OWC is far more important and if we're going on an example basis, wins. Let's be fair, the least competent players are the least competent players and SHOULD be knocked out first, that's what seeding does and if you disagree with it then you don't believe in this fact.
Also here is the 1st OUKT seeding. http://challonge.com/UKosu
ALSO I don't see a SINLGE complaint in the first OUKT thread: t/165077
Fair game.
PortalLife wrote:
Yeah well this is the last tournament until winter, because OWC will be Autumn time so, who's to complain.
Also, heres my compromise. Once signups have ended, i'll run a seeding method and see how the brackets look. If they are good, we can keep them. If not, I will randomize them.
Fair game?
You made that rule....PortalLife wrote:
This has been a rule since OUKT1.
I fail to see how staff playing the tournament can affect it.
I am currently seeking out more referees.
Which can be confirmed by the other selectors. This isn't a problem guys don't worry.PortalLife wrote:
Because I'm not biased and theres two other map selectors. I just act as a moderator over the map selection process, a place where I think OWC lacks from what i've seen.
PortalLife wrote:
This has been a rule since OUKT1.
I fail to see how staff playing the tournament can affect it.
I am currently seeking out more referees.
Some games before that were streamed too, I remember people watching me get slapped on streamJeromelol wrote:
For the last tournament (OUKT2) I believe the semi final and final games were streamed - with the tournament client too! (So you can watch both players at the same time).
I doubt every single game will be streamed, but perhaps some of the higher rated players might have their games in earlier rounds streamed, I'm not sure
I will try my hardest to stream every game.Jeromelol wrote:
For the last tournament (OUKT2) I believe the semi final and final games were streamed - with the tournament client too! (So you can watch both players at the same time).
I doubt every single game will be streamed, but perhaps some of the higher rated players might have their games in earlier rounds streamed, I'm not sure
Crai wrote:
am i allowed to play x
I'm 52k.PortalLife wrote:
Crai wrote:
am i allowed to play x
You are a UK player and you are not banned.
Yes, you are allowed to play.
Y o uKyou wrote:
THIS TIME i wont drop my pen ;w;
inb4 loseChicagoTed7172 wrote:
I win lesgo.
wow pls what is a loseRinnou Kouriri wrote:
inb4 loseChicagoTed7172 wrote:
I win lesgo.
R.I.P Starblazesstarblazes wrote:
...
Fix'dAwesomefacerox wrote:
You've spelt my name wrong in the player list :c
My nerves will likely even the odds. Good luck.Run-Cat wrote:
I'm gonna die, because the guy im playing is good at jumps im guessing, and i do streams
Are you joking? Why even consider that Mudkipz will beat Scootawoo, it's obvious that Mudkipz will lose.cooki3zz wrote:
So, If I somehow manage to win my first match, I will either face Scootawoo or Mudkipz in the second round. GG me
DatPenguinTho wrote:
Are you joking? Why even consider that Mudkipz will beat Scootawoo, it's obvious that Mudkipz will lose.cooki3zz wrote:
So, If I somehow manage to win my first match, I will either face Scootawoo or Mudkipz in the second round. GG me
Story of my life.Run-Cat wrote:
I'm gonna die, because the guy im playing is good at jumps im guessing, and i do streams