That's nice and all, but I'll stick to how it is for now :3Sakura wrote:
That's all nice and all, but you should keep 1 thread per request.
To avoid losing your stars you could edit your thread to only one of the requested features, and then make threads for the others.
forum
New Mulitplayer Mode "TAG SYNC"
posted
Total Posts
80
Topic Starter
Topic Starter
If its a rule then allright,I'll do it.Sakura wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/1640Are you sure you want me mark this as invalid just because you dont want to follow a simple rule?chan wrote:
4. Keep to one request per topic.
This would be quite fun!
Uhh, Why would you mark this as invalid? I'm pretty sure peppy would rather have all of these in 1 topic rather than 3.
t/21821/hilit=ph0x Should he make a thread for every request aswell?
t/21821/hilit=ph0x Should he make a thread for every request aswell?
Thanks, now on the current one, I dont know if it will be possible due to latency issues, which is why you cant see other players' cursors in a multiplayer match either.
That's what i thought.Gabi wrote:
Uhh, Why would you mark this as invalid? I'm pretty sure peppy would rather have all of these in 1 topic rather than 3.
Topic Starter
About the seperation.Gabi wrote:
Uhh, Why would you mark this as invalid? I'm pretty sure peppy would rather have all of these in 1 topic rather than 3.
t/21821/hilit=ph0x Should he make a thread for every request aswell?
Your Avatar expresses my current face, and my girlfriend's face too.
that would be a great mode especially for friends :3
nice idea man
+1
nice idea man
+1
And it might also be used for tag battles.
Choose the best player to aim, and the best person to tap/click/whateveryouwanttocallit For Tag battles of epic proportion
Choose the best player to aim, and the best person to tap/click/whateveryouwanttocallit For Tag battles of epic proportion
It can be especially exciting for love couples.lol.
I do agree that this feature will be very useful. Probably going to be the most used unranked mode in multiplayer.
This sounds amazing.
Take this star.
Take this star.
ampzz
God no, the latency issues and synchronisation drop-outs alone are hard enough to deal with whenever you're doing nothing more than spectating someone.
This also has nothing to do with TAG either as TAG itself implies a constant change of whoever is in control of the game arena on each new combo then a batton pass to the next person in the team which this does nothing of the sort.
This also has nothing to do with TAG either as TAG itself implies a constant change of whoever is in control of the game arena on each new combo then a batton pass to the next person in the team which this does nothing of the sort.
For the player moving the cursor, it would be as playing with an inconsistent relax mode, only problem is to get the visuals of the cursor movement in sync with whos tapping. I guess if you have the variable of latency, then you could run autopilot on the screen of the tapping one, and then throw those keypresses onto the cursor guy, but then it wont be more then a solo game with the end result being boths efforts combined.
Although I don't see why you shun it away just like that, ampzZzzzzZzz. Its a neat idea, only issue is the latency, but that if you want it visually synced too, even tho that OP did not state that.
Although I don't see why you shun it away just like that, ampzZzzzzZzz. Its a neat idea, only issue is the latency, but that if you want it visually synced too, even tho that OP did not state that.
I wouldn't like to play a multiplayer game if it wasn't visually synced. That would look ugly and messy. It is an interesting concept, but the implementation would be tricky, unless you want the game to "pretend" you got notes at the right time until proven otherwise by comparison of the cursor location and click times.
WHERE ARE MY VOTES?!. D:
Hey, I would fear it wouldn't be synced. TAG4 works pretty well and it's already very similar to this.
Hasn't this been requested before? i think it has.
A mode designed for couples to play? This makes me think of the whole "two-man canoes = divorce boat" thing. Still, it could be hilarious. Supporting.
Reminds of couple dance on audition online, and the latency there can be fatalD33d wrote:
A mode designed for couples to play? This makes me think of the whole "two-man canoes = divorce boat" thing. Still, it could be hilarious. Supporting.
That old dream of mine and Draeno to FC likely everything... yeah, a neat idea you got there~
I support this >< seems nice for multi~
soo... i guess tag sync will fail because of latency issues?
But it's a very2 nice idea though ^^
But it's a very2 nice idea though ^^
I think it is hard to playing if they don't have good tacit,but it sounds interesting
cookiezi+White Wolf+tag sync=Auto
Yeah, I was going to suggest exactly the same thing.
It would also be possible in Taiko: one player hits the dons, the other ones the kats.
But it wouldn't work well in CtB I guess: one player hitting the direction keys, one the dash?
It would also be possible in Taiko: one player hits the dons, the other ones the kats.
But it wouldn't work well in CtB I guess: one player hitting the direction keys, one the dash?
That wouldn't work well at all, actually. Imagine trying to hit a drum roll or a stream. It'd be very awkward :<Tshemmp wrote:
It would also be possible in Taiko: one player hits the dons, the other ones the kats.
I guess it's easily players hit all note on their keybored to keep their rhythm,the game only read drums or rims they hit ,thus it willSync wrote:
That wouldn't work well at all, actually. Imagine trying to hit a drum roll or a stream. It'd be very awkward :<Tshemmp wrote:
It would also be possible in Taiko: one player hits the dons, the other ones the kats.
meaningless for taiko
It should be called Copilot Mod.
This kind of coop has been rejected due to latencies issues for ctb :s
It really should.mm201 wrote:
It should be called Copilot Mod.
Hmmm.....Audition.....then 5Street.....and now osu! hmmm... I will Support....But LoliFlan you are still fat
Well hey, this is actually a duplicate. t/46829
I'm gonna mark that one as a duplicate though because of all the stars this one has.
I'm gonna mark that one as a duplicate though because of all the stars this one has.
Can this even be made, since there might me some delay with the connection between the two players??
There already is delay in Tag but osu! handles it somehow (uh, can someone explain this, I always wanted to know how it works .-.)
Oh and star :3
Oh and star :3
Perhaps this will only work well in LAN games, so add that and then add this to it!
lol, I remember that russian guy who requested this.laport wrote:
Perhaps this will only work well in LAN games, so add that and then add this to it!
Not going to happen.
I don't think there's any purpose for a LAN setting, just play the standard mode together on 1 pc lol.
I did this with my love already and it's quite fun actually
I did this with my love already and it's quite fun actually
I did this with thelewa together and it was fun too, so it's not just for lovers >.> you probably never go to events like big lanparties with many osu players, but internet is usually fail at big lan events so to play together, a simple lan function would be golden for times like these. and yes at lan parties internet connectivity is actually a very common issue.happy30 wrote:
I don't think there's any purpose for a LAN setting, just play the standard mode together on 1 pc lol.
I did this with my love already and it's quite fun actually
I remember peppy has said that he will implement LAN if the osu! server ever gets shut down, and correct me if i'm wrong but I think he said he already has the LAN mode all worked out, but simply like you he can't imagine a purpose for now.
So I was just saying, if sync is a problem then LAN is the solution!
420 blaze it sonBRBP wrote:
imagine if someone practiced K1/K2 + M1/M2.
Guidelines for bumping a feature requesthopefulDecay wrote:
bump
This seems good. One will act like Autopilot mod and one will act like Relax mod.
Maybe this can be available for CTB users as well 
? Player 1 = Dashes. Player 2 = Moves the Fruit ryuuta! 
? Player 1 = Dashes. Player 2 = Moves the Fruit ryuuta! Interesting concept, the one thing that's iffy for me is how this will end up working. Because how would you factor in different things such as lag or internet speed difference? I enjoy the idea which will be nice for smaller friend to friend fun, but overall the concept would be hard to create due to some unavoidable factors.
Cool idea
xD i think LoliFlan had a nice idea, so i used all votes in this feature requestKuron-Kun wrote:
please
Latency exists so this would not work very well, sadly enough.
ks- wrote:
Latency exists so this would not work very well, sadly enough.
Oh, I think like that.B-52 wrote:
Like this?
But, how does it work on Internet? (especially for players with higher ping?)
T-up
here's a quick fix for the network latency issue
for the person moving the mouse, (although i wish there was) there'll be no hitsounds, because he ain't hiting anything.
for the person pressing the keys, his song would be delayed compared to the other person's by twice the average latency (thus if his ping is 200ms, the song and mouse cursor would be delayed 400ms behind the ACTUAL move movement of the other guy) should there be a temporary break in network connection, have auto take over for the time there's no incoming movement packets.
as for the handling the timing of movement packets, to prevent dependency of "starting at the same time", each hit/cursor movement packet's timing is identified by how long since the start of the song was it generated.
at the end of the song the clients transfer and merge each of their respective components, resimulate the game to generate the score and display the scoreboard (live score updating not required as you can't see the scores/accuracy in relax/auto)
players will only realise the delay if:
there is a packet loss and autocursor hits a note the actual cursor player has missed, and they were counting the score,
or they have a method of communication with lower latency than their internet connection (phone or sitting right next to each other, however if they're using skype or something they won't notice)
for the person moving the mouse, (although i wish there was) there'll be no hitsounds, because he ain't hiting anything.
for the person pressing the keys, his song would be delayed compared to the other person's by twice the average latency (thus if his ping is 200ms, the song and mouse cursor would be delayed 400ms behind the ACTUAL move movement of the other guy) should there be a temporary break in network connection, have auto take over for the time there's no incoming movement packets.
as for the handling the timing of movement packets, to prevent dependency of "starting at the same time", each hit/cursor movement packet's timing is identified by how long since the start of the song was it generated.
at the end of the song the clients transfer and merge each of their respective components, resimulate the game to generate the score and display the scoreboard (live score updating not required as you can't see the scores/accuracy in relax/auto)
players will only realise the delay if:
there is a packet loss and autocursor hits a note the actual cursor player has missed, and they were counting the score,
or they have a method of communication with lower latency than their internet connection (phone or sitting right next to each other, however if they're using skype or something they won't notice)
I was thinking about this
Great idea :3
bump
Great idea :3
bump
have to bump this :3 great idea, i made a post about the same idea not knowing this one already existed, so im throwing stars
ok, nice idea
I doubt they can sync these 2 players so well that this will work...
Sounds cool, great idea.
Implement pls
This is great 0u0
'it will be ESPECIALLY exciting for love couples'
okay first of all there are only a few tag 4 ranked maps so I would see it being useless
second of all I could see people doing it with the big black or something and becoming op
i'm out~
Denied ~
okay first of all there are only a few tag 4 ranked maps so I would see it being useless
second of all I could see people doing it with the big black or something and becoming op
i'm out~
Denied ~
Why do you put "denied" after your comments, you don't have any sort of moderator powers that are going to mark this invalid. But anyways, you don't need to use it on tag4 maps, just like with the normal tag game modes. Second, it would be implemented as a non-ranked game mode.Whirl wrote:
'it will be ESPECIALLY exciting for love couples'
okay first of all there are only a few tag 4 ranked maps so I would see it being useless
second of all I could see people doing it with the big black or something and becoming op
i'm out~
Denied ~
You can also play Tag on maps which aren't Tag4 you know.
I'd like this, but we have to be realistic here, and accept the fact that there is like a 0% chance of this ever happening
I'd like this, but we have to be realistic here, and accept the fact that there is like a 0% chance of this ever happening
i think so too, but i like the idea actually.Bara- wrote:
You can also play Tag on maps which aren't Tag4 you know.
I'd like this, but we have to be realistic here, and accept the fact that there is like a 0% chance of this ever happening