Hey ppl
Gun to your head, how many scum off the wagon?
Gun to your head, how many scum off the wagon?
Sephibro wrote:
0 or 1 imo
nobody else pushed it, and also the discussion about NL arose, so I decided to hear both sides out.Sephibro wrote:
oh i forgot to make this other question to you tanz
you told that no lynch with the motivation i brought for suppoting it made sense, so why you never voted for it?
NoHitter wrote:
Vote: bmin
His "I don't want to interrupt discussions" and that pointless question struck me odd as I was skimming through the thread.
As I said, I'm not going to interrupt discussions even if it's on the barge of going out of hand, despite my hatred for it. I'll have to admit that those could be used for future reads, so I have no intentions of stopping people from gathering info.bmin11 wrote:
Well, first of, I wish you guys to keep in mind that this is just a game through communication. I would not like to have another game like Dota Mafia nor 111111 mafia. I won't be disrupting discussions just to prevent that, but I hope you guys would know where to draw the line and how not to cross it.
Why would you ask a hider where he hide?Sephibro wrote:
actually i have another case about Tanz
if you're really hider, why didn't you tell us behind who you hid tonight?
oh i forgot to mention the plurality lynch partSephibro wrote:
ok then
pushing a lynch instead of no lynch giving fake success percentages (30% instead of 12~15%)
claiming vig d1 to get towncred
not vigging anyone n1
bringing cheap excuses
because if a hider hides behind scum he passively diesDakeDekaane wrote:
Why would you ask a hider where he hide?
a) The 30% comes from assuming that some people are confirmed town.Sephibro wrote:
a) pushing a lynch instead of no lynch giving fake success percentages (30% instead of 12~15%)
b) claiming vig d1 to get towncred; not vigging anyone n1
c) bringing cheap excuses
d) oh i forgot to mention the plurality lynch part
also rEdo suddenly stopped answering after this answer
According to my somewhat reliable source of information, his PC is broken right now, but he'll a back-up one in no time. also why do people always associate me with fanderwik, fucenTanzklaue wrote:
in fact, i am interested in what farto says, as i think that farto and redo are atm the scummiest people.
Zero to one, that lynch was pretty much forced in the end.GuyInFreezer wrote:
Hey ppl
Gun to your head, how many scum off the wagon?
Why the indirectly dependent stance?bmin11 wrote:
I'm not sure if I want to buy on GIF's night action. You were quite active honestly, but you just couldn't make it for the night? That's pretty hard to swallow.
So you're voting me only because of pieguy? I still didn't see your reason for the vote on me.GuyInFreezer wrote:
I was.
But then I saw townflip and thought shooting inside of the wagon would be better (bc usually 2 scums on a wagon in a case like this)
But then so many ppl there looked town in various degrees so I got scared and went back to the outside of wagon.
Also good point to note that pie hated farto's posts before he died.
And why does it sound scummy? I had a brief thought in my mind that Oni was playing a troll-game that time and was fishing for someone to hammer him because he was SS. I didn't notice he got hammered already though.Sephibro wrote:
this post by farto sounds scummyfartownik wrote:
Oh, right. Never mind then. I smelled super saint/vengeful for a moment there.
Because I don't know your lifeGuyInFreezer wrote:
Why the indirectly dependent stance?bmin11 wrote:
I'm not sure if I want to buy on GIF's night action. You were quite active honestly, but you just couldn't make it for the night? That's pretty hard to swallow.
Yes, you are screaming scum.DakeDekaane wrote:
Wasn't I screaming scum the whole game?
Vote: fartownik
The most scummy votes in the wagon, as you even said yourself, were Sephibro's, rEdo's and Dake's.That's eventually what I reached at one time but then I realized that Sephi actually had a scumread on ONI.
This looked awfully self-centered.DakeDekaane wrote:
Can you elaborate? Otherwise you have my vote on you.
fartownik wrote:
The most scummy votes in the wagon, as you even said yourself, were Sephibro's, rEdo's and Dake's.
Sephi is trying so damn badly to insult everyone that I've began thinking it's artificial, trying to fit the meta of his usual self and cover up that random jump on the Oni wagon (justified as 'fuck it'). He's nowhere close to be helping Town as well, nowhere close to making good notices.
rEdo jumped on the wagon with "Okay then, if that's going to help, then why not." Seriously, wtf. I pointed this out yesterday already, he only voted Oni because of the circumstances and because it was the easiest thing to do. Even if he wanted to avoid a no lynch, that's not the way to go and it doesn't make it a non-plurality lynch. It's a fake one.
Dake screams scum the whole game. Can we lynch that please?
He didn't even make/have a case on me, that's why his vote on me it's bad and made me cry.fartownik wrote:
Vote: Dake
I'm voting Dake because yolo. I feel like he's scum.
nope.jpgrEdo wrote:
a) The 30% comes from assuming that some people areconfirmedleaning town.
OMGUS onlyDakeDekaane wrote:
I feel like sheeping best buddy but I have a stronger scumread on farto.
idk. I wanted to lynch that dude and only that dude since page 1. I guess that doesn't count.Sephibro wrote:
yeah it was
That is because I can't vote him after he's lynched.Sephibro wrote:
and why keeping your vote on a guy who had 2 active posts only until he got lynched?
you didn't even pressure him for more post nor asked the mod to prod him
What exactly is my scum meta? No seriously, I have no idea.Sephibro wrote:
if nh's scum im very sorry for him - he was scum in higurashi, multiball and vgc
it is true that the way he's playing fits his "scum meta" but relying on meta is shit
actually i think he was scum in every game i've played with him
Well the problem is that as is, you're using that excuse NOT to participate in most discussion. Using an excuse like that is pretty scummy IMO. If you have an input in any discussion, you should say it, not keep quiet in hopes of not "interfering". Any info/discussion not said is useless.bmin11 wrote:
As I said, I'm not going to interrupt discussions even if it's on the barge of going out of hand, despite my hatred for it. I'll have to admit that those could be used for future reads, so I have no intentions of stopping people from gathering info.bmin11 wrote:
Well, first of, I wish you guys to keep in mind that this is just a game through communication. I would not like to have another game like Dota Mafia nor 111111 mafia. I won't be disrupting discussions just to prevent that, but I hope you guys would know where to draw the line and how not to cross it.
OiSephibro wrote:
uhm now i have in mind a scenario where you are scum and one among NH and Nyquill is a scumpartner of yours
this one is an interesting questionGuyInFreezer wrote:
For a minute, put yourself in a situation where I got nightkilled and flipped town.
If then, who are the scums?
tbh I don't understand how did you give this a townread.GIF wrote:
Nyquill - I liked his "if we're lynching, it better be a full wagon" thing.
It could go either way: town wanting the most info-gain from the wagon as possible or scum telling his buddy to hop in.DakeDekaane wrote:
tbh I don't understand how did you give this a townread.GIF wrote:
Nyquill - I liked his "if we're lynching, it better be a full wagon" thing.
it would have given false (or unsecure) information to town, especially if i had died and then everyone found out that i'm not a hider. staying behind fakeclaims for any amount of time is pretty scummy, though in my case if all had worked out perfectly for me it would've been perfect to live through night 1 and give some real information on day 2.bmin11 wrote:
Now that I think about it, I don't quite understand why Tanz didn't sit behind his fake claim. Since the Tracker is gone, I could only imagine how abusive it could have been.
yes it was meNoHitter wrote:
For the record GiF, wasn't Sephi the first one to day "if we're going to lynch, make it a full wagon", and NOT Nyquill?
Ya I was saying that on the assumption of "if Tanz is scum"Tanzklaue wrote:
it would have given false (or unsecure) information to town, especially if i had died and then everyone found out that i'm not a hider. staying behind fakeclaims for any amount of time is pretty scummy, though in my case if all had worked out perfectly for me it would've been perfect to live through night 1 and give some real information on day 2.bmin11 wrote:
Now that I think about it, I don't quite understand why Tanz didn't sit behind his fake claim. Since the Tracker is gone, I could only imagine how abusive it could have been.
why should i tell you?Sephibro wrote:
so what's your actual role?
I probably need to reread aren't I <_<NoHitter wrote:
For the record GiF, wasn't Sephi the first one to day "if we're going to lynch, make it a full wagon", and NOT Nyquill?
the wagon against oni wasn't in my taste at all, and i didn't have any solid scumreads on anyone else aswell.Sephibro wrote:
Tanz: why didn't you vote anyone for the whole d1?
Si.Sephibro wrote:
also gif are you going v/la without posting any content before?
you didn't even comment the tanz case
is this for convenience?
what do you think bmin11?
i'm just trying to involve him too, looks like he needs to be asked to post for actually postingGuyInFreezer wrote:
Also I saw you wanting to talk to bmin about it, so I'm not responding to it for now.
it was meGuyInFreezer wrote:
So whoever said NH was playing his scum meta, explain pls?
bmin wrote:
I would like to take the chance to lynch, despite reasons you have explained (which are valid). My reasons would be 1) It's one of our limited ways to actually kill a mafia and our opportunity to lynch shouldn't be wasted (we are being chased by time after all). 2) Lynch is arguably an uncontrollable factor for mafia. Yes, they can vote, but we have the majority. We shouldn't be playing scared. 3) We can't fully rely on night actions even though it's early in the game. It is highly speculated that the game is power madness, but at the same time, it is pretty clear that Jinxy tried his best to make a balance set up. Normally, a power madness results in townies getting too much info from night actions (hosts were slightly biased towards town most cases), so I'm afraid Jinxy may have done something about it and that makes me worried. Other reasons are solely based on possibility (mostly set up speculation), so I wouldn't put it as my reason, but I would be a lot more comfortable with taking the lynch opportunity rather then NL.
End of Day 1 Votecountvote: bmin
- O n i - (7) - GuyInFreezer, pieguy1372, NoHitter, Nyquill, rEdo, Sephibro, DakeDekaane
Sephibro (1) - - O n i -
DakeDekaane (1) - fartownik
bmin11 (1) - Raging Bull
What I saw in his meta was something different.Sephibro wrote:
it was meGuyInFreezer wrote:
So whoever said NH was playing his scum meta, explain pls?
but i also said "meta" is a very volatile and unreliable thing
btw i noticed that in his games as scum, NH plays lurking a lot and trying to draw as little attention as he can
i've never played with him town i guess, but from what i saw in stacking the deck, his townplay is much more proactive towards scumhunting and also more reckless
L-3GuyInFreezer wrote:
vote: bmin
Choo choo
I also played in touhou pyp IV, mystery mafia (ignore that one, i don't even know how i screwed myself this badly), Lucid Dreamers (don't remember much from that game) and information mafia (died night 1, so yeah).Sephibro wrote:
i dont remember anyone saying that
btw he's active on unusual mechanics and he played in stacking the deck iirc
my first forum mafia gameTanzklaue wrote:
information mafia (died night 1, so yeah).