READ PEOPLE, get the best out of what has been said in D1 and vote for someone you think is scum. D1 has 20 pages, don't tell me you can't get ANYTHING by reading them. That's the base of this game in which you lynch scum, with your logic we could be as well no lynching everyday and that wouldn't give us any chance of getting scum.Sephibro wrote:
try to convince me that lynching is better, fartoSephibro wrote:
1. people have an average of 10~15 posts each (included pre-start posts) and 4 people (fartownik, rEdo, bmin11, - O n i -) have less than 5 posts. A lynch would give us 0 or nearly 0 information
2. this is most likely role madness, so if we lynch someone who's not scum, we lynch a pr
3. this is most likely role madness, so if someone gets pressured and has a brain, he will claim his role for sure -> we'll have to change wagon and restart from the beginning, we don't have enough time for that and i don't support this way of playing
This is pretty much similar to what we were talking about a few days ago on IRC.
Also all of your points from this quote are invalid. 1. Lynch is ALWAYS informative., 2. The argument of being too afraid of losing PRs while nolynching is always stupid and I will always call it stupid. PRs are important, but not as important to block a lynch from happening., 3. I can see it only being legit when someone claims a pro-town role only, which is likely to happen in a very few cases in a game (also GiF already claimed Vig which is a pro-Town role so the probability of this is even lower). Also in the end, we shouldn't look at roles themselves when lynching but rather at the behavior of a player.
)
