GuyInFreezer wrote:

Because I'm Mion's unlyncher.
And flavor is Oryou. (I don't even know who Shion is)

Sephibro wrote:

now in my top5
NH > Rantai > farto > Sakura > BRBP , DD follows

How about a mass nameclaim? not a fullclaim
does anybody think it would be useful? yes - why? no - why?

fartownik wrote:

To Zexion: You should ask for a replacement, because what you're doing right now will only get you lynched (and if you're Town it's not gonna be good).

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Because Mion is guaranteed to not die.
My wincon is to survive with Mion.

fartownik wrote:

I thought Sephibro + rEdo was exceptionally plausible because of the votecount. It just hit me straight in the head. Sephibro was being pressured with 5 votes on him, he had to get the attention on someone else, he picked on Sakura then. rEdo's FoS on Sakura was rather convenient, and obviously he had to put another FoS on someone else not to have a single one just on her. I find both weak tbh.

fartownik wrote:

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Because Mion is guaranteed to not die.
My wincon is to survive with Mion.

Not to die from a lynch. And that's not even guaranteed since you have just one vote and one voice. The person that's Mion will most likely be nightkilled after it claims since the Unlynchee is usually Town.

rEdo wrote:

do you have anything else to say besides your funny "reaction tests" and blatantly tagging to the wagons with the most people on them?

fartownik wrote:

Perhaps she's mad with the Hinamizawa Syndrome (huehue).

fartownik wrote:

If she's got Satoshi's bat... hm... who might she be?

rEdo wrote:

not sure if trying to fakeclaim, or... oh well

Unvote

you'll prove yourself soon.

Sephibro wrote:

there's one thing that worries me: Blue Yoshi posted on his mafia QT the 10th October

Sephibro wrote:

Also Rantai why don't you read every post?

Sephibro wrote:

you've not read many posts, and not only mine

vote Rantai

already been addressed to my satisfaction

Irreversible wrote:

Could you explain why, GIF?

Will Blue Yoshi be replaced sometime? Because if sephi is right.. well 8 days are quite much to be inactive here

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Why do you want to lynch claimed doctor again?

GuyInFreezer wrote:

@Irre
Why would anyone scumread anyone with that reason ever?

pieguy1372 wrote:

are you implying actions determine intent? cause it's the other way around, intent determines actions

rEdo wrote:

four last posts looked like you were defending from pieguy too much about that case, which irks me a lot.

NoHitter wrote:

Also Sakura, nice bat. Though why did you claim your character role?

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Why do you want to lynch claimed doctor again?

DakeDekaane wrote:

Target me this night Sephibro, if you don't do it, you're scum in my eyes, I'm willing to trust you today, even if you're playing in a bad way.

Zexion wrote:

My vote was random but after a read throughout the thread I can tell that Sephibro is so far just acussing with reasons I couldn't explain myself, I mean really, did Raging Bull ask to be replaced just because he was mafia and couldn't read the QT?

Zexion wrote:

I believe Sakura is just making reaction tests. Pressure is put upon you when you are voted and often people say something they shouldn't have to. Anyways, seems like a good investigation. Pretty obvious Sephibro is scum, he just contradicted himself way too many times. And his reasons are just... meh.

DakeDekaane wrote:

Oops, my bad. I'm too used to dd/mm. But omg the 19.

Unvote
Vote: Sephibro

I have a stronger scum read on him and I'm still sticking with it.

inb4 Dake is scum.

Rantai wrote:

DD's one was the strangest of the 5, I understand a NL is bad but did you even have any reasons to vote him other than "oh he's got a wagon"?

DakeDekaane wrote:

I'm ok with a policy lynch on BRBP, BUT Sephibro doesn't like them, what to do?

DakeDekaane wrote:

pieguy actually doesn't look so town after voting BRBP when he thinks he's town, what did you expect to get from his lynch?

rEdo wrote:

oh well, let's see how THIS works.

Vote: Sakura
do you have anything else to say besides your funny "reaction tests" and blatantly tagging to the wagons with the most people on them?

Rantai wrote:

The fact it's tunneling is indicative of very little. But the fact it's based on something as weak as meta makes it something else completely. If you had actually based it on something solid then I wouldn't be so uncomfortable with it.

Rantai wrote:

Try again though.

Sephibro wrote:

inb4 scum with pgo-like passive

Sephibro wrote:

at this point, scum are among NH Rantai farto DD for me

pieguy1372 wrote:

I don't like this train of thought - seems like he wants to put suspicion on someone just for jumping on a wagon, when such a thing really isn't always bad. and yes I still say there are situations where it's good to just jump on a wagon.

I'm not debating whether or not a wagon jump is good (I have no opinion on it). I'm more concerned about reason behind the vote. As it stands I have never liked people using crappy or no reasons to vote because that means they can simply vote the flavour of the hour and fly under the radar if not scrutinised. Even "pressure" is something I guess, but in his case it was simply because "he had a wagon" which is simply nothing.

Of course after I asked him about it (please note this is after the fact), he provided a so-so reason which doesn't reek of scum so I let it go (though saying "pieguy brought up good points" has me thinking again, now that you mention it, I'll have to dwell on it a bit).

I'll be watching in the future for any double standards you make, however.


oh great not the meta debate again. you're not going to change my position that meta is valid :>

I still believe meta is weak at best. We're going to have to meet half way here.

this seems like a really defensive reaction. not sure if it's alignment indicative or not

I'm being condescending towards him for good reason. What reason? His plans are dumb and he refuses to listen to reason.

fartownik wrote:

Also Sephibro calls me scum again without explanation

CalignoBot wrote:

Be careful of needles in your ohagi.

Sephibro wrote:

CalignoBot wrote:

Be careful of needles in your ohagi.

I think this could have something to do with game later, but I'm not telling more, who knows flavor maybe understood what I mean

Sakura wrote:

Inb4 it's meant to scare me.

GuyInFreezer wrote:

Zexion
Let's do this then. Save mod some trouble.

Irreversible wrote:

Guy, what do you exactly mean ? Like which ones I would lynch and which ones not?

Sephibro wrote:

Irreversible wrote:

Guy, what do you exactly mean ? Like which ones I would lynch and which ones not?

Not Lynching = i'm not gonna wagon
Ok with lynching = i will wagon if needed
Willing to lynch = people i want to vote

Sephibro wrote:

fartownik wrote:

Also Sephibro calls me scum again without explanation

It's not that hard to understand, i got there for elimination, since this was the situation before: