sheela901 wrote:

[Rare's Hard]
01:05:310 (1) - Line with 01:04:944 (6) i'll fix it if anybody else says so
01:56:346 (5) - Maybe stack it it's intentional
02:28:724 (1) - Stack with 02:26:712 (9) i dont like stack very much.
03:19:578 (4) - At the end, add a Finish I'm following the drum.
03:47:200 (4) - Not well stack it's intensional
03:56:346 (4) - Stack with 03:55:432 (1) ^

Papysh wrote:

Rare's Hard ~
01:12:261 (4) - Rotate it by -5 I don't understand difference.
02:59:090 (6) - Remove NC fixed
02:59:822 (1) - Nc here o3o fixed

CDFA wrote:

Hard:
00:06:956 (2) - No fun overlap here ;a; it doesn't matter i think.
00:32:566 (5) - This might be a bit awkward for a hard added new combo.
02:28:907 (2) - WOAH WELL HELLO THERE like this jump doesn't really seem fitting at all and can be EASILY avoided i want keep my current pattern.

GrayKaiser82 wrote:

Hi ~ From my queue

Well... there's nothing i can mod here since this map is REALLY perfect for newbies. but i hope the Collab diff is passable o_o

Anyways, have a "Good Luck" star ~

Rukario wrote:

[Rare's Hard]
- Very good difficulty, nice flow, very natural. Just a few minor things I'd like to clean up:
01:56:346 (5) - Maybe stack that on the previous sliderend? Looks cleaner imo it's intensional
02:12:444 (6) - ^ ^
02:24:334 (1,2,3) - This felt a bit awkward when playing, but looking back at it it makes sense, timing wise. Don't quite know what to change about this to make it feel right. i got it
03:47:200 (4) - Maybe stack that on the previous sliderend? Looks cleaner imo it's intensional

Rukario wrote:

Random Mod
[General]
The Aspect ratio of your BG atm is 16:10 which is unrankable. It'd be great if you could change it to one that is either 16:9 or 4:3.
actually it's rankable

[Normal]
- I think this needs an easier diff -- If you want to keep the current one as the easiest, then it needs some changes. Let me know what you decide on.
I think it's fine like this..

[Collab]
Very fun to play, not too many issues:
00:05:127 (3) - Either make this a New Combo or move the rest of the combo a bit further away, that anti-jump is a bit confusing without a New Combo. Fixed
03:47:200 (1,2,3,4) - I'm just pointing this out because I thought it was a really good idea^^ Like this a lot.
:D

That's pretty much all. Call me back when you decided on your Normal.

Sonnyc wrote:

Here goes the real mod.

Normal:
01:53:419 (3) - 1 Grid up ok

Collab:

00:05:127 (3) - Since this is an anti jump, an NC won't hurt. ok
02:08:602 (1) - Why is this NC? removed
03:13:267 - I think here needs a note, according to the song. yup
03:13:907 (7,8) - Rather making this a 1/4 slider jump, placing the jump in 03:13:724 (5,7) feels better. ok
03:55:066 (1,1) - Make spacing like 03:49:212 (1,1)? ok
03:59:182 (4) - NC. This is in the blue line, and is confusing to hit since the rhythm wasn't as expected. nah it's fine

-- Nice diff which was fun to play, but I didn't enjoyed the 1/4 slider jumps(since I'm not so pro to manage that pattern :<).

dkun wrote:

Card Captor Madoka doesn't exist. This is the third opening of "Cardcaptor Sakura", please fix the source. (I saw the ranked version, it's also wrong)
Other then that, I don't have any qualms with this map.

Feel free to call me back!

Zero__wind wrote:

5 mods for bubble :3 huehue
Mythol so pro~
＊ before it got ranked~
Aoi Yuuki so moe~

Sonnyc wrote:

Rare's Hard:

00:08:968 (9) - I think whistle would rather suit at the head, than the end. i'm following the hi-hat of drum.
01:08:237 (1) - I think the jump is too far. Consider putting the head of the slider at (336,344). i don't think so
02:02:017 (4) - ctrl+G will be better in spacing. changed placement by myself
02:28:724 (1,2) - I can't understand this jump, it fits nowhere D: PLEASE make a change for this. I don't think you should keep this. i want keep my current pattern
03:13:267 - Adding a note will be better, but no need to. no changed
03:59:182 (4) - Same as <Collab>. mythol didn't fix it, i don't fix it too.

-- Either there was some jumps, most felt quite nice and not too tough. Nice job.

alacat wrote:

goヽ(；▽；)ノgo

Darksonic wrote:

Isn't the source "Card Captor Madoka" ?

Darksonic wrote:

Isn't the source "Card Captor Madoka" ?

Ultimate wrote:

xasdfasf

peppy wrote:

This is shit. Why would you remap a map which already has two perfectly playable versions with something like this? What ever happened to good mapping ,

Blue Dragon wrote:

peppy wrote:

What ever happened to good mapping ,

What happened to good mapping indeed

peppy wrote:

This is shit. Why would you remap a map which already has two perfectly playable versions with something like this? What ever happened to good mapping , Two of these difficulties aren't even yours. Did you check the quality? Did you realise how bad they were to play?

Blue Dragon wrote:

2013: no one cares about following the song, making a "fun jumpy map" is what players want

peppy wrote:

This is shit. Why would you remap a map which already has two perfectly playable versions with something like this? What ever happened to good mapping , Two of these difficulties aren't even yours. Did you check the quality? Did you realise how bad they were to play?

peppy wrote:

This is shit. Why would you remap a map which already has two perfectly playable versions with something like this? What ever happened to good mapping , Two of these difficulties aren't even yours. Did you check the quality? Did you realise how bad they were to play?

peppy wrote:

This is shit. Why would you remap a map which already has two perfectly playable versions with something like this? What ever happened to good mapping , Two of these difficulties aren't even yours. Did you check the quality? Did you realise how bad they were to play?

no one cares

peppy wrote:

This is shit. Why would you remap a map which already has two perfectly playable versions with something like this? What ever happened to good mapping , Two of these difficulties aren't even yours. Did you check the quality? Did you realise how bad they were to play?

peppy wrote:

This is shit. Why would you remap a map which already has two perfectly playable versions with something like this? What ever happened to good mapping , Two of these difficulties aren't even yours. Did you check the quality? Did you realise how bad they were to play?

peppy wrote:

Why would you remap a map which already has two perfectly playable versions with something like this?

Blue Dragon wrote:

peppy wrote:

This is shit. Why would you remap a map which already has two perfectly playable versions with something like this? What ever happened to good mapping ,

2013: no one cares about following the song, making a "fun jumpy map" is what players want

What happened to good mapping indeed