Mionix Naos 5000 must be really awesome, then. 450 > all, too.
^^^^masood wrote:
I'm surprised at all the people who pay for nice mice then max their windows sensitivity. In fact, as a long time fps player it terrifies me.
Here is a good article for those wishing to make the most of their mouse:
http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1846538
Anyways, I have a Logitech g9x @ 2000 dpi with 6/11 windows sensitivity.
fingertip grip / no angle snapping / MarkC Acceleration fix / no precision enhance / default osu sensitivity
Yeah... Isn't that weird? You spent the money on a good gaming mouse, and you set your windows sensitivity above or below 6 when you are perfectly capable of adjusting DPI instead? Why do this to yourself!? The only explanation is that these people do not research how mouse settings work, and so they think that it is all automatic and doesn't need to be tuned in any one way. It is the kind of attitude people give to tools when they don't understand the art that the tool applies to.masood wrote:
I'm surprised at all the people who pay for nice mice then max their windows sensitivity. In fact, as a long time fps player it terrifies me.
Here is a good article for those wishing to make the most of their mouse:
http://www.esreality.com/?a=post&id=1846538
Anyways, I have a Logitech g9x @ 2000 dpi with 6/11 windows sensitivity.
fingertip grip / no angle snapping / MarkC Acceleration fix / no precision enhance / default osu sensitivity
Use 2100/4= 525dpi with 6/11 sensitivity.Arnold0 wrote:
What's the problem with windows being at other settings than 6/11 ?
I'm using a mouse with changeable DPI's, I use it at 2100 DPI but windows at 3/11 (Acceleration ticked off but never applyed any fixes)
(If someone can explain me the benefit for using 6/11 instead of 3/11 I would like to know the exact DPI I must use with 6/11 for having the same feel as now)
With 5/11, 7/11, 9/11 and 11/11. You have a 50% chance of being off by 1 pixel + there may be pixel skipping.Purple wrote:
I use non 6/11 as well. Is the precision loss substantial or are we talking about just a 3/4 chance of being off by 1 pixel?
8/11 skips every second pixel, but otherwise is fine. If your mouse has adjustable DPI it would benefit your accuracy if you went 6/11 and used double of what you have now.[AirCoN] wrote:
I use 8/11, and you haven't mentioned anything about that
Pretty sure a 400dpi mouse takes 6.5cm to move across a 1024x768 screen, but that's besides the point. I guess it's something you get used to, it's actually not as tiring as people seem to think.Lelion wrote:
I just don't get how people can play with dpi as low as 450. You get so much faster tired in your hand, and you have to move your hand like 20 cms just to get to the other side of the screen. I use 1700 dpi now(changed up to 6/11 windows speed) and I really can not see my self ever using anything lower.
Thanks for that info. My mouse is a cheap one I got for $5, so it doesn't have adjustable DPI. However, skipping every second pixel doesn't seem like that big of a deal, seeing how hitcircles would always be larger than 1 pixel, and the only problem that can arise is missing the edge of a circle.YayMii wrote:
8/11 skips every second pixel, but otherwise is fine. If your mouse has adjustable DPI it would benefit your accuracy if you went 6/11 and used double of what you have now.[AirCoN] wrote:
I use 8/11, and you haven't mentioned anything about that
@Full Tablet: Windows doesn't use floating point for cursor position AFAIK... It would be more beneficial to find the DPI that your mouse tracks best at (which is usually not the max DPI) and use that in combination with a good, comfortable setting at 6/11 or below (excluding 5/11 due to uneven-ness) instead of using an inaccurate setting to pointlessly drop pixels.
to be fair he's newAccountWontWork wrote:
6 yil bro