)400 would just be plain excessive. I think 50's good enough.ArmandoR wrote:
ok, we all get the idea of this being awesome, so lets stop making comments about if yes or no, and lets ask something more productive.
How many ranks will it display? i think 40 is ok, but 400 wouldn´t be imposible
will they have replays? not needed
Will de webpage have the same option one day? it could, and probably will happen before applying it in osu! itself
What about the small countries?they wont reach 40 for each song, but is there really a problem with that? there are songs with less than 40 taiko plays, but there is no problem with those...
So should it be implemented? YES please!
That's a trade-off I would be willing to accept, but peppy hasn't said anything in this thread yet, so we don't know if trade-offs are going to be necessary.Drafura wrote:
Just filter the 400 wich are already in the ranking.
That is true, filtering on the client side has that advantage.Drafura wrote:
He said in the friend filtered scoreboard request that he could have performance issues (adding new indexed tables to the database etc...), The problem here is going to be the same as for friend only ranking. Filtering in local could be the solution.
this game is dead | why should we care about new playersthe logic
Wow, that's a brilliant argumentation.Macacito wrote:
new players= new admins since the current ones suck, new mappers since the current ones suck, new osu design since the current one suck, etcetcetc
