Sakura wrote:

Might as well let RBRat3 become our official achievement graphic creator

Derekku wrote:

Well that's not very fair to Ballance, now is it? :p

They'll have to fight for the title :v (or both have it)

RBRat3 wrote:

Cheesus this is was way too tight for my taste XD

RBRat3 wrote:

Ballance wrote:

http://puu.sh/YnY6
im also doing my best !

bomber34 wrote:

RBRat3 wrote:

the idea is great but i don't know ._. the face looks weird.
The rest looks great

Derekku wrote:

I love this thread more and more each day. Great job to both of you!

Ballance wrote:

image
its 1:30 now ,i find some problem with it but i submit it in advance
go to sleep Zzz

theowest wrote:

Ballance wrote:

image
its 1:30 now ,i find some problem with it but i submit it in advance
go to sleep Zzz

transparent background? heart outlines?

Mercurial wrote:

Congratz RBRat3

RBRat3 wrote:

Huh I didnt even notice, Probably would have never noticed XD

JInxyjem wrote:

Hm, maybe the older secret achievements could get some touch-ups too, like Non-stop Dancer. Not enough Pippi there I'd say

XK2238 wrote:

What does 'non-flattened' mean? Do we have to keep all the layers as they were from the template?

Doodley wrote:

Still not sure if it's obvious that she's doing the "rock on" hand positions, but maybe I'm overthinking it.

Soaprman wrote:

Doodley wrote:

Still not sure if it's obvious that she's doing the "rock on" hand positions, but maybe I'm overthinking it.

Maybe have the fingers facing forward. This would also make it much more visible at the resolution it'd eventually be shrunk down to.

Ballance wrote:

XPJ38 wrote:

Ballance wrote:

image

Love it! But gosh, what a huge forefinger

RBRat3 wrote:

Heres somewhat of a feature request but more of an idea to throw around. what about doubling the rez to 266x206 but keeping its physical size representation the same as it is now on the page and having the image scale to size on mouse hover?

Doodley wrote:

I can't say I like it when it's small though, I think it lacks defined outlines. I'm not sure. I could never work at a res as small as the achievement graphics, so I just drew it at a size similar to Ballance's.

SPOILER

RBRat3 wrote:

Doodley wrote:

I can't say I like it when it's small though, I think it lacks defined outlines. I'm not sure. I could never work at a res as small as the achievement graphics, so I just drew it at a size similar to Ballance's.

XD am I the only one that does? I hate collapsed pixels...
http://i.imgur.com/i7xLo.png

inverness wrote:

May I try?



I know this one sucks and needs moar improvements ><

Doodley wrote:

Doodley wrote:

Thanks.

Also, I think my take on Obsessed could probably also work with Dedication.

Derekku wrote:

Doodley wrote:

Thanks.

Also, I think my take on Obsessed could probably also work with Dedication.

Actually, there's another achievement (that hasn't been listed in this thread yet) that your "Obsessed" art would be PERFECT for! If multiple people are going to be making artwork, then we should try to avoid duplicates/overlapping each other. :p

Derekku wrote:

Doodley wrote:

Thanks.

Also, I think my take on Obsessed could probably also work with Dedication.

Actually, there's another achievement (that hasn't been listed in this thread yet) that your "Obsessed" art would be PERFECT for! If multiple people are going to be making artwork, then we should try to avoid duplicates/overlapping each other. :p

RBRat3 wrote:

I thought they were chosen by how aesthetically fitting it was not by first come first serve?

Doodley wrote:

It's more like there's a lot of good art being contributed for one achievement, and it would be better to use all of the art for different achievements rather than just take one of them and skip the others.

RBRat3 wrote:

Doodley wrote:

It's more like there's a lot of good art being contributed for one achievement, and it would be better to use all of the art for different achievements rather than just take one of them and skip the others.

I dont see a problem with skipping others for one that fits the best, hell I was about to do another dedication I can pop them out like a pez dispenser
If someone out do's my ideas I would like that persons work published instead of mine it wouldn't seem right for me to be chosen on the basis that I did it first let alone set an avoidance in place to deter a person from producing a work that may or may not be superior to mine.

Aslo all requests have been filled so I don't see a problem with dupes at this point since the demands has been satisfied.

Doodley wrote:

Yeah. It's just that it can be tough to make a choice between two excellent entries, and it's easy enough to just use art from one achievement for another. Best of both worlds, you know?

Doodley wrote:

popner wrote:

Doodley wrote:

Such an ugly one, just like a worm wriggling on pippi's face.

Bittersweet wrote:

Its creepy. May look better if you use main screen instead, but i'm not sure.

Bittersweet wrote:

Its creepy. May look better if you use main screen instead, but i'm not sure.

SPOILER

Doodley wrote:

I like how nobody in this community can ever give constructive criticism regarding art unless it's a beatmap.

jamujamu wrote:

Generalization.

jamujamu wrote:

Work scales badly. Share anyway. Might vector it and any others I do.

SPOILER

Derekku wrote:

inverness wrote:

May I try?



I know this one sucks and needs moar improvements ><

Cute, but we're looking for original artwork. :p

inverness wrote:

There's no rules and guidelines on the frontpage that stated we have to draw our own artwork here.

MillhioreF wrote:

inverness wrote:

There's no rules and guidelines on the frontpage that stated we have to draw our own artwork here.

http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/1460621

MillhioreF wrote:

inverness wrote:

There's no rules and guidelines on the frontpage that stated we have to draw our own artwork here.

http://osu.ppy.sh/forum/p/1460621

theowest wrote:

I was really hoping for jamujamu to win.

peppy wrote:

Accepting Doodley's "Obsessed"

Accepting RBRat3's "Nonstop" (the pippi one, although the other is very usable too. i mostly chose the pippi one due to the anti-aliasing artifacts on the hard diagonals of the panel on the arrow one, for what it's worth. i know this could easily be fixed.)

Thinking Ballance's "Obsessed" works better for "dedication" from a conceptual perspective, and would like to use it still. Does anyone disagree with this move?

Really like RBRat3's "jack of all trades" except the cards have no jack showing, which makes it a bit weird. Are there enough pixels to show a "J" + suit on the top-most card or something?

Thanks for the awesome submissions guys. You are making this hard (to judge ).

Could the winning entries please send over the PSDs at earliest convenience.

theowest wrote:

I was really hoping for jamujamu to win.

jamujamu wrote:

I threw a few cards together for the hell of it. If I can think of ideas for each number I might just finish the set.

A colourless proof of concept:

theowest wrote:

jamujamu wrote:

I threw a few cards together for the hell of it. If I can think of ideas for each number I might just finish the set.

A colourless proof of concept:

I think you should be able to see more than just the osu icon. More game modes.

theowest wrote:

I think you should be able to see more than just the osu icon. More game modes.

bomber34 wrote:

maybe just 3 cards with all game mode icons like theowest suggested?

theowest wrote:

I don't see the point with 2 extra osu ones. Three or four would be enough (+ osu!mania?)

You are going to add more colour, right?

jamujamu wrote:

I can't find a place for much colour since these icons aren't very colourful to begin with, so it may not be the best choice in that respect.

jamujamu wrote:

I can't find a place for much colour since these icons aren't very colourful to begin with, so it may not be the best choice in that respect. osu!mania currently has no icon (?) so I don't have anything to vector for that.



I'll have to come back to this since I'm out of time to work on it right now. I appreciate the advice.

jamujamu wrote:

I can't find a place for much colour since these icons aren't very colourful to begin with, so it may not be the best choice in that respect. osu!mania currently has no icon (?) so I don't have anything to vector for that.



I'll have to come back to this since I'm out of time to work on it right now. I appreciate the advice.

Galkan wrote:

This is sweeeeeet! If only icons were coloured (like they are present in game) it'd be even more awesome.
Also, the Taiko Jack is red, while others are black.

theowest wrote:

How about you nudge the two cards on the side down a bit, so that they don't all blend together on the top.
I was thinking of having the original colours. Pink for osu, green or red apple and maybe an orange drum?

Winshley wrote:

I think the osu! logo can be left with red instead, along with either Jack of Heart or Jack of Diamond. You can leave the rest as black with Jack of Spade and Jack of Clubs.

peppy wrote:

This is great.

Doodley wrote:

EDIT: BUT, red might work a little nicer for Taiko than a brown. Green pink red.

theowest wrote:

Doodley wrote:

EDIT: BUT, red might work a little nicer for Taiko than a brown. Green pink red.

I disagree. Red is too close in colour to pink. Taiko drums are orange/brown, right?

Mithost wrote:

It also helps define the center of the image better by emphasizing a centerpiece

Doodley wrote:

It's perfect. Crazy how much input is going into this, but this is the beauty of constructive criticism. (also why we have the modding system)

Go with Mithost's input and it's perfect.