how am I supposed to hammer when you guys Unvote?
forum
Crazy Mafia 2 [Mafia (Townie) Win!]
posted
Total Posts
163
Not just that, it seems like you're quoting the obvious but you meant more. You know you're accusing LS there, so I'd go ahead and say you're now scumpainting LS by that subtle hint (since LS DID wait until one more person claimed, and that one more person before LS was you.)0_o wrote:
With regards to Pas's attack against me, keep in mind I was the second person to claim, and that was after you claimed you knew of Bagel's innocence. If I were the traitor I would waited until at least one more person claimed, since I would have no way of knowing if the rest of the mafia received extra information as well, and if this was the case I would have been screwed.
You better come up with a far stronger defence of yourself soon, really... This just won't cut it.
So my defense of myself is "stating the obvious?" Shouldn't that mean I'm obviously not mafia? =/Pasonia wrote:
Not just that, it seems like you're quoting the obvious but you meant more. You know you're accusing LS there, so I'd go ahead and say you're now scumpainting LS by that subtle hint (since LS DID wait until one more person claimed, and that one more person before LS was you.)
You better come up with a far stronger defence of yourself soon, really... This just won't cut it.
And I wasn't sending subliminal scumplanting messages, I was saying facts. And yes, they do incriminate LadySuburu, which makes her most likely to be the traitor with the knowledge we have.
vote LadySuburu
In fact I am almost positive that LadySuburu is the traitor, even ignoring who you and BagelBob got innocent results for:
-Pas and BagelBob I cleared here
-I don't believe Derekku knew about the "No Result" possibility for Cop investigations until this game (since I am fairly certain this is the first time he has been a cop, and No Result hasn't come up in any of the games him/we have played so far, as far as I know). Also (WIFOM warning) if you a traitor claiming cop, why not give actual results?
-and I'm clear because I know I am
Also Pasonia, No Lynch is not the way to go here, if we don't lynch someone tonight we will be at LyLo tomorrow (unless my protection is successful), and we will have 4 people to choose from instead of 3.
Topic Starter
Two no-lynches brings you to three players, with an extra Night, but only once chance of killing the Mafia (ignoring aux roles).0_o wrote:
Also Pasonia, No Lynch is not the way to go here, if we don't lynch someone tonight we will be at LyLo tomorrow (unless my protection is successful), and we will have 4 people to choose from instead of 3.
Yes, but the 2 people who die those nights are guaranteed to be pro-mafia, whereas if we do a lynch tonight there is a chance we hit the traitor, and we get a second chance we aren't not correct.strager wrote:
Two no-lynches brings you to three players, with an extra Night, but only once chance of killing the Mafia (ignoring aux roles).0_o wrote:
Also Pasonia, No Lynch is not the way to go here, if we don't lynch someone tonight we will be at LyLo tomorrow (unless my protection is successful), and we will have 4 people to choose from instead of 3.
The only reason we would want an extra night is for an extra cop investigation. Thing is though, if Derekku really is the cop then I would get NK'd the first night, leaving Derekku open to get NK'd night 2, and that still only leaves us with one investigation.
So unless I'm missing something here, No Lynch won't do us a bit of good.
Also, I don't think the mod is supposed to contribute to the discussion..
Here's why I see something wrong here. Assuming that I am indeed the traitor, and there's no sanity problems, here's how things would look.
Pasoinia - Mafia with innocent on BB (Mostly clear due to posting this first, and followed by a similar claim.)
BagelBob - Mafia with innocent on Derekku cleared by Pasonia.
Already, if the two above are true, the Mafia win instantly, as the only possible results are me and 0_o.
Not only do we have those two, but we have this as well.
0_o - Mafia Doctor
Derekku - Mafia Cop with unknown on Pasonia
So, in this theoretical situation, We've got not only two/three confirmed innocents, but a cop and a doctor as well?
As another note, I find it humorously funny, though frustrating, that I'm the only one here without any sort of power or "extra knowledge".
Now, I have to write a paper, but I'll be back with more either later tonight or tomorrow. (Or earlier if I can fit a post in.)
Pasoinia - Mafia with innocent on BB (Mostly clear due to posting this first, and followed by a similar claim.)
BagelBob - Mafia with innocent on Derekku cleared by Pasonia.
Already, if the two above are true, the Mafia win instantly, as the only possible results are me and 0_o.
Not only do we have those two, but we have this as well.
0_o - Mafia Doctor
Derekku - Mafia Cop with unknown on Pasonia
So, in this theoretical situation, We've got not only two/three confirmed innocents, but a cop and a doctor as well?
As another note, I find it humorously funny, though frustrating, that I'm the only one here without any sort of power or "extra knowledge".
Now, I have to write a paper, but I'll be back with more either later tonight or tomorrow. (Or earlier if I can fit a post in.)
Topic Starter
I can do as I wish. I'm just a ... hallucination. =]0_o wrote:
Also, I don't think the mod is supposed to contribute to the discussion..
Hey Suburu, that's a great set-up you have there, but, umm, it includes you being scum. Do you have anything where someone else is scum?
To cut a long story short it's that I'm only left with 0_o or LS to suspect against. Please, more from LS please. What you did back there was only regurgitating known information...
Here's some possibilities of setups where I am not scum. Some is pure speculation, and WIFOMY, but it's really all I have.
A: Pasonia's information was false. BB is scum and Derekku is innocent. BB copied Pasonia's statement. Unlikely due to a statement early on when voting for Derekku. (Though, that vote is contradictory.)
B: Bagel's information was false. Derekku is scum.
C: 0_o fake claimed. 0_o is our scum.
D: Pas is scum. strager provided an addition to Pas's PM which contained the version of the role PM bagel was sent, with no name attached. (Possibly with name attached, would work too.) Pas claimed first to "confirm" self as town, and chose to claim BB innocent.
I have nothing solid, and having no abilities nothing much else to give. Those are the only situations I can think of as possible.
Final WIFOM statement: If I were scum, why not have claimed similar to Pasonia? Scum know who is and is not innocent.
Meh.
A: Pasonia's information was false. BB is scum and Derekku is innocent. BB copied Pasonia's statement. Unlikely due to a statement early on when voting for Derekku. (Though, that vote is contradictory.)
B: Bagel's information was false. Derekku is scum.
C: 0_o fake claimed. 0_o is our scum.
D: Pas is scum. strager provided an addition to Pas's PM which contained the version of the role PM bagel was sent, with no name attached. (Possibly with name attached, would work too.) Pas claimed first to "confirm" self as town, and chose to claim BB innocent.
I have nothing solid, and having no abilities nothing much else to give. Those are the only situations I can think of as possible.
Final WIFOM statement: If I were scum, why not have claimed similar to Pasonia? Scum know who is and is not innocent.
Meh.
Ahem, yes, that first vote came because I had yet to talk to strager. At first I thought "innocent" meant traitor since, you know, this is crazy Mafia and we are the Mafia, so Guilty would mean one of us. strager cleared it up. That conversation ended with strager telling me that I couldn't post "PANTS PANTS PANTS PANTS".
I'd like to assume that strager was telling the truth, as otherwise he would be a Bastard.
I know option A to not be the correct set-up, and it looks like a majority thinks similarly.
I'd like to believe option B to be false, as I'd like to believe that strager is not a Bastard.
I'll give it a 3% chance of being true.
I have no way to prove or disprove option C. I'll give it a 45% chance of being true.
I'd like to append option D, then refute it. The basic set-up here is that the cop has both a doctor and someone who can confirm the cop's innocence. I'd say it's possible that Pasonia received a list of Everyone's roll. It would make story-sense because the Traitor is one of us, so should know us well. I further think that since this is crazy mafia, strager might have made the doctor insane. Or the option where he kills if his protection fails. That's what I would have done anyway. This is further supported, but not confirmed, by Derekku getting roleblocked. (I'm pretty sure that's what happened)
With only a 1 in 4 chance of hitting the cop, this game would be a 75% win chance for the town on day 1 and probably even higher on day 2 (ignoring day 2, unless of course the Traitor AND the doctor killed N0, in which case there would be no day 2) anyway, that ends my append of "if the Traitor is Pasonia, he knows more than just my role" story
Now, I think it is unlikely that Pasonia is lying because she choose me to Buddy with me, and I mean come on; that's totally out of character. Unless he spent those last two games making me think he hates me personally and really doesn't, in which case that's extremely something. I'll give it a 2% chance.
I'd like to assume that strager was telling the truth, as otherwise he would be a Bastard.
I know option A to not be the correct set-up, and it looks like a majority thinks similarly.
I'd like to believe option B to be false, as I'd like to believe that strager is not a Bastard.
I'll give it a 3% chance of being true.
I have no way to prove or disprove option C. I'll give it a 45% chance of being true.
I'd like to append option D, then refute it. The basic set-up here is that the cop has both a doctor and someone who can confirm the cop's innocence. I'd say it's possible that Pasonia received a list of Everyone's roll. It would make story-sense because the Traitor is one of us, so should know us well. I further think that since this is crazy mafia, strager might have made the doctor insane. Or the option where he kills if his protection fails. That's what I would have done anyway. This is further supported, but not confirmed, by Derekku getting roleblocked. (I'm pretty sure that's what happened)
With only a 1 in 4 chance of hitting the cop, this game would be a 75% win chance for the town on day 1 and probably even higher on day 2 (ignoring day 2, unless of course the Traitor AND the doctor killed N0, in which case there would be no day 2) anyway, that ends my append of "if the Traitor is Pasonia, he knows more than just my role" story
Now, I think it is unlikely that Pasonia is lying because she choose me to Buddy with me, and I mean come on; that's totally out of character. Unless he spent those last two games making me think he hates me personally and really doesn't, in which case that's extremely something. I'll give it a 2% chance.
I protected myself the first night and I'm still here, so that second option isn't the case.BagelBob wrote:
I further think that since this is crazy mafia, strager might have made the doctor insane. Or the option where he kills if his protection fails. That's what I would have done anyway.
Nonetheless, very interesting theory..
unvote
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
The traitor getting a list of our roles and roleblocking my scan DOES seem likely (and something that strager would do).
Hmm..
Hmm..
Okay then, Derekku, what's the use of a Cop Role if it's already told to the Traitor? Won't the Traitor then kill the cop on N0 instead of leaving us a chance like this?Derekku Chan wrote:
The traitor getting a list of our roles and roleblocking my scan DOES seem likely (and something that strager would do).
Hmm..
Besides, if it's possible that Traitor Kills N0, what are the chances of a successful doctor protect? Then you're implying you have to be both a doctor and a cop in order to protect yourself N0?
Hmm I dunno. I'm just thinking along the lines that this is CRAZY mafia and that strager can host it however he wants. Maybe the traitor wasn't allowed to kill N0? I really don't know. ._.;Pasonia wrote:
Okay then, Derekku, what's the use of a Cop Role if it's already told to the Traitor? Won't the Traitor then kill the cop on N0 instead of leaving us a chance like this?
Besides, if it's possible that Traitor Kills N0, what are the chances of a successful doctor protect? Then you're implying you have to be both a doctor and a cop in order to protect yourself N0?
What? We have 36 hours to make a decision, and me unvoting means I want a no-lynch??Pasonia wrote:
1. Why are you flip-flopping on the matter? First you say that no lynch is not the way to go, THEN you proceeded to perform an unvote yourself.
2. Why are you so intent on pushing votes on LS? You made that intention extremely clear with this:So... me posting a vote count means I'm trying to get LadySuburu lynched.. this makes no sense?
[Quote of my vote count]
You helped us highlight an L-1, thank you very much. But this is very clear as day you're trying very hard to get LS lynched.
While I do not trust that LS is cleared yet, I am of a strong opinion on the matter of you being the traitor. Your eagerness to push a vote and then suddenly backing out is making your case weaker in my eyes, and your second unvote has forced my hand. You seemed like you didn't want to deal the finishing blow; I can't think of a reason other than you being a traitor as the only plausible reason behind your flippy-floppiness.I unvoted because BagelBob made a good case, am I not allowed to change my opinion if someone presents an argument that makes more sense than mine, and blindly follow my own convictions? If I recall correctly, that's exactly one of the things you accused me of after CM1.
1) We don't know if there was a kill N0, I but I'm guessing no since the game is so small to begin with, and if there was a kill we would be at LyLo on the first dayPasonia wrote:
Okay then, Derekku, what's the use of a Cop Role if it's already told to the Traitor? Won't the Traitor then kill the cop on N0 instead of leaving us a chance like this?Derekku Chan wrote:
The traitor getting a list of our roles and roleblocking my scan DOES seem likely (and something that strager would do).
Hmm..
Besides, if it's possible that Traitor Kills N0, what are the chances of a successful doctor protect? Then you're implying you have to be both a doctor and a cop in order to protect yourself N0?
2) If the traitor is a role-blocker, then it doesn't matter if Derekku is a cop because he can block him every night anyway.
I actually think Bagel's "knowledgeable traitor" idea makes a lot of sense. Seeing as this is Crazy Mafia, don't you think it would be wayy too easy to have 2 knowledgeable townies CONFIRMING innocence of another, as well as a Cop and Doctor? There has got to be something more going on here.
Consider this...
If Traitor was allowed to kill N0, then we'll be Day 1 LyLo. =_=
Anyway, yea, as of current information on Day 1 I clear BB and DChan, so only 0_o and LS remains.
The behavior of 0_o makes me doubly sure that I've got our Traitor; if he dies and one of us gets killed, then LS is the only option left to us.
The only way my claim can be disproved is if both 0_o and LS dies on Day/Night 1.
If Traitor was allowed to kill N0, then we'll be Day 1 LyLo. =_=
Anyway, yea, as of current information on Day 1 I clear BB and DChan, so only 0_o and LS remains.
The behavior of 0_o makes me doubly sure that I've got our Traitor; if he dies and one of us gets killed, then LS is the only option left to us.
The only way my claim can be disproved is if both 0_o and LS dies on Day/Night 1.
I was just reading through and I'm having trouble understanding this statement (post is here), could you or someone else who gets it paraphrase?Pasonia wrote:
Assuming any one of the remaining three (myself BB and LS) were scum, and we lynch them after surviving D1 then D2 it's almost open season for the remaining Innocents to attack the scum. I firmly believe that at least BB and LS are not stupid enough to leave themselves in the open.
I'll paraphrase that.
If you want to say myself or BB or LS are scum, then by the way we three are acting now the remaining Mafia would vote the obvious, the traitor. Lynching/killing them (0_o and DChan) assuming they both bore actual roles as Mafia would almost certainly mean game over and a town loss (yet again).
But this is only and only IF myself, BB or LS are scum, and it's certain for now that we aren't scum.
I have explained before why this is a highly improbable scenario and why 0_o is the likeliest to be scum given his flip-flops on his voting. Don't give me the "first vote is random" crap, you'd have stuck by it if you wanted LS dead but when I unvoted you also followed suit.
So I'm only telling you how unlikely it is that any of the three of us (exclusive of 0_o and DChan) are scum given the way we've acted on this phase.
If you want to say myself or BB or LS are scum, then by the way we three are acting now the remaining Mafia would vote the obvious, the traitor. Lynching/killing them (0_o and DChan) assuming they both bore actual roles as Mafia would almost certainly mean game over and a town loss (yet again).
But this is only and only IF myself, BB or LS are scum, and it's certain for now that we aren't scum.
I have explained before why this is a highly improbable scenario and why 0_o is the likeliest to be scum given his flip-flops on his voting. Don't give me the "first vote is random" crap, you'd have stuck by it if you wanted LS dead but when I unvoted you also followed suit.
So I'm only telling you how unlikely it is that any of the three of us (exclusive of 0_o and DChan) are scum given the way we've acted on this phase.
Hold on, since when did "we" clear LS? I'm pretty sure when you originally said that there was zero evidence that LS wasn't scum.. enlighten me?Pasonia wrote:
But this is only and only IF myself, BB or LS are scum, and it's certain for now that we aren't scum.
I have explained before why this is a highly improbable scenario and why 0_o is the likeliest to be scum given his flip-flops on his voting. Don't give me the "first vote is random" crap [...]First of all, you accuse me of flip-flop voting, when in fact you have switched votes more than I have:
Me
Vote BagelBob
unvote
Vote LadySuburu
unvote
You
Vote LadySuburu
unvote
Vote No Lynch
unvote
Vote 0_o
Secondly, everyone's first vote was random/jokes except yours. So really you "flipped" between 3 serious votes, whereas my only voting activity was a joke vote, followed by a serious vote that I retracted because of Bagel's knowledgeable traitor idea.
Excuse me? You unvoted LS before I even voted for him!Pasonia wrote:
you'd have stuck by it if you wanted LS dead but when I unvoted you also followed suit.
So I'm only telling you how unlikely it is that any of the three of us (exclusive of 0_o and DChan) are scum given the way we've acted on this phase.Do you still hold this view? Because you seem to be ignoring the discussion of a possible knowledgeable traitor, which would make everyone suspicious (to a degree) except BagelBob, since if he was scum then your information would be incorrect (which I am starting to doubt would be the case)
Also, it seems like one of your main arguments against me is that I was attacking LadySuburu. So what if I did? Why is that incriminating? Guess what - you are attacking me for doing exactly what you are doing right now - attacking someone. (and you've attacked me way more than I have LS)
So for the reasons above
vote Pasonia
There you go, now our vote counts are equal
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Consider the following.
I admit it was my error, because I was lazy to keep referring and re-referring to posts every day I put forth an argument.
You didn't unvote anybody. However, you HIGHLIGHTED L1 on me and refused to push a vote, then complained when I unvoted saying someone has to be voted off in order to avoid the 4-man LyLo. You flip-flop on decisions.
Two possibilities.
If you're not Traitor, you're totally terrified of lynching the wrong person.
If you're Traitor, you're totally terrified of drawing flak and fire.
Whereas, from the start to the finish, I made every decision based on the game condition at that point of time, from my first vote to the unvote/nolynch and then vote you.
DChan, if there is your so-called shit logic in anything I've been saying, there's two possibilities.
1. You did not bother to read through carefully anything I've posted thus far, mostly because they were addressed at 0_o for the most part.
2. You are the scum yourself, and you refuse to accept any of my arguments and brand them as shit (without any clear logic to your arguments either, really) because you want people to believe I'm not making sense. That is scummy behavior.
Also, I reject 0_o scumpainting LS because I am currently given the impression that LS is feeling lost; it could be possible that LS didn't get any role appends but is also a Mafia (not traitor). But if new arguments emerge from LS that points to other possibilities I wouldn't dismiss it either.
Liar, liar, who's the liar? Likely the man with the crooked face.
Also, HOS on both 0_o and DChan. (as if that wasn't very obvious...... -_-|||)
Originally, LS has zero evidence of not being scum. However, bear in mind that LS, like myself and BB, did not declare a role for themselves. Only you and DChan did, so I am not at all surprised that both of you are staring at me hard.0_o wrote:
There you go, now our vote counts are equal
I admit it was my error, because I was lazy to keep referring and re-referring to posts every day I put forth an argument.
You didn't unvote anybody. However, you HIGHLIGHTED L1 on me and refused to push a vote, then complained when I unvoted saying someone has to be voted off in order to avoid the 4-man LyLo. You flip-flop on decisions.
Two possibilities.
If you're not Traitor, you're totally terrified of lynching the wrong person.
If you're Traitor, you're totally terrified of drawing flak and fire.
Whereas, from the start to the finish, I made every decision based on the game condition at that point of time, from my first vote to the unvote/nolynch and then vote you.
DChan, if there is your so-called shit logic in anything I've been saying, there's two possibilities.
1. You did not bother to read through carefully anything I've posted thus far, mostly because they were addressed at 0_o for the most part.
2. You are the scum yourself, and you refuse to accept any of my arguments and brand them as shit (without any clear logic to your arguments either, really) because you want people to believe I'm not making sense. That is scummy behavior.
Also, I reject 0_o scumpainting LS because I am currently given the impression that LS is feeling lost; it could be possible that LS didn't get any role appends but is also a Mafia (not traitor). But if new arguments emerge from LS that points to other possibilities I wouldn't dismiss it either.
Liar, liar, who's the liar? Likely the man with the crooked face.
Also, HOS on both 0_o and DChan. (as if that wasn't very obvious...... -_-|||)
Is what I was meant by "shit logic". First votes usually ARE random votes, so I don't see how you can use that as logic in your arguments. Also, ALL of us have "flip-flopped" our votes by unvoting and/or changing, so I don't see why you're pinning down 0_o.Pasonia wrote:
I have explained before why this is a highly improbable scenario and why 0_o is the likeliest to be scum given his flip-flops on his voting. Don't give me the "first vote is random" crap, you'd have stuck by it if you wanted LS dead but when I unvoted you also followed suit.
On another note: I still can't explain why I got an Unknown reading N0. Since the idea of a roleblocker doesn't sound probable, perhaps strager just decided to not give me a reading N0. This sounds REALLY stupid, but this IS "crazy" mafia. I dunno D:
*sigh* I'm not sure what else to say. Sorry for the "attack" Pasonia. I'm just trying to help find the scum in the group :3
*goes to bed*
That vote count was a warning in LadySuburu's favour. I posted it so everyone would be aware that if they voted for Suburu, he would be lynched, so be careful. I point out L-1s all the time in mafia/WW, it keeps people from accidentally lynching someone when they didn't realize how many votes the person already had.Pasonia wrote:
You didn't unvote anybody. However, you HIGHLIGHTED L1 on me and refused to push a vote,
then complained when I unvoted saying someone has to be voted off in order to avoid the 4-man LyLo. You flip-flop on decisions.My response was to the fact that you voted "No Lynch", I didn't care that you unvoted. No Lynch would have only benefited the traitor, hence why I pointed it out.
Whereas, from the start to the finish, I made every decision based on the game condition at that point of time, from my first vote to the unvote/nolynch and then vote you.Likewise.
-My vote on BagelBob was completely random (during Random Voting Stage)
-My vote on LadySuburu was outlined clearly here
-My unvote of LadySuburu came to be when BagelBob brought up the idea that the traitor possibly knew everyone's role (or at least knows more than we think he does)
-My vote on you is outlined in my last post.
DChan, if there is your so-called shit logic in anything I've been saying, there's two possibilities.You forgot the third possibility where you are the scum and we are dead-on
1. You did not bother to read through carefully anything I've posted thus far, mostly because they were addressed at 0_o for the most part.
2. You are the scum yourself, and you refuse to accept any of my arguments and brand them as shit (without any clear logic to your arguments either, really) because you want people to believe I'm not making sense. That is scummy behavior.
And I for one have read through your arguments thoroughly, and my last post has already outlined all of your crap logic. I don't think it's fair to say he's either lazy or scum
Also, I reject 0_o scumpainting LS because I am currently given the impression that LS is feeling lost; it could be possible that LS didn't get any role appends but is also a Mafia (not traitor). But if new arguments emerge from LS that points to other possibilities I wouldn't dismiss it either.I don't know if this means anything, but he seems to be throwing a lot of suspicion at the two claimed aux roles, while virtually dismissing the one who claims to have no powers that could be used against the traitor.
Liar, liar, who's the liar? Likely the man with the crooked face.
Also, HOS on both 0_o and DChan. (as if that wasn't very obvious...... -_-|||)
Anyone else feel like elaborating on my thought processes here? Bagel? LS?
[offtopic]
What's up with you guys getting genders wrong? >_>
Derekku - Guy
Pasonia - Guy
LadySuburu - Must I say?
BagelBob - I ASSUME guy =<
0_o - The world may never know
[/offtopic]
What's up with you guys getting genders wrong? >_>
Derekku - Guy
Pasonia - Guy
LadySuburu - Must I say?
BagelBob - I ASSUME guy =<
0_o - The world may never know
[/offtopic]
Actually I'm pretty sure LadySuburu really is a guyDerekku Chan wrote:
LadySuburu - Must I say?
me too
Please tell me that's sarcasm D: I get gullible when I'm sleepy ;-;0_o wrote:
Actually I'm pretty sure LadySuburu really is a guyDerekku Chan wrote:
LadySuburu - Must I say?
A-HA! THE TRUTH COMES OUT!0_o wrote:
me too
Nope lol. This has been discussed somewhere before, I think an another mafia/WW game, but I forget where..Derekku Chan wrote:
Please tell me that's sarcasm D: I get gullible when I'm sleepy ;-;
I could just be crazy though. Ask SFG she knows
awA-HA! THE TRUTH COMES OUT!0_o wrote:
me too
Notice why I never refer to LS as "she"? -________-|||
WOAH, hold it.
Pasonia has an HOS on Derekku. He also claims that he is sure of Bagel's innocence. But isn't Bagel claiming that Derekku is innocent? Why are you so suspicious of him if the one person you are sure isn't the traitor has already cleared him?
Pasonia has an HOS on Derekku. He also claims that he is sure of Bagel's innocence. But isn't Bagel claiming that Derekku is innocent? Why are you so suspicious of him if the one person you are sure isn't the traitor has already cleared him?
I was wondering that too, but I thought I had just misread something while being sleepy last night. XP0_o wrote:
WOAH, hold it.
Pasonia has an HOS on Derekku. He also claims that he is sure of Bagel's innocence. But isn't Bagel claiming that Derekku is innocent? Why are you so suspicious of him if the one person you are sure isn't the traitor has already cleared him?
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Yes, but since he believes you are innocent (who knows Derekku is innocent), shouldn't that rule out Derekku all together, regardless of Derekku's cop claim?BagelBob wrote:
Pasonia is suspicious of people with night actions in this 5 man game, which is, I guess, a reason to suspect Derekku
Yes
Topic Starter
Uhh...Derekku Chan wrote:
[offtopic]
What's up with you guys getting genders wrong? >_>
Derekku - Guy
Pasonia - Guy
LadySuburu - Must I say?
BagelBob - I ASSUME guy =<
0_o - The world may never know
[/offtopic]
Derekku Chan - f
Pasonia - m
LadySuburu - f
BagelBob - m
0_o - o_0
Derekku - Avatar makes it ambiguousstrager wrote:
Uhh...Derekku Chan wrote:
[offtopic]
What's up with you guys getting genders wrong? >_>
Derekku - Guy
Pasonia - Guy
LadySuburu - Must I say?
BagelBob - I ASSUME guy =<
0_o - The world may never know
[/offtopic]
Derekku Chan - f
Pasonia - m
LadySuburu - f
BagelBob - m
0_o - o_0
Pasonia - obvious m
LadySubaru - Car
BagelBob - if there are any girls named Bob, I'd like to meet one
0_o - Androgynous
Topic Starter
I can hook you up.BagelBob wrote:
BagelBob - if there are any girls named Bob, I'd like to meet one
ffffff Derek is obviously a male name. Also shouldn't Pasonia be amiguous too with the female avatar? ARGH
Okay so uh... I guess I trust Bob... I clearly know that I'm not scum... I think I trust 0_o. Who to vote for who to vote for...
I'd really like to hear more from LS even though he/she is busy D:
Okay so uh... I guess I trust Bob... I clearly know that I'm not scum... I think I trust 0_o. Who to vote for who to vote for...
I'd really like to hear more from LS even though he/she is busy D:
Seriously, all LS has done so far is said everything that we can't know.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
so let's have a vote from ya, 5 hours
Vote: 0_oBagelBob wrote:
so let's have a vote from ya, 5 hours
Mod: votecount cuz I'm lazy plz
Topic Starter
LadySuburu: 0_o
0_o: Pasonia
Pasonia: 0_o
Derekku Chan: -
BagelBob: PANTS PANTS PANTS
So...
0_o - LadySuburu, Pasonia (2)
Pasonia - 0_o (1)
Not voting: BagelBob, Derekku Chan
0_o: Pasonia
Pasonia: 0_o
Derekku Chan: -
BagelBob: PANTS PANTS PANTS
So...
0_o - LadySuburu, Pasonia (2)
Pasonia - 0_o (1)
Not voting: BagelBob, Derekku Chan
I don't want to end up doing the tie breaker, so I'll Vote: Pasonia. We don't have much on LS and I personally don't think 0_o is the traitor, so yeah. I hope my scan will be of use tomorrow provided I'm not night killed D:
I still want to hammer Suburu. In 30 minutes, I'll hammer 0_o, unless someone has a change of heart before then.
I find 0_o more suspicious than Pas. However, 0_o does have a doc claim.
Should we lynch Pas in case 0_o is indeed the doc?
Should we lynch Pas in case 0_o is indeed the doc?
No, this is crazy mafia, so a failed protection by 0_o could mean death.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Vote: 0_o
dun dun dun :S
Topic Starter
0_o ends up choking himself with a wooden stethoscope.
Night 1 Begins
You know the drill guise.
Night 1 Begins
You know the drill guise.
Topic Starter
Day 2 Begins
You wake up.
You wake up.
Since he was the traitor? :<
Topic Starter
loledited.BagelBob wrote:
That's not very nice =(
Topic Starter
He edited, which is why I lol'd.Derekku Chan wrote:
That's not very nice =(
He said something like "wtf no one died!?"
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Uhh, wait, what the hell is going on?
0_o is dead but nobody was killed for Night 1?
0_o is dead but nobody was killed for Night 1?
Topic Starter
Nope.Pasonia wrote:
0_o is dead but nobody was killed for Night 1?
So......... is the game over or no? >_>
Btw strager you suck at editing the OP and topic title
Btw strager you suck at editing the OP and topic title
Topic Starter
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Topic Starter
Actually, it's kinda funny all three girls are alive.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Topic Starter
You didn't ask who died...Derekku Chan wrote:
Hey... why didn't you announce BB's death? D:
Hmm, I should try that.Derekku Chan wrote:
2) strager is being mean and maybe gave me a crazy sanity where I don't get results ._.
Knew it, either BB or myself would be killed (that much I've predicted correctly)
Now I'm stuck choosing DChan and LadySuburu, but as per what I said previous Day Phase, I tend towards DChan being the Traitor over LadySuburu because of the role claim. But I don't want to move too fast and end up allowing either one to vote the other when one of them is scum, so I'd really like to hear more from DChan and LadySuburu.
HOS on DChan.
FOS on LS.
Now I'm stuck choosing DChan and LadySuburu, but as per what I said previous Day Phase, I tend towards DChan being the Traitor over LadySuburu because of the role claim. But I don't want to move too fast and end up allowing either one to vote the other when one of them is scum, so I'd really like to hear more from DChan and LadySuburu.
HOS on DChan.
FOS on LS.
Topic Starter
Oh yeah, LyLo and stuff.
Good luck gals.
Good luck gals.
It turns out that BB was innocent, but that still doesn't prove Pasonia's innocence. He could have easily made up this bit because obviously if he's the traitor, then everyone else would be innocent.Pasonia wrote:
It was funny really; I was told that I was an "Innocent" i.e. I am a Vanilla Mafia, and BagelBob is innocent.
Bagel, on the other hand, can be believed. I see no reason why a townie would make up something like this, and since he was cleared, then I should also be cleared.BagelBob wrote:
I'm a Vanillia Mafia with the append that Derekku is Innocent.
But wait, after re-reading and seeing this:
I am obligated to believe Pasonia. Pasonia posted about Bagel's innocence BEFORE Bagel posted. The traitor wouldn't have known that someone ACTUALLY got a note like that in their role PM. The traitor would've seen what Bagel posted and then made up something AFTERWARDS.0_o wrote:
I think it's safe to clear Pasonia, since he was the first one to say he received someone else's innocence in their PM.
That only leaves us with LS, whom has only been suspicious this whole time. Vote: LadySuburu
And there you have it.
Of course, I'm inclined to believe Pasonia for similar reasons. However, we still have not disproved the possibilities of the info Pasonia and BB recieved being incorrect. Pasonia's info is obviously true, whereas with you being the only possible suspect in MY eyes, BB's info was false.Derekku Chan wrote:
It turns out that BB was innocent, but that still doesn't prove Pasonia's innocence. He could have easily made up this bit because obviously if he's the traitor, then everyone else would be innocent.Pasonia wrote:
It was funny really; I was told that I was an "Innocent" i.e. I am a Vanilla Mafia, and BagelBob is innocent.Bagel, on the other hand, can be believed. I see no reason why a townie would make up something like this, and since he was cleared, then I should also be cleared.BagelBob wrote:
I'm a Vanillia Mafia with the append that Derekku is Innocent.
But wait, after re-reading and seeing this:I am obligated to believe Pasonia. Pasonia posted about Bagel's innocence BEFORE Bagel posted. The traitor wouldn't have known that someone ACTUALLY got a note like that in their role PM. The traitor would've seen what Bagel posted and then made up something AFTERWARDS.0_o wrote:
I think it's safe to clear Pasonia, since he was the first one to say he received someone else's innocence in their PM.
That only leaves us with LS, whom has only been suspicious this whole time. Vote: LadySuburu
And there you have it.
Also, you investigated Pasonia twice? I see no reason for you to have done so.
Vote: Derekku_Chan
Which leaves Pasonia as the deciding factor.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
unvote just in case.
I never said BB made up a lie that you were innocent. What I said was that it is possible that the info given to him at the start is false.
I don't really see the logic behind investigating Pasonia again, but I guess it's not that big of a point.
I still suspect you heavilly, but it's much safer to not have votes out at this point.
I never said BB made up a lie that you were innocent. What I said was that it is possible that the info given to him at the start is false.
I don't really see the logic behind investigating Pasonia again, but I guess it's not that big of a point.
I still suspect you heavilly, but it's much safer to not have votes out at this point.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Topic Starter
I hate you too, you faggot avatar changer.Derekku Chan wrote:
Blugh strager I hate you for making this so 'crazy' xd
(Page 10 get.)
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
LS and I already stated our arguments ffffff we're just waiting for you X3
I'm entering confirmation of vote phase, so I'll need you both to answer some pretty crucial questions.
1. Are you certain that additional roles existed for this game? If so, provide a rationale for why DChan wanted to investigate me, of all people, twice.
2. LadySuburu has not spoken much on his identity, claiming all the while to be civilian. While I understand that there's close to nothing to back this up, the fact that so little has been said by LS (not even getting involved in the fracas b/w me and 0_o) does provide some cause for suspicion. Is there anything you might want to add in the reasoning?
Both persons should answer these two questions. I want a strong, clear, concise answer, not wishy-washy "I think"s. I want you to be as truthful as possible, even if that means you lied about something, such as being a cop. Of course, I'm not expecting the traitor to 'fess up, still.
1. Are you certain that additional roles existed for this game? If so, provide a rationale for why DChan wanted to investigate me, of all people, twice.
2. LadySuburu has not spoken much on his identity, claiming all the while to be civilian. While I understand that there's close to nothing to back this up, the fact that so little has been said by LS (not even getting involved in the fracas b/w me and 0_o) does provide some cause for suspicion. Is there anything you might want to add in the reasoning?
Both persons should answer these two questions. I want a strong, clear, concise answer, not wishy-washy "I think"s. I want you to be as truthful as possible, even if that means you lied about something, such as being a cop. Of course, I'm not expecting the traitor to 'fess up, still.
I'm not certain if 0_o was really the doctor, but I am the cop. I had no direction on Night 0 (obviously), so I randomly picked you to investigate. With an "Unknown" result, I thought that I would try investigating the same person (you) again to see if it would do anything. Without knowing my sanity, I thought I might as well try to do something useful instead of scanning another random person and leaving me even more clueless.Pasonia wrote:
1. Are you certain that additional roles existed for this game? If so, provide a rationale for why DChan wanted to investigate me, of all people, twice.
I really have nothing to add. What you've said in this paragraph pretty much sums up how I feel about LS in this game.Pasonia wrote:
2. LadySuburu has not spoken much on his identity, claiming all the while to be civilian. While I understand that there's close to nothing to back this up, the fact that so little has been said by LS (not even getting involved in the fracas b/w me and 0_o) does provide some cause for suspicion. Is there anything you might want to add in the reasoning?
1. I'm not sure what you're asking here.Pasonia wrote:
I'm entering confirmation of vote phase, so I'll need you both to answer some pretty crucial questions.
1. Are you certain that additional roles existed for this game? If so, provide a rationale for why DChan wanted to investigate me, of all people, twice.
2. LadySuburu has not spoken much on his identity, claiming all the while to be civilian. While I understand that there's close to nothing to back this up, the fact that so little has been said by LS (not even getting involved in the fracas b/w me and 0_o) does provide some cause for suspicion. Is there anything you might want to add in the reasoning?
Both persons should answer these two questions. I want a strong, clear, concise answer, not wishy-washy "I think"s. I want you to be as truthful as possible, even if that means you lied about something, such as being a cop. Of course, I'm not expecting the traitor to 'fess up, still.
2. I haven't had much to say, been busy with other things, and I have no powers at all. There's nobody claiming I'm innocent, and in fact quite the opposite happened D1.
And still busy, so short response.
I wish to end this quickly regardless... But LS has so far not attempted to defend and there's no choice but for me to vote.
Vote LadySuburu.
Vote LadySuburu.
I also want to get this over with. I'm almost equally suspicious of both of you, but I don't even care anymore D:
Vote: LadySuburu Sorry
inb4PasoniaisactuallymafiaandIdie
Vote: LadySuburu Sorry
inb4PasoniaisactuallymafiaandIdie
The game's technically over, so i can talk now right?
My money is still on Pas =/
My money is still on Pas =/
Topic Starter
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Topic Starter
That's the secret. I mean, seriously, four Mafia and one non-Mafia?0_o wrote:
didn't expect it to be so imbalanced though >_>
yes I realize that now lol
I kinda didn't wanna vote Pas so I wouldn't have to listen to his bitching about town losing AGAIN and starting a shitstorm. X3 But I did feel like LS was a TEENY bit more suspicious (from being quiet but ugh that doesn't tell much) but ugh w/e
It's just a game :3
It's just a game :3
Topic Starter
You just lost the game.Derekku Chan wrote:
It's just a game :3
Oh wait I just realized that Pas and I won XD
It's confusing when you have "mafia" as innocents. Oops~
So that means I was right for not killing Pas? YAY X3
It's confusing when you have "mafia" as innocents. Oops~
So that means I was right for not killing Pas? YAY X3
I thought it was Bagel
Mainly due to role claim stuff
Mainly due to role claim stuff
I totally am not convinced that my theory is correct, and I was thinking of strager was going to go "ahhhh but I lied to you".
0_o I don't even know if the role claim was correct, and nobody defended him. So it has to be b/w him and LS. I didn't want to lynch LS D1 in case I lynched a townie, but when he survived and Bagel died I knew Bagel is most likely telling the truth. Since I DID already know he's innocent.
I just wasn't expecting it to become a debate that didn't involve me. LOL.
0_o I don't even know if the role claim was correct, and nobody defended him. So it has to be b/w him and LS. I didn't want to lynch LS D1 in case I lynched a townie, but when he survived and Bagel died I knew Bagel is most likely telling the truth. Since I DID already know he's innocent.
I just wasn't expecting it to become a debate that didn't involve me. LOL.
I tried as hard as I could with being busy, and with the setup completely against me. As per how this game started:
Confirmed:
Pasonia - Cleared by claim first - Clears BB
BB - Cleared by Pasonia - Clears Derekku
Derekku - Cleared by BB - Cop that recieved no result N1.
Unconfirmed:
0_o - Doctor.
Me - Normal Mafia goon (Until I complained to strager and he gave me roleblocking powers, which didn't really help much.)
D1: Lynch me or 0_o
D2: Lynch the remaining.
Town wins. (Mafia in the story.)
Also, I totally predicted that town would never win unless they were calledtown mafia.
Confirmed:
Pasonia - Cleared by claim first - Clears BB
BB - Cleared by Pasonia - Clears Derekku
Derekku - Cleared by BB - Cop that recieved no result N1.
Unconfirmed:
0_o - Doctor.
Me - Normal Mafia goon (Until I complained to strager and he gave me roleblocking powers, which didn't really help much.)
D1: Lynch me or 0_o
D2: Lynch the remaining.
Town wins. (Mafia in the story.)
Also, I totally predicted that town would never win unless they were called
Topic Starter
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
The one time I get to be a cop and I can't get results X3
You can't just "not allow" an investigation :/ That breaks the town's reasoning.