Night 0 Begins
Night actions in two days and stuff.
Night actions in two days and stuff.
Echo isn't in this game, therefore he is not mafia. Silly.BagelBob wrote:
How can someone be innocent in a game with only Mafia. Think before you post, silly.
He was a (the?) Mafia member another town.0_o wrote:
Echo isn't in this game, therefore he is not mafia. Silly.BagelBob wrote:
How can someone be innocent in a game with only Mafia. Think before you post, silly.
And I'm a deceased crazy person in that townstrager wrote:
He was a (the?) Mafia member another town.
Stress on was. That town is no more.
You only think you killed yourself, to satisfy your deep desire.0_o wrote:
And I'm a deceased crazy person in that townstrager wrote:
He was a (the?) Mafia member another town.
Stress on was. That town is no more.Though I guess I could be a mafia zombie..
..do ANY of the other votes so far not seem random to you?Pasonia wrote:
LadySuburu: Why are you voting at random? Doesn't seem like you actually gave much thought to this.
Weird, a Mafia Doctor in a game this short?0_o wrote:
"I didn't" was referring to Pas's question of if anyone else's guilt/innocence was in their PM.
Might as well get everything out in the open though
Role Claim: Mafia Doctor
A roleblock? Not sure if this traitor can do that, but if a roleblock actually did affect you then that must be absolutely coincidental.Derekku Chan wrote:
Sorry guys, I was gone all day =<
Role Claim: Mafia Cop
I randomly picked Pasonia to scan on Night 0 and got an "Unknown" reading. I'm not sure what to make of that.
I cannot reveal this information.Pasonia wrote:
strager: Clarification, Night 0 the Traitor can't kill, amirite?
Please don't tell me you placed my alignment as Insane again for the second game running.strager wrote:
A Doctor may protect himself.
Sanities are unknown (as far as the players are concerned of course) for all players. I may provide false information like I did in CM1 (for anyone except SFG in that game, anyway, who was Sane), except in this post.
An "unknown" result means an action was unsuccessful.
All players are randomly matched to a certain set of roles. I did not arrange the players to roles myself.Pasonia wrote:
Please don't tell me you placed my alignment as Insane again for the second game running.
Sounds familiar...0_o wrote:
With regards to Pas's attack against me, keep in mind I was the second person to claim, and that was after you claimed you knew of Bagel's innocence. If I were the traitor I would waited until at least one more person claimed, since I would have no way of knowing if the rest of the mafia received extra information as well, and if this was the case I would have been screwed.
Not just that, it seems like you're quoting the obvious but you meant more. You know you're accusing LS there, so I'd go ahead and say you're now scumpainting LS by that subtle hint (since LS DID wait until one more person claimed, and that one more person before LS was you.)0_o wrote:
With regards to Pas's attack against me, keep in mind I was the second person to claim, and that was after you claimed you knew of Bagel's innocence. If I were the traitor I would waited until at least one more person claimed, since I would have no way of knowing if the rest of the mafia received extra information as well, and if this was the case I would have been screwed.
So my defense of myself is "stating the obvious?" Shouldn't that mean I'm obviously not mafia? =/Pasonia wrote:
Not just that, it seems like you're quoting the obvious but you meant more. You know you're accusing LS there, so I'd go ahead and say you're now scumpainting LS by that subtle hint (since LS DID wait until one more person claimed, and that one more person before LS was you.)
You better come up with a far stronger defence of yourself soon, really... This just won't cut it.
Two no-lynches brings you to three players, with an extra Night, but only once chance of killing the Mafia (ignoring aux roles).0_o wrote:
Also Pasonia, No Lynch is not the way to go here, if we don't lynch someone tonight we will be at LyLo tomorrow (unless my protection is successful), and we will have 4 people to choose from instead of 3.
Yes, but the 2 people who die those nights are guaranteed to be pro-mafia, whereas if we do a lynch tonight there is a chance we hit the traitor, and we get a second chance we aren't not correct.strager wrote:
Two no-lynches brings you to three players, with an extra Night, but only once chance of killing the Mafia (ignoring aux roles).0_o wrote:
Also Pasonia, No Lynch is not the way to go here, if we don't lynch someone tonight we will be at LyLo tomorrow (unless my protection is successful), and we will have 4 people to choose from instead of 3.
I can do as I wish. I'm just a ... hallucination. =]0_o wrote:
Also, I don't think the mod is supposed to contribute to the discussion..
I protected myself the first night and I'm still here, so that second option isn't the case.BagelBob wrote:
I further think that since this is crazy mafia, strager might have made the doctor insane. Or the option where he kills if his protection fails. That's what I would have done anyway.
Okay then, Derekku, what's the use of a Cop Role if it's already told to the Traitor? Won't the Traitor then kill the cop on N0 instead of leaving us a chance like this?Derekku Chan wrote:
The traitor getting a list of our roles and roleblocking my scan DOES seem likely (and something that strager would do).
Hmm..
Hmm I dunno. I'm just thinking along the lines that this is CRAZY mafia and that strager can host it however he wants. Maybe the traitor wasn't allowed to kill N0? I really don't know. ._.;Pasonia wrote:
Okay then, Derekku, what's the use of a Cop Role if it's already told to the Traitor? Won't the Traitor then kill the cop on N0 instead of leaving us a chance like this?
Besides, if it's possible that Traitor Kills N0, what are the chances of a successful doctor protect? Then you're implying you have to be both a doctor and a cop in order to protect yourself N0?
What? We have 36 hours to make a decision, and me unvoting means I want a no-lynch??Pasonia wrote:
1. Why are you flip-flopping on the matter? First you say that no lynch is not the way to go, THEN you proceeded to perform an unvote yourself.
2. Why are you so intent on pushing votes on LS? You made that intention extremely clear with this:So... me posting a vote count means I'm trying to get LadySuburu lynched.. this makes no sense?
[Quote of my vote count]
You helped us highlight an L-1, thank you very much. But this is very clear as day you're trying very hard to get LS lynched.
While I do not trust that LS is cleared yet, I am of a strong opinion on the matter of you being the traitor. Your eagerness to push a vote and then suddenly backing out is making your case weaker in my eyes, and your second unvote has forced my hand. You seemed like you didn't want to deal the finishing blow; I can't think of a reason other than you being a traitor as the only plausible reason behind your flippy-floppiness.I unvoted because BagelBob made a good case, am I not allowed to change my opinion if someone presents an argument that makes more sense than mine, and blindly follow my own convictions? If I recall correctly, that's exactly one of the things you accused me of after CM1.
1) We don't know if there was a kill N0, I but I'm guessing no since the game is so small to begin with, and if there was a kill we would be at LyLo on the first dayPasonia wrote:
Okay then, Derekku, what's the use of a Cop Role if it's already told to the Traitor? Won't the Traitor then kill the cop on N0 instead of leaving us a chance like this?Derekku Chan wrote:
The traitor getting a list of our roles and roleblocking my scan DOES seem likely (and something that strager would do).
Hmm..
Besides, if it's possible that Traitor Kills N0, what are the chances of a successful doctor protect? Then you're implying you have to be both a doctor and a cop in order to protect yourself N0?
I was just reading through and I'm having trouble understanding this statement (post is here), could you or someone else who gets it paraphrase?Pasonia wrote:
Assuming any one of the remaining three (myself BB and LS) were scum, and we lynch them after surviving D1 then D2 it's almost open season for the remaining Innocents to attack the scum. I firmly believe that at least BB and LS are not stupid enough to leave themselves in the open.
Hold on, since when did "we" clear LS? I'm pretty sure when you originally said that there was zero evidence that LS wasn't scum.. enlighten me?Pasonia wrote:
But this is only and only IF myself, BB or LS are scum, and it's certain for now that we aren't scum.
I have explained before why this is a highly improbable scenario and why 0_o is the likeliest to be scum given his flip-flops on his voting. Don't give me the "first vote is random" crap [...]First of all, you accuse me of flip-flop voting, when in fact you have switched votes more than I have:
Excuse me? You unvoted LS before I even voted for him!Pasonia wrote:
you'd have stuck by it if you wanted LS dead but when I unvoted you also followed suit.
So I'm only telling you how unlikely it is that any of the three of us (exclusive of 0_o and DChan) are scum given the way we've acted on this phase.Do you still hold this view? Because you seem to be ignoring the discussion of a possible knowledgeable traitor, which would make everyone suspicious (to a degree) except BagelBob, since if he was scum then your information would be incorrect (which I am starting to doubt would be the case)
Originally, LS has zero evidence of not being scum. However, bear in mind that LS, like myself and BB, did not declare a role for themselves. Only you and DChan did, so I am not at all surprised that both of you are staring at me hard.0_o wrote:
There you go, now our vote counts are equal
Is what I was meant by "shit logic". First votes usually ARE random votes, so I don't see how you can use that as logic in your arguments. Also, ALL of us have "flip-flopped" our votes by unvoting and/or changing, so I don't see why you're pinning down 0_o.Pasonia wrote:
I have explained before why this is a highly improbable scenario and why 0_o is the likeliest to be scum given his flip-flops on his voting. Don't give me the "first vote is random" crap, you'd have stuck by it if you wanted LS dead but when I unvoted you also followed suit.
That vote count was a warning in LadySuburu's favour. I posted it so everyone would be aware that if they voted for Suburu, he would be lynched, so be careful. I point out L-1s all the time in mafia/WW, it keeps people from accidentally lynching someone when they didn't realize how many votes the person already had.Pasonia wrote:
You didn't unvote anybody. However, you HIGHLIGHTED L1 on me and refused to push a vote,
then complained when I unvoted saying someone has to be voted off in order to avoid the 4-man LyLo. You flip-flop on decisions.My response was to the fact that you voted "No Lynch", I didn't care that you unvoted. No Lynch would have only benefited the traitor, hence why I pointed it out.
Whereas, from the start to the finish, I made every decision based on the game condition at that point of time, from my first vote to the unvote/nolynch and then vote you.Likewise.
DChan, if there is your so-called shit logic in anything I've been saying, there's two possibilities.You forgot the third possibility where you are the scum and we are dead-on
1. You did not bother to read through carefully anything I've posted thus far, mostly because they were addressed at 0_o for the most part.
2. You are the scum yourself, and you refuse to accept any of my arguments and brand them as shit (without any clear logic to your arguments either, really) because you want people to believe I'm not making sense. That is scummy behavior.
Also, I reject 0_o scumpainting LS because I am currently given the impression that LS is feeling lost; it could be possible that LS didn't get any role appends but is also a Mafia (not traitor). But if new arguments emerge from LS that points to other possibilities I wouldn't dismiss it either.I don't know if this means anything, but he seems to be throwing a lot of suspicion at the two claimed aux roles, while virtually dismissing the one who claims to have no powers that could be used against the traitor.
Liar, liar, who's the liar? Likely the man with the crooked face.
Also, HOS on both 0_o and DChan. (as if that wasn't very obvious...... -_-|||)
Actually I'm pretty sure LadySuburu really is a guyDerekku Chan wrote:
LadySuburu - Must I say?
Please tell me that's sarcasm D: I get gullible when I'm sleepy ;-;0_o wrote:
Actually I'm pretty sure LadySuburu really is a guyDerekku Chan wrote:
LadySuburu - Must I say?
A-HA! THE TRUTH COMES OUT!0_o wrote:
me too
Nope lol. This has been discussed somewhere before, I think an another mafia/WW game, but I forget where..Derekku Chan wrote:
Please tell me that's sarcasm D: I get gullible when I'm sleepy ;-;
awA-HA! THE TRUTH COMES OUT!0_o wrote:
me too
I was wondering that too, but I thought I had just misread something while being sleepy last night. XP0_o wrote:
WOAH, hold it.
Pasonia has an HOS on Derekku. He also claims that he is sure of Bagel's innocence. But isn't Bagel claiming that Derekku is innocent? Why are you so suspicious of him if the one person you are sure isn't the traitor has already cleared him?
Yes, but since he believes you are innocent (who knows Derekku is innocent), shouldn't that rule out Derekku all together, regardless of Derekku's cop claim?BagelBob wrote:
Pasonia is suspicious of people with night actions in this 5 man game, which is, I guess, a reason to suspect Derekku
Uhh...Derekku Chan wrote:
[offtopic]
What's up with you guys getting genders wrong? >_>
Derekku - Guy
Pasonia - Guy
LadySuburu - Must I say?![]()
BagelBob - I ASSUME guy =<
0_o - The world may never know
[/offtopic]
Derekku - Avatar makes it ambiguousstrager wrote:
Uhh...Derekku Chan wrote:
[offtopic]
What's up with you guys getting genders wrong? >_>
Derekku - Guy
Pasonia - Guy
LadySuburu - Must I say?![]()
BagelBob - I ASSUME guy =<
0_o - The world may never know
[/offtopic]
Derekku Chan - f
Pasonia - m
LadySuburu - f
BagelBob - m
0_o - o_0
I can hook you up.BagelBob wrote:
BagelBob - if there are any girls named Bob, I'd like to meet one
Vote: 0_oBagelBob wrote:
so let's have a vote from ya, 5 hours
loledited.BagelBob wrote:
He edited, which is why I lol'd.Derekku Chan wrote:
That's not very nice =(