oh youthose wrote:
Definitely had another thought the first time I looked at thisRBRat3 wrote:
Project companion.... Brings good luck XD
forum
Post your osu! fan art!
posted
Total Posts
2,108
I can round it off... Just thought it kept things separate and made more sense for a ball to roll on rounded tracks instead of square onespeppy wrote:
The only issue I have is that the slider endpoint's radius doesn't match the track, like a badly-made skin :p.
Anyways its alittle late now for what I was gonna use it for XD
I'm not sure I understand the rounded vs square you are talking about. The specific part I'm talking about is this join, though: 
The endpoint's outer ring is square while the track is tubular...
The join? As in the endpoint not being flush with the track or the radius not meeting up with the track width?
It intersects with it slightly, didn't think much about it since its far from view and put crap over it for what I wanted XD
The join? As in the endpoint not being flush with the track or the radius not meeting up with the track width?
It intersects with it slightly, didn't think much about it since its far from view and put crap over it for what I wanted XD
the track width should be equivalent to the start-point's diameter
You guys mean it should be tangent.
And I mean the real meaning of tangent, not the "but it's already touching one edge" kind of meaning.
So yes, the track should be on the furthest edge of the circle to be correct.
And I mean the real meaning of tangent, not the "but it's already touching one edge" kind of meaning.
So yes, the track should be on the furthest edge of the circle to be correct.
awsome 
Heres something to ponder...
What is pippi's measurements & age?
(Yes I care)
What is pippi's measurements & age?
(Yes I care)
Its not really on the basis of drawing... I wouldn't mind knowing some approximate numbersDaru wrote:
Depends on who's drawing her.
Anywhere from 12 to 21, it would seem.
I'm not super familiar with "measurements", just that she's fairly modestly built.RBRat3 wrote:
Heres something to ponder...
What is pippi's measurements & age?
(Yes I care)
She was originally designed to be 17, but was scaled back to 15 at the time of inception. Depending on whether or not she ages in realtime, she's either 15, or 18~19 now.
thank you very much >u<boat wrote:
this is a good artstyletsuruui wrote:
i can't art but i was bored so i drew pippi-tan >w>
i like it
"i can't art"Daru wrote:
SPOILERi can't art but i was bored so i drew pippi-tan >w>Depends on who's drawing her.RBRat3 wrote:
Heres something to ponder...
What is pippi's measurements & age?
(Yes I care)
Anywhere from 12 to 21, it would seem.tsuruui wrote:
[spoilerbox]
It's not good to lie, ya'know.[/spoilerbox]pshhh, it's not that far from the truth = u =
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1X2bf76wn54RBRat3 wrote:
"This is what old osu! use to look like in the 70s"
Could I get some honest critique on this? 4chan's telling me the proportions are too skinny, but I'd like a second opinion.
The chin feels way too sharp and sticking out imo, and the lips feel overly thick, but that's only because I keep thinking it has to be anime-ish.
And yes that is much too skinny
And yes that is much too skinny
Basically this.JInxyjem wrote:
The chin feels way too sharp and sticking out imo, and the lips feel overly thick, but that's only because I keep thinking it has to be anime-ish.
And yes that is much too skinny
Also, her hands are too large.
Her arms are too long and stomach area is too small.
Do you want a cartoony approach to it, or do you want her to actually look like a girl? Her torso looks more like a cylinder then an actual body, arms need to be 10-20% shorter, legs are not feminine. Its really weird and you should take a look at a real girl and perhaps take an approach that looks slightly more healthy and normal/real. I'd rather have a more realistic pippi then an anorexic twig pippi.Loginer wrote:
Could I get some honest critique on this? 4chan's telling me the proportions are too skinny, but I'd like a second opinion.
Definitely too skinny.Loginer wrote:
Could I get some honest critique on this? 4chan's telling me the proportions are too skinny, but I'd like a second opinion.
Arms are also a couple inches too long
There's a very uncanny-valley look to it, particularly with the clothing and skin texture.
The face also creeps me out. Possibly the shape of the mouth/jaw. It looks too narrow and distended. I'd suggest flushing it out a bit more, using models/images from video games as references.
Her figure should be 2 heads wide, especially around her shoulders. I believe you have it around maybe a little more than 1 head wide but it's hard to tell from the angle. Her hands are too long and where her skirt ends is pretty much about the area that her crotch should be given the location of her tiny waist. Because her hips and thighs are not full enough, her legs are really skinny as a result and makes her resemble a little more like a trap than anything to me right now.
As for her facial features, I'd say move the mouth and nose up a little bit. It's up to you if you want to make the eyes a little smaller or prefer the really big Kanon-like eyes. Remember that the lips should be pushed a little further back than the nose or else she might possibly be confused with a chimpanzee.
- Wider shoulders and slightly more upper body mass (but not to the point of a manly figure, obv)
- Fuller hips (should bring out the butt figure as well and fill out the thighs more)
- Not as long/manly hands (NOT to be confused with smaller since you still need to stay in proportion with where a normal woman's arms should meet at the thigh)
- Bring the skirt down unless panty shots are your thing
Good job though. 3D modeling, especially manipulating polygons and such, can be pretty challenging. I'd recommend having bitmaps of a woman's figure (top, right, front) and setting them as the background in their respective camera views when you're modeling. I did this when I used to do 3D modeling as well, but for vehicles, and it works pretty well as a general guide.
tl;dr Feed her a little bit of American food
As for her facial features, I'd say move the mouth and nose up a little bit. It's up to you if you want to make the eyes a little smaller or prefer the really big Kanon-like eyes. Remember that the lips should be pushed a little further back than the nose or else she might possibly be confused with a chimpanzee.
- Wider shoulders and slightly more upper body mass (but not to the point of a manly figure, obv)
- Fuller hips (should bring out the butt figure as well and fill out the thighs more)
- Not as long/manly hands (NOT to be confused with smaller since you still need to stay in proportion with where a normal woman's arms should meet at the thigh)
- Bring the skirt down unless panty shots are your thing
Good job though. 3D modeling, especially manipulating polygons and such, can be pretty challenging. I'd recommend having bitmaps of a woman's figure (top, right, front) and setting them as the background in their respective camera views when you're modeling. I did this when I used to do 3D modeling as well, but for vehicles, and it works pretty well as a general guide.
tl;dr Feed her a little bit of American food
should be the new pippi looks much better then the current one
that is the current one, as far as I can tellboat wrote:
looks much better then the current one
Then you quite clearly can't tell all that far.
I can tell as far as the first 16 letters of the alphabet. That's over half of them. Good enough to pass
Whats so wrong with the current one? Lack of ass...ets?
big boobs would be bad character design for a dancer
Woah wait a min, When did she become a dancer now?
Ohh forgot to add that assets are a good thing to have when taking the pole position if we're talking about "Dancing" XD
Ohh forgot to add that assets are a good thing to have when taking the pole position if we're talking about "Dancing" XD
I mean dancer in the cheerleader/pep-rally sense? I guess? Like the EBA or OTO doing their dances. Boobs just get in the way
Didn't the Hard Rock mode prove that wrong though
it didn't prove anything
I meant realistically
but maybe I'm at fault for taking a realistic perspective when designing a cartoon
I meant realistically
but maybe I'm at fault for taking a realistic perspective when designing a cartoon
Well...I like em all kinda... 
Heres a small story, Found a 45° blade laying in a junk box so I wasn't too sure if it was dull so gave me a reason to test a roll of vinyl a bought from a company im not familiar with and to see if the blade was in shape. After running around the house with a 24" x 30yd roll of vinyl on my arm pretending to be megaman I came to the conclusion that the fastest means of a test with minimal waste was to 2 tone that pippy I readily had available and slap it on my pc case XD
But sadly the vinyl adhesion to its carrier cant cope with the thin tolerances of her hair which resulted 2 failed cuts but awell I'll just have to tweak it
But sadly the vinyl adhesion to its carrier cant cope with the thin tolerances of her hair which resulted 2 failed cuts but awell I'll just have to tweak it
Her head is too small.
Welp you might have to take that one up with another artist, Im not the person who designed the original base body. It was pulled from an old reference book out of laziness with moderate changes to her leg size, slightly moved arm/finger positions and changed her sharp chin but other than that its untouched for the most part.
Ohh and rounded off her hip bones being I like women with something to grab onto, needed something fast and simple and finding that pose & size almost translated perfectly for the idea I was gonna half ass so I used it rather than dicking around with a drawing manikin.
BUT... The finished example reference did have the base with a rather large head of hair which may have covered up the perception of a small head. Overall it seems fine to me plus the image you see is a 2 tone version of a branch off from the original project file so its basically fun scrap to play with, with plenty of errors to pick out mind you. It was gonna be a wallpaper till I realized it wasn't gonna work out with the BG having gradients and the subject not having any so I wasn't about to redo that BG just get a shade method to look right so it just became incomplete scrap
I would finish the original if I wasn't too busy playing around with this ugly ass thing XD...
Originally I thought I would complete this faster than that pippy but it's slightly over my assumed timeframe :<
Ohh and rounded off her hip bones being I like women with something to grab onto, needed something fast and simple and finding that pose & size almost translated perfectly for the idea I was gonna half ass so I used it rather than dicking around with a drawing manikin.
BUT... The finished example reference did have the base with a rather large head of hair which may have covered up the perception of a small head. Overall it seems fine to me plus the image you see is a 2 tone version of a branch off from the original project file so its basically fun scrap to play with, with plenty of errors to pick out mind you. It was gonna be a wallpaper till I realized it wasn't gonna work out with the BG having gradients and the subject not having any so I wasn't about to redo that BG just get a shade method to look right so it just became incomplete scrap
I would finish the original if I wasn't too busy playing around with this ugly ass thing XD...
Originally I thought I would complete this faster than that pippy but it's slightly over my assumed timeframe :<
This is so Awesome :3
I don't know, what ur mean... did u think its a chibi?? because of the head??
but i think everything is alright O.o?
u see?
V
but i think everything is alright O.o?
u see?
V
I agree with Wojjan, her hips and possibly crotch (not her waist though) are a little too low. Try shifting them upwards a bit.
it does not seem off to me
at least, looking at the skeleton version
at least, looking at the skeleton version
Think of it this way
Our elbows are in level with our waist, or hip bone.
Our elbows are in level with our waist, or hip bone.
Welp I'd like to think im done with this XD
Full PNG, 3,430 x 6,020 pixels http://i.minus.com/dbeXKpb5p2JIeX/TaikoRun.png
Full PNG, 3,430 x 6,020 pixels http://i.minus.com/dbeXKpb5p2JIeX/TaikoRun.png
So much bloom ._.
But very nice looking nonetheless. Good job man
But very nice looking nonetheless. Good job man
Kitsunemimi wrote:
So much bloom ._.
But very nice looking nonetheless. Good job man
Close but its not bloom,
SPOILER
Anyways THX!!!!!Bloom interacts with luminescence and feathers it. What you saw was a camera shader nicknamed peppy porn star (glare) which renders on its own layer and works for and against lume (brightest pixel wins) but instead of feathering it will blur the affected areas. Chose to use it so I could get away with having 1 light source and no global lighting without rendering it a shit load of times to get it right (kinda a fix it all).
I would do it over and work on the lighting but forgot to save the changes to it after peppy said the sizes were off and it looked like shit XD
I would do it over and work on the lighting but forgot to save the changes to it after peppy said the sizes were off and it looked like shit XD
Cool.
Ryu_old
LmaoVext wrote:
I do my parkour in crocs as well.JMC wrote:
well i dont know my artwork included osu! fan art or not..
but this artwork inspired from FREEDOM DiVE beatmap, enjoy...
don't try this at IRL...!!!!
Ryu_old
Vext wrote:
I like the square sun and the all black hair with a pink hood in particular.Ryu wrote:
lol i ve just noticed i drew wrong
p.s.
ty moe vext >w</
Well.
EDIT: JJ got angry and raged at me about saying something he said on skype on here, so I removed it thus making this post seem confusing and make no sense!
So I'll periodically upload a little at a time all of the backlogged stuff I did for monthly that never got released.
Here's caption contest #3 Raw without the caption bubble. It is quite old.
EDIT: JJ got angry and raged at me about saying something he said on skype on here, so I removed it thus making this post seem confusing and make no sense!
So I'll periodically upload a little at a time all of the backlogged stuff I did for monthly that never got released.
Here's caption contest #3 Raw without the caption bubble. It is quite old.
Eeyup. That was confusing and made no sense.
*rolls eyes*
♥
that is delightful I'm keepin' that one
that is delightful I'm keepin' that one
<3
woah, those are awesome renders
contemplating using one of those as my background
contemplating using one of those as my background
did them at 1920x1080 just for a default, wallpaper wasn't really a main point but if you want an absurd rez let me know
nah don't worry, my resolution is only 1366x768 or something like that so I can manage resizing myself
actually, they'd be awesome userpages.
Ryu_old
cute ><
Ryu_old
nobody this isn't osu! fanart this is anime girls move that nonsense to offtopic and stick with osu! fan art here
awp I don't mean to be rude but it's quite difficult to read sentences like that when they don't have any punctuation and by that I mean ones that need more than just a comma or two
that looks like the current hairstyle to me :{
The hair in the back is longer, that's the difference... I think. That's how I always draweded the Pipster, it does look more pleasing to the yes imo.
Very nice.
wow... awesome
What is the osu! logo font type so I can straighten that damn "o", It was in the SVG but I lost it and its no longer up in the FAQ.
Verdana.RBRat3 wrote:
What is the osu! logo font type so I can straighten that damn "o", It was in the SVG but I lost it and its no longer up in the FAQ.
Ah, I was referring to how I had the hair go down instead of up - the bangs make more sense that way, imo.
If you made it - be proud of it.
If you're not proud of it, don't show us until you've damn well made it something to be proud of.
Also, since it's been far too long since I drew this, I might as well post this:
Pet peeve of mine: People posting art with a comment along the lines of "Ugh this sucks!".RBRat3 wrote:
Bah... Junk XD
If you made it - be proud of it.
If you're not proud of it, don't show us until you've damn well made it something to be proud of.
Also, since it's been far too long since I drew this, I might as well post this:
Oh, by that do you mean the hair has a natural structure/flow to it, as oppose to that airplane-vent sort of hair that a lot of anime characters have? (Bad-angled example: http://quizilla.teennick.com/user_image ... _Power.jpg)Daru wrote:
Ah, I was referring to how I had the hair go down instead of up - the bangs make more sense that way, imo.
I didn't say it sucks I said it was junk as in not needed or met my expectations I dont see any reason not to post it.Daru wrote:
Ah, I was referring to how I had the hair go down instead of up - the bangs make more sense that way, imo.Pet peeve of mine: People posting art with a comment along the lines of "Ugh this sucks!".RBRat3 wrote:
Bah... Junk XD
If you made it - be proud of it.
The only thing to be proud of is the model, having it sit there for 45 min for the renderer push out the wrong exposure isn't something to be desired by myself but others may find it to their liking.
I have tons of junk outputs hell my signature is another one, That beauty is a fluid simulation that took 4 hours to calculate an osu! logo shaped puck shot into a pool of water at high velocity and I got a crappy splash breakage. All in all It did make for an interesting sig tho.
Junk renders are fun to produce and churn out some pretty interesting shit XD
Even this was a junk output but it didnt stop others from liking it nor does it mean Im not proud of it in some form or other.
Those are called hair_intakes.awp wrote:
Oh, by that do you mean the hair has a natural structure/flow to it, as oppose to that airplane-vent sort of hair that a lot of anime characters have? (Bad-angled example: http://quizilla.teennick.com/user_image ... _Power.jpg)Daru wrote:
Ah, I was referring to how I had the hair go down instead of up - the bangs make more sense that way, imo.
The ones that daru draws Pippi with are very minor and subtle though.
ah, yes! Thank youKitsunemimi wrote:
Those are called hair_intakes.
The ones that daru draws Pippi with are very minor and subtle though.
Yeah, those.
I think I've said this before, but I generally don't like drawing hairstyles that would require obscene amounts of styling or gel in real life to pull off when used as an "everyday" hairstyle. It doesn't feel right.
And wow, they have a name. o3o
I think I've said this before, but I generally don't like drawing hairstyles that would require obscene amounts of styling or gel in real life to pull off when used as an "everyday" hairstyle. It doesn't feel right.
And wow, they have a name. o3o
I did a full-blown spiky hair thing once. It took an extra person and like half a bottle of hair gel to pull off. It's friggin' ridiculousDaru wrote:
I think I've said this before, but I generally don't like drawing hairstyles that would require obscene amounts of styling or gel in real life to pull off when used as an "everyday" hairstyle. It doesn't feel right.
Daru wrote:
Ah, I was referring to how I had the hair go down instead of up - the bangs make more sense that way, imo.Also, since it's been far too long since I drew this, I might as well post this:RBRat3 wrote:
Bah... Junk XD
Looks pretty.
---
My version of what i can see.
Can't see the character, just numbers, also thats the limit for osu from my perspective.
Edit.
You can't catch IR and UV frecuencies
>I can see them but ignore it's difficult.
Sending to black that.
Oink oink, hahaha.
.....What?