Agreed. Damn scum.UnderminE wrote:
vote: Mashley
Agreed. Damn scum.UnderminE wrote:
vote: Mashley
Mashley wrote:
HEY GUYS THE GAME STARTED WHERE ARE YOU ALL
as Nyquill said, it's called RVS. This can pressure a player to defend himself/herself and to prove that he/she is town.Makar8000 wrote:
soooo why are people voting here without real reason
lol. We just lose in Mafia in the Dark.foulcoon wrote:
nobody is allowed to vote for me. i will never be lynched. i will never be night killed
i am forever... winning
I don't think so.animask wrote:
Do you think your role matches your celebrity?
and you vote for Swatty anyway?animask wrote:
I prefer not being part of the RVS
My role doesn't match in my opinion.animask wrote:
Vote: Swatty the new people always end up being mafia!
I prefer not being part of the RVS, so lets make this a RQS instead.
Do you think your role matches your celebrity? Mine does not match at all.
You are Kanye West, a Gay Fish (Serial Killer). Each night you may choose to strangle (or in any way other than shooting, kill) someone who won't explain why you are a gay fish.kanye west wrote:
Mine makes zero sense.
But...but...I do believe I'm a gay fish! And it still makes no sense! Halp plzfoulcoon wrote:
You are Kanye West, a Gay Fish (Serial Killer). Each night you may choose to strangle (or in any way other than shooting, kill) someone who won't explain why you are a gay fish.kanye west wrote:
Mine makes zero sense.
you clearly think your role makes zero sense because you don't believe that you're a gay fish.
I was thinking of that too, but was wondering if that was because of RVS only.Nyquill wrote:
Hey, anyone noticed that pieguy is the only one who wagoned so far.
2.)Um... I don't actually know what role will pop out on my first 2 picks. The other one I think will pop out as a Third Person role.dafuq does this even mean
Basically this.Rantai wrote:
Forgot? You were only 1 post behind the first one and only 40 mins later O.o
Yeah, that was just an RV... I forgot someone had already voted NoHitterThe phrasing strikes me as odd, as "I forgot" around the circumstances doesn't really make much sense. I wanted to vote bmin, as his pointing out of (a second vote on same person in RVS, which isn't really that notable expecially if someone isn't watching meticulously to make sure they don't) in a game with this many people seems more like a subtle scum tactic than town. However, something really irks me about pieguy's statement and we're less than a day from deadline. Also hitter still had 2 votes and was on the lead to be lynched (assuming there's a lynch at deadline versus no lynch, haven't checked the rules on that part at the time I'm posting this. Trying to finish posting before the storm kills my electricity.
EXACTLY! RV's are not supposed to be thought about in the first place. They're RANDOM - no need to reason why you did it.pieguy1372 wrote:
That probably wasn't the best word to use, but regardless, I wasn't really paying much attention, as it was just RVS.
unvote, vote NoHitter... oh wait, I'm already voting him. Anyway he called me out for not caring about my RV and then asked why I would care in the first place. It seems like a bit of a contradiction IMO.
Well this is the only suspicious thing that arose today apart from Papi who I think is just inexperienced.bmin11 wrote:
Hmm... I can logically agree with your accusations, but it isn't heavy enough for a lynch for me. I really wish I could get something to work on.
I'm concerned with NoH'i'tter's attitude right now. I think he is pushing this lynch way harder then the actual weight of suspiciousness.
I'm pushing for the lynch because among everyone today, pieguy has acted most suspiciously.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Personally I see NoHitter's reasoning for pushing for a lynch is that we'll get an idea by seeing the Lynchee's alignment which will give all of us a general idea what this setup looks like. I mean I'd rather lynch someone than a no lynch on Day 1 for pyp's. Just my opinion.