in
HAHAHAHAHA.JInxyjem wrote:
oh wow you sent it to how many people?
/replace
btw you forgot to send it to manslayer
Automatic join pretty much? lol I'll playSalvage wrote:
9.bmin11
1. It's tricky now, since we have people on this forum who generally lurk but yet mafia are starting to lurk as a strategy. Neutral right now.Wojjan wrote:
vote mashley
fuck the police
RQS YAY
1. DO YOU ENDORSE OF LYNCHING LIURKERS??????!!!
2. DO YOU LIKE PLAYING SCUM-ALIGNED?
3. ARE YOU MAFIA LIKE SRSLY FOR A SECOND?
1. If there's not much to go on, sure. Keeps the game going, and avoids situations at LyLo with players we don't know anything about.Wojjan wrote:
vote mashley
fuck the police
RQS YAY
1. DO YOU ENDORSE OF LYNCHING LIURKERS??????!!!
2. DO YOU LIKE PLAYING SCUM-ALIGNED?
3. ARE YOU MAFIA LIKE SRSLY FOR A SECOND?
1. EVER SINCE SONGFIA WENT DOWN YES. SERIOUSLY THAT GAME WAS BULLSHIT AND I STILL HATE MYSELF FOR ITWojjan wrote:
1. DO YOU ENDORSE OF LYNCHING LIURKERS??????!!!
2. DO YOU LIKE PLAYING SCUM-ALIGNED?
3. ARE YOU MAFIA LIKE SRSLY FOR A SECOND?
Wojjan wrote:
you should post your role pm else it's not a real ragequit
I would laugh if anyone thought that was real.Salvage wrote:
You are a Jester and One-shot bulletproof.
You win when you are lynched. If you are Nightkilled, you lose.
oh well, you should clear it up for us EkaruEkaru wrote:
Also, I don't vote for anybody right now 'cuz nobody has been killed yet so we can't come up with any trends yet.
That was more of a way to read people's reactions to that. Anyways...Sync wrote:
oh, you think? I thought he was because of:oh well, you should clear it up for us EkaruEkaru wrote:
Also, I don't vote for anybody right now 'cuz nobody has been killed yet so we can't come up with any trends yet.
Unvote Disregard that, I learned to read.LadySuburu wrote:
Vote: DxS
Let's trust that gut!
vote MashleyMashley wrote:
It don't think No one atm is in this game
Why didn't you just state you don't want to vote for anyone in this game?-Newbie- wrote:
Vote: No one atm
1. I now think that we should only lynch lurkers if that's against their town meta. For example, if Rantai starts to lurk (which is against his town meta) then that is definitely suspicious.Wojjan wrote:
1. DO YOU ENDORSE OF LYNCHING LIURKERS??????!!!
2. DO YOU LIKE PLAYING SCUM-ALIGNED?
3. ARE YOU MAFIA LIKE SRSLY FOR A SECOND?
lol'dWojjan wrote:
we all know since Luna and Swift that while furry = dumb, dumb =/= scum.
*sigh* Fine, I'll confess, since I pretty much have to at this point. Yes, what Wojjan said is true and is exactly what happened.Sync wrote:
I wasn't shooting it down because it was meta or anythingIt was just a shit ton of meta that I have nothing to do with so I was like "~_~"
Because I felt like it?NoHItter wrote:
@LadySuburu
Why did you softclaim this early?
Actually, my role is unimportant, and only dangerous if I use it. Actually, only that PART of my role is dangerous if I use it.Wojjan wrote:
so "I have an important dangerous role" is not dangerous to town?
I always have a magic bag, aren't you used to that by now?Wojjan wrote:
he's magic bagging, GET HIM