they weren't added to the members list when I made thatRantai wrote:
Oh it's the volatile combination of players again. Rollercoaster time.
Did anyone else miss the fact that Chris didn't mention Two at all? /wild theories ahoy
you wereDafydd wrote:
I thought I was the last guy in the list...
alrightTwo wrote:
well, I completely disagree
and I have a better track record so I trust my intuition more
he can still play after he's lynched so there is no point in not voting to confirm a townRantai wrote:
Good god overreactions anyone?
You know only 1 person followed Two and it was Chris (surprise surprise). Honestly I cannot follow this spat with any amount of reasoning.
Deja vu.Salvage wrote:
this would be the second time two claims an anti town role and doesnt get lynched, its actually pretty funny how u guys fear him
Sounds kind of crappy really. It's like getting 100% on every assessment but failing the final exam and failing the entire course anyway (yes that's the best I could think of, sue me). Sure you did great during the duration but in the end a fail is still a fail.Two wrote:
no, even when cult is bigger than town you still achieve your goal of beating the mafia
not to mention the cult is comprised almost entirely of town members
you lose in name only, and even then only if you died before being assimilated
exactlyChris wrote:
in this case it's actually anti-mafia which is why you want him gone
my win condition can be the same as town's if I simply hit 2 mafia at any point in the game, or 2 independentRantai wrote:
Seriously though, let's say he is telling the truth about his win con, then he is very much anti-town as it requires town death to achieve (not to mention is very easy to achieve given some luck).
Chris wrote:
don't forget they backed out of their "vote who you want me to shoot" with "don't want 3 kills in 1 night"
The other way round, ChrisWojjan wrote:
or do you not want three kills in one night that's cool too.
no it's exactly how I said itJInxyjem wrote:
Chris wrote:
don't forget they backed out of their "vote who you want me to shoot" with "don't want 3 kills in 1 night"The other way round, ChrisWojjan wrote:
or do you not want three kills in one night that's cool too.
You are more likely to hit one of two different types, and when that happens you win independent from us.Two wrote:
my win condition can be the same as town's if I simply hit 2 mafia at any point in the game, or 2 independentRantai wrote:
Seriously though, let's say he is telling the truth about his win con, then he is very much anti-town as it requires town death to achieve (not to mention is very easy to achieve given some luck).
even if I hit 2 town I become town, so really your apprehension is illogical
no, like I said there's an approximately even divide of alignmentsJInxyjem wrote:
You are more likely to hit one of two types, and when that happens you win independent from us.
And if you hit 2 town, we still lose a town
Oh look a sakuya whoopChris wrote:
look since I want to lol when salvage flips mafia here's how it's going to work
you're all going to vote salvage
if you don't I'm going to reverse time until you do
if salvage isn't mafia I'll reverse time
if he is, two kill wojjan
simple enough right
Except you need 2 kills. For example, you kill a town, you can claim you're going to aim a town and then you shoot down an independent or maf.Two wrote:
no, like I said there's an approximately even divide of alignmentsJInxyjem wrote:
You are more likely to hit one of two types, and when that happens you win independent from us.
And if you hit 2 town, we still lose a town
I assume that means 5/5/6
I'm not good at math but I'm 100% sure that means I'm more likely to become town, and regardless of that I just told you how I can win
are you all unable to lynch me if I come close to winning?
I have lost all faith in this ever happening.Two wrote:
are you all unable to lynch me if I come close to winning?