12131123123123123
forum
Rita - Little Busters! -Ecstasy Ver.-
posted
Total Posts
189
well, the map still has some issues as far as I can see it (issues which really needed to be fixed IMO) but that doesn't justify that rating.
TokidoSaya_old_1
想必你完全打不了Rika难度,也无法判断好与坏.KayeSara wrote:
恭喜rika又rank图，说实话这次做的很有进步！至少我很喜欢！同时也是作为key社fans的喜欢！！木哈哈
再者，投黑票的还是该自重了。我知道这部分多余的黑票都出至于rika的rank速度很快的让人羡慕，但从另外来讲，rika付出很多，而且一直很努力，至少每次我上线都看到她都在作图，难道这还不够？（写给国人看也够了，外国人也没闲心建小号浪费时间帮人投票）
歌是歌,map是map,即便是我用着这样一个ID也没办法消除我对这张map的反感.
如老詹所说,就算你再怎么搞基要来再多的mod也无法拯救一张骨子里就没有存在意义的map.
另外,这图有充足理由被unrank,有note没有被正确snap,而我也指出过这一点,不过既然现在这图获得了这样的rating,那么我也不多说什么,好自为之.
至于rank图速度过快遭人红眼,这点如果map本身足够好自然是可以避免的,你见过别人因为婆婆图rank太快而spam一分?
哇开小号刷1分的真了不起
TokidoSaya
Previously known as a dirty cheater
要说就开大号啊
首先开小号黑1分是一个对OSU风气有非常大影响的行为，经历过几次事件我自己都觉得会去开黑刷1分的都只有中国人干得出来的事了。这是给中国人长了脸呢，还是丢了脸呢？要知道，这部分数据老板和几个管理那边其实是看得到的。
其次这图可能确实不是很好，给1分是你的自由，但是开小号刷或者叫一群人去刷这种事情，真的是很值得自豪的事吗？我知道估计你也自豪不起来，所以你才开小号在这里说话。这是你的自由，请自便。不过，莫要人不知，除非己莫为。
至于mapper自己我觉得也需要有所检讨，为什么会被黑1分，是行为或者是图本身的问题，也必须自己思考思考，别人黑你当然也是有理由的，无论那是正当的还是不正当的。我也希望所有mapper都能思考这个问题，包括我自己。
TokidoSaya
Previously known as a dirty cheater
要说就开大号啊
首先开小号黑1分是一个对OSU风气有非常大影响的行为，经历过几次事件我自己都觉得会去开黑刷1分的都只有中国人干得出来的事了。这是给中国人长了脸呢，还是丢了脸呢？要知道，这部分数据老板和几个管理那边其实是看得到的。
其次这图可能确实不是很好，给1分是你的自由，但是开小号刷或者叫一群人去刷这种事情，真的是很值得自豪的事吗？我知道估计你也自豪不起来，所以你才开小号在这里说话。这是你的自由，请自便。不过，莫要人不知，除非己莫为。
至于mapper自己我觉得也需要有所检讨，为什么会被黑1分，是行为或者是图本身的问题，也必须自己思考思考，别人黑你当然也是有理由的，无论那是正当的还是不正当的。我也希望所有mapper都能思考这个问题，包括我自己。
我什麼也不說 我只想問unsnap note在哪
TokidoSaya_old_1
What's the matter with the rating? o_o
This is not a shit.
This is not a shit.
ykcarrot wrote:
What's the matter with the rating? o_o
This is not a shit.
Maybe somebody or some people do it viciously by use new account vote for 1/call their friends do iteldnl wrote:
ykcarrot wrote:
What's the matter with the rating? o_o
This is not a shit.
哟e婆你知道我ID是什么意思吗?goodbye wrote:
哇开小号刷1分的真了不起
TokidoSaya
Previously known as a dirty cheater
要说就开大号啊
首先开小号黑1分是一个对OSU风气有非常大影响的行为，经历过几次事件我自己都觉得会去开黑刷1分的都只有中国人干得出来的事了。这是给中国人长了脸呢，还是丢了脸呢？要知道，这部分数据老板和几个管理那边其实是看得到的。
其次这图可能确实不是很好，给1分是你的自由，但是开小号刷或者叫一群人去刷这种事情，真的是很值得自豪的事吗？我知道估计你也自豪不起来，所以你才开小号在这里说话。这是你的自由，请自便。不过，莫要人不知，除非己莫为。
至于mapper自己我觉得也需要有所检讨，为什么会被黑1分，是行为或者是图本身的问题，也必须自己思考思考，别人黑你当然也是有理由的，无论那是正当的还是不正当的。我也希望所有mapper都能思考这个问题，包括我自己。
我为什么在第四页开小号来mod这个map?
这首歌?
我有隐藏自己身份的意思?我是盒饭.我的modding queue里明确有这个ID,这人也去我的queue里求过mod.
我相信开小号刷一分的大有人在Heatherfield wrote:
哟e婆你知道我ID是什么意思吗?goodbye wrote:
哇开小号刷1分的真了不起
TokidoSaya
Previously known as a dirty cheater
要说就开大号啊
首先开小号黑1分是一个对OSU风气有非常大影响的行为，经历过几次事件我自己都觉得会去开黑刷1分的都只有中国人干得出来的事了。这是给中国人长了脸呢，还是丢了脸呢？要知道，这部分数据老板和几个管理那边其实是看得到的。
其次这图可能确实不是很好，给1分是你的自由，但是开小号刷或者叫一群人去刷这种事情，真的是很值得自豪的事吗？我知道估计你也自豪不起来，所以你才开小号在这里说话。这是你的自由，请自便。不过，莫要人不知，除非己莫为。
至于mapper自己我觉得也需要有所检讨，为什么会被黑1分，是行为或者是图本身的问题，也必须自己思考思考，别人黑你当然也是有理由的，无论那是正当的还是不正当的。我也希望所有mapper都能思考这个问题，包括我自己。
我为什么在第四页开小号来mod这个map?
这首歌?
我有隐藏自己身份的意思?我是盒饭.我的modding queue里明确有这个ID,这人也去我的queue里求过mod.
至于你认为别人一看到你那小号就知道是你，抱歉，我相信大部分人都没有那么了解你。
当然，其实一看那说话口气就知道是你了。
既然如此，何苦用小号?
Tokido Saya
麻烦百度一下
麻烦百度一下
开小号这么自豪?Heatherfield wrote:
Tokido Saya
麻烦百度一下
不扯了打麻将去，你爱怎么样怎么样我之前也说了。把这贴搞成没有意义的战帖也没有必要。
该说什么之前也说了
我只想说集团刷黑什么的，呵呵
当然这图不算好，mapper也该自我检讨
我只是想说明一下我使用这个ID在这里发帖的意图,如果你一定要情绪化把这变成战帖我觉得那我也还是提前闭嘴比较好,毕竟事前事后我该说的都说了,事已至此,再说都是多余.goodbye wrote:
开小号这么自豪?Heatherfield wrote:
Tokido Saya
麻烦百度一下
I really wanna know what you guys are writing, but I can't read Chinese~
呵呵 人家外国人都在这里替这图抱不平，到底是不是集团黑那就只有黑的人知道了Hatsune Miku wrote:
屎图该拿一分 好图该拿十分 自然法则
非要说有人集团黑 那也有黑的理由 不可能一大堆人都把白的说成黑的
盒饭eatshi 完了
一大堆人吗
嘛这事我是不想管了，你们爱怎么怎么样吧
Me too :CTenshi-nyan wrote:
I really wanna know what you guys are writing, but I can't read Chinese~
I check Ai mod and note are properly snap. :C
But what happen.
A least it's not bad to vote 1 .
KayeSara
不会玩我发个帖子干什么？TokidoSaya wrote:
想必你完全打不了Rika难度,也无法判断好与坏.KayeSara wrote:
恭喜rika又rank图，说实话这次做的很有进步！至少我很喜欢！同时也是作为key社fans的喜欢！！木哈哈
再者，投黑票的还是该自重了。我知道这部分多余的黑票都出至于rika的rank速度很快的让人羡慕，但从另外来讲，rika付出很多，而且一直很努力，至少每次我上线都看到她都在作图，难道这还不够？（写给国人看也够了，外国人也没闲心建小号浪费时间帮人投票）
歌是歌,map是map,即便是我用着这样一个ID也没办法消除我对这张map的反感.
如老詹所说,就算你再怎么搞基要来再多的mod也无法拯救一张骨子里就没有存在意义的map.
另外,这图有充足理由被unrank,有note没有被正确snap,而我也指出过这一点,不过既然现在这图获得了这样的rating,那么我也不多说什么,好自为之.
至于rank图速度过快遭人红眼,这点如果map本身足够好自然是可以避免的,你见过别人因为婆婆图rank太快而spam一分?
1pc+spun 玩多了没意义，天又晚，全身都发冷的玩给你看，不过我不是你老触，弱B没能力FC，录像一起给你贴了
Download: KayeSara - Rita - Little Busters! -Ecstasy Ver.- [Rika] (2011-12-04) Osu.osr
Hatsune Miku_old
哦，好，收回前言，向你道歉。
我也不想再出口伤人，请便。
我也不想再出口伤人，请便。
People are just mad.qilliam wrote:
how... did this happen ._.
O___O WHAT RATING 0^0
I really can't understand this...
I don't understand either even though I can read chineseVerdisphena wrote:
I really can't understand this...
尊重下mapper本人吧o_o;
@all : nothing happen \o/
@all : nothing happen \o/
retards voting 1 again...
congrats for the rank, sorry that this hate-rating is happening to you
congrats for the rank, sorry that this hate-rating is happening to you
Clearly something happened if there are walls of texts with a score image. What's the issue with this map?
this sounds better to me, should we unrank this map because of this part ??
i need other BAT's opinions
EDIT:After some discussion in #BAT, we may unrank this mapset, plz fix those notes and let it reranked
H.. Heart broke(n) :C
Alace wrote:
this sounds better to me, should we unrank this map because of this part ??
i need other BAT's opinions
EDIT:After some discussion in #BAT, we may unrank this mapset, plz fix those notes and let it reranked
in my opinion, ↑ is more exact/appropriate
TokidoSaya wrote:
00:14:921 (1,2,3,4)karenying wrote:
我什麼也不說 我只想問unsnap note在哪
无论多木耳开25%也能明白这压根不是2/3
unsnap的定义你懂? 依你的道理自造连打全是unsnap
Did some quick IRC modding for Kawayi's diffs.
[Taiko]
00:13:326 (1,1) - These sound awful, but if you want them in there, at least snap the ends so you don't get that extra blob that has no tick to hit at the end. Maybe doing a crescendo would make it sound better. Right now it's just so much in your face for such a subdued but rising part.
01:50:776 (2) - Huh?
[Zero]
01:37:167 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - After all those streams, this part suddenly felt rather empty.
02:43:922 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - This too, but at least the spacing is larger so it isn't as easy.
SPOILER
00:39 <Garven> : Well then
00:39 <Garven> : Let's start with Busters!
00:39 <Garven> : First, the beginning's combos feel off
00:40 <Kawayi Rika> : yeah
00:40 <Garven> : Since you use the combo changes for the pattern instead of the music
00:40 <Garven> : Then later change to the music instead of the patterns
00:40 <Garven> : Stick to one or the other to give a better feel of consistency
00:40 <Garven> : Personally I prefer keeping with the music
00:40 <Garven> : Makes more sense to me.
00:40 <Garven> : So if we do that, 00:03:790 (3) - new combo
00:40 <Garven> : 00:06:174 (5) - ^
00:40 <Garven> : 00:07:366 (1) - remove
00:40 <Garven> : 00:08:558 (2) - new
00:41 <Garven> : 00:07:366 (2,1,2) - Spacing feels too small amongst these
00:41 <Garven> : 00:15:909 (1) - May as well extend this spinner to 00:17:498 -
00:42 <Garven> : 00:24:452 (3) - It'd be cool if you could get this slider to not have the circle part to not be overlapping. It'll look a lot cleaner.
00:42 <Garven> : Even something like one grid left/right on the two sliders works fine
00:43 <Garven> : 00:31:604 (5) - new combo
00:44 <Garven> : 00:33:194 (3,4,5) - Well, I guess with this pattern maybe not new combo at that last one
00:44 <Garven> : This is why doing it to the pattern feels so wrong to me.
00:45 <Garven> : 00:52:664 (4) - Maybe something like this to break up the monotonous 1/1/1/1/1 rhythm you have going? http://puu.sh/9Y5Z
00:47 <Garven> : http://puu.sh/9Y6d Try a technique like this if you're trying to acheive an elbow slider. Looks much cleaner this way. 01:04:982 (1) -
00:47 <Kawayi Rika> : 00:24:452 (3) - how to fixed this?
00:48 <Garven> : 01:07:366 (1) - So taht applies to this slider as well
00:48 <Garven> : 00:24:452 (3) - Move right one grid 00:23:260 (2) - move left one grid
00:49 <Kawayi Rika> : OK
00:49 <Garven> : 01:09:750 (1,3) - It'd be nice if you could position these so they dont' have that overlap apprear http://puu.sh/9Y6C
00:50 <Garven> : 01:15:313 (3) - New combo
00:50 <Garven> : 01:16:505 (1) - remove
00:50 <Garven> : 01:27:233 (3) - new combo
00:50 <Garven> : etc.
00:51 <Garven> : Try to have around 2 measure long combos
00:51 <Garven> : Er
00:51 <Garven> : two big white ticks
00:51 <Garven> : It will give a much better consistency feel
00:51 <Garven> : So you avoid awkward short combos like this one 01:29:617 (1) -
00:52 <Garven> : 01:35:578 (4,5) - soft hitsounds feel weak here
00:52 <Garven> : 01:44:717 - Move this break back to the default spot. It's positioned incorrectly. Just drag it all the way left
00:53 <Garven> : 01:55:843 (1,2) - Starting with a stack then moving on to a pattern makes for awkward play when the music doesn't change any to give
00:53 <Garven> : a good feel for the stop and go motion that you set up
00:53 <Garven> : 01:59:021 (5,6) - ^
00:54 <Garven> : 02:01:803 (3) - Don't recommend stacks under slider ends for the easiest of a set
00:54 <Garven> : 02:04:584 (4) - Add whistle to the end of this slider
00:54 <Garven> : 02:08:558 (1) - Too soon after a spinner for the easiest of the set
00:55 <Garven> : 02:08:558 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Honestly feels overmapped for such a softer part of the song. You use the exact same rhythm during the
00:55 <Garven> : stronger parts of the song, so this feels overly done.
00:57 <Garven> : Maybe a rhythm like this would work better to convey the softer tone of this part
00:57 <Garven> : http://puu.sh/9Y7Q
00:58 <Garven> : 02:33:988 (3,4) - Kinda ugly overlap and easily avoidable
00:58 <Garven> : 02:52:266 (3,4) - Same comment about the odd use of stacking when the music doesn't change any
00:59 <Garven> : 02:56:339 (1) - Why have the end silent when you have such a strong drum hit to finish it with?
01:00 <Garven> : On to [Rin]
01:00 <Garven> : 00:09:353 (2) - Why did you use this rhythm when you follow the guitar so well up until this point? Plays awkward
01:01 <Garven> : 00:10:942 (1) - Spinner ends in a strange spot and feels like it drags on too long. End it at 00:10:942 (1) -
01:01 <Garven> : 00:14:915 (1,2,3) - Set these notes to the same rhythm that was suggested due to the unranking
01:02 <Garven> : 00:15:710 (4) - End this slider at 00:17:498 -
01:02 <Garven> : 00:21:670 (1) - Why a normal finish when there's no percussion at all in the music?
01:03 <Garven> : 00:30:809 (1) - Yeah, see what you can do about the new combo usage to avoid short combos like this
01:04 <Garven> : 01:28:425 (5,6) - Strange pattern to make. I would have preferred them to be normal circles there and have sliders earlier in the combo
01:05 <Garven> : 01:33:392 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This looks really messy with all the overlap
01:06 <Garven> : 01:42:730 - Should add a slider tick sound here
01:06 <Garven> : 01:44:717 - Drag this break all the way to the left
01:07 <Garven> : 02:10:942 (1,3) - These sliders could look a lot better
01:07 <Garven> : 02:13:922 (3) - These short sliders are kinda meh. I like 'em better as stacked circles
01:08 <Garven> : 02:23:260 (3,5) - Please don't cover a circle so much with a slider. It's ugly and bad practice.
01:09 <Garven> : 02:31:406 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - The pattern looks fine, but it's too long for the phrase in the music so the combo feels wrong
01:10 <Garven> : 02:51:472 (5) - ctrl + h for better flow
01:10 <Garven> : 02:52:266 (7) - ^
01:10 <Garven> : 02:49:286 (1) - Can you position this so it doesn't overlap with 02:48:293 (9) - ?
01:11 <Garven> : 02:43:525 - Another thing: Why isthe slider speed still 1.5x here? The music has taken a step back in intensity, but the slider speed
01:11 <Garven> : doesn't reflect that
01:12 <Garven> : And it ends up causing strange spacing like at 02:46:704 (1) - that feels too big for how the music is flowing and compared to how you
01:12 <Garven> : mapped previous sections
01:13 <Garven> : 02:54:651 (1,2,3) - I would have preferred just more circle usage and patterns instead of just sitting in the middle clicking on stacked
01:13 <Garven> : kick sliders since it's such a huge buildup to that last note
01:13 <Garven> : 02:56:339 (1) - Same comment about the silenced spinner end
01:24 <Garven> : Okay, I'll do a forum post for the Taiko/Zero diffs
01:24 <Garven> : On to [Rika]
01:25 <Garven> : 00:14:915 (1,2,3,4) - Of course fix this rhythm
01:25 <Garven> : 00:08:558 (1,2,3,4,5) - Strange that you opted to do 1/1 rhythms after the beginning part
01:26 <Garven> : 00:34:088 - Snap this timing section to the end of the slider at 00:34:187 -
01:26 <Garven> : The slider slide is -really- noticible during that silent part of the song
01:27 <Garven> : 00:47:498 (1,2,3,4) - Pretty radical spacing for such a measured part of the music
01:29 <Garven> : 01:24:055 (1,2,3) - A really sudden jump after so much distance snapping
01:30 <Garven> : 01:49:485 (1,2,3,4) - At least position them so that they're not overlapping (or have them even looking as 4 looks further away from the
01:30 <Garven> : 2/3 than 1 does)
01:31 <Garven> : 01:50:876 (6,1) - Uncharacteristic jump during this part of the song
01:31 <Garven> : 01:51:074 (1) - This slider ends in a strange spot. Feels better ending at 01:51:074 (1) - or at 01:51:074 (1) -
01:32 <Garven> : 02:00:015 (3,4,5) - Uneven spacing like this is eh
01:32 <Garven> : 02:05:379 (1) - Why such a silent end of the spinner when you have a good drum beat there in the music?
01:34 <Garven> : 02:43:525 - Same comment about the 1.5x slider speed
01:34 <Garven> : 02:56:339 (1) - Why silent spinner end aaah
00:39 <Garven> : Let's start with Busters!
00:39 <Garven> : First, the beginning's combos feel off
00:40 <Kawayi Rika> : yeah
00:40 <Garven> : Since you use the combo changes for the pattern instead of the music
00:40 <Garven> : Then later change to the music instead of the patterns
00:40 <Garven> : Stick to one or the other to give a better feel of consistency
00:40 <Garven> : Personally I prefer keeping with the music
00:40 <Garven> : Makes more sense to me.
00:40 <Garven> : So if we do that, 00:03:790 (3) - new combo
00:40 <Garven> : 00:06:174 (5) - ^
00:40 <Garven> : 00:07:366 (1) - remove
00:40 <Garven> : 00:08:558 (2) - new
00:41 <Garven> : 00:07:366 (2,1,2) - Spacing feels too small amongst these
00:41 <Garven> : 00:15:909 (1) - May as well extend this spinner to 00:17:498 -
00:42 <Garven> : 00:24:452 (3) - It'd be cool if you could get this slider to not have the circle part to not be overlapping. It'll look a lot cleaner.
00:42 <Garven> : Even something like one grid left/right on the two sliders works fine
00:43 <Garven> : 00:31:604 (5) - new combo
00:44 <Garven> : 00:33:194 (3,4,5) - Well, I guess with this pattern maybe not new combo at that last one
00:44 <Garven> : This is why doing it to the pattern feels so wrong to me.
00:45 <Garven> : 00:52:664 (4) - Maybe something like this to break up the monotonous 1/1/1/1/1 rhythm you have going? http://puu.sh/9Y5Z
00:47 <Garven> : http://puu.sh/9Y6d Try a technique like this if you're trying to acheive an elbow slider. Looks much cleaner this way. 01:04:982 (1) -
00:47 <Kawayi Rika> : 00:24:452 (3) - how to fixed this?
00:48 <Garven> : 01:07:366 (1) - So taht applies to this slider as well
00:48 <Garven> : 00:24:452 (3) - Move right one grid 00:23:260 (2) - move left one grid
00:49 <Kawayi Rika> : OK
00:49 <Garven> : 01:09:750 (1,3) - It'd be nice if you could position these so they dont' have that overlap apprear http://puu.sh/9Y6C
00:50 <Garven> : 01:15:313 (3) - New combo
00:50 <Garven> : 01:16:505 (1) - remove
00:50 <Garven> : 01:27:233 (3) - new combo
00:50 <Garven> : etc.
00:51 <Garven> : Try to have around 2 measure long combos
00:51 <Garven> : Er
00:51 <Garven> : two big white ticks
00:51 <Garven> : It will give a much better consistency feel
00:51 <Garven> : So you avoid awkward short combos like this one 01:29:617 (1) -
00:52 <Garven> : 01:35:578 (4,5) - soft hitsounds feel weak here
00:52 <Garven> : 01:44:717 - Move this break back to the default spot. It's positioned incorrectly. Just drag it all the way left
00:53 <Garven> : 01:55:843 (1,2) - Starting with a stack then moving on to a pattern makes for awkward play when the music doesn't change any to give
00:53 <Garven> : a good feel for the stop and go motion that you set up
00:53 <Garven> : 01:59:021 (5,6) - ^
00:54 <Garven> : 02:01:803 (3) - Don't recommend stacks under slider ends for the easiest of a set
00:54 <Garven> : 02:04:584 (4) - Add whistle to the end of this slider
00:54 <Garven> : 02:08:558 (1) - Too soon after a spinner for the easiest of the set
00:55 <Garven> : 02:08:558 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Honestly feels overmapped for such a softer part of the song. You use the exact same rhythm during the
00:55 <Garven> : stronger parts of the song, so this feels overly done.
00:57 <Garven> : Maybe a rhythm like this would work better to convey the softer tone of this part
00:57 <Garven> : http://puu.sh/9Y7Q
00:58 <Garven> : 02:33:988 (3,4) - Kinda ugly overlap and easily avoidable
00:58 <Garven> : 02:52:266 (3,4) - Same comment about the odd use of stacking when the music doesn't change any
00:59 <Garven> : 02:56:339 (1) - Why have the end silent when you have such a strong drum hit to finish it with?
01:00 <Garven> : On to [Rin]
01:00 <Garven> : 00:09:353 (2) - Why did you use this rhythm when you follow the guitar so well up until this point? Plays awkward
01:01 <Garven> : 00:10:942 (1) - Spinner ends in a strange spot and feels like it drags on too long. End it at 00:10:942 (1) -
01:01 <Garven> : 00:14:915 (1,2,3) - Set these notes to the same rhythm that was suggested due to the unranking
01:02 <Garven> : 00:15:710 (4) - End this slider at 00:17:498 -
01:02 <Garven> : 00:21:670 (1) - Why a normal finish when there's no percussion at all in the music?
01:03 <Garven> : 00:30:809 (1) - Yeah, see what you can do about the new combo usage to avoid short combos like this
01:04 <Garven> : 01:28:425 (5,6) - Strange pattern to make. I would have preferred them to be normal circles there and have sliders earlier in the combo
01:05 <Garven> : 01:33:392 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This looks really messy with all the overlap
01:06 <Garven> : 01:42:730 - Should add a slider tick sound here
01:06 <Garven> : 01:44:717 - Drag this break all the way to the left
01:07 <Garven> : 02:10:942 (1,3) - These sliders could look a lot better
01:07 <Garven> : 02:13:922 (3) - These short sliders are kinda meh. I like 'em better as stacked circles
01:08 <Garven> : 02:23:260 (3,5) - Please don't cover a circle so much with a slider. It's ugly and bad practice.
01:09 <Garven> : 02:31:406 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - The pattern looks fine, but it's too long for the phrase in the music so the combo feels wrong
01:10 <Garven> : 02:51:472 (5) - ctrl + h for better flow
01:10 <Garven> : 02:52:266 (7) - ^
01:10 <Garven> : 02:49:286 (1) - Can you position this so it doesn't overlap with 02:48:293 (9) - ?
01:11 <Garven> : 02:43:525 - Another thing: Why isthe slider speed still 1.5x here? The music has taken a step back in intensity, but the slider speed
01:11 <Garven> : doesn't reflect that
01:12 <Garven> : And it ends up causing strange spacing like at 02:46:704 (1) - that feels too big for how the music is flowing and compared to how you
01:12 <Garven> : mapped previous sections
01:13 <Garven> : 02:54:651 (1,2,3) - I would have preferred just more circle usage and patterns instead of just sitting in the middle clicking on stacked
01:13 <Garven> : kick sliders since it's such a huge buildup to that last note
01:13 <Garven> : 02:56:339 (1) - Same comment about the silenced spinner end
01:24 <Garven> : Okay, I'll do a forum post for the Taiko/Zero diffs
01:24 <Garven> : On to [Rika]
01:25 <Garven> : 00:14:915 (1,2,3,4) - Of course fix this rhythm
01:25 <Garven> : 00:08:558 (1,2,3,4,5) - Strange that you opted to do 1/1 rhythms after the beginning part
01:26 <Garven> : 00:34:088 - Snap this timing section to the end of the slider at 00:34:187 -
01:26 <Garven> : The slider slide is -really- noticible during that silent part of the song
01:27 <Garven> : 00:47:498 (1,2,3,4) - Pretty radical spacing for such a measured part of the music
01:29 <Garven> : 01:24:055 (1,2,3) - A really sudden jump after so much distance snapping
01:30 <Garven> : 01:49:485 (1,2,3,4) - At least position them so that they're not overlapping (or have them even looking as 4 looks further away from the
01:30 <Garven> : 2/3 than 1 does)
01:31 <Garven> : 01:50:876 (6,1) - Uncharacteristic jump during this part of the song
01:31 <Garven> : 01:51:074 (1) - This slider ends in a strange spot. Feels better ending at 01:51:074 (1) - or at 01:51:074 (1) -
01:32 <Garven> : 02:00:015 (3,4,5) - Uneven spacing like this is eh
01:32 <Garven> : 02:05:379 (1) - Why such a silent end of the spinner when you have a good drum beat there in the music?
01:34 <Garven> : 02:43:525 - Same comment about the 1.5x slider speed
01:34 <Garven> : 02:56:339 (1) - Why silent spinner end aaah
[Taiko]
00:13:326 (1,1) - These sound awful, but if you want them in there, at least snap the ends so you don't get that extra blob that has no tick to hit at the end. Maybe doing a crescendo would make it sound better. Right now it's just so much in your face for such a subdued but rising part.
01:50:776 (2) - Huh?
[Zero]
01:37:167 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - After all those streams, this part suddenly felt rather empty.
02:43:922 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - This too, but at least the spacing is larger so it isn't as easy.
确实不是unsnapLKs wrote:
unsnap的定义你懂? 依你的道理自造连打全是unsnap
应该是off
其实这样更准的样子
oh maybe i missed something interesting
还是把rank体系撤了算了这种破事一次会有两次会有三次也会有
还是把rank体系撤了算了这种破事一次会有两次会有三次也会有
Someone should recognize that if you want to make a map for some extremely famous songs(like "bad apple" or “Tori No Uta”），you need have awareness of being“spurt”（oh，equal to condemn），you know,your map will climb to "most played list "immediately,blames are something you have to shoulder,i guess this this the "coexistence of venture and opportunity,isn't it?
and,at the same time,other people should also recognize that it's quite stupid to show you unsuppressed feeling directly on a public forum，no matter how bad,how stupid the map is,if the map get ranked,that means it has pass the principle of mapping,it suitable for the rule.which means,at some point of view，this map‘s ranking sequence is logical and reasonable,then,it's nothing to blame.
what?you told me some Bats mapping accord to privacy emotion？come on,we are just human beings,if you take that position and without a restrictive rule to balance your behavior,it's no doubt that same thing will also happened.
oh 不得不说有些BAT的确是巨蠢，也怪不得别人黑他
and,at the same time,other people should also recognize that it's quite stupid to show you unsuppressed feeling directly on a public forum，no matter how bad,how stupid the map is,if the map get ranked,that means it has pass the principle of mapping,it suitable for the rule.which means,at some point of view，this map‘s ranking sequence is logical and reasonable,then,it's nothing to blame.
what?you told me some Bats mapping accord to privacy emotion？come on,we are just human beings,if you take that position and without a restrictive rule to balance your behavior,it's no doubt that same thing will also happened.
oh 不得不说有些BAT的确是巨蠢，也怪不得别人黑他
玩毛蛋的屙屎，还不快快去吃翔？
吗的批宿舍网真差
吗的批宿舍网真差
Wow.
Ok.
Ok.
啧啧啧
=w=w=w=w=
Download: Rita - Little Busters! -Ecstasy Ver.- (Kawayi Rika) [Ozzy's Little Taiko].osu\o/o\o/o\o/o\o/
真蛋疼 kawayi第一次作图应该是10年12月21号，到现在还不到一年。当时她的图连timing都不准，现在已经都能rank了 这比多少瞎作图还让人mod然后没两天就放弃了的人强？想投一分没问题，但是刷就有点说不过去了吧？不管怎么样我支持你喔kawayi~~
Topic Starter
fixed most ~ update ~
我错过了啥
图满ok的
图满ok的
[Busters!]
00:23:260 (2,3) - Oops, looks like you misunderstood and did the opposite. So move the 2 slider 2 grids to the right, and the 3 slider 2 grids to the left. This way the circle parts won't be overlapping.
01:04:982 (1) - A tip with these kinds of elbow sliders: try to count out how many grids away your red points are from the center point and make sure both sides are equal. This way the curve will be the smoothest and look the best.
01:36:770 (1,2,3) - ctrl + h these for better flow
02:08:558 (1) - Still too soon after a spinner for this level of difficulty.
02:08:558 (1) - Still wish you simplified this section a little more to give some rhythmic diversity.
[Rin]
You should take a closer look at the combo usage in this difficulty too. See if you can apply the general pacing that I gave examples for in the Busters! difficulty.
01:12:531 (1,1) - Spacing
01:12:929 (1) - The way you build up to this point from 01:09:551 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - left me kind of underwhelmed playing this one lone slider to start off the kiai section.
01:33:392 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This still looks really crowded compared to your other patterns.
02:09:353 (3,4) - Maybe tone this jump down since up to this point there aren't really any large spacing jumps like this, and it's during a softer part of the song anyway.
02:31:406 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I still think you should rethink this pattern since it's based off an uneven set of beats through the song so it starts with a new phrase, but ends partway through the next. The pacing just feels off.
[Taiko]
00:13:326 (1) - Snap the slider so it ends at 00:15:313 - so you don't get this
I still think a crescendo during that part would be much better aurally than just having it at full volume the entire time.
[Rika]
00:05:379 (4,1) - and 00:04:584 (2,3) - are kinda bad spacing since you set the precedent with 00:03:392 (4,1) - You change that spacing around a lot and it just feels really inconsistent.
00:18:094 (2) - This feels better ending at 00:20:478 -
00:47:498 (1,2,3,4) - These jumps still feel really bad without anything in the song or pattern pacing to back it up.
01:10:942 (2,3) - This jump is really unnaturally placed. Would feel a little better from 01:10:743 - to 01:10:942 - though I'm thinking that accelerated spacing or incremental jumps would fit a build up like this a lot better.
02:02:796 (4,7) - This kind of pattern is a little dangerous since the sliders cover up each others repeat arrow. Might be best to have them sticking outward instead of inward.
I suggest you take a good look at the Rika diff and try to make your patterns fit the music a bit more. Right now some don't quite fit the phrases that they are trying to represent either with spacing or with general length of the pattern.
00:23:260 (2,3) - Oops, looks like you misunderstood and did the opposite. So move the 2 slider 2 grids to the right, and the 3 slider 2 grids to the left. This way the circle parts won't be overlapping.
01:04:982 (1) - A tip with these kinds of elbow sliders: try to count out how many grids away your red points are from the center point and make sure both sides are equal. This way the curve will be the smoothest and look the best.
01:36:770 (1,2,3) - ctrl + h these for better flow
02:08:558 (1) - Still too soon after a spinner for this level of difficulty.
02:08:558 (1) - Still wish you simplified this section a little more to give some rhythmic diversity.
[Rin]
You should take a closer look at the combo usage in this difficulty too. See if you can apply the general pacing that I gave examples for in the Busters! difficulty.
01:12:531 (1,1) - Spacing
01:12:929 (1) - The way you build up to this point from 01:09:551 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - left me kind of underwhelmed playing this one lone slider to start off the kiai section.
01:33:392 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - This still looks really crowded compared to your other patterns.
02:09:353 (3,4) - Maybe tone this jump down since up to this point there aren't really any large spacing jumps like this, and it's during a softer part of the song anyway.
02:31:406 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I still think you should rethink this pattern since it's based off an uneven set of beats through the song so it starts with a new phrase, but ends partway through the next. The pacing just feels off.
[Taiko]
00:13:326 (1) - Snap the slider so it ends at 00:15:313 - so you don't get this
I still think a crescendo during that part would be much better aurally than just having it at full volume the entire time.
[Rika]
00:05:379 (4,1) - and 00:04:584 (2,3) - are kinda bad spacing since you set the precedent with 00:03:392 (4,1) - You change that spacing around a lot and it just feels really inconsistent.
00:18:094 (2) - This feels better ending at 00:20:478 -
00:47:498 (1,2,3,4) - These jumps still feel really bad without anything in the song or pattern pacing to back it up.
01:10:942 (2,3) - This jump is really unnaturally placed. Would feel a little better from 01:10:743 - to 01:10:942 - though I'm thinking that accelerated spacing or incremental jumps would fit a build up like this a lot better.
02:02:796 (4,7) - This kind of pattern is a little dangerous since the sliders cover up each others repeat arrow. Might be best to have them sticking outward instead of inward.
I suggest you take a good look at the Rika diff and try to make your patterns fit the music a bit more. Right now some don't quite fit the phrases that they are trying to represent either with spacing or with general length of the pattern.
从这里可以看出现在BAT越来越糟糕.建议大整改一次
我是来蛤蛤蛤的，去TM的蠢比BAT滚你妈逼蛋死你妈裤裆里回去舔屎去吧玩个JB游戏
液，坐等删回复
液，坐等删回复
guess you should contact the mapper himself for a mod rather than posting here, since it irritates some people, resulting in more flaming in the thread.Garven wrote:
mods
破论坛改版改得我还得上电脑才能编辑回帖 真是蠢巴平
看了两遍...看完了.........
I'll care later when we get this map re-ranked. They are obviously helping in the best way they know how, so I'll help in the way that I know how.ignorethis wrote:
guess you should contact the mapper himself for a mod rather than posting here, since it irritates some people, resulting in more flaming in the thread.
破论坛改版改得我还得上电脑才能编辑回帖 真是蠢巴平
好吧
thanks moe garven
www
Download: Rita - Little Busters! -Ecstasy Ver.- (Kawayi Rika) [Ozzy's Little Taiko].osuwww
thanks moe garven
www
Topic Starter
fixed some in Busters! and Rin diff.
update ~
update ~
[General]
- Metadata: Difficulty names are supposed to indicate the difficulty level, you will probably refuse to change the names so just make it clear in the map's description (Bold or bigger font should work). Oh, and keep that in mind for your next mapset, please.
By the way, your difficulty names could use some consistency, perhaps [Little] for [Normal] and [Busters!] for [Insane]? I don't know... just try to find some consistency, if it's possible. - Skin: "Hitcircle" is supposed to be in grayscale so colorizing works as intended. Although, if you'd like to keep it like that, there's no problem.
- 02:08:558 (1) - This post-spinner slider is bugged, the NC needs to be added manually. Hm, unrankable stuf...
- 02:53:061 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - These little streams might be too tricky for the easiest diff in the mapset, I'd suggest to either replace both stacks with repeating sliders o just one of them.
- I don't see any other major problems here.
- 00:14:915 (1,2,3) - I found a bit hard to hit these circles accurately, you should consider using a slider for this difficulty level.
- 01:11:339 (9) - This slider doesn't fit well this part, sounds kinda odd. You should use 1/2 sliders, sounds better.
- 02:37:167 (4,5) - Hm, the spacing between this objects should be wider, a couple of girds should be enough.
- 00:55:644 (6,7) - Without "Sneaking Sliders" on, this pattern kind of confused me. I strongly suggest to unstack (7), here's an alternative.
- 00:30:611 (4,1) - Uh, this part felt rather odd. After those little jumps this reduced spacing doesn't flow well, I strongly suggest to increase spacing a bit.
- 00:34:386 (1,2,3) - This would flow much better if you switch positions between (1) & (2), consider changing it.
- 01:23:260 (7,8) - By the time the ball starts reaching the end of (7), (8)'s apporach circle appears but it overlaps with the slider-followcircle so it's hard to see, I'd suggest to unstack (8) to avoid any problem.
- 02:01:803 (1,2,1) - Hm, if it's possible, I'd like to ask you to reduce this jump a little bit, feels too harsh imo.
- 02:02:598 (3,4,5,6,7) - As Garven mentioned above, I'd not suggest to use this kind of patterns, the repeat arrow is completely visible since the beginning so it feels unexpected.
- 02:15:114 (4,1) - This spacing doesn't make much sense, all the other objects have wider spacing. I strongly suggest to increase spacing, at least a few grids so it flows better.
- 02:53:657 (2,3,4,5,6) - You should either merge these 2 stacks into 1 or unstack all the objects. Any of those alternatives would fit the music muuuch better, try it.
oh 巨蠢
Topic Starter
Thanks Gonzvlo ~ update ~Gonzvlo wrote:
SPOILER[General]
[Busters!][Rin]
- 02:08:558 (1) - This post-spinner slider is bugged, the NC needs to be added manually. Hm, unrankable stuf... <<fixed
- 02:53:061 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - These little streams might be too tricky for the easiest diff in the mapset, I'd suggest to either replace both stacks with repeating sliders o just one of them. <<I think this not too hard~
- I don't see any other major problems here.
[Riko]
- 00:14:915 (1,2,3) - I found a bit hard to hit these circles accurately, you should consider using a slider for this difficulty level.<sorry no~
- 01:11:339 (9) - This slider doesn't fit well this part, sounds kinda odd. You should use 1/2 sliders, sounds better.<<OK.
- 02:37:167 (4,5) - Hm, the spacing between this objects should be wider, a couple of girds should be enough.<sorry no~~ I think np~
Hm... overall, the mapset should be okay.
- 00:55:644 (6,7) - Without "Sneaking Sliders" on, this pattern kind of confused me. I strongly suggest to unstack (7), here's an alternative.<<OK,fixed
- 00:30:611 (4,1) - Uh, this part felt rather odd. After those little jumps this reduced spacing doesn't flow well, I strongly suggest to increase spacing a bit.<<sorry,no
- 00:34:386 (1,2,3) - This would flow much better if you switch positions between (1) & (2), consider changing it.<<sorry,no
- 01:23:260 (7,8) - By the time the ball starts reaching the end of (7), (8)'s apporach circle appears but it overlaps with the slider-followcircle so it's hard to see, I'd suggest to unstack (8) to avoid any problem.<<I think it's ok now ~ so no~
- 02:01:803 (1,2,1) - Hm, if it's possible, I'd like to ask you to reduce this jump a little bit, feels too harsh imo.<<sorry,no
- 02:02:598 (3,4,5,6,7) - As Garven mentioned above, I'd not suggest to use this kind of patterns, the repeat arrow is completely visible since the beginning so it feels unexpected.<<OK.fixed
- 02:15:114 (4,1) - This spacing doesn't make much sense, all the other objects have wider spacing. I strongly suggest to increase spacing, at least a few grids so it flows better.<<fixed
- 02:53:657 (2,3,4,5,6) - You should either merge these 2 stacks into 1 or unstack all the objects. Any of those alternatives would fit the music muuuch better, try it.<<sorry~no
star~
hope Ranked
hope Ranked
The map is nice, but I also hope it'll get approved soon. I didn't get down to install it until today, and now with the update, it refuses to rank. >_< 
))))))
))))))[Rin]
01:12:134 (10,1) - That spacing intentional?
[Rika]
Compare spacing between 00:03:392 (4,1) - 00:04:584 (2,3) - 00:05:379 (4,1) - 00:06:968 (4,5) -
Please keep your spacing changes like this consistent. Otherwise it just feels bad.
I still don't like a lot of the patterns used as they don't fit musically, but whatever. The inconsistency in the intro is aweors;df though.
01:12:134 (10,1) - That spacing intentional?
[Rika]
Compare spacing between 00:03:392 (4,1) - 00:04:584 (2,3) - 00:05:379 (4,1) - 00:06:968 (4,5) -
Please keep your spacing changes like this consistent. Otherwise it just feels bad.
I still don't like a lot of the patterns used as they don't fit musically, but whatever. The inconsistency in the intro is aweors;df though.
Topic Starter
OK.update ~
Rebub~
After discussed with Garven, fixed some 1 grid movement blahbla, It's time to
re-RANK this map
re-RANK this map
gratz rerank
congratz~!
lol Gratz.
:>
GooD map ><
我只能夠SS 2個難度，另外兩個無能 TAT 原諒我
我只能夠SS 2個難度，另外兩個無能 TAT 原諒我
lol
Rika baka, gretz >w<
又看完一部戏剧了.
lol