Prod: Backfire
Heading to work soon. Will finish reading the thread on my mobile. Will post tonight.
Heading to work soon. Will finish reading the thread on my mobile. Will post tonight.
Prod? Im right here :l Unless prod means something else.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Prod: Backfire
Heading to work soon. Will finish reading the thread on my mobile. Will post tonight.
We're losing the trackerLadySuburu wrote:
I don't see how we're losing anything.
How is that different than any other situation where the watcher claims and gives us the names?Wojjan wrote:
We're losing the tracker
By the way, one of those two names is the tracker.Wojjan wrote:
That we can scumhunt those two names and make an educated guess to their alignments. We don't have Two but that doesn't mean we can't hit mafia.
So if I'm following correctly, this is what you want:Wojjan wrote:
the watcher is on the tracker. The mafia loses two mafia. Not really a gambit I'd take if I were them, with already a member down
Then the mafia will go after the voyeur or the watcher, and both tracker and maf will probably stay unconfirmed. The tracker won't be needing a counterclaim, but since they killed the watcher already the tracker dies next night regardless of the voyeur.bmin11 wrote:
I was thinking if we just let the watcher target one of the two people without role claiming.
and both tracker and maf will probably stay unconfirmedAccording to LS's plan, trackers will track themselve. Once the watcher targets one of them for the night and figures if the person targetted himself or not, the watcher can just role claim on D3 and tell us the result of it. I think it would be fairly obvious at that point.
but since they killed the watcherI doubt the watcher will survive this night if watcher role claims, because I'm also doubting there would be a doctor if we look at the night result. Not a sane doctor would let a double night kill happen knowing there were no guarantees Two had a protective ability. IF we have the watcher not to role claim, we would be taking a 1/6 chance of losing a watcher.
Basically, yes. The chance of lynching another mafia today that doesn't counterclaim the tracker is slim, because hardly anyone has even discussed the lynch yet, everyone discusses what we'll do tonight. That's important but nothing to lynch on. The odds of lynching town or mafia while not considering the tracker is more leaning towards lynching town than lynching the two mafs I suspect remain in the group.LadySuburu wrote:
So if I'm following correctly, this is what you want:Wojjan wrote:
the watcher is on the tracker. The mafia loses two mafia. Not really a gambit I'd take if I were them, with already a member down
50% chance of lynching the tracker and losing another power role at night, have just the one confirmed mafia.
50% chance of lynching mafia and losing the tracker at night, gain another mafia name next night.
VS
100% chance of not lynching the tracker, and a chance of lynching a different mafia
Basically 100% chance of tracker dying at night. We get the one confirmed mafia.
Is that about right?
Actually disagree. Watcher is good for a semiprotection role where the mafia have to sacrifice a member to kill someone, but tracker can definitely confirm a lot of people for "not mafia" most of the time.Lybydose wrote:
Watcher is more valuable than Tracker because it's easier to predict which person the mafia will target at night than it is to predict who is mafia AND which one is going to perform the kill that night. And even then it could just be some other aux that just happened to target the same person as the mafia that night.
Okay, so how does this work? Afaik a motivator grants his/her target with an extra action, and the probability of killing a target in two attempts, when your kill percentage is 9%, is not 99%, but rather 17%.Wojjan wrote:
Oh and I guess I'll boost you tonight giving you probably a 99% chance of killing? HAve fun as a vig I guess
Ah I see. Thanks for the clarification.Lybydose wrote:
@KRZY: what the motivator actually does it up to the host. The default case is to give another action, but it's not uncommon for the motivator to "enhance" the role in some way. For example, it might "upgrade" a role, say by making a tracker into an actual cop. Or give masons daychat. Or turn a normal kill into a strongman kill.
NoHItter did something like this in his TF2 mafia game.
I really doubt there is. I don't think the doctor would have let Two get NK'd while clearly Two didn't guaranteed any kind of protection for himself.Raging Bull wrote:
Maybe there's a doctor around that hasn't said a thing yet? :s
bmin11 wrote:
Not having the Watcher to role claim and execute LS's plan (Trackers track themselve while Watcher watchs one of them. Voyeur, do whatever you want). The downside of this is if the mafia gets a lucky shot and kills the watcher by 1/6 chance, we end up not knowing who were the Trackers.
This seems the most practical way to go about this. Though if they die tonight without a claim I'm going toakrolsmir wrote:
I think that the watcher has already decided not to claim, given the time that has elapsed. How about we set a deadline, like if s/he haven't claimed by the end of Sunday then we will proceed under the assumption that s/he won't be doing so for the day, and move on from there?
Salvage wrote:
I find Raging bull way more suspicious on the way he posts ..i think you're mafia bull .. what do you have to say about that
Did you use an action last night?Backfire wrote:
Role claiming reisen. I get 2 night kills and 1 protect. Perhaps that clears things up. Im not mafia ^_^;
How many of your actions can you use per night?Backfire wrote:
Nope. I did not.
Not quite sure honestly. I'm going to guess she can induce madness to do them but *shrug*Rantai wrote:
Uh. Might I ask how does Reisen fit in with 2 kills and 1 protect?
It doesn't seem to fit with the character as far as I know. Though I admit I only know as far as whatever the game provides.
The only real problem is that he's not confirmed, so if you motivate him and he is scum we may have bad stuffs happen.Wojjan wrote:
Actually though now I feel more strongly (sorry Cirno) for motivating Backfire since having more kills/protects around is always awesome.
Raging Bull wrote:
And why is that? Because I don't scum hunt? I gave my reason.
Both seem scummy in their own way, if their names are the ones that come up it'd be hard to decide who's guilty.Backfire wrote:
By the way, Im fairly sure DxS and Raging Bull are the guys we're looking for.
What? "See a target"? What are you talking about? Are you the watcher or not?DeathxShinigami wrote:
Hi there. Well according to this "so called plan" I still have yet to see a target.
Oh and I'm still pretty sure Backfire has no idea how to play this game.
Salvage wrote:
Raging Bull wrote:
And why is that? Because I don't scum hunt? I gave my reason.
cause you post useless stuff and then doctor rolefish , but hey .. you found the 'doctor' , so what would you do if you were mafia now?.
regarding the change of plans cause of the new claim i guess we all agree that Wojjan's plan it's the more sittuable right now ..
Chris wrote:
roleclaim: Momiji Inubashiri
guess I have no choice since you are destined to be bad and roleclaim
two switched rolled and mebmin11 wrote:
Chris wrote:
roleclaim: Momiji Inubashiri
guess I have no choice since you are destined to be bad and roleclaimSo you are also a watcher? What's your result if that's the case?
nvm and are you willing to give us your result as a Tracker?
Dammit, forgot about that. Any complex plan I can conceive of falls apart if they have a roleblocker, which isn't unlikely given that one of the scum was already weakened by being a lover. Not to mention the number of aux roles we have running around. It doesn't even have to be a roleblocker- a silencer could accomplish a similar thing. Basically a mafia power role could severely interfere with our plans, which is likely present to balance out the town aux roles.bmin11 wrote:
as long as we don't have a role blocker
If everyone wouldn't of roleclaimed like I said everything would still be fine.akrolsmir wrote:
Dammit, forgot about that. Any complex plan I can conceive of falls apart if they have a roleblocker, which isn't unlikely given that one of the scum was already weakened by being a lover. Not to mention the number of aux roles we have running around. It doesn't even have to be a roleblocker- a silencer could accomplish a similar thing. Basically a mafia power role could severely interfere with our plans, which is likely present to balance out the town aux roles.bmin11 wrote:
as long as we don't have a role blocker
I guess... we continue with lynching one of Lybydose or chris (I'll wait for Lybydose to present his case before voting), and if we mislynch we try again tomorrow. Meanwhile aux roles individually come up with a plan but don't reveal it?