Funny, I was going to do just that. Is this guy new or something?Rolled wrote:
unvote.
vote: Swiftwolf Yellowtail
forum
Mafia Game [Town Win]
posted
Total Posts
676
Do you recall the last Mind Mafia?akrolsmir wrote:
Funny, I was going to do just that. Is this guy new or something?
There's your answer.
Vote: Lybydose
still hasn't made a direct link to mafia sub-subforum from the main forum page
still hasn't made a direct link to mafia sub-subforum from the main forum page
Oh, dear. Going to past games to get me killed again. Is this your strategy? Look, I know last game was a total mess, but believe me, I'm not going to run back to that round ever again.
I'm so waiting for RVS to end.
Yeah... It's RVS.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Oh, dear. Going to past games to get me killed again. Is this your strategy? Look, I know last game was a total mess, but believe me, I'm not going to run back to that round ever again.
Vote: Wojjan
Incidentally, you guys don't seem to want RQS anymore, so I'll stop.
Swiftwolf is kinda suspicious.
Explain yourself, LadySuburu.
Major over reaction to a vote.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
..okay.. everyone seems to be voting like there's no tomorrow. I'm not gonna vote right now, though, because it's a bit too soon for me to declare anyone as mafia, but I will say that DxS is a bit odd for throwing his vote on me. Why do you want me to start talking, anyway?
How would that be a major overreaction? I just want an answer.
It should be obvious you know.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
How would that be a major overreaction? I just want an answer.
I don't feel like I'm overreacting, LS. Please, explain.
Basically, you overreacted to a RVS vote.
Votes during RVS are usually placeholder votes that change upon someone doing something suspicious.
Votes during RVS are usually placeholder votes that change upon someone doing something suspicious.
..Oh. In that case, my bad.
This guy knows what I do mean.NoHItter wrote:
Basically, you overreacted to a RVS vote.
Votes during RVS are usually placeholder votes that change upon someone doing something suspicious.
Topic Starter
Vote Count
Swiftwolf Yellowtail (2): DeathxShinigami, Rolled
Lybydose (2): animask, Chris
NoHItter (1): 0_o
Rolled (1): pieguy1372
pieguy1372 (1): akrolsmir
Rantai (1): Lybydose
0_o (1): Mashley
Wojjan (1): NoHItter
LadySuburu (1): Wojjan
Not voting: Rantai, LadySuburu, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, foulcoon
Swiftwolf Yellowtail (2): DeathxShinigami, Rolled
Lybydose (2): animask, Chris
NoHItter (1): 0_o
Rolled (1): pieguy1372
pieguy1372 (1): akrolsmir
Rantai (1): Lybydose
0_o (1): Mashley
Wojjan (1): NoHItter
LadySuburu (1): Wojjan
Not voting: Rantai, LadySuburu, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, foulcoon
I almost never do anymore. lolWojjan wrote:
Vote: LS
not voting during RVS hmmmmm?
You people and your RVS. It makes me sad.
RVS is a standard mafia thing, silly 
swift it's obvious what you have to do to not get lynched
If not, its lynch or be lynched.Chris wrote:
swift it's obvious what you have to do to not get lynched
yeah that's true, you don't ever.
unvote
feeling pretty good about LS
unvote
feeling pretty good about LS
Calling it now, mafia are Wojjan, LadySuburu, Swifttail, etc.
I'd like to see your explanation, foulcoon, unless you're still going through the RVS.
Yes I am going to buddy out in the open, day one, during RVS
way to go foulcoon, you solved it again.
way to go foulcoon, you solved it again.
You don't have any proof that I'm scum, or even suspicious. And don't bring up what's already been brought up, that doesn't work.
faceman
DxS
pieguy
lybydose
^ none of these people posted again after voting
Rolled only posted again to vote for someone else
Swifttail is super defensive over random votes and won't vote for lybydose to put them over the lynch mark
maybe swifttail and lybydose are both mafia
DxS
pieguy
lybydose
^ none of these people posted again after voting
Rolled only posted again to vote for someone else
Swifttail is super defensive over random votes and won't vote for lybydose to put them over the lynch mark
maybe swifttail and lybydose are both mafia
I kinda wanna lynch Lyby more, because Swift also overreacted that way in another game he played. Allegedly. I don't know whether he was town though.
geez, it hasn't even been 24 hours >_>
Swift was town last game. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for now.
Swift was town last game. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for now.
Chris: Actually, if I voted NoHitter right now, he'd be the one to get lynched if it was the last vote. He's the only one that was voted against before I was.
Wojjan: Yes, and I'd like to have that put aside. That was my fault. Apparently, I'm still overreacting. If I am, that's again, my fault, because that's not putting me in a good position.
Faceman: If I do my calculations correctly, there's a 2 in 3 chance that I'm still town. I'm pretty sure some of you are willing to use a lynch on me again to see if I've been converted to mafia. To be blunt, I'm not mafia.
Wojjan: Yes, and I'd like to have that put aside. That was my fault. Apparently, I'm still overreacting. If I am, that's again, my fault, because that's not putting me in a good position.
Faceman: If I do my calculations correctly, there's a 2 in 3 chance that I'm still town. I'm pretty sure some of you are willing to use a lynch on me again to see if I've been converted to mafia. To be blunt, I'm not mafia.
Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Chris: Actually, if I voted NoHitter right now, he'd be the one to get lynched if it was the last vote. He's the only one that was voted against before I was.
you're 100% wrong about how voting works
so actually if you voted lybydose you'd be saving yourself from a lynch
though it is only the first day maybe someone will unvote you before you say something that makes them want to bandwagon you again
Actually, you do have a point about voting Lyby right now. I WOULD be saving myself, however, if anyone that voted for Lyby unvotes, I'm in trouble.
Recall the pregame, Chris. Two and I pointed out that it's the FIRST vote that counts, not the LAST.
Recall the pregame, Chris. Two and I pointed out that it's the FIRST vote that counts, not the LAST.
Man I wish my defense was as brilliant as this.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
You don't have any proof that I'm scum, or even suspicious. And don't bring up what's already been brought up, that doesn't work.
*Does something suspicious*
*Everyone brings it up*
Hey you can't all use that because it was already brought up!
You missed at least one there. Trying to blame me for nothing hmmmmmmm?Chris wrote:
faceman
DxS
pieguy
lybydose
who did I missLybydose wrote:
You missed at least one there. Trying to blame me for nothing hmmmmmmm?Chris wrote:
faceman
DxS
pieguy
lybydose
You tell me since you seem to be so keen on everyone's posting habits here.
Lyby: I only say that because it's simply beating a dead horse now.
sounds like you're just talking out of your ass unless you can tell me who I missedLybydose wrote:
You tell me since you seem to be so keen on everyone's posting habits here.
@above post: damnit the URL doesn't include search filters. Just search "mafia"
Once above, priorities change.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Actually, you do have a point about voting Lyby right now. I WOULD be saving myself, however, if anyone that voted for Lyby unvotes, I'm in trouble.
Recall the pregame, Chris. Two and I pointed out that it's the FIRST vote that counts, not the LAST.
Actually, your statement is correct. Foulcoon never voted, yet he only posted once
Ow, ninja fest.
..Oh? I seem to be misinformed about this. Then again, I never really knew much about this game since before I started playing it. Guess it's time to do more research!LadySuburu wrote:
Once above, priorities change.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Actually, you do have a point about voting Lyby right now. I WOULD be saving myself, however, if anyone that voted for Lyby unvotes, I'm in trouble.
Recall the pregame, Chris. Two and I pointed out that it's the FIRST vote that counts, not the LAST.
wordLadySuburu wrote:
Once above, priorities change.Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
Actually, you do have a point about voting Lyby right now. I WOULD be saving myself, however, if anyone that voted for Lyby unvotes, I'm in trouble.
Recall the pregame, Chris. Two and I pointed out that it's the FIRST vote that counts, not the LAST.
Maybe you should learn to read. This person has posted once in this game since this game started.Chris wrote:
l2readLybydose wrote:
That was hard
obviously I meant in the game, not forum wide
rantai didn't voteLybydose wrote:
Maybe you should learn to read. This person has posted once in this game since this game started.
Not voting: Rantai, LadySuburu, Swiftwolf Yellowtail, foulcoon
ugh, fine, nevermind then.
That being said, you do seem to be pushing quite hard for a lynch on me off the basis of nothing (RVS on Rantai). ie, trying to push Swiftwolf's vote on me when it's 2 vs 2 votes and questioning him when he doesn't do so and we're not even through the first day out of three so why would he even need to do that yet?
That being said, you do seem to be pushing quite hard for a lynch on me off the basis of nothing (RVS on Rantai). ie, trying to push Swiftwolf's vote on me when it's 2 vs 2 votes and questioning him when he doesn't do so and we're not even through the first day out of three so why would he even need to do that yet?
oh right, also unvote
every post he makes isn't exactly helping people not bandwagonLybydose wrote:
ugh, fine, nevermind then.
That being said, you do seem to be pushing quite hard for a lynch on me off the basis of nothing (RVS on Rantai). ie, trying to push Swiftwolf's vote on me when it's 2 vs 2 votes and questioning him when he doesn't do so and we're not even through the first day out of three so why would he even need to do that yet?
he's like an injured dog, the closer you corner him the more aggressive he's gonna get
I'm the only one trying to be productive
and of course I'd question why he wouldn't do it unless you were both mafia it makes no sense for him to not save himself even on day one
and I question why you wouldn't vote for him as well considering if he votes for you, you need TWO votes to not get lynched not one
You have a point there, Chris. If we were both mafia, why would he not be helping me? ..but you know what strikes me as odd? You're helping me, and if your statement is true, then why are you helping the mafia? ..Okay, that isn't helping turn my case around, but still, I'm sure you get my point.
because defending someone else usually shows you've aligned somehow if the accusation isn't really stupid to begin withSwiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
You have a point there, Chris. If we were both mafia, why would he not be helping me? ..but you know what strikes me as odd? You're helping me, and if your statement is true, then why are you helping the mafia? ..Okay, that isn't helping turn my case around, but still, I'm sure you get my point.
you're new so you're more likely to play worse which means if he defends you and you turn up mafia, all suspicion is probably gonna lead right to him
also I never claimed you were mafia, I just said it was a possibility
are you trying to roleclaim
he's like an injured dog, the closer you corner him the more aggressive he's gonna getso you're trying to defend him then? You clearly don't want him to become cornered (and thus act aggressive). Why? He your mafia buddy or something? Why aren't you questioning me for not voting swiftwolf to save myself?
I did question you for not voting him ^ read upLybydose wrote:
he's like an injured dog, the closer you corner him the more aggressive he's gonna getso you're trying to defend him then? You clearly don't want him to become cornered (and thus act aggressive). Why? He your mafia buddy or something? Why aren't you questioning me for not voting swiftwolf to save myself?
and I'm just pointing out the obvious
I would totally vote Swifttail right now, except meta apparently excuses him? (rantai, I looked through both Mind Games, he didn't seem to be in there)
---
ninja'd like five times.
---
ninja'd like five times.
You're helping me, and if your statement is true, then why are you helping the mafia?Unvote, vote Swift
Akrol: He meant the Less Experimental Mafia game.
..also, guess I'm heading to a dead-end yet again. Woohoo.
You know, if you gave up less often you might have a shot at making it to day 2. Might.
Lyb/Doc: Hmm, your actions seem to be pretty pro-town. Based on the last few posts... I'm not really suspicious of you so...
unvote
VashWolf: You're getting too worked up about people accusing you of being suspicious/mafia. I don't recommend roleclaiming on Day 1
unless you have a role that would benefit from that in some way. You're playing the same way as the last game and I think if you were mafia you would have at least changed your playstyle knowing your previous one made you suspicious. Neutral
Chris: Uggh, your posts remind me of Two except not as egocentric and obnoxious.
I'll see what I have on everyone else later...
unvote
VashWolf: You're getting too worked up about people accusing you of being suspicious/mafia. I don't recommend roleclaiming on Day 1
unless you have a role that would benefit from that in some way. You're playing the same way as the last game and I think if you were mafia you would have at least changed your playstyle knowing your previous one made you suspicious. Neutral
Chris: Uggh, your posts remind me of Two except not as egocentric and obnoxious.
I'll see what I have on everyone else later...
I'm glad RVS ended, but it seems like whatever period we are in now is less productive.
What the fuck is going on.
What the fuck is going on.
unvote
I don't think we can tell anything from this situation. This is exactly what Swiftwolf did last time, and he was still town. As a result, we can't say Swiftwolf is mafia from this... At this point, I don't think anyone accusing him is mafia either.
Also, I thought we needed 8 votes for a lynch (15/2, rounded up).
IMO, it's a bit too early to worry about who takes priority over who in a lynch...
vote: NoHItter. I have a gut feeling he's mafia (though I'm not sure about some of the more inactive players). >.<
I don't think we can tell anything from this situation. This is exactly what Swiftwolf did last time, and he was still town. As a result, we can't say Swiftwolf is mafia from this... At this point, I don't think anyone accusing him is mafia either.
Also, I thought we needed 8 votes for a lynch (15/2, rounded up).
IMO, it's a bit too early to worry about who takes priority over who in a lynch... vote: NoHItter. I have a gut feeling he's mafia (though I'm not sure about some of the more inactive players). >.<
I'm really confused about people saying like "if Swift votes Lyby hes saving himself from a lynch" How many fucking votes do you think you need for a lynch? 4? lol...
Anyways as far as suspicion goes I'm leaning towards voting Swift because hes being a tard clown. Sorry for taking it lightly, but your defense is awful. Not only did you draw so much attention to yourself, but you make it worse with every post.
tl;dr - chill out Swift. It's day 1. RVs fly around first day of every mafia game. If you're not mafia this game then you're just a bad player and shouldn't join anymore games.
you know what, fuck leaning.
Vote: Swift
Anyways as far as suspicion goes I'm leaning towards voting Swift because hes being a tard clown. Sorry for taking it lightly, but your defense is awful. Not only did you draw so much attention to yourself, but you make it worse with every post.
tl;dr - chill out Swift. It's day 1. RVs fly around first day of every mafia game. If you're not mafia this game then you're just a bad player and shouldn't join anymore games.
you know what, fuck leaning.
Vote: Swift
Unvote
Attempting some set-up speculation.
Given 15 players, I think we should expect three to four scum, and perhaps one SK? We could also have other Independent roles.
Thoughts?
Now we have Swift and his overreaction to a RVS vote. His antics are similar to that of Less Experimental Mafia 2, except then was refusing to answer RQS. He also made many logic fails in regards to his defense.
Attempting some set-up speculation.
Given 15 players, I think we should expect three to four scum, and perhaps one SK? We could also have other Independent roles.
Thoughts?
Now we have Swift and his overreaction to a RVS vote. His antics are similar to that of Less Experimental Mafia 2, except then was refusing to answer RQS. He also made many logic fails in regards to his defense.
Swiftwolf Yellowtail wrote:
You don't have any proof that I'm scum, or even suspicious. And don't bring up what's already been brought up, that doesn't work.
Where did this come from? How exactly is not voting for Lybydose = Lybydose and Swift being mafia?Chris wrote:
Swifttail is super defensive over random votes and won't vote for lybydose to put them over the lynch mark
Why are you suggesting a self-preservation vote this early in the Day?Chris wrote:
so actually if you voted lybydose you'd be saving yourself from a lynch
Yeah... I think you should use a more solid reason for voting someone.pieguy1372 wrote:
vote: NoHItter. I have a gut feeling he's mafia (though I'm not sure about some of the more inactive players). >.<
I always vote on my gut day 1. It's just basic statistics, the less information you have the higher the sample variance is and the higher chance you will have a false positive with a lower critical value. As a result, on day 1 there really isn't enough information to make a substantiated claim unless someone does something really obvious = =//
I also found it somewhat suspicious how you didn't do RVS "because people didn't like it"...anything to get information is good IMO. Yes, RVS itself doesn't give much information, but it would have definitely started a conversation that could lead to information. (Though, I guess that doesn't matter much because a conversation started anyway...)
Personally, I still want to see more from the inactive people (Mashley, Rantai, DxS). ==
I also found it somewhat suspicious how you didn't do RVS "because people didn't like it"...anything to get information is good IMO. Yes, RVS itself doesn't give much information, but it would have definitely started a conversation that could lead to information. (Though, I guess that doesn't matter much because a conversation started anyway...
)Personally, I still want to see more from the inactive people (Mashley, Rantai, DxS). ==
I think you should change your Day 1 voting scheme then. Using only your gut is a bad voting scheme.pieguy1372 wrote:
I always vote on my gut day 1. It's just basic statistics, the less information you have the higher the sample variance is and the higher chance you will have a false positive with a lower critical value. As a result, on day 1 there really isn't enough information to make a substantiated claim unless someone does something really obvious = =//
You mean RQS?pieguy1372 wrote:
I also found it somewhat suspicious how you didn't do RVS "because people didn't like it"...anything to get information is good IMO. Yes, RVS itself doesn't give much information, but it would have definitely started a conversation that could lead to information.
Oh, yeah I did mean RQS. Sorry
Also, in every game I played the person lynched D1 was lynched "because he was suspicious" and he was always town. This is just basic statistics at hand as I mentioned before, especially when you consider the mafia tries to NOT be suspicious... This is just my idea of how to play the game, and IMO it's worked a lot better than lynching town members who screw up, instead of actually showing signs of wanting to hinder town progress or mislead us. >.>
Also, in every game I played the person lynched D1 was lynched "because he was suspicious" and he was always town. This is just basic statistics at hand as I mentioned before, especially when you consider the mafia tries to NOT be suspicious... This is just my idea of how to play the game, and IMO it's worked a lot better than lynching town members who screw up, instead of actually showing signs of wanting to hinder town progress or mislead us. >.>
I guess NoHitter just can't win. Also, just wondering, was your gut ever right? Since I recall you suspecting me in about every game.pieguy1372 wrote:
I also found it somewhat suspicious how you didn't doRVSRQS "because people didn't like it"
---
Swift, instead of talking about yourself (which you don't seem to be very good at), how about you tell us who you think is suspicious?
It's been right before, but it's also been wrong lol 
It's not like it matters much because after day 1 I usually don't vote by my gut feelings.
It's not like it matters much because after day 1 I usually don't vote by my gut feelings.
Rawr, I'm awake now.
I was reading through all the posts and will be honest here, I have no clue what's going on. Part of me wants to shut out Swift's posts altogether (considering I had reread them a few times to try to understand what he was on about). Maybe I'm still groggy.
One thing I will say though - I don't think Swift and Lybydose are mafia buddies. As far as I can tell, the only lead that accusation was going on was the fact Swift was hesitant to vote Lybydose to save himself (and vice versa?).
If it were me, I wouldn't vote someone I didn't believe was anti-town (assuming I was town) based on the fact I wanted to save myself. Because the next day I would be dead from hammer accusations leading to 2 dead town (assuming both were town).
Opps, sorry not mind mafia. It was less experiment, I knew it was one of LS's games >.<akrolsmir wrote:
I would totally vote Swifttail right now, except meta apparently excuses him? (rantai, I looked through both Mind Games, he didn't seem to be in there)
I was reading through all the posts and will be honest here, I have no clue what's going on. Part of me wants to shut out Swift's posts altogether (considering I had reread them a few times to try to understand what he was on about). Maybe I'm still groggy.
One thing I will say though - I don't think Swift and Lybydose are mafia buddies. As far as I can tell, the only lead that accusation was going on was the fact Swift was hesitant to vote Lybydose to save himself (and vice versa?).
If it were me, I wouldn't vote someone I didn't believe was anti-town (assuming I was town) based on the fact I wanted to save myself. Because the next day I would be dead from hammer accusations leading to 2 dead town (assuming both were town).
And for the record I don't think Swift is mafia at this moment, just really... confusing.
self preservation above all d1
that's not hard to understand
that's not hard to understand
Well I guess that's your way of approaching D1. Even if it's naive, I still rather vote based on whatever information is presented in front of me instead of resorting to defensive votes.
Yes, but you don't self preservation vote until nearing the deadline.Chris wrote:
self preservation above all d1
that's not hard to understand
Your vote indicates who you find suspicious.
By using it as self-preservation early on the game, you deprive that information.
there is no information on d1
self preservation above all, and you're both full of it if you had the last vote and wouldn't vote to save yourself
self preservation above all, and you're both full of it if you had the last vote and wouldn't vote to save yourself
NoHItter wrote:
Yes, but you don't self preservation vote until nearing the deadline.
glad to know you're contributingRolled wrote:
NoHItter wrote:
Yes, but you don't self preservation vote until nearing the deadline.
Chris: Uggh, your posts remind me of Two except not as egocentric and obnoxious.aww thx for the compliment
Are you seriously suggesting to lynch for no reason because when we vote for a good reason they're usually town? What makes you think lynching on nothing will get a better chance at getting scum?pieguy1372 wrote:
Also, in every game I played the person lynched D1 was lynched "because he was suspicious" and he was always town. This is just basic statistics at hand as I mentioned before, especially when you consider the mafia tries to NOT be suspicious... This is just my idea of how to play the game, and IMO it's worked a lot better than lynching town members who screw up, instead of actually showing signs of wanting to hinder town progress or mislead us. >.>
NoHItter, pieguy, scum team of the year?
How did what pieguy make you think we're both scum?Wojjan wrote:
NoHItter, pieguy, scum team of the year?
@Chris
So you still think that one should prioritize self-preservation over information in voting long before the deadline?
This statement:Not always trueChris wrote:
there is no information on d1
yes for the third timeNoHItter wrote:
How did what pieguy make you think we're both scum?Wojjan wrote:
NoHItter, pieguy, scum team of the year?
@Chris
So you still think that one should prioritize self-preservation over information in voting long before the deadline?
especially on d1 where votes are mostly random and bandwagons are common
there is no "information" to be gained, just speculating based off nothing because nothing has happened
Everything in this game is speculations. You can't even take the information you receive from the host as fact, as you now know ^__^
With your logic, a vanilla townie would just RV the whole way through a mafia game. All they have is speculation.
I feel you're underestimating the usefulness and power of speculation, though.
With your logic, a vanilla townie would just RV the whole way through a mafia game. All they have is speculation.
I feel you're underestimating the usefulness and power of speculation, though.
d1 d1 d1 d1 d1 d1 d1Rolled wrote:
Everything in this game is speculations. You can't even take the information you receive from the host as fact, as you now know ^__^
With your logic, a vanilla townie would just RV the whole way through a mafia game. All they have is speculation.
I feel you're underestimating the usefulness and power of speculation, though.
did you read that yet
So what's classified as information as opposed to speculation?
anything that is confirmedRolled wrote:
So what's classified as information as opposed to speculation?
Do you realize how little in mafia is confirmed? Nine times out of ten a decision must be made without previous confirmation on whether it's good or bad.
This is really derailing the thread though. I'm just showing flaws in your argument.
This is really derailing the thread though. I'm just showing flaws in your argument.
my entire argument is based around d1Rolled wrote:
Do you realize how little in mafia is confirmed? Nine times out of ten a decision must be made without previous confirmation on whether it's good or bad.
This is really derailing the thread though. I'm just showing flaws in your argument.
that's what you and everyone else seems to continue to ignore
Nobody is arguing that information on d1 is generally lower than information in later days. What people are arguing is that there is no information to be gathered day 1.
what information can you gather that is useful d1 other than roleclaims?Rolled wrote:
Nobody is arguing that information on d1 is generally lower than information in later days. What people are arguing is that there is no information to be gathered day 1.
voting patterns and crap like that doesn't help till later
And there lies the disagreement (that I have at least).
I see information as anything that can be used to read a player, whether that be 'speculation' or otherwise. At the very least it could help with choosing a D1 lynch as opposed to blindly picking or 'gut voting'.
.....Wow ninjas.
I see information as anything that can be used to read a player, whether that be 'speculation' or otherwise. At the very least it could help with choosing a D1 lynch as opposed to blindly picking or 'gut voting'.
.....Wow ninjas.
yeah, what he said.
anyone you lynch d1 is going to be lynched blindly 100% of the time unless they just claim mafiaRantai wrote:
And there lies the disagreement (that I have at least).
I see information as anything that can be used to read a player, whether that be 'speculation' or otherwise. At the very least it could help with choosing a D1 lynch as opposed to blindly picking or 'gut voting'.
.....Wow ninjas.
So are you suggesting that we do not have more information on you than we have against somebody who has posted 0 times?
This conversation is such a derailer so just admit you are wrong and be on with it.
This conversation is such a derailer so just admit you are wrong and be on with it.
tell me then what you've gathered from me posting? I'd love to hear thisRolled wrote:
So are you suggesting that we do not have more information on you than we have against somebody who has posted 0 times?
This conversation is such a derailer so just admit you are wrong and be on with it.
it isn't derailing anything because there is no other conversations going on, and this is about mafia
I gathered that you're bad at mafia
exactly, nothingRolled wrote:
I gathered that you're bad at mafia
thanks for proving my point
If a hypothetical situation arises in which a bus driver were to switch you with player x, and player x dies, it's more likely that you are a strongman rather than you shooting yourself anticipating my switch. Hypothetically.
See, I concluded that due to information I gathered on day 1.
See, I concluded that due to information I gathered on day 1.
I think you've got your games switched upRolled wrote:
If a hypothetical situation arises in which a bus driver were to switch you with player x, and player x dies, it's more likely that you are a strongman rather than you shooting yourself anticipating my switch. Hypothetically.
See, I concluded that due to information I gathered on day 1.