Fuck, Two did explain his stuff. I really need to read more carefully. Anyway, Chris' ability seems insanely overpowered. Though, I suppose LadySuburu's justification for it sort of works... meh, idk.
LunaticMara wrote:
Wait.... Two just posted 4 times already. Did he just lie about his role?
I'm all for thisakrolsmir wrote:
Also, I propose we lynch chris in three days if he isn't nk'd- it would be disastrous if he were mafia
wrong shade doesn't countTwo wrote:
I'm all for thisakrolsmir wrote:
Also, I propose we lynch chris in three days if he isn't nk'd- it would be disastrous if he were mafia
Based on my own speculation as to why I'd be given a role like this as town (Excluding role flavor), would be that basically I'm a day vote theif whose extra vote is used in secret as opposed to publicly in thread. This does give me the ability to prevent early hammers from others, as well as move away votes that someone I consider mafia has onto another target. However, as you've mentioned it is a role of limited use which is why I claimed once people were getting confused over what happened. The confusion it can create would rarely be helpful (only if I manage to pull off an unlikely gambit early), whereas the extra vote is helpful.Wojjan wrote:
Oh, if you want a roleclaim out of me by all means force it so. Right now I am actually pretty interested in hearing from DxS because he's been lurking like shit and he probably picked me as a role option. META YAY META YAY YAY
I'm still left wondering why Ls' ability would in any case be applicable to a townie, seeing as the secrecy and ocnfusion using it generates, as long as the possibilty to rerail lynches at the last second makes it more of a liability than a useful skill.
am I gonna have to vote you?pieguy1372 wrote:
I've been following the thread and don't really have anything to say about anything. With large games like this, I find it harder to pick up any leads on anyone.
I'll probably come up with something later on
Or if you guys are really curious and want to know. I'd prefer to not have to explain until it comes up though.LadySuburu wrote:
If we decide to lynch DxS at any point in the future, nobody hammer him. I have my reasonings and will explain at the time if/when it comes up.
a certain group of people are eliminatedThis is from Echo's last message. Any idea on what the group may be?
What would you like me to say to the host N2?
Regardless of if you believe me or not, as it is now I appear to be Town's only option. You either take your lead or you go in blind again and possibly lynch another important player.
Chances are I'm going to be NK'd, however if I am that would confirm my list so either way it works out.
I got a couple new games the other day, screw posting.pieguy1372 wrote:
Conversely, Mashley was really active day 1 and has hardly said anything today
Two wrote:
you're not gonna get one bud
it's your job to read the thread
Explain. Pointing others isn't a good reason.Two wrote:
I would be sad too if I was on the team you are onMashley wrote:
Any explaination for why you can post more than 3 times now, Two? :<
Let me get that for you.Two wrote:
speaking of smart, I lied about that whole 3 post restriction thing in order to live to day 2, so thanks a bunch, mafia
Assuming you aren't NK'd or roleblocked, I suggest...Chris wrote:
What would you like me to say to the host N2?
Regardless of if you believe me or not, as it is now I appear to be Town's only option. You either take your lead or you go in blind again and possibly lynch another important player.
Chances are I'm going to be NK'd, however if I am that would confirm my list so either way it works out.
How do you figure that one? I thought it was more of a bluff than anything.bmin11 wrote:
Currently, I have no idea what to do today. The lynch on DxS seems like the public view, but this feels like a waste when we could pretty much assume he would be some kind of a role with bomb ability.
Speaking of which, thanks for indirectly reminding me.foulcoon wrote:
I want to vote for DxS, however I'm not going to allow him to get hammered before we hear what LS has to say.
Being confirmed town makes it much easier to say what's on your mind without worrying about the mafia trying to twist around anything you say. It also means that my thoughts will actually get listened to properly instead of ignored ect...Two wrote:
nothing encourages someone to post more than saying we will never lynch you
Before I get any more confused, who are you referring to? LS or DxS?Two wrote:
nothing encourages someone to post more than saying we will never lynch you
lolChris wrote:
why is your post not red
If I'm reading correctly he hasn't been confirmed anything...akrolsmir wrote:
Also, how is DxS suddenly confirmed town now?
DxS, I see you're on, say something.
If he's town why are you voting for him again?Two wrote:
yeah he has been confirmed town
I just explained that a few posts up
However, with 4-5 already confirmed town, the chances of multiple people in a group of 3 being anti-town is much higher. In that case even though getting a true result is amazing, getting a false is much less helpful. If you detect two of the scummier (or lurkers likely to be lynched), then a true gets us on the right track, where as a false allows us to choose which one we think is scum and lynch them (which we would be doing anyway, since they're the scummiest or since people seem to like to lynch lurkers here.)akrolsmir wrote:
it might be better to just confirm 3 people as town- the reasoning being that knowing that at least one out of two scummy people are actually mafia doesn't put us that much ahead, since we might have to spend two days to hit the one person. While it'll be very good to know if one of the people who is giving off a townie feel is actually scum.
Ah, that's unfortunate then.Two wrote:
really, though
my roleclaim wasn't fake and neither was my restiction
as wojjan was so lovely to point out, I misclicked a shade and so there is no longer a purpose to posting in red
it's fine even if they do~akrolsmir wrote:
Fine, 2 people then. Honestly I don't think it makes a difference, as I've said before the mafia will probably figure out a way to stop his ability.
How do you figure that one? I thought it was more of a bluff than anything.Bluffing orz...... that's a possibility orz....
I guess that's good news? In setups I'm used to, roles that don't visit their targets can't get roleblocked. mod: is this the case for this game?Two wrote:
last night chris was targeted by and targeted no one
Any ability that involves sending me an action can be roleblocked.Wojjan wrote:
I guess that's good news? In setups I'm used to, roles that don't visit their targets can't get roleblocked. mod: is this the case for this game?
11:24 <BanchoBot> DeathxShinigami was silenced byBefore you can finish reading the message, the Bancho server restarts for a mandatory update.
1. I think a player of your caliber would know that deathxshinigami wasn't mafia and that lunaticmara missing that is actually a town tellfoulcoon wrote:
Sorry guys I spent the holiday with my family and I wasn't able to follow the thread.
Right now the top two people I find suspicious are DxS and LunaticMara. DxS for claiming to have some awesome role and not posting after LS practically explained that it was possible DxS did nothing to affect the vote..
1. I think a player of your caliber would know that deathxshinigami wasn't mafia and that lunaticmara missing that is actually a town tell1. At this point, yes I agree DxS isn't mafia. I don't understand how Mara repeatedly trying to make you look suspicious is a town tell, though.
2. you are extremely likely to have picked 1 or more BATs for your role choices
oh and I honestly would rather one of these lurkers voted so they have a reason to talk
duhTwo wrote:
so a vote on you is what is urgent enough for you to post from your phone
For now I'll say that it's mostly gut as well.akrolsmir wrote:
LS, care to explain?
Aside from the fact I don't think I've seen animask since this post, this is just screaming for future 'what they said' reasoning... (and to be honest I really think that kind of excuse is a cop out)animask wrote:
Also, anyone want to summarize Day 1 for me? (Three people maybe?)
Just the important stuff? I don't want to over-analyze every post...
so we're 9+ days into the game and you've already said you didn't read day 1, and I guess with this post you are saying you didn't read day 2animask wrote:
I'm in a tl;dr mood right now...
(Stop voting for me lol xD)
"Is X town"Chris wrote:
What would you like me to say to the host N2?
you don't trust me yet you "want the doctor to protect chris every night" XD XD XDHaneii wrote:
Also, anyway to test if Chris is telling the truth about his role? (ignoring watcher results because I don't trust Two XD - Leaning towards town but I can't put my trust in you completely, sorry)
Wow, that's nearly spot on o.o (except for the specifics. ie: names like you or wojjan). Get out of my head Two :UTwo wrote:
do you think that he picked 1 mafia to claim as town? all town to claim as town? how about two? would the two mafia be myself and wojjan? if that were the case, you'd have 3 mafia entangled in that, so you see this is a slippery slope