per general rc: Difficulty names in a beatmap must be clearly progressive and accurately indicating of their respective difficulties
current is clearly progressive but not accurately indicative of their respective difficulties since they all use the same word
given that the rule is in conjunction, the latter must also be followed
a fix would be similar to what the std ver linked in the desc did where it added the respective difficulty to the diffname or simply use standard ctb names
02:37:442 (2,3,4,5) - idk but this feels awkward considering everything else happening in this section
01:11:963 (4,5,6) - could b prettier, theres no distinct individual sound on the 1/2 ticks so i dont c y theres need for tapdash
00:59:770 (2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4) - prolly using too wide spacing w antiflow involved, would nerf a bit
02:58:015 (1,2,3,4,5) - maybe have 2 sliders w jus dashes so theres better contrast as pitch increases
02:56:612 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - can u make the wind down more apparent, spacing doesnt seem too different when song decreases
02:08:893 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - this whole part is more dense than it should be which makes it hard to follow which rhythm is being prioritised. have more gaps for proper contrast and see my diff for spread reasons
02:06:086 (1,2) - spacing between this is kinda fat and makes it rather snappy, would jus use 1/2 rhythm tbh
01:55:121 (2,3,4,5,6) - too much for a rain, breaks guideline and theres not even a distinct sound on 01:55:472 -
00:28:369 (3,4) - weird rhythm maybe jus use 1/2 or 1/1 like how u do others