01:23:012 (6) - and 01:23:928 (2) - The two sliders look very similar, but 01:23:928 (2) - sounds a lot more intense here. It is recommended to use a 1/2 slider and a circle instead
I suggest you stack 00:43:490 (3) - and 00:43:328 (2) - ,cuz 00:43:328 (2,3) - and 00:43:815 (4,1) - are the same spacing, but the rhythm is different, It's a bit confusing. Or you can do something like this 01:24:842 (2,3,4,1,2) - Distinguish the spacing between 01:24:842 (2,3) - and 01:25:329 (4,1) -
00:29:374 (3) - I thought you shouldn't ignore the drum in this slider, It can be changed to 3/4 and a circle
00:26:692 (3,4,5,6,7) - Sorry, but I can't understand why so many 1/4 are put here. It only has drums on 00:26:944 (4) - and 00:27:027 (5) - . So I propose to change it to https://graphical.s-ul.eu/sRrG7k89
00:51:497 (1,2) - ctrl+g, I think it's better not to ignore the sound on this white line. 00:48:815 (1,2) - You did the same earlier
00:42:279 (4) - It is recommended to change it to the same rhythm as before and after to better reflect the vocals
00:07:921 (1,2,1,2) - 01:17:642 (1,2,3,4,5) - These two places are the same, but what you make is different, please be consistent
00:36:497 (5) - Replace with a 1/4 reverse slider
, cuz the sound is continuous
00:24:011 (5) - nc, and remove nc on 00:24:178 (1) - Because this is the beginning of another vocal
00:12:279 (3) - Replace with a 1/2 slider, This allows you to better express your vocals, and it can also take into account the drums above 00:12:446 -
00:12:197 (5) - remove this, because I think the rhythm of this section should focus on the vocals