[TIMELINE]

00:03:607 (3,4,5,6) - rhythm bit too dense i think for hyper, kinda takes away from 00:01:607 (1,2,3,4) -

00:05:607 (3) - i think ctrl g this slider for better movement emphasis, to match 00:01:607 (1,2,3,4) -

00:08:750 (5) - nc probably

00:11:036 (1) - i think u can move this to like x252 y189 and rotate for better emphasis, because this 00:10:607 (2,1,2) - angle is the same as 00:10:893 (2,1) - currently, also stops it from overlapping 00:09:464 (1,2,3) - which is really minor but, its nice to use a new part of the playfield for a important object

00:11:036 (1,2) - i think this should be grouped together and 00:12:179 (3) - can be nc to seperate

00:12:750 (1,2,3,4) - grouping is visually really loose, u could just nc 00:13:179 (2) -

00:13:893 (1,2,1,2,1) - would just try to make the overlaps consistent spacing, 00:10:464 (1,2) - probably like this

00:14:464 (1,2,3,4,5) - visually loose, u could just nc 00:15:322 (2) - , 00:14:464 (1,5) - avoid overlapping this if possible

00:18:607 (2,3,4,5,6) - rotate this like 25 degrees because you rarely use angles other than 5-10 degrees unless its for emphasis, see 00:20:464 (1,1,1,1) -

00:19:607 (1) - think needs more emphasis, it kinda just continues from 00:18:607 (2,3,4,5,6) - rotation + same angle, if u wanna keep same rotation, i recommend rotate 00:19:607 (1) - 180 degree so 00:19:464 (6,1) - becomes sharp angle

00:21:322 (1) - think needs more emphasis, top right corner might be funny lol

00:23:893 (1) - can make this a circle shape slider or something, i think overlapping it makes it stand out less, esp with more complex 00:23:036 (1) - hogging all the space right before it

00:26:464 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - might be a little too intense for hyper

00:29:893 (1) - wave here might have better proportions against 00:30:750 (3) - but this doesent matter

00:40:750 (1) - could move this to x0 y196 for better emphasis on 00:41:036 (1) -

00:43:607 (1) - moving circle to x224 y276 goes crazy

00:47:036 (1,2,3) - ctrl g each of these slider one by one gives better emphasis to 00:47:036 (1,1) -

00:48:464 (1,1) - spacing a little retarded for hyper, 00:48:179 (1,1) - and overlap kinda cringe, 00:48:750 (1,2,3) - could be moved over to the left side, different slider might be necassary idk

00:52:179 (1) - anything but this slider im dying

00:53:893 (1,2,3) - could use some different kind of movement than 00:53:036 (1,2,3) - for contrast and more interesting flow here

00:56:464 (1,2) - can move this down a bit and 00:56:893 (1,2) - more to the right to make room for 00:57:322 (1,2) - to avoid overlap, because its kinda important object i think

00:56:464 (1,1) - slider end not snapped

00:58:179 (1,1) - upward momentum kinda associated with these sounds, i think ctrl g this 00:58:893 (1) - would be better because its also upward momentum but not on that sounds if that makes sense lol

[GENERAL]

00:08:464 (4,5,6) - u went for super like close visual spacing like this alot but not all the time, not executed the best, feels kinda weird cause 00:09:464 (1,2,3) - you switch between super close and not close, i would just space out examples of super close sliders as it wont change the playability as much

if you want the close visual spacing, u need to 00:30:750 (3) - and 00:40:750 (1,2,1) - make sure stuff like this is really consistent, because it just looks unintentional if you dont

overall kinda makes the map look a little cramped, i wouldnt mind u increasing CS slightly if that helps