Any reason why 00:02:883 (4,5) - 00:04:179 (3,4) - 00:05:846 (4,5) - 00:07:141 (3,4) - 00:08:809 (4,5) - 00:10:104 (3,4) - 00:11:587 (3,4) - 00:13:067 (3,4) - are spaced out to 1.59x+ and not 1.0x?
The spacing with 02:21:587 (4,5,6) - 02:22:327 (4,5,6) - 02:22:790 (1,2) - and 02:23:253 (5,6) - confuse me a bit as they look as though you should dash them but they are also walkable at the same time and end up being pretty ambiguous imo.
00:19:827 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - I feel like this section can have more movement to match the sounds it is mapped to like how 00:16:864 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - is done.
01:18:253 (3,1) - here are at 2.49x spacing. I suggest having a spacing like 01:16:772 (3,1) - and here 01:21:216 (3,1) - to prevent any possible ambiguity in distance recognition for platter players
It feels a bit off having 01:10:198 (1,2) - a lot closer together than 01:01:309 (1,2) - 01:02:790 (1,2) - and other patterns on that same sound
00:25:753 (1,1,1,1) - I would make these dashes to be consistent with the previous long slider section you had here 00:13:901 (1,1,1) - as 00:25:753 (1,1,1,1) - imo is musically more intense than 00:13:901 (1,1,1) -
With the way it is hitsounded, having 00:19:087 (2) - as a same direction walk feels a bit awkward to play. I think ctrl+h and moving it out by 1.5x away from 00:18:346 (1) - play better and compliments the hitsounding more.
00:03:161 (3,1) - 00:04:642 (3,1) - 00:06:124 (3,1) - 00:09:087 (5,1) - 00:10:569 (5,1) - unsure if these are meant to be dashes or walks as you have 00:07:605 (3,1) - as a dash.
00:35:442 (2,3,4) - Same as previous, suggest making 3 evenly spaced out like 00:14:014 (3,4,5) -
00:11:565 (3,4,5) - I'm not liking this weirdly tight looking spacing from 4 to 5 while the same rhythm is used here 00:14:014 (3,4,5) - Suggest changing to be like 00:14:014 (3,4,5) -
02:40:560 (1) - and 02:44:142 (1) - 05:11:008 (1) - and 05:14:590 (2) - 05:23:993 (2) - Not sure how I feel about the wiggles in these spots as in my opinion there isn't a change in sound to justify them
05:19:963 (5,1) - In my opinion this standstill feels out of place with the other patterns in this section
I feel like there should be progressive spacing increases between 04:32:053 (1,2,3,4) - 04:32:948 (1,2,3) - and 04:33:956 (2,3,4) - as the flute sound they are mapped on gradually gets louder and more intense
04:01:829 (7,1) - this works as is but I would like to see it a tiny bit more spaced out to emphasize the change in the flute sound as it feels too much like I can stand still and hit it.
02:53:097 (4,5,6) - Here I would change this to something like 02:49:515 (4,5,6,7,8) - as they are on the same sound
02:15:197 (1,2,3,4) - is more spaced out than 02:09:979 (1,2,3,4) -
I would say to match the spacing with 02:09:979 (1,2,3,4) - as they are on the same sound
00:44:545 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - 00:47:153 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Not sure if these are supposed to be walks or jumps as you can walk them. I would make small spacing changes to help better indicate if they are dashes or walks