01:22:764 (1,3,5,7) - Hit me with the subjective no change but, the dramatic change in slider shape over a sustained note feels like forced variation and its pretty uckers ngl. I recommend making all the sliders the same/similar

01:19:133 (2) - I pretty sure this should be two circles to stay consistent with previous patterns

01:06:501 (2) - https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/16377547/4da6 perhaps stick to your 1/4 spacing convention?

01:28:449 (1) - This is troll, at least center it

00:40:370 (5) - This should be nc'd as the start of the burst because it ends at 00:41:001 (4) - and is still an odd number burst so you dont need to clarify that the blue tick with nc. Msg on disc if this is confusing

03:01:974 (1,1) - These shouldnt be nc'd

02:33:860 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - This stream section could be so much cooler. At minimum each burst could be smaller spacing than the last one to represent the falling pitch of the layer theyre mapped to

02:05:231 (1,1,1) - These do not need to be nc'd

01:46:374 (3,1,2) - This is really awkward -w-

01:18:088 (4,5) - There is no emphasis on either of these objects and there should be because 01:18:088 (4) - is a down note and 01:18:260 (5) - is a strong vocal. I recommend changing the pattern so you can add spacing emphasis on both objects.

00:57:860 (1,2,3,4) - Maybe nc these because the spacing is similar to some of your 1/2 spacing and you want to differentiate it

00:53:402 (1,2,3,4,5) - This feels really overspaced and would be better if it started with small spacing and built up to match the buildup in the song

00:51:002 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Not sure if this was your intention, but this is really reading intensive and there are better ways to organize structure besides stacking on slider heads and ends

Try to maintain spacing logic, for instance making 00:16:202 (4,5,6) - 00:19:460 (2,3,4) - the same spacing because they serve the same function.

00:24:756 (1) - This doesnt need to be NC'd

00:15:940 (1,2) - maybe change rhythm to 1/1 slider circle to map kick. Also, having the same rhythm across multiple diffs is generally not encouraged.

01:23:288 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2) - Maybe changing some of these patterns a little bit so they arent literally copy paste from the first kiai

00:15:940 (1) - Maybe make this a 1/2 reverse slider and make 00:16:400 - a circle so you can map drums as active

01:30:350 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - This feels really under mapped compared to some other cool patterns. Maybe you can make this more exciting?

00:08:769 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3) - This rhythm makes no sense. Are you mapping the piano or not? If so map those 1/2 beats you left anyway.

01:54:512 (2,3) - This is really hard to read. cause the distance is the same between 01:54:512 (2,3) - and 01:54:665 (3,4) - . Maybe change things around to clarify the rhythm here

01:40:889 (1) - probably no nc here

01:38:287 (3,2) - Another probably unintended overlap that is a little ugly. clean up a bit

01:36:144 (1,2,3) - This spacing is massive compared to everything else. I believe emphasizing it in a way is a good idea but not through spacing. Consider something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/16138724/6351

01:35:609 (2) - There is no reason to map the 1/8 here particularly since you've chosen to ignore the 1/8th in the past like 01:30:787 (2,3,4,5) -

01:29:104 (3) - The stream starts here. Rhythm should be https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/16138714/ddad

01:22:063 (1,2,3,1,2) - This musical phrasing is exactly the same as the first kiai but it is mapped with so much more spacing. Either nerf this to make it consistent with the first kiai or buff the other one

01:21:451 (1,2) - This feels really undermapped. Try spicing it up to make it more engaging and exciting. Rhythm spacing etc

01:11:655 (1,2,1) - This slider cluster is pretty gross. Maybe make a change like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/16138706/7cc4