Bakudanma

00:06:758 (2) turn this into a 1/1 slider like you did at 00:04:092 (2) ?

00:07:758 (1) you could shorten this slider to a 1/1 (end at 00:08:092) and have a dash to the downbeat at 00:08:258 simmilar to 00:00:925 (3,1)

00:08:396 (2,3) - this antiflow wiggle pattern is quite difficult for a rain in general and very overwhelming here considering the calm intro, please make this more flow so that there would be no need to wiggle here

00:09:313 - can add note

00:09:592 - 00:20:258 то ли ты выделял гитару, то ли что. Прослушай это парт в замедлении и ремапни его. Пример 00:09:592 (1) - посередине слайдера гитара, 00:10:258 (3,4) - тут запил, поставь длинный слайдер, 00:11:592 (3) - нет гитары? нету ноты

00:13:489 (5) - wrong snap, please snap to 1/4

00:14:563 (2,3) - even with the strong snares, this pattern is a bit overwhelming (several 1/4 hyperdash in a row in rain at this bpm is one of the hardest things in general) and takes emphasis away from 00:14:896 cymbal. you could get rid of the hyperdash between 00:14:563 (2,3) to make this a bit calmer and hyperdash only once cymbal comes at 00:14:729 (3,1)

00:22:229 (2) - kinda weak, just hihat sound, no need to emphasise, could skip

00:38:592 - 00:40:092 мало мувмента, попробуй сделать что то типа такого

00:39:258 (3,1) add hyper for cymbal at 00:39:425 like you did with 00:38:758 (4,1) but since the pattern would feel way too harsh then i would reccomend chnaging 00:38:925 (1,2,3) to something like this:

00:40:092 (1) - сделай здесь слайдер чтобы выделить вокал

00:42:258 (1) - сделай здесь что то типа такого, для того чтобы увеличить эмфазис на 00:42:925 (1) - и выделить вокал

00:42:563 (2,1) - this hyperdash distance is a bit too overwhelming for rain, can do like 4x instead so it's a bit stronger but not overdose-feeling

00:44:925 (3) - такие слайдеры немного не к месту так как они убивают весь эмфазис на 00:45:592 замени их чем нибудь

00:47:396 (2,3) - vocals go kinda intense here, maybe could do stronger dash or maybe hyperdash here even and make simpler pattern between 00:47:563 (3,4)

00:48:925 (1,2) - почему тут гипердэш? если ты до этого и после этого не делал в подобных местах гипердэш

00:52:592 - тут можно было поставить ноту и сделать джампы перед лефт райтом

00:53:229 (1,2,1) - for emphasis, the higher hyperdashes is ok here, but the distance is a bit too much. could do like 3-3.5x distance instead

00:59:092 (2,3,4) - у тебя тут идет протяжной вокал собственно если ты так не любишь выделять вокал хотя бы измени ритм на такой

01:02:175 (2,3) add hyper vor vocal emphasize at 01:02:258? (for more emphasize on the "yo" in sayonara)

01:04:258 (1,2) i think you should stay consistent with you walk distance of 0.9x you used before exclusively here, right now its 0,75x

01:08:092 (4,1) - пиксель

01:08:229 (1) - maybe could do dash within this slider to emphasise high pitch guitar at 01:08:396, then also skip 01:08:229 (1,2) so there is not too much dash in a row

01:09:229 (2,3) - you could skip hyperdash here, it's not a very intense section so it feels a bit overwhelming to use this pattern

01:11:563 (3) - could skip the note, it's just a weak hi-hat while everything around it is stronger, so skipping it gives more emphasis to other notes around it

01:13:229 (1) - remove nc

01:14:508 (4,1) would make this a hyper like you did with all the other streams that all have no dash and only hypers. (if i missed any and you spot one, i would highly suggest you to change those as well)

01:14:925 - 01:22:925 слишком много звуков выделил для рейна, предлагаю упростить до выделения вокала + барабанов (типа 01:17:592)

01:16:092 (1,2) would be cool if you moved (2) further to the left, the flow is accelerating with the shape of (1) and it just kinda feels awkward to have (2) right on top of it. you could do something like this which i believe would fit nice:

01:24:758 (5) - кто дэш украл?

01:33:592 (1,2) increase distance to ~1,0x to stay consistent with all your other walk distances

01:34:092 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - пианино в 1/6 прислушайся. и ты пропустил некоторые звуки между тройками

01:34:618 - could map it as you mapped all other 1/6th piano notes in this section

01:34:647 - (2) stay consistent with top diff, #4820489

01:37:425 (5) - каковы мотивы на выделение данного звука, если он более слабый чем все барабаны во всем паттерне?

01:48:563 - add note for consistency with 00:52:563 (2) -

01:54:592 (2,3) decrease this to about x2,58 like you did in previous kiai

01:55:092 (2) - очень сильный вокал а ты его не выделил никак(((

01:58:092 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - выглядит и играется не оч

01:59:146 (4) - right now this object being here creates uncomfortable flow on 01:59:063 (3,4,5) could move this a bit left to be on top of 01:59:229 (5) and it will flow nicer

01:59:175 пропустил барабан

01:59:425 (3) - ну у тебя же тут вокаааал добавь слайдееер

02:01:758 (3,1) pretty low distance here, feels a bit weird to play you could just make it a proper walk distance instead because i dont think there are other occasions where you used this weird distance

02:07:063 (3) - id make this a slider cuz sound is stretching and 02:07:229 - is unmapped when having decent strength

02:14:312 (2) - im pretty sure it need to be 1/6 however i think simplification should be acceptable for playability but would like more opinions

02:15:896 (1,2,1) - can do around 3.5x distance here, right now it feels a bit too much for rain

02:18:925 (1,2,1,2) - - у тебя тут гитара в 1/6 используй просто два длинныйх реверс слайдера для выделения

02:27:842 (5,6) - не вижу причин для гипердэша

02:28:258 (1,2,3) - выдели вокал мувментом например реверс 1/2 слайдер

02:28:758 (4,5,6) - поменяй местами дэш и гипердэш

02:30:758 (2,1) stack these notes on top of each other? would look better visually imo

02:32:092 (5,1) - добавь дэш

02:32:925 (5) - та же мысль что и #4793995

02:35:258 (3) - нота не на звуке

02:36:258 mapping this downbeat with a sliderend feels very underwhelming and i highly suggest to choose a different rhythm and have a hyper on 02:36:258 for more emphasize.

02:36:758 (4,5) increase distance from 0,83x -> ~1,0x?

02:40:258 (3,1) why is this kick suddenly emphasized with a hyper while no other kick previously in the section has a hyper on it?´

i think you should stay consistent with previous emphasize choices and map it with a dash instead of a hyper.

02:41:425 simmilar to #4822242 i dont think a hyper fits well here as it only takes away the emphasize from 02:42:258 (3,4,5)

02:44:925 (3,4) increase distance to ~1,0x?

02:49:592 (2,3) - увеличить спейсинг до 1,5x-1,7x, а то как то вяло играется

03:06:258 (3,4) increase distance to ~1,0x?

03:12:508 пропустил барабан

03:27:592 (1,2) increase distance to ~1,0x?

03:29:508 добавь ноту