Central Nucleus

00:01:671 (1671|2,1757|2,1842|3) - and 00:09:899 (9899|3,9985|3,10071|2) - consider these pattern as these both are the only section to use this pattern and both of them are on the right hand side, how about rearranging the pattern so it won't be too one sided or mirror one of the pattern

00:01:928 I think you should add a note here and in the similar parts, because it is practically the same as here 00:03:042 (3042|2,3128|2,3214|1,3299|1) -

00:19:328 - triple for snare sound

00:21:128 (21128|1) - move to 00:19:757 - col 4

00:21:557 (21557|1) - prefer to move this to col3 as this section is too left hand biased

00:22:757 (22757|0,22757|3,22928|0) - same sound as 00:22:071 (22071|2,22071|3) and different from 00:21:728 (21728|3,21728|0,21899|0), consider making this a [12]3 to differentiate them

00:30:128 (30128|1,30214|1,30471|0,30557|0,30728|1,30814|1) - this section here is too left hand biased, consider moving one of the shield to right hand side

00:32:699 (32699|0,32699|1,32785|2,32871|3,32957|3) - should be similar to 00:38:185 (38185|0,38185|1,38271|1,38357|3,38442|3) no?

00:34:071 (34071|1,34157|1,34242|2,34328|2,34585|1,34671|1,34757|0,34842|0) - flow is rather weird here, mostly because its rather anchored to col 2 overall, i would suggest arranging it to something like this so its more balanced , other reason i reccomend doing this because it seems there some kind of theme of it being repeating patterns for the sound clink clink like this 00:23:099 (23099|1,23185|1,23271|2,23357|2) -

00:34:928 (34928|2,35099|2,35271|2,35442|2,35528|2,35785|2) - long anchor, consider to rearrange the pattern, I suggest to move 00:35:099 (35099|2) - to col1 and 00:35:271 (35271|2) - to col2

00:39:385 (39385|2,39471|2,39557|3,39642|3,39728|2,39814|2) - this section is too right hand biased, consider to rearrange if not intended

00:41:785 (41785|0,41957|3) - how about flipping this? it's missing a second minijack

00:47:014 (47014|2) - mind telling me whats this ln for? if its for the metallic sound you should add another ln here 00:46:928 (46928|3) - just to be consistent. same with 00:52:414 (52414|3) - 00:57:899 (57899|3) - 01:03:385 (63385|2) -

00:51:042 (51042|1,51128|1,51214|0,51299|0,51385|1,51557|0,51557|1,51728|1,51814|1,51899|0,51985|0,52071|1,52157|1) - all of the minijack in this section is on the left hand, prefer to move some of the minijack to the right side if its not intended

00:54:299 (54299|0,54299|2,54299|3,54471|1,54471|2,54642|0,54642|2,54642|1,54728|2) -
What do you think if you rearrange this like this?
https://gyazo.com/4c5649aba2542aba7ef24c5a2c4c75b3
so you can avoid this
00:54:299 (54299|2,54471|2,54642|2,54728|2) -

01:04:757 missing an ln here because 01:04:242 (64242|0) - has it and its the same sound

01:05:099 - it sounds weaker here than the other double in this section, may reduce to single

01:06:299 (66299|3) - consider moving this to col 1 so it doest feel too heavy on the col 3 and 4 going into the minijack

01:07:671 (67671|2,67699|0,67757|1,67785|2,67842|3,67871|0,67928|1,67957|3) -
the pattern here lacks neat and clean feel, can hardly show the clear 1/4 sound in the music, and it's a bit too hard between many SVs.

this one looks cleaner

01:10:071 (70071|1,70071|3,70128|2,70185|1) - this sound ends pretty sudden so using 1/6 to make it continuous to the next sound at 01:10:242 doesnt really fit imo. Consider removing the the 1/6 and just have a 1/8 note on col 3 at 01:10:114

applied for 01:07:328 (67328|3,67328|1,67385|2,67442|3), 01:08:699 (68699|1,68699|0,68757|2,68814|0), etc.

01:11:271
wrong snap, 1/16 332 rhythm is correct
and better do not use 4x jackhammer, feels not that good

01:15:728 (75728|0,75728|3) - for consistency purpose, move one of the note to 01:15:757 - and remove one of the note here 01:15:814 (75814|0,75814|2) -

01:15:757 (75757|2) - I think this should be removed. I don't see the reason for putting it, when the sound is already represented by this 01:15:728 (75728|0,75814|0) -

same
01:08:899 (68899|0) -
01:10:271 (70271|3) -
01:13:014 (73014|3) -

01:17:099 (77099|2,77185|2,77442|2,77528|2) - these 2 jacks cause an unnatural spike on this col. Moving the second jack to col 1 or 2 might be better.
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/19364707/c6bb
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/19364709/cccf

01:17:128 - missing note for pattern consistency

01:18:042 (78042|3,78128|1) - how about making these on the same col cuz they r the same sound? sth like this should work

01:22:199, 01:27:685 - missing sound

01:25:671 - consider to add another note here as double for pattern consistency and for missing kick and remove 01:26:014 (86014|3) - as there is no kick or other unique distinct sound here

01:45:557 - for pattern consistency, there should be a LN here and there shouldn't be a LN at 01:46:071 (106071|3) - like this section 01:39:899 (99899|2,100071|0,100242|3,100242|2,100757|2,100928|1,100928|0) -

01:53:442 (113442|3,113528|3,113614|2,113699|2,113785|3,113871|3) - this is pretty heavy for a quieter part of this section

01:54:985 (114985|1,114985|2,115071|2,115157|3,115242|3,115328|3) -
This pattern is harder a lot than
02:00:471 (120471|1,120471|3,120557|3,120642|0,120728|0,120814|0) & 02:05:957 (125957|2,125957|3,126042|3,126128|0,126214|0,126299|0).
You would better not lock the index finger 01:55:071 (115071|2) while the middle finger was dealing with the hardest 3-notes jack 01:55:157 (115157|3,115242|3,115328|3).

Seperate them from the same hand.

01:57:728 (117728|3,117814|3,117899|0,117985|0) - Shouldn't these be on the same hand like 01:52:242 (112242|1,112328|1,112414|0,112499|0)

02:12:814 - what a cool section

02:13:471 (133471|0) - move to 02:13:499 - . refer to the rest snares.

02:21:042 - missing a note for kick

02:22:071 (142071|0,142099|1,142128|2,142242|3,142271|2,142299|1) -
avoid using too much LN grace for a single melody sound, 02:22:414 (142414|0,142442|1) - this pattern is the most imo

02:22:757 (142757|1,142785|0,143442|3,143471|2) - these r not the same as 02:23:099 (143099|1,143128|2), as they r a lot quieter. Consider not gracing them and lower their LN length to represent that

02:30:985 (150985|0,151028|1,151071|2,151114|1,151157|0) -
02:31:671 (151671|3,151714|2,151757|1,151799|2,151842|3) -
[Subjective] I think using 1/6 divisor to stretch this pattern is more appropriate, since this sound is obviously longer than 1/2 beat.
But if you want to emphasize the "1/4 jack tension" here, keep is also fine.

it's unfortunate to ignore the melody from 02:33:385 - to 02:34:671 - (leaving it as just a 1/2 LN).

You could represent it with something like this:

or in a way that you prefer.

02:34:757 (154757|2,154928|2,155014|2) - this one looks a bit twisted
how about switch these two 02:34:757 (154757|1,154757|2) - ? then it can look cleaner

02:57:042

wrong snap, 1/6

03:07:842 (187842|0,187928|0,188014|0) -
i'm afraid it can be a bit hard compared to former parts
cus there are 3 jacks and heavy SVs which are both harder than before
i recommend to nerf the SV softer

03:17:957 - missing note i guess (?)

03:19:114 - the piano sound starts here, maybe you can add a single note here and act as a grace, also you can move 03:19:185 (199185|3) - 1/12 backward to 03:19:157

i think you forgot to make it a double at 03:25:328 - , as it becomes inconsistent with the following parts that have the same sound, such as 03:25:671 - , 03:26:699 - , 03:30:814 - , etc.

idk if there's any inavoidable consistency issue to make here quad, but how about nerf this 03:40:585 (220585|1) - to make it triple?

also the jacks are concentrated in col2 like this 03:39:471 (219471|1,219557|1,219728|1,219814|1,220071|1,220157|1,220414|1,220499|1,220585|1) - , so better move one or two of them to col1 for better handfeel

why don’t you follow the piano sound at 03:45:557 - ? is there any particular reason? if not, i suggest following it there instead of at 03:45:728 - because i don't think there is any specific sound

03:47:614 - prefer to add a note here, the piano sounds stronger here

03:53:099 (233099|1,233614|1,233957|1,234299|1,234814|1) -
the gaps between these notes looks a bit repeated, and i think it can be fixed just by fill 03:53:957 (233957|1) -

04:24:385 imo the sv rising can barely be seen cuz the time is too short

solution:
your original sv:

263207,-500,4,2,1,50,0,0
263550,-500,4,2,1,50,0,0
263893,-500,4,2,1,50,0,0
264235,-500,4,2,1,50,0,0

change them from 0.1x to 0.2x
output:

263207,-500,4,2,1,50,0,0 263550,-500,4,2,1,50,0,0 263893,-500,4,2,1,50,0,0 264235,-500,4,2,1,50,0,0

and
stretch

264385,-1000,4,2,1,50,0,0
264406.5,-303.030303030303,4,2,1,50,0,0
264428,-181.818181818182,4,2,1,50,0,0
264449.5,-128.205128205128,4,2,1,50,0,0

to make them start from 04:24:299, also change them to 0.4 0.55 0.7 0.85
output:
264299,-250,4,2,1,50,0,0 264342,-181.818181818182,4,2,1,50,0,0 264385,-142.857142857143,4,2,1,50,0,0 264428,-117.647058823529,4,2,1,50,0,0

inconsistency:
04:49:014 (289014|3) - 05:27:414 (327414|3) -
05:05:442 (305442|3) -
04:54:499 - 04:59:985 - 05:10:957 - 05:16:442 - 05:21:928 -

04:50:528 (290528|3,290614|3,290699|3,290764|2,290828|1) -
tbh the handfeel is not that good, and it looks abrupt when i go through the testplay, try rearranging it

inconsistency:
04:51:557 - 1/8->1/12grace->1/4jack
05:02:528 - 05:24:471 - 1/6->1/12grace->1/4jack
05:13:499 - 1/6->1/4jack

05:17:999 (317999|0,318042|1,318085|2,318128|3,318185|0,318242|1,318299|2,318299|3,318357|0,318414|1) -
looks repeat and become too easy suddenly (compared to former), try to rearrange

05:24:857 (324857|1) - i think it's better to give enough gap to the latter jackhammer, otherwise the patterns are a bit mixed

if that's your purpose thats ok, but you didnt keep it up at 05:27:557, so better consist it

i think making it a triple at 05:30:299 - is fine since it emphasizes the cymbal sound