00:08:402 (5,6,7,8) - I'd suggest to emphasize these note maybe increasing their spacing a little. I don't wanna ruin your circle pattern, so what about something like this? https://i.imgur.com/Jlqn1Ry.jpeg . Same applies for 00:19:830 (5,6,7,8) -
00:31:259 (5,6,7,8) -
00:42:687 (5,6,7,8) -
01:39:830 (5,6,7,8) - etc.
if i did this id have to do the opposite for 00:13:759 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - etc. and even the drums for 00:48:045 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - and at that point it dilutes the pattern to almost being unrecognizeable. i only made concessiosn for this 00:25:187 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - because there was no other way to do it without affecting the new section
00:14:116 (5,6,7,8) - here I'd suggest the same thing as #4538114 but reversed, I would decrease the spacing here.. something like this maybe? https://i.imgur.com/l1npKiO.jpeg . Same applies for:
00:36:973 (5,6,7,8) -
00:48:402 (5,6,7,8) - etc.
00:48:491 (6) - what about removing this note to emphasize and follow 00:48:402 (5,6,7) - this sound instead? you could even map it passively by replacing that note with a 1/4 slider https://i.imgur.com/Cpv6t97.jpeg (I've also inverted 00:48:580 (6,7) - to emphasize the sound)
01:08:045 (3,4,5) - what about replacing the soft hitwhistle with the normal ones? I'm asking because you used the soft ones for a different sound in this section (even tho the pattern is the same) 00:53:045 (1,2,3) - 01:04:473 (1,2,3) -
from 01:45:901 (1) - to 01:54:473 (1) - you hitsounded the melody but still followed the streamy sound... I would either remove these normal whistles or follow the melody, it sounds confusing to me
02:01:616 (1,2,3) - 02:13:045 (1,2,3) - I'd suggest to keep using the normal whistles since you used soft ones 02:07:330 (1,2,3) - here (or just use soft ones for all these 3)
02:18:580 (4) - uhmm what about replacing this with a note and add another one on the blue tick right after? this look cleared to me https://i.imgur.com/VTcXyIA.png
02:36:616 (3) - I wouldn't skip this note here, what about ending 02:35:902 (2) - this slider earlier?
03:33:849 (2,3) - what about removing these two notes and replacing 03:33:759 (1) - with a slider? it sounds better to me https://i.imgur.com/ELvpOp5.jpeg
03:42:509 (1,1) - what about removing these NC? I feel like they are very extra.. same for 03:53:937 (1,1) - 04:05:545 (1,1) - 04:16:795 (1,1) -
03:45:366 (3,4,5) - I guess you made this on purpose, but I'd still suggest to not ignore the 1/6 sounds in the entire kiai (you could even start following them from 04:25:902 (1) - )
04:33:045 (1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5) - might be ur intention here but tbh i would buff at least the spacing fo this one, since as it is now it's kinda bland compared to 04:31:617 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) -
04:35:366 (2,3,4) - slightly broken stack that made me read this as a double instead of a triple with hd, if you decide to dq can you fix this