mapped by tacoyaki5
submitted
last updated
Hype Train13 / 5
Nomination Status0 / 2
New Discussion
Please sign in to post or reply
Discussions
Sort by

00:22:220 (5) - How about changing this to a circle to distinguish the vocal from 00:21:596 (3,4)?

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by KaiserWeebs

00:34:361 (3,4) - I think this rythme is better, because this is more natural to play and there are fewer clickable notes in this part, so I don't think it's a problem in terms of density.

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by KaiserWeebs

00:39:025 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - It is understandable that the song is expressing the excitement of the song, but this pattern is too difficult for this part. 00:39:335 (4) - what about changing the - to 1/2 slider to reduce the density

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by KaiserWeebs

00:44:295 (4,5) - This vocal set is stronger than 00:43:984 (2,3), so unstacking 00:44:295 (4,5) would help differentiate the vocal intensity.

permalink
permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by KaiserWeebs

01:01:097 - The rhythm here is very confusing, as it switches layers of vocals and instruments many times. Maybe try concentrating on one of the layers.

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by KaiserWeebs

01:02:179 (2,3,1) - 01:04:033 (3,4,5) - fix distance snap

permalink

ds is fine, i think the stacking leniency is what make it look like they close to each other

permalink
Marked as resolved by KaiserWeebs

01:12:136 (4,5,1) - would be better for emphasis reasons if you didnt map the triple in here. not only do you not map the other triples in this section (01:13:447 - 01:14:689 - 01:17:176 - etc), removing the triple will signify a change in intensity from the very intense chorus to a weak downtime

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by KaiserWeebs

01:20:841 (5) - stack on 01:20:685 (4) - would be more cool

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by KaiserWeebs

01:43:996 (4) - i think this shoudn't be reverse, 01:44:307 - I feel like it's a huge waste of time to use slidertail to describe the snare of the So why not try 1/2 slider + circle?

permalink
permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by KaiserWeebs

02:12:912 (3,1,2) - this rhythm makes no sense, the 1/2 sliders should be starting on 02:13:222.

permalink

ok

permalink
Marked as resolved by KaiserWeebs

02:51:382 (5) - 02:53:869 (5) - the triples in this section should be hitsounded on your difficulty if you plan to overmap them

permalink

gonna remove the triples instead

permalink
Marked as resolved by KaiserWeebs
/