00:20:001 (1) - while i understand that you are trying to make contrast more clear through low hs volumes, 5% hs volume is a bit too low, i'd start it at 15% at least and then go up by 10% or maybe even start at 20% and go up by 5% or smth like that
i dont know if this would be a great addition, because 00:34:473 (2) - is an active sound, if I were to map 00:34:367 (1) as a slider would negate the active sound
00:40:494 (2) - to 00:41:762 (4) - i'd suggest following violins here, since they have pretty clear and audible rhythm, while the drums are really quiet except the one snare at 00:41:128 (1) - . it would also be nice, since you follow violins here 00:41:128 (1,1,1,2,3) - but not before even though it sounds pretty much the same
00:40:564 (3,4,5) - ik you're following violin here but its a little jarring with this 1/6 constrasting the 1/8 5-note hihat roll
00:41:269 (1) - if you are mapping violin then this should be a burst so you are missing a circle on a red tick
00:47:043 (1,2,3) - this is kinda awkward to play since you pretty much only have a 1/6th gap to jump that which is a bit too much, could change this 00:47:043 (1,2) - to a slider
01:09:443 (1) - 01:10:287 (1) - would be cool if you made these kicksliders in groups of 3 to follow the guitar chugs, especially since you did that so much in the section before
01:12:400 (1) - would be nice to see some nod to the vocals here, the vocal phrase is pretty impactful so some movement changes on white ticks to follow them would be nice, doesnt have to be turns per say just more activity (you can dm me for ideas if you need on any of these mods)
01:14:090 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - could made it a decel and 01:14:372 (5,6) - a kick slider into the next stream
on the other side its the same sound as this 01:07:329 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - so could have mapped it the same way or map 01:07:329 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - as you did here 01:14:513 (1) -
i mapped stuff like 01:14:513 (1) as streams cuz there are cymbals there instead, it overall sounds stronger at 01:14:513 (1) compared to like 01:07:329 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3)
01:22:963 (2) - could stack this circle on the slider or reduce spacing, since it's not as impactful as the rest of the snares but you grouped them into one jump section
same here 01:28:034 (2) - 07:35:217 (2) -
01:26:344 (1) - spacing changes could be so much more obvious, like every spacing change in this map could be more drastic and it would be better imo
01:30:991 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - this whole section feels a bit weird, since its all jumps of relatively same spacing but they cover entirely different sounds, i'd suggest either considerably changing up the spacing and making some stacks or changing up the rhythm to add more sliders (for example these 01:31:837 (1) - 01:32:682 (1,2,3) - aren't as important as the other sounds, so you could make those less spaced/stacked or change them for more passive rhythm)
same thing here 02:21:696 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - 07:43:245 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) -
01:31:837 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - wth is this
plays pretty poorly perhaps on sounds like this 01:31:837 (1,2) - map a slider or sm
or simply make isomir type jumps just peep his maps would fit nicely in this part
01:33:808 (3,4,5,6) - eg. this would be much more immersive if it was mapped in decel spacing of jumps like this its weird
01:31:837 (1,2) - this and 01:30:991 (1,2) - being the same spacing feels really troll to me, they should be obviously distinct so players don't missread (even tho this is 8* this still feels wrong)
01:38:597 (1,2,3,4) - stuff like this could be mapped as sliders for more variation and :skull: for you not to suffer with mapping jumps
01:44:090 (7,8,9,10) - why not continue the pattern you had for these notes aswell like so since the drums seem to sound the same
(also you did it there 02:52:118 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - but not here)
01:46:203 (1) - why dont you map a slider here until vocals end and then have this as a break 01:46:625 (2,3,4) -
02:54:231 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - maybe replace circles with sliders with muted sliderends to emphasize on the violin?
03:06:907 (4,5) - triple for violin would be nice especially since there isnt a drum on 03:07:048 (5) -
03:11:696 (7,1) - slider here for lack of drum aswell like in some of the previous suggestions
i was ncing in patterns and i thought the difference between 03:20:216 (4,1) - was significant enough for nc to be on 03:20:428 (1) - unless u think otherwise
03:52:562 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - a bit more rhythm patterning would be nice here, since violins sound the same but the rhythm changes randomly as far as i can tell, could even just go full 1/3 slider spam here with no reverses to emphasize slow section and violins if you want
same here 03:55:942 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - especially since these sections 03:55:942 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 03:57:632 (7,1,2,3,4,5,6) - sound identical but have very different rhythms, so anything with more consistent rhythm would be better
04:21:293 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - maybe a bit quieter finish sample, because rn it kinda overshadows the song and the rest of hs
04:33:124 (1,2,3) - i'd just skip these vocals since they don't have clear snapping and you could stop the break here 04:33:124 (1) -
if u wanna keep vocals tho, definitely make them lower sv so there is a contrast when the drums start at 04:34:814 (1) -
06:14:059 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - while there are drums on blue ticks here, 1/4 slider jumps here would be better to be consistent with 05:56:992 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - and 06:05:525 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - since you emphasized these sounds quite a bit before with either jumps or 06:09:792 (1,2,3) - this type of rhythm
if you really don't want to change the rhythm then i'd suggest making noticeable spacing change in the stream, something like this https://files.catbox.moe/c0ep4q.png to keep the contrast that you gave to these sounds before
same here 06:18:325 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - and here 06:22:592 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) -
"06:14:059 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - while there are drums on blue ticks here, 1/4 slider jumps here would be better to be consistent with 05:56:992 (1,2,3,1,2,3)" wrrrrrrrong! the guitars are different on both parts, the guitar is on each note on 05:56:992 (1,2,3,1,2,3) meanwhile its just the two notes on 06:14:059 (1,1) -
07:21:554 (1) - you have an nc and a flow change in the stream here but not 07:22:400 (5) - here, would be better if it was consistent
yea its 07:21:273 (1,2,3,4,1) - "Inherit" and 07:21:977 (7,1) - is "Inhale" i dont think putting a 2nd nc on inhale is needed
07:48:668 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - there is really no reason for this irregular rhythm here lol, maybe you meant to make those triples instead of doubles? either way it doesnt follow the song at all rn, change it to something like you did here 02:16:625 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - in the same section of the song but the other kiai
08:45:639 (1,2,3) - is supposed to follow drums or violin?
if drums, missed important beat at 08:45:780
if violin, violin starts at 08:45:569, not 08:45:639
08:49:583 (7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24) - could give even more spacing even for emphasis, since it sounds more intense than any of this 08:46:344 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40) -
09:53:386 (4) - a bit more spacing on this to emphasize the ending if u want
also nc probably since u did it here 03:14:090 (1) - which is fairly similar