Sympathy

00:00:875 -
It should be a double for consistency with 00:03:057

00:07:602 (7602|3,7693|1) - 我感觉这俩键总有一个是要加双压的？
比如按规律他是每段的第三节，虽然主旋律不一样但是鼓点还是差不多的，之前同样的位置（00:03:239 (3239|0,3239|1,3330|2) - ）这里是双压。
又或者是听感？我觉得他听起来就挺像之前加了双压的某些二连鼓点音。。不太像某些（00:02:148 (2148|1,2239|2) - ）处于后半几拍的单压音。。。位置上也不属于

（后一个有双压感是因为这仨主旋律比较重

可能没啥必要吧 但我觉得这种都应该错开放，毕竟第一个音和后面的不是一种
00:08:511 (8511|1) - move to col4
00:32:693 (32693|1,32693|0,32784|2,32784|3,32875|0,32875|1,32966|2,33057|1,33057|3,33057|0) - 00:45:784 (45784|3,45784|2,45875|0,45875|1,45966|2,45966|3,46057|1,46148|3,46148|2,46148|0) - ctrl+h
01:16:148 - 就是这么摆我感觉比较舒服。。

00:13:420 (13420|0,13693|0,13966|0) - 这三个最好隔开，00:14:239 (14239|0) - 挪到2轨，另外00:12:602 (12602|1,12875|1,13148|1) - 这三个为了跟后面做区分最好别摆一轨上，比如00:13:148挪到34，然后00:15:602这三下bass也写个锚

00:14:420 - 按规律讲这个是不是应该三压 ？
.. - 00:12:239 - 00:13:420 - 00:14:420 - 00:15:602 - .. 只有这里不三压总之不太合适吧，这里听起来也有点三压味

00:18:239这一串可以想办法换一下排列，全是对拍确实欠点意思

00:21:066 (21066|3,21066|1,21066|0) - 00:22:157 (22157|3,22157|2,22157|1) - 00:23:248 (23248|1,23248|0,23248|2) - 00:24:339 (24339|3,24339|1,24339|0) - 00:25:429 (25429|3,25429|2,25429|0,26520|0,26520|1,26520|2,27520|2,27520|0,27520|3) - If you want, you can use an LN like this to give more impact to the sound in this part

00:28:693这一小段听感其实是00:28:693 00:29:239 00:29:693 00:29:966 00:30:330鼓最重，没必要把反拍那个轻鼓写最重，而且00:30:875按你的写法可能多写一押

00:29:148 (29148|3,29420|3) - 挪到3轨，00:29:511 (29511|0) - 挪到4，即表达了旋律高度走向又没有破坏手感或增加难度，你现在的写法00:29:511 这个音写不出来音高跟前面的不同

跟前面同理，00:31:693 (31693|3,31875|2) - 这俩互换一下轨道，00:32:420挪2轨，解决了8230提的问题，同时00:31:875 (31875|3,32148|2,32420|1) - 三个ln表达旋律

00:32:420 (32420|3) -
It's more suitable with the sounds if you make it like this 00:30:239 (30239|1,30330|2) cuz they're have same sounds.

00:34:148 -
Change to triple here for consistency with 00:33:057

00:34:966 - imo, using 1/2 LN is more fitting for this sound than a double, which is kinda confused with other drum doubles

00:46:148 (46148|3,46420|2,46420|3,46693|3,46693|2,46966|2) - 00:47:420 (47420|2,47784|2,48057|2,48330|2,48602|2,49148|2,49420|2,49693|2,49966|2,50239|2,50511|2,50784|2,51057|2,51330|2) - 这里有点太右了

00:47:148 (47148|1,47148|0,47420|2) - 为啥押数不同？建议双压去了，如果按照你的思路 双压全部压反拍那个轻鼓 那这个低音重鼓就一个双压都不放

00:47:420 - 00:51:784 - vs 00:56:148 - not sure why this is inconsistent, vocal and drum sound same

00:48:875 (48875|0,49148|3,49330|0) - 尽量把面条排开一点，最好不要出现俩个长面尾挨着头的情况，这样会挤占其他轨道的note，从而出现一些不太容易发现的锚键

00:55:420 (55420|0,55693|0,55875|0,56148|0,56511|0,56784|0,57330|0) -
00:56:784 (56784|3,57057|3,57330|3,57602|3,57875|3,58148|3) -
不应该出现这么多锚键

00:57:057 (57057|1,57602|0,58148|3,58693|2) - 这四个面对应的人声时值是一样的，不应该出现三种不同的面条长度

00:59:248 (59248|0,59520|0,59793|0,60066|0,60339|0) - IMO, how about making it just like this ?

it will be more interesting in terms of gameplay and I think by stacking in 1 column with quite different PR vocals will make a less gameplay impression later.

01:00:875 -
Not double? Since you use double for previous kick sounds

01:03:330 (63330|2,63330|3) - why

01:06:602 (66602|0,66602|1,66602|3,66875|1,66875|3,66875|0) - 这两个音是不同音高的，可以适当做出区分，单单加一个LN感觉不太够

01:07:420 (67420|0) - It's a consistent portamento on piano. Maybe using consistent stairs instead of two pieces of stairs is a better choice. Or you can use a ln to show the portamento.
02:15:602 (135602|0) - Same as above.

01:07:420 - suggest you change this to 1/8 cuz 1/6 doesnt feel fast enough for the piano, its actually 1/12 or 1/16 i think

01:08:784 (68784|0) - pretty subjective but i feel this note is a bit dragged long and causes increased difficulty spike for this whole kiai part. not saying this pattern is too hard for insane, but rather everything else is simple but only this is hard feels unnatural.

suggest change to this

01:08:966 (68966|2,69239|0,69602|3) - 如果可以，这三个最好也锚键一下，如果不能，01:07:966 (67966|0,68239|0,68511|0) - 最好也拆了

01:15:330 (75330|3,75330|1,75602|1,75602|3) - 后面的音变化相比前面应该多一点，感觉01:15:602 (75602|1) - 这个音右移一个轨道会好一点

01:17:511 (77511|1,77693|1) - 不考虑排开一下嘛

01:17:511 (77511|3,77693|2) - hard难度尽量避免难度较高的release键型，尽量把两个release面放在两只手上面，类似01:13:148 (73148|3,73330|0) - 一样

01:22:429 (82429|2) - this is the length of the vocals only until 01:22:520 - here IMO

01:22:602 -
Missed a note for string sounds(?)

01:26:239 (86239|3) - 是否有充足的理由ln而非rice

01:28:966 (88966|1,89239|1,89511|1,89784|1,90057|1,90330|1,90602|1,90875|1) - 逆天长锚

01:29:239为啥没有一个长ln，你可能有什么设计，但是俺看不太懂

01:31:148是不是缺个ln

01:33:693 (93693|0,93693|1,93784|2,93784|3) - 这俩可以一押其实

01:40:602 - can do some PR for this part

01:41:511
It should be double, since you use double here 00:07:693 -

01:42:784 (102784|1) Why not use double here, like the three doubles before. Or use three notes to substitute three doubles.
00:08:966 (8966|2) - And the same reason here.

01:54:875 I think for instances like this turning it into LN can be a consideration

01:55:420 - here can use overlap LN to give more emphasis to last note at 01:55:693 -

01:59:784 (119784|1) - minor thing , 可以像之前那样01:55:420 (115420|3) - 放col1吧，还能避免1轨太长时间没东西

02:14:602 (134602|0,134648|1,134693|2) - 这是啥 ><

02:14:648 - this is weird... i think u can just follow the vocal here 02:14:693 -

02:19:966 (139966|0,140239|1,140239|0,140511|0,140511|1,140784|1) - 太左了

02:22:966 (142966|1,143239|1,143511|1,143784|1,144057|1,144330|1,144602|1,144875|1,145148|1) -

02:30:602 (150602|0,150875|0,151148|0,151420|0,151693|0,151966|0) -

02:36:739 - if this LN is meant for vocal it should be on 1/4

03:02:784 (182784|2,183057|2,183330|2,183602|2,183875|2,184148|2,184420|2,184693|2) -

03:08:511 (188511|3,188511|0,188784|0,188784|2,188784|1) - 为啥和03:07:966 (187966|1,187966|2,187966|3,188239|3,188239|0,188239|1) - 不一样，我作为一个普通玩家真的听不出来曲子的区别，起码前三个音是一样的吧

03:18:602 (198602|3,198875|3,199148|3,199420|3,199693|3,199875|3) -

03:18:602 - this LN should end at 03:18:875 - its a longer melody

03:20:239双ln？

03:27:602 (207602|0,207602|1,207602|3,208057|0,208057|3,208057|1,208420|1,208420|3,208420|0,208693|0,208693|1,208693|3) - 十分不建议完全不同音高的旋律摆成一样的排列，不管是旋律还是低音很明显都完全不一样，可以把一个面点成米，这样就有空位置做转换了，然后03:27:602 (207602|0,207602|3,208693|0,208693|3) - 这两个音是一样的，可以只把中间的做修改

03:27:875 (207875|2,207875|3,208330|2,208602|2) - why

03:29:602 (209602|0) - 可以to3跟前面一样pattern的，没啥必要改

03:32:239 - 这个音实际上还是能听见的，感觉可以不用忽略

03:52:966 - why here dont have 1/6 LN?

03:54:511 (234511|3) - 应该在 03:54:602 - 吧