Myosotis no Hanataba

00:02:786 (2786|1,2948|2) -

well ok

It looks like these still aren't ctrl+hed since the timestamps still highlight the notes, but definitely tell me if I'm wrong here.

I think they are ctrl+hed. If so please resolve this Envory.

.

how odd? your suggestion are still stair based 00:05:690 (5690|1,5770|2,5851|3) - like mine

Lude expressed the pitch of synth melody for the notes after stairs I guess.

both 00:05:851 (5851|0,5851|1,6335|1,6335|0) - are intense crash so i make them similiar

ok

nah they are repetitive melody

I don't usually intervene in mappers' opinions, but in this case I think Lude's suggestion is more compelling.

If your intention was to express a repetitive melody, you should have done the same as before, deleted the note 00:18:593 (18593|2) - this note and expressed everything else as regular notes, not LNs.

Therefore, I think Lude's mod is a better choice if you want to keep LN.

change to normal note

Though, this post should be kept in mind if you accept: #3903013

done

hmm to make layering more consistent with the first kiai, I'd recommend removing doubles on kicks like 00:19:722 (19722|3,19722|0) - and 00:20:044 (20044|3,20044|2) - , and keeping them on crashes like 00:19:399 (19399|1,19399|0) - and 00:20:044 (20044|3,20044|2) - . Right now the layering is about as dense as komugii's diff

k

00:21:335 - As said in the first post, I think this part should be buffed so it's a little closer to komugii's diff in terms of spread. Maybe it could be patterned like

so its similar to the part before it, but more difficult due to the double on 00:21:819 (21819|2,21819|3) -

short ln representing the burst

Somewhat related point, but if you agree 00:33:593 (33593|2,33915|2) - should be in different columns since they represent completely different pitches. Maybe 00:33:915 (33915|2) - could go to 2?

00:33:915 (33915|2) - still its on same sounds volume and not a big prob the others are applied

oh nice i will only add it coz lower diff has a note too

It looks like there still isn't a note at 00:35:206 -

There definitely is a note so I'll resolve this on behalf of Envory.

changed

I think komugii's making a really good point here and I want to add a little more to it in the next section, 00:38:754 - to 00:54:238 - .

I think triplets are used inconsistently here. Specifically, you have some synth triples as trills: 00:41:012 (41012|1,41093|2,41174|1) - and some as just regular triples. I think these synth triplets should all either be trills (I don't recommend that) or making all of triplets (including stuff like 00:41:496 (41496|0,41577|2,41657|0) - ) not trills.

While they're all three notes in a row, trills play very differently than regular triplets and they shouldn't be treated the same way imo.

For this section, the only three set of notes that make sense as a trill imo is 00:45:528 (45528|3,45609|0,45690|2) - since there are three kicks here. It could be mapped out like this:

This also gets rid of the one hand trill at the end, which will make it a little more comfortable for players. (now

My suggestions here are all subjective, but I think it'll improve this section a lot of you do this

Using 00:40:690 - as an example on how you can remap this:

y

Now that I'm seeing it 00:41:899 - and 00:39:964 - need a note as well for the synth

k

change to stair

00:48:915 (48915|3) - should be a double for the same reason

k

right

02:16:980 (136980|2,137061|3,137141|2,137141|1) -

hmm not really like the jump between red line and blue line so keeping the current

what do you mean by 'jump' and 'red line' and 'blue line' ?

jump between col 4 to 2 that i using almost from col 1 to 2 and col 3 to 4 so i mean its just easier with stair

so you meant jump by alternating hand, and red line for 02:16:980 - , blue line for 02:17:061 -
i got it

iirc, 'jump' is usually used for alias of double notes. so i got little confused in this case

Maybe 01:03:432 (63432|1) - could move to 1 or 2? That way there isn't a one handed trill at 01:03:432 - , which would be a little more comfortable imo, but it doesn't make 01:03:593 (63593|1,63593|2) - and 01:03:915 (63915|3,63915|2) - the same kind of double like the first suggestion does. Hopefully this is a good compromise!

idk what not comfortable about 01:03:432 (63432|2,63512|3,63593|1,63593|2) - after a pattern like 01:02:948 (62948|0,62948|3,63190|3,63190|0) - i intended put this because of 01:03:432 (63432|2,63593|2) - because they are similiar strong sounds and 01:03:915 (63915|3,63915|2,63996|1,64077|2) - i make them like that because of the burst representing like 01:03:915 (63915|2,63996|1,64077|2) -

Because 01:03:432 (63432|2,63512|3,63593|1,63593|2) - this have to play the trill with one hand. Both my and Mystic's suggestions are avoiding the one-handed trill in common.

When creating patterns, it's worth looking at patterns for the left and right hands separately, because the actual difficulty of the pattern is heavily influenced by how much each hand is loaded. And I think three 1/4 notes in a row in one hand is a pretty heavy load for this part.

From that perspective, the current pattern is actually a bit uncomfortable, which is why I suggested alternating pattern(which means, a pattern can play with alternating hands), and Mystic suggested splitting the synths and chords between left and right hands.

k moved 01:03:432 (63432|2) - to col 1

its all good

ok moved

Somewhat related, but if you agree with this 01:32:948 (92948|0) - should move to 3

Aaaand if you accept 02:54:238 (174238|2) - should move to 4. Though honestly you should consider doing something like

to avoid the one handed trill, it feels out of place here.

y

Ugh I don't know why I decided to make 02:54:238 (174238|3,174238|0) - a double, sorry about that. 02:54:238 (174238|3) - should be deleted since it's just a kick

k

and plus, if you want them more effective, you better not place a note in same hand right before the snare.

ex:
01:25:851 (85851|3) - this is more effective
01:24:883 (84883|0) - this is less effective

ok

k

will do

on a similar note, 01:29:157 (89157|1,89238|2,89319|1,89399|2,89480|1,89561|2) - should be nerfed as well. It is the longest trill besides these 01:17:625 (77625|3,77706|0,77786|3,77867|0,77948|3,78028|0,78109|3) - (which cover a major trilled synth melody) and 01:44:480 (104480|2,104561|1,104641|2,104722|1,104803|2,104883|1) - , which is a note leading into trilled kicks

However, 01:29:157 (89157|1,89238|2,89319|1,89399|2,89480|1,89561|2) - only covers a synth melody that's somewhat similar to 01:28:109 - . I really don't think it should be in a trill this long.

k

moved to another col but no stair remap

Got it! I'd appreciate it if 01:28:351 (88351|2) - was on 4 though, the 3 note anchor on 3 at 01:28:190 (88190|2,88351|2,88512|2) - doesn't really make much sense from a musical perspective

If you agree 01:30:609 (90609|2) - could move to 4 too

k

If you agree, there should be notes at 01:36:174 - , 01:36:254 - , and 01:36:577 - for the same reasons

k

i think it will less impacted because i might only playing 1-2-1 at 1/2 snap and the gap from insane are pretty far so i trying to introduce the insane concept with stair

oh yeah i speedrun this gd on 20 minutes so many mistakes happen

oh nice idea

01:46:174 (106174|3,106254|2,106335|1,106415|2,106496|1,106496|0) - is this intentionally got mirrored?

yeah all mirrored for that section

oh nice

ok

The use of double is odd in the revision you sent. I think you've misunderstood something, and 'switching patterning by 3 notes' means to keep the same rule, but change the patterning, such as 131 424 131 424 or 123 124 134, 123 432 123, etc(or at least like 123 123 123). I don't understand the meaning of the double you've put in, so I'd suggest removing the double or moving it to an appropriate place and reapplying my mod.

hmm sent a screenshot as example

for example:

as suggested

k

k

k

sure

sure

02:34:883 -

there is 2 notes, are you wrong timestamping?

i mean from 02:17:464 to 02:21:335

done

If you agree, 02:40:690 (160690|2,160851|2) - should move to 4 for the same reason, same with 02:40:690 (160690|2,160851|2) -

k

oh i get it thanks

The revision you sent me is different from my screenshot, is this intentional?

yes

.

k

Same for 03:02:222 - , they're pretty loud

1st one is ok but the 2nd is keep coz the jump between 1 note to other are too far i prefer the current

about the second one, i think you should fill the missing notes at least since you accepted #3900016 this. (considering consistency)

sure

i remap it