Kyuukou

00:04:588 (4588|2) - Minor but concept wise you usually jack your pattern with previous chord such as 00:06:672 - etc, so this one kinda stood out awkward in comparison. Try Ctrl+H 00:04:588 (4588|2,4727|4) - to achieve that

00:10:561 - I think you misplaced some of the 1/3 around this part. there is no sound at 00:10:653 (10653|1,10931|2) - . You should actually put notes at 00:10:607 - and 00:10:885 - instead because that's where the sound is.

00:12:366 - 00:12:644 - these can probably be triple chord considering how emphasized these instruments are compared with previous one, and this also serves as the basis for build up as well which i think should be good for you

00:12:852 (12852|1) - Really wanna delete this because the 1/4 things start at 00:12:922 - . 00:12:991 (12991|2,13130|3) - you can compare with the two with 00:12:852 (12852|1) -

00:14:588 (14588|1) - I think it should be a rice cuz seems 00:14:519 (14519|6) - short LN for the piano but 00:14:588 (14588|1) no piano and no melody

00:17:494 (17494|4,17633|6) - Personally think you can accent the pitch a bit better by making it slightly more denser. Something like this will be fine i think. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18698466/454d

00:25:144 - I think the LN 00:24:450 (24450|3) - should not be divided here cuz the melody here is ：https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18477145/e78e

00:28:963 - Not sure if you intentionally ignore this for playability, but it doesnt seem more difficult than 00:29:658 - even if you try to layering that part. Something like this can be considered ig? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18698474/8242

00:29:172 - 00:29:033 - OK compare with the strength ， 00:29:172 - are stronger . and same part 00:29:866 - only use single so I suggest 00:29:033 - 00:29:866 - double 00:29:172 - 00:30:005 - triple. and 00:30:144 (30144|3) - should be LN like 00:29:311 (29311|3) -

00:32:783 (32783|6,32922|6,33061|6,33200|6,33338|6,33477|6,33616|6) - Not sure if you intentionally wanting the 7 notes anchor but moving 00:33:477 (33477|6) - to column 6 won't hurt i think? should be easier to hit

00:36:533 - I believe its 1/6 here but not 1/8.

00:37:505 - shuold reduce the chord size cuz no kick here

00:38:269 - add one to triple compare with 00:38:130 - 00:37:991 - ...

00:41:047 - I prefer add one on col1 (1-7) cuz the burst has a obvious stop sound here

00:41:672 - use at least quad cuz it is stronger than 00:41:764 - 00:41:857 -

00:42:135 (42135|6) - delete this cuz no kick like 00:41:950 - and more smooth pianoly

00:42:366 - reduce chord size compare with 00:42:227 -

00:42:644 (42644|4,42644|6,42713|4) - This part kinda stood out for me because for the entirety of this section you usually layered with either double jack or triple jack, while this is the only single jack in the entire section. Wouldn't it better to also layer this double minijack for structural purpose

00:42:644 (42644|6,42644|4,42713|4) - You can grace this part as well since this also has strong continuous sound like the previous grace at 00:46:429 (46429|4,46429|2) -

00:43:026 (43026|4) - more like a ghost note ? how about this : https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18477153/7fe3

00:45:838 (45838|0) - I prefer delete this for no-kick chord size compare with 00:45:700 -

00:46:950 - I believe it is not a stairly pattern but two small wubs and 00:47:088 - should be quad compare with 00:47:158 - so how about this ? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18477159/29eb

00:48:078 (48078|0,48095|2,48113|4) - I think it should be 1/16 earlier. The timing is different with 00:47:870 - the three

00:50:005 - Oh I think the burst should start here so the structure should be more like this : https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18687611/9ba0

00:50:422 (50422|4,50491|5,50561|4,50561|6,50653|4) - Not sure how this transition will work, probably balance it a bit with this? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18698511/a386

00:51:255 - Oh honey look this small burst I think its longer and slower like this :

00:51:950 - 00:52:019 maybe convert some notes from the hexa chord into a bursty stair? it can represent the synth sound after the kick even more.

00:55:005 - 00:55:213 imo, three 1/16 notes here is not that powerful to represent the scratch so i would suggest that we need to sacrifice a note from both of the said timestamp and make it a 1/16 stair burst instead. https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18746173/18f3

00:55:109 - Too scary here // how about this ? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18477167/64fd

00:58:304 (58304|1) - 01:00:526 (60526|5) - ... for these 1/8 just for visual ? I think its unreasonable to make a wub here . seems more quiet compare with 00:59:496 (59496|2,59542|1) -

00:59:033 - should be quad refer to your 4+1+4+1 logic this part

01:00:422 (60422|4) - Should be at column 4 imo, you always maintain that shield visual consistency so break it here is awkward

01:03:755 (63755|5,63894|5,63894|6,64033|6,64033|5) - I'm not too confident on this part actually. having 01:03:755 (63755|5) - at column 4 will be cool i think.

01:09:450 - reduce to triple compare with 01:09:727 -

01:09:797 - can add one on col 5

01:11:533 - I think it would be better if you actually bracket this part so that it would transition better into non bracket part at 01:11:811 - . Currently you have sudden non bracket after the bracket at 01:11:255 - which is awkward structural wise. How about try modify the pattern into something like this? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18698533/8bac

01:12:227 (72227|4) - I think it is a rice cuz the LN is not devided . how about this ? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18477177/1f77

01:19:588 - how about this ? to emph the chord here 01:19:658 - and more clear https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18687614/4bb4

from 01:19:866 - to 01:21:047 - I wanna ctrl+H this cuz near 01:19:727 - the left hand are under too much pressure.(nitpick).fell free to keep

01:20:561 (80561|0,80630|2) - I think would be better if you make these into LNs, your pattern kinda have a hole right now which doesn't seem so good atm. You can try use this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18698545/d774

01:26:811 - how about make a burst here like 01:27:088 - ? but 01:26:950 - should be a chord . do sth like this ?https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18477179/77e0

01:31:325 - The chords should be 1/2 LN follow the sound consistency of 01:31:116 (91116|5,91116|1,91116|0,91116|6,91672|0,91672|5,91672|6,91672|1) - . Playability wise it should be alright too.

01:31:950 (91950|0,91984|1,92019|2) - just for visual ? Turn the to rice ? cuz quite here

01:34:727 - 01:35:838 - 01:36:255 - 01:36:672 - 01:36:950 - might wanna put double if you want to emphasize the crash for the sake of keeping consistency with 01:35:283 -

or if you just want to keep single note for everything, then remove 01:35:283 - into single note only also fine, up to you.

01:34:884 (94884|4) - accident ? it should be on 01:34:866 -

01:35:075 (95075|1,95769|3,96880|3) - consider delete them. they are sooo weak

01:35:075 (95075|1,95769|3,96880|3) - hmmmmm the LN tails are dangerous I think it seems unreasonble for rank yea

01:36:394 - I think it should use similar trilly structure like 01:34:172 (94172|1,94241|3,94311|1,94380|3) - and 01:35:977 (95977|4,96047|3,96116|4,96186|3) - so sth like :

01:55:282 - Think since there is certain clear sound here you shouldn't ignore it. Probably you can try rearrange pattern to fit this as well. Maybe how about this?

01:59:449 - seems need to add the chord size so how about this ? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18477194/6c1d

02:01:115 - Think you can shorten this LN at 02:01:115 (121115|5) - so that you can filled out the note gap at 02:01:208 -

I'm meaning you can try make more coherent pattern , so that you will have more consistent shield pattern with 02:01:856 -

Something like this for example:

if you accept, you might wanna shorten 02:01:949 (121949|1) - to 1/2 LN too to make it consistent with previous structure.

02:02:412 - can make them longer for more obvious wub and 02:03:893 - can make them to rice cuz so quiet

02:06:949 - seems unreasonable to use double jack compare with 02:06:764 - I prefer : https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18477200/7be0

02:09:541 to 02:11:115 i would suggest to emphasize the whistle sound here since its pretty obvious not to map. Like adding 1/8s

02:09:912 (129912|2) - prefer delete this similar with #3610585 seems no double sound here

02:10:097 - Probably bit confused why it layered as 6 chords when 02:10:467 - got 5 instead. Probably reduce one note?

02:10:745 - This can have bit denser chord because the instrument is pretty stand out here

02:10:930 - add one on col 3 ？ （1-7）

02:11:115 - Should be 3 chord at max, the instrument are very soft here

02:11:578 - can make them 1/12 for more symmetry：https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18687624/cad1 and the real length are more longer than current one yeah