00:12:307 (57,58,59) - for consistency with the section, i think you should change it to dkd like you did in 00:21:907 -
00:13:807 (71,72,73,74) - can be more accurate with the guitar and the drum if you make it k d k k
im not sure if this makes sense musically, but I made the pattern the way it is (1/2 pattern at 00:18:757 (115,116,117) - ) to emphasize the 5 note pattern 00:19:207 (118,119,120,121,122) - more
i would shift 00:18:457 (112,113,114) - 00:18:757 - for drum emphasis too, the 1/2 at 00:19:057 - is already "emphasis" for the 5 note pattern
00:28:432 (192) - consider remove that note, the long patterns should start in 00:28:507 - to be in accordance with the drums
00:48:307 -
in this section feels a bit undermapped in some spots that sounds the drums very noticeable
try to add more notes in 00:50:632 - , 00:51:007 -, etc. following a similar sequence like 00:49:057 (312,313,314,315,316,317,318,319) -
hmm this one I only left 00:48:457 - empty because I wanted to emphasize the finisher, the rest of the patterns are still consistent with each other, unless I'm missing something
00:48:307 (311,312,313) - d [] k d
00:50:407 (323,324,325,326) - d d k d
00:55:807 or 00:55:507 - any of these feel more like finisher parts compared to 00:57:907 (368) - tbh
00:55:507 (355) - made a finisher, along with other similar patterns in the map
00:57:907 (368) - the vocal's pause justifies the finisher imo
its clearly hearable in all the kiais for me so consider applying the suggestion to these too
01:19:507 (536) -
02:31:507 (1043) -
03:48:307 (228) -
The accompaniment still serves the function of a chorus. Therefore, the sudden drop in density here gives an unnatural impression.
At the very least, it would be better to have this level of density.
Example (1st Chorus)
01:19:807 - add k, 01:19:957 - add k, 01:20:257 - add d, 01:20:557 - add d
this section of the song 02:07:507 - repeat the same structure like 00:55:507 - , with the difference there are more instrumental and drums in 02:09:307 -
i would suggest make a similar structure for consistency (you can vary with the notes to follow the vocal) and try to follow the drums in 02:09:307 -
03:00:307 (1) - spinner here feels out of place when there really isn't anything it builds on and there isn't anything for it to lead up to or is need for any anticipation. Either map it out or leave it blank
the 1/3 doublets like 03:10:407 (6,7) - or 03:12:807 (16,17) - feel like they were improvised, but really the first note there is no apparent sound to follow, generating a strange sensation that you are playing something that doesn't sound.
If you listen very clearly the sounds are in these spots 03:11:007 - 03:12:207 - 03:13:407 - 03:13:707 - .
Try to follow the drum better here by listening slowly to the song and you will get it.
added a 1/1, avoided the 1/3 note for emphasis still (also for 03:22:207 (54,55,56,57,58,59) - to match 03:17:407 (35,36,37,38,39,40) - )