00:26:401 (4) - place the emphasising slider and NC here on the downbeat instead of 00:26:566 (1) -
00:48:819 (1,2,3,4) - when you have clear groupings of objects like these, it is often nice to have consistent visual spacing to further reflect the grouping, instead of this kinda slight overlap you have with 2 and 3
something like this https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/18298664/ee52
actually there are a lot of NC inconsistencies so I'm not gonna point them all out, but basically you switch a lot between NCing every measure (each strong white tick) and every other measure. Its best to stick to one consistently, unless there is a clear patterning idea (e.g groupings of certain objects to certain sounds) or rhythmic reasons (i.e. 1/3s) that justifies a change to the norm
01:19:148 (1) - cool pattern, probably a bit overdone with no real warning though, might be better to start with a smaller sv change and then build it up with the next pattern at 01:21:786 (1) so its a satisfying progression
01:46:017 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11) - cool pattern it absolutely does not follow the music at all though. If you want to do something like that, try grouping the objects according to something more consistent, and maybe also have a progression in the intensity of the pattern, instead of just giga spacing from the start, cos theres a clear build up of intensity throughout the combo
you are indeed illiterate however, the rhythm wasn't changed. If you slow down the song, you can hear a strong vocal and a drumbeat on the sliderend of 01:51:126 (2) - this slider, which is what I was referring to.
01:55:989 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1) - mhmmmmmmmm this looks familiar doesnt it