Chikyuu Saigo no Kokuhaku o

00:14:721 (12) - I think this is fine as a d considering vocal pitch?

00:25:538 (4,5,6) - k k d if you were following instrumental pitch, k d k is fine but personally I would have preferred k k d following background instruments

00:27:275 (8,9,10) - k k d? same reason

00:29:644 - I think it is safe to put a d here both considering the instrumental beats and the gap guideline in rc?

00:31:854 (16,17,18) - k k d might work here, kinda subjective tho

00:43:854 (31,32) - d and k considering the latter has higher pitch compared to former? also the former note has a similar pitch to the preceding d

00:46:380 (33) - k, same reason to #2750364 I think

00:51:433 (41) - k following vocal pitch? (subjective tho)

00:53:959 - should be (K) for the cymbal crash

01:24:275 -

00:54:907 (48,49,50) - k k d if you follow vocal pitch (not if you follow instruments tho)

00:58:380 (55,56,57) - d d k if you follow vocal pitch, k d k if you would like to follow both instrument and vocal

01:06:907 (72) - d, respecting the following k considering vocal pitch

01:08:801 (75,76) - k considering vocal pitch?

01:11:012 (79,80,81) - k d k considering vocals

01:13:854 (85) - d considering both instrument and vocals? the following D should be stronger than the preceding note in vocals and drum-wise this note is a d I think

01:19:222 (97) - D? I think this is clearly stronger than the previous d however it is not as high as the following vocals(01:21:117 (98,99,100) - )

01:27:749 (113,114,115) - move these 1/2 forward? I think this fits the vocals better as I think is what you wanted to follow

01:32:486 (123,124,125) - k k d if vocals

01:37:538 (133) - I think this is better to change to a d k on 01:37:380, 1/1 gap each. consult ss(https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/17315031/725c) for what I mean

01:48:907 (157,158,159) - k d d considering general pitch in the 3 and comparing to preceding 3?

01:50:801 (161,162,163,164,165) - k k d k d if following bg instruments

01:53:644 - might be safe to put a d here

01:56:486 (174,175) - k k?

02:12:907 (8,9,10) - k k d considering vocal pitch

02:14:170 (11,12,13) - k d d, compared to general pitch within the 3 and what has been suggested on #2750401

02:24:275 (30,31,32) - d d k considering vocal pitch

02:26:328 (35,36) - d d considering piano?

02:27:749 (38) - Rhythm mod starts here

I consider it might be better to follow a 3/3/2 divided beat in this kiai. it will help represent the vocals better than the current placing.

• related changes -
  02:27:749 (38) - move to 02:27:907
  02:29:328 (41) - move to 02:29:170
  02:30:907 (45) - move to 02:30:591
  02:31:222 (46) - move to 02:31:065
  02:31:854 (47) - move to 02:31:696
  02:32:801 (49) - move to 02:32:959
  02:34:380 (52) - move to 02:34:222
  02:35:644 (55,56) - move to 02:35:328
  02:40:380 - add d
  02:40:696 (65) - move to 02:40:854

02:45:433 (75) - remove. would help if you want to represent instruments

02:53:959 (92) - d considering piano pitch

02:58:696 - I think it is safe to put a d here

03:01:380 (108) - D? following pitch I think a D might be more logical