00:24:831 (4,1) - this jump here weights 2,06x while this 00:23:796 (2,3) - weights 1,78x. What makes the jump mentioned first pretty harder to read :/ Maybe you could make sure those elements are more fluent :v
00:44:486 (5,6) - if someone doesn't knows the song he will click this single way to early because of the pattern you have choosen earlier - that's why I've mentioned to lower the spacing for those elements. xD
01:48:624 (4,5) - This one is compared to earlier mentioned ones way to small tho. xD aaah! :D Fix that please that confuses me! :c
00:50:693 - I would move the 2, 3 and 4 so they stay together but are under the 1 like this https://prnt.sc/1irzauc
I understand that you want them to be stacked, but here the cursor stays too long in the same location
00:51:520 (3) - if you change stack leniency to 6 this would become a perfect stack which would look nicer
01:46:969 (1) - same sound as 01:44:486 (1,2,3,4) - so why not place it in the same place and dont nc it also gets rid of the hard to read triple pattern
01:47:175 (1,2,3,1,2,1) Spacing of these seems a bit overwhelming compared to the rest of the map
02:13:658 (1,2,3) Same