huh, i dont think starting at the middle of the music is a good idea, isnt it weird that you'd start playing in the middle of a section instead of the start? I wanna keep it undermapped to signify the start, I'll keep for now, but i'll think about continuing the pattern if it needs to be
00:18:464 (1) - it would be better to have a clickable object instead of a sliderend on 00:19:761 - . imo just shorten the slider by 1/4 and add a circle to represent the strong downbeat better
00:22:031 (5) - 00:23:328 (5) - should probably raise sv on these and all other iterations of these notes or at least space it farther away since it is such a distinct sound from other notes in these patterns
00:25:274 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - gradually increase spacing or gradually decrease spacing (some variation depending on what you hear) bc the sound is definitely not constant in intensity like you map it here
00:39:220 (1) - This section with the bursts has a pretty drastic rhythmic change that isn't very intuitive. I'd consider mapping the series of triplets with 3 reverse sliders if going for ranked.
01:00:013 (1,2,3) - im sure this is intentional but stacking these would look SO much better visually. seeing these while playing makes me think they're stacking errors
01:00:013 (1), 01:00:337 (4), 01:00:661 (7) - You mapped the guitar to a slider here - 00:59:688 (1). It's probably best to keep it consistent, i.e slider first, then doubles second.
01:01:472 (1) - tbh i think changing this to a spinner would work a lot better and also you would be able to make 01:02:607 - a clickable circle to represent the strong downbeat better
01:03:256 (6,1) - Probably some spacing between these notes to emphasize the change in section, same here - 01:06:012 (1) and other sections like it
01:25:634 (6,7) - Would be good to use spacing to emphasize the difference in time. 01:30:823 (6,7) as well , etc