00:27:910 (1,2) - this really shoul b more forceful movement, since the instruments start 2 pick up again it would contrast p nice against all the same linear movement u were doing b4
00:41:563 (5) - having this continue the movement from the previous jump makes it a bit awkward 2 play since u have to suddenly slow down, doing something similar to this https://i.imgur.com/Xz90vhX.png would be more natural to play and would align with kidna wat u did here 00:44:437 (5) -
nope those are both good https://i.imgur.com/tFd5uFy.png andhttps://i.imgur.com/luxvWJT.png
01:24:137 (3) - on my dt sightread play of this, this note felt like it shouldve been on 01:23:958. Maybe space 01:24:137 (3) a little further away to lessen the chance of misread. I played around a little and found X:470 Y:40 to fit my personal taste.
03:08:868 - in my personal shitty opinion, i found that the transition from vocal lead to trumpet lead is ignored in the sense that the map doesnt change whatsoever, continuing on with the same patterns as before. Perhaps consider some changes to this section could help emphasize the trumpet lead.
On a similar note, i strongly believe 03:08:149 (3,4,1) could be more diverse as it is 3 distinct trumpet ONLY notes. I think slight slider angle changes could help emphasize these notes
01:28:808 (2,3,4,5) - imo this whole pattern should have higher spacing since the songs intensity is higher here
01:45:155 (7,8,9,10,1) - 01:48:030 (4,5,6,7,1) - i think a stream would be too much for this, i don't feel like 01:48:299 (7) - & 01:45:424 (10) - have any important sounds to be emphasized here. I'd say just make a triple instead
stuff like 01:45:515 (1,2,3) - should have the same rhythm as 01:42:640 (1,2) - since they sound pretty much the exact same
01:52:341 (6,1) - i think the spacing here is really too high despite the prominent sound of 01:52:521 (1) - there shouldnt be such a huge change in the increasing spacings between 01:51:982 (4,5,6) - and 01:52:341 (6,1) -.
Also, spacing between 01:52:341 (6,1) - and 01:52:521 (1,2) - are about the same so that makes players think that they are both played as 1/2 beat jumps even though they aren't
I got people to play this and this really isn't hard to read. This is almost 6* on a 167bpm song which is pretty high, and I expect players who can FC maps like this to be able to read this. I made the spacing smaller for 01:52:521 (1) - but I still think the original is fine.
02:07:431 (2,3) - would b nice if u did some circle stuff like u did with the previous drums like 01:55:575 (1,2,3,4) - etc
02:49:467 (3,4) - here this guitar sound is pretty strong so i would recommend this rhythm http://prntscr.com/ntqbxi
02:51:263 (5,6,7,8,1) - I think it will be more convenient and better http://prntscr.com/oitc5m
03:12:460 (2,4) - the stacked notes here are slightly off putting. Suggesting offset notes. I missread this part.
03:34:736 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - I think can be spaced much more in between 1-2's. Suggesting moving 03:34:736 (1,1,1,1) upwards by some amount. Incremental spacing is a possibility too.
04:20:724 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,1,2) - new combo-ing here inconsistent with first instance of this type of pattern 01:22:521 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3).
Suggesting 04:21:802 (3) to be new combo and 04:21:982 (1) to be not new combo.
Also consider making combo colours compliment the BG, always a nice touch.
Very fun map with nice song choice :)
03:21:622 (2) - you should increase the SV on here because it looks like a 1/2 beat slider instead of 1/1. Or do something that makes it noticeable
Don't think the SV change is necessary, I've done slow sliders like 00:38:329 (3) - early enough that it introduces the idea
Yes but slow sliders like 00:38:329 (3) - are appropriate because the song intensity is not that high and thus the SV is expected to be lower. However, compared to 03:21:622 (2) - where the song intensity much greater; a lot of people expect the SV to be much higher. Therefore the SV should change as well to match song intensity. Or you could NC it to show that there is an unexpected SV change. If you decide to NC make sure to remove NC on 03:21:443 (1) - as well.
04:47:311 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - i can see why you made these triples, but they stand out too much rhythmically so i would keep the 1-2 spam going here
still don't agree with the rhythm placements of these triples. As it stands now, it just seems like random triples that don't reflect anything in the song. I would strongly recommend starting triples on 04:47:491 and 04:47:850 instead, that way you still have a point to reset aim and you are following drums here with them.