Everyone is beta as fuck:
Profile link?Tanzklaue wrote:
it's a new counting system, some people already have something in there.
nahtzee #1jesse1412 wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/u/916675
that acc
Hit Accuracy: 93.57% (beta: 95.14%)I'm okay with this!
This is beautifulpeppy wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/images/d/d6/Performancepoints.png
Correct. It uses exactly the same process but applies the results to accuracy rather than weighted rank.Tanzklaue wrote:
so basically, the new accuracy is the accuracy of the maps that count towards your pp, and better scores with higher pp-value will affect the accuracy more?
I have considered this, and may make it available in the future .JappyBabes wrote:
Will we be able to see a list of our scores with the most worth?
My pp is rather high, so I guess I should try playing on a really hard map so that I can see the new Accuracy stats, eh?peppy wrote:
If you want to see your new accuracy, just make your pp go up a bit :p.
I thought peppy meant "age of record" rather than "age of beatmap"? silmarilen already said it:Valentiino wrote:
Also, just as a question to the part which says that maps older than a year wont give you pp anymore.
Does this mean, if I get a hidden SS from an older map, like an example http://osu.ppy.sh/s/4651 , you won't be awarded pp at all?
silmarilen wrote:
and floks, its not older maps, its older scores
Ah kk, thx for clearing this outWinshley wrote:
I thought peppy meant "age of record" rather than "age of beatmap"? silmarilen already said it:Valentiino wrote:
Also, just as a question to the part which says that maps older than a year wont give you pp anymore.
Does this mean, if I get a hidden SS from an older map, like an example http://osu.ppy.sh/s/4651 , you won't be awarded pp at all?silmarilen wrote:
and floks, its not older maps, its older scores
thelewa wrote:
having a beta accuracy is so mainstream
Not being mainstream is too mainstream these days /superhipsterthelewa wrote:
having a beta accuracy is so mainstream
lol 100%SunnyMario wrote:
I got a strange beta accuracy ;_;
Are you certain? His info-graphic says that the maps stop giving, which makes it seem like it's the map age, not the score age. Can Peppy clarify?silmarilen wrote:
and floks, its not older maps, its older scores
I can assure you from my own experience these past few days that yes, old maps definitely count. I'm talking from 2009 here, too. A lot of really old maps are extremely easy and have very low contention, though, so be careful of which ones you bother with; naturally, nobody cares if you get into the top 20 on an extremely easy map where there are only two mod scores, and the system probably reflects this.Floks wrote:
Are you certain? His info-graphic says that the maps stop giving, which makes it seem like it's the map age, not the score age. Can Peppy clarify?silmarilen wrote:
and floks, its not older maps, its older scores
So why I gain more pp farming new ranked maps than making a #1 on an old insane ?peppy wrote:
As this directly ties in with pp calculations, you may want to check out the new infographic I made: http://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/images/d/d6/Perf ... points.png
Older than 1 year?... yes.Drafura wrote:
So why I gain more pp farming new ranked maps than making a #1 on an old insane ?peppy wrote:
As this directly ties in with pp calculations, you may want to check out the new infographic I made: http://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/images/d/d6/Perf ... points.png
So basically I did a better performance on playing 1 try not even FCing a random new map than getting a #1 on an old beatmap wich ton of players played it ?iMercurial wrote:
Older than 1 year?... yes.