1. Easy (1.86 stars, 200 notes)
2. Hard (4.95 stars, 581 notes)
3. Insane (5 stars, 857 notes)
4. Normal (4.12 stars, 338 notes)

Thunderstorm wrote:

Hey! You're welcomed by Thunderstorm's modding system v 220708000...2! lol hi xD

Some suggestions

[Overall]
Tags on [Normal] conflicts w/ tags on other diff's. Consider to make it consistent in whole mapset kk~~
I really dislike any kind of overlaps, but since it's up to me, I won't say 'bout that okay~ I will consider it

[Easy]
Well, can't find anything usefull. But consider to put a bit more hitsounds here, whole diff sounds like empty. yepp~

[Normal]
00:03:236 (1) - remove repeat, note here 00:03:997 and it'll sounds a little bit better imo looks better even now.
01:14:201 (6) - consider to delete this circle and start incoming spinner here well. more think about it. spinner on 01:14:201 (6) here is a little unnatural.
01:51:358 (2,3,4) - consider to respace this pattern, I guess it's too tricky for normal. oh my mistake
02:59:886 - imo too short for normal players can beat this spinner. actually, I ask for test play some players :3
03:37:957 (6) - same as 01:14:201 (6) same as 01:14:201 (6)
03:41:916 - note here? nope. same as about other diffs. not fit this part.
03:57:145 (1) - same as 01:14:201 (6) same as 01:14:201 (6)


[Hard]
00:30:647 (3,4) - broken spasing (okay, but try to do not overuse it) looks fine :3 it is not too different for playing. so keep this.
00:54:404 (1,2,3,4) - isn't there jumps too HUGE for hard? same reason. and its note are suitable about jump.
00:56:840 (1-) and same parts on "Hai-Hai-Hai" vocal - consider to make ends of these sliders at 10% volume or replace them w/ circles? That way it won't sound's weird imo more consider it.
01:14:201 - start spinner here move to 01:14:048 this point.
02:17:551 - ^ move to 02:17:398 this point.
03:05:673 (2) - I really see no point for that slider to be here, no vocal/rhythmical patterns for it. carefully listening. you can hear drum sounds on it.

[Insane]
Overall - Why there's so HUGE jumps? Song have 197 bpm, it's kinda fast, so no need to make it [Hell], not [Insane]
lol Insane will become real insane. I don't like easily Insane.


Rest seems fine

OEvil wrote:

/me Slaps scanter
[Hi, From #modreq]

Sorry My Mod Sucks

[General]

Background
bg.jpg is 800x600, which differs from the recommended size of 1024x768. looks fine. actually, 800x600 is best size. 1024x768 is due to use compatibility

[All Difficulties]

General

Inconsistency in PreviewTime:
- [Easy] : 119281
- [Hard] : 119281
- [Insane] : 119281
- [Normal] : 119277 Thank you

[Easy]

Cool Diff:

[Normal]

Cool Diff

[Hard]

Some Edits:
- 00:09:327 (1,2,3) - Hmm, Better Like This?? http://puu.sh/2Uvv3.jpg it doesn't fit well this vocals. so, keep this.
- 00:37:043 (2,1) - Same Like This http://puu.sh/2Uvye.jpg more consider it ~
- 03:51:510 (6) - Move node #3 to {x:260 y:80}, move node #4 to {x:260 y:80}.looks good even now.

[Insane]

Cool Diff

1. add to tags: ラブライブ Lantis
2. It'll be better if you added slider tick with clap sound to make claps consistency (specially @easier diffs cx)

1. 00:19:074 (2)- : Slider start at 00:18:921 and end at 00:20:292 ? It'll follow vocal more imo
2. 00:54:404 (1)- : Spinner end at 00:55:470 more fit imo\
3. 01:05:977 (3)- : rather than clap, finish is more fit x.x
4. 01:57:754 (1)- : spinner end at 01:58:820 more fit imo
5. 02:09:327 (3)- : same as 01:05:977 x.x
6. 02:46:180 (4)- : put this on x296 y288?

1. 01:12:373 (2)- : unstack this? I believe player will miss-read this note as 1/2 imoooooooo x.x
2. 01:14:201 (6)- : add clap
3. 02:07:195 (4)- : same as 01:12:373 x.x
4. 02:09:632 (4)- : add clap
5. 02:29:429 (1,1)- : spinner is too early I suppose. It'll be hard to DT this part uh
6. 02:44:657 (2,3,4)- : how about arrange them like this?
   
   SPOILER

   

   208,208,164657,2,0,P|204:264|160:304,2,100,0|8|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   292,156,165571,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   384,196,165876,2,0,L|440:212,2,50,2|2|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

7. 02:59:886 (1,1)- : same reason as 02:29:429
8. 03:36:129 (2)- : same reason as 01:12:373 x.x
9. 03:37:957 (6)- : add clap
10. 03:44:962 (1,1)- : same reason as 02:29:429

1. 00:07:500 (4)- : ctrl j this
2. 00:10:241 (4)- : put this at x256 y48? not a big deal, but i think it'll good to put this on straight axis

1. good diff really, can't mention anything q___q

- t e n n y a - wrote:

Hi scanter-san. M4M req from my inbox . o3o/

[General]

1. add to tags: ラブライブ Lantis okay ~
2. It'll be better if you added slider tick with clap sound to make claps consistency (specially @easier diffs cx) lol yup~

[Easy]

1. 00:19:074 (2)- : Slider start at 00:18:921 and end at 00:20:292 ? It'll follow vocal more imo looks good even now :3
2. 00:54:404 (1)- : Spinner end at 00:55:470 more fit imo\ fix
3. 01:05:977 (3)- : rather than clap, finish is more fit x.x ^
4. 01:57:754 (1)- : spinner end at 01:58:820 more fit imo ^
5. 02:09:327 (3)- : same as 01:05:977 x.x ^
6. 02:46:180 (4)- : put this on x296 y288? ^

[Normal]

1. 01:12:373 (2)- : unstack this? I believe player will miss-read this note as 1/2 imoooooooo x.x move to better place :3
2. 01:14:201 (6)- : add clap yup~
3. 02:07:195 (4)- : same as 01:12:373 x.x okay~
4. 02:09:632 (4)- : add clap add whistle :3
5. 02:29:429 (1,1)- : spinner is too early I suppose. It'll be hard to DT this part uh reduce it to 02:31:256 this time
6. 02:44:657 (2,3,4)- : how about arrange them like this? okayy~
   
   SPOILER

   

   208,208,164657,2,0,P|204:264|160:304,2,100,0|8|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   292,156,165571,1,8,0:0:0:0:
   384,196,165876,2,0,L|440:212,2,50,2|2|8,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

7. 02:59:886 (1,1)- : same reason as 02:29:429 kk~
8. 03:36:129 (2)- : same reason as 01:12:373 x.x ^
9. 03:37:957 (6)- : add clap ^
10. 03:44:962 (1,1)- : same reason as 02:29:429 ^

[Hard]

1. 00:07:500 (4)- : ctrl j this it is not suitable this sound.
2. 00:10:241 (4)- : put this at x256 y48? not a big deal, but i think it'll good to put this on straight axis yup~

[Insane]

1. good diff really, can't mention anything q___q

a star should be ok. good luck Thank you so much >.<

K i A i wrote:

[dlwl]
00:29:429 (2,1,2,3) - 이거 몇 개 슬라이더 응용해서 교체 가능하신가요? 네에~
00:42:221 (1) - 앞 부분과 끝 부분 모양이 대칭이 되도록 만들면 더 보기 좋을 것 같아요~ 크킄 대칭 찍는게 힘들긴하지만 고쳤음
00:43:439 (2) - ^ ^
00:47:094 (1) - 이런 형태의 슬라는 대각선보다는 직선이 더 보기 좋을 것 같아요~ 음이 갑자기 바뀌는 곳이 양쪽에 다 있어서 이대로 유지함
00:49:530 (1) - ^ ^
01:25:774 (1,2,1,2) - 자칫 헷갈릴 수도 있으니 슬라로 대체해보는건 어떤가요?(그냥 의견이에염) 음 좀 생각해볼께요
02:06:282 (3) - 이런 형태의 슬라는 대각선보다는 직선이 더 보기 좋을 것 같아요~ 모양을 다르게 바꿔봤음. 소리가 직선은 아닌것같음.
03:01:713 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 이거 몇 개 슬라이더 응용해서 교체 가능하신가요? / 아니면 좀 더 대칭이 확실하게 바꿔보시는건 어떤가요? nice

[shajf]
01:29:581 (3,4) - 기울기 같게 해주세요~ okay
03:10:850 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - 이거 몇 개 슬라이더 응용해서 교체 가능하신가요? / 아니면 좀 더 대칭이 확실하게 바꿔보시는건 어떤가요? 한 번 더 지적오면 고쳐볼께요 사실 귀찮은거

[gkem]
00:09:937 (3) - 조금 더 y축에 가깝게 기울기를 바꿔주세요~ okay~
00:12:221 (6,7) - 이런 형식의 점프가 간간히 보이던데..
노트가 서로 붙어있는 상태에서의 점프라면 모르지만, 해당 점프와 같이 갑자기 노트가 서로 벌어지는 식의 큰 점프를 하드에 사용하기엔 부적합한 것 같아요 ㅇㅁㅇ
-> 00:12:678 (7,1) - 이런건 갠차늠 고침
-> 00:24:404 (6,1,2) - 이런것도 괜차나여 ^
-> 00:42:221 (1,2) - 점프가 이것도 큰 편이긴 하지만 like it! 여긴 괜찮을듯
-> 01:13:439 (1) - 이런 형식은 조금 디스턴스를 줄이는게 좋을 것 같아요~ 인간적으로 이건 좀 심했나봄 ㅋㅋ

[dlstps]
00:06:891 (5,6,7) - 점프를 하다가 갑자기 디스턴스가 줄어드는 형식은 별로 좋지 않아요.. / "서클 노트끼리의 '점프 - 안티점프' 형식 + 곡과 매치" 일 때에만 적절한 효과에요! 말한거 토대로 고침
00:08:718 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 슬라이더로 교체해보는건 어떤가요? 괜찮아보여요 xD
01:22:119 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 좀 어려운 감이 있지만 good ㄳㄳ
02:41:003 (1,2,3,4) - 각각 뉴콤 nice ~!


음

별이나 드세염

Thank you

Xinely wrote:

Hi moe ~ o3o/
m4m in my queue

[Easy]
00:17:855 - whistle in here is it intentional? yes.
00:26:992 (3) - ctrl+H for better flow? if yes put it x56 y:132 to make consistency spacing~ looks good even now ~
00:32:475 - whistle? you did it in normal, hard and insane diff okay ~
01:01:104 (2) - how about http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/760119 ? to make consistency curved with 00:58:668 (2) - yup ~
01:02:627 (2) - x:316 y:112 . i think better flow looks good even now.
01:32:779 (2) - x:192 y:216 for one diagonal in 01:31:561 (1,2,1) - ? ^
01:35:825 (1) - x:352 y:60 for straight with 01:35:216 (2) - good
02:22:424 - add spin here until 02:24:556 - .. if you want to keep no spin.. make break in 02:24:556 - see timeline more think about it ~
02:39:175 (3) - NC here for consistency yup ~
03:12:069 (2) - ctrl+H? okay ~

[Normal]
00:06:891 (5) - NC? sound flow is continual. so keep this.
00:14:048 (3) - how about end this slider in 00:14:353 - ? rhythm a little bit strange.
00:47:094 (1) - make it same with 01:43:135 (1) - ? better imo looks good even now.
01:13:744 (5) - NC for consistency? ^
01:30:952 (5) - NC for consistency okay ~
02:17:094 (5) - NC? pass ~
02:22:424 - same with easy same as easy.
03:04:759 (2) - x:392 y:300 for branket? if yes fix spacing after this (maybe 03:05:673 (1) - x:152 y:200) looks good even now. :3
03:06:586 (1,2) - swap NC sampleset was changed. keep. but, I modded several times, might fix this.
03:09:937 (3) - remove NC? sampleset was changed. so keep this.
03:37:500 (5) - NC? pass ~

[Hard]
00:06:282 (2) - spacing 1,10x is it itentional? if no. move 00:06:282 (2,3) - x:176 y:216 fix ~
00:16:942 (5,6,7) - how about https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/760274 ? it has high volume at vocals part. so keep this.
00:39:175 (2) - ctrl+G? it will become boring pattern.
00:49:530 (1) - spacing 1,14x is it itentional? lol fix
00:53:794 (5) - ctrl+G? same as 00:39:175 (2) keep this.
01:23:642 (5) - NC? more think about it ~
01:49:683 (5) - x:384 y:352 for branket? okay ~
02:22:424 - same with easy pass ~
02:39:175 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - not mod. but i love it *w* <3 >_<
02:46:485 (9) - NC? NC at 02:46:180 this point.
03:21:815 (3) - ctrl+H? looks good even now :3
03:37:652 (4) - NC? because you NC every stanza from 03:35:216 - maybe it will become NC spam.

as you know i can't mod insane but Fun for play \o/
omg u are nice mapper o.o
Good Luck slapter *runs*

Thanks your modding

Sonnyc wrote:

Easy:

00:05:063 (2) - 끝에 평범한 소프트 휘슬 넣으면 좋을듯요 다른 난이도에 다 안 넣었는데 여기만 넣자니 좀 껄끄러움
00:34:911 (1) - 끝은 클랩 보다는 휘슬이 어울릴듯 해요 제 방식이 아니긴 하지만.. 음. 넵
00:36:129 (2) - 00:35:977에서 시작하세요. 빨간선에서 시작하면 박자잡히 힘들수 있다고 생각하실 수도 있지만 슬라라서 괜찮아요. 그리고 ^ 넹
00:52:576 (1) - (308,356)에 중간 점 놓으셔서 완벽한 대칭으로. 무슨 소리신지 모르겠어요 ㄷㄷ;
00:56:231 (1) - 이지니까 지우는게 나을듯요 넵
01:11:459 (1) - 끝점 (260,144)가 더 나을듯요 x:260, y:140이 더 잘 감싸지는듯하여 그렇게 처리함
01:28:211 (1) - 음? 의도한 일반 피니시인가요? 넹
01:42:830 (3) - (328,184)에 놓아서 직선으로. 또는 (320,200)에 놓으셔서 01:43:135 (1)이 덮도록 처리해주세요 후자로 처리함
01:59:581 (1) - 삭제? ㅇㅇ.
02:12:069 (3) - (257,270) roger that
02:17:246 (1) - 02:18:464에서 끝내세요. 힛사는 그럼 피니시가 되나요? 스피너가 초보자들이 치기에는 많이 짧아진다고 생각하네요. 그리고 노트들이 여러개 나오는것도 아니고 서클이 아닌 슬라이더로 1개만 뜨니까 복잡하지 않아서 칠 수는 있을듯함
02:19:683 (1,1) - 좀더 여유롭게 둘러싸기 바랍니다. 네 ㅠㅠ
02:32:475 (1) - 음,, 좀 스핀이랑 너무 시간적 여유가 적은듯 그 근처에 리듬을 통으로 바꿨음
02:39:784 (2) - (478,222)가 여유 있게 좋을겁니다. 말하신거 토대로 고쳤음
02:46:485 (1) - 02:50:140에서 끝내세요. 다음 노트와 너무 가까워요. 넵 T^T
03:09:937 (3) - 리듬의 변조이므로 NC okay
03:27:906 (1) - NC 해제. 대칭 패턴을 더 살려줄겁니다. 넵
03:37:652 (1) - 03:38:871에서 끝내기 02:17:246 (1) 이쪽과 같은 의견입니다.
03:40:089 (1,1) - 비슷한 의견 고 chim
03:54:708 (1,2) - IRC ^

Normal:

00:27:449 (5) - 클랩 안 어울리는 것 같아요
00:34:911 (1,2) - (2)에서 뉴콤을 시작하세요 클랩보다 피니시가 더 강렬하다고 생각하기에 유지
00:54:404 (1) - 끝점을 (104,376)에 놓으면 (4)의 끝 위를 잘 지나가지요 넵
01:32:779 (3) - 다른 곳에 놓으세요. 노말에서는 이런 패턴 안됩니다. (슬라이더가 노트를 가리는 것.) 네엥
02:17:551 (6) - 클랩 박수 짝
02:22:119 (1) - ..ctrlH? 몇 번 더 지적오면 고쳐볼께요

Hard:

00:02:475 (6) - 슬라 끝 언스냅 컼
00:05:063 (1) - 안어울리는 점프 같네요 ㅇ.ㅇ..
00:17:855 (1) - 다음 슬라와의 관계는 모르겠지만 ctrl+G하는게 흐름에 좋을듯 근처에도 다르게 바꿔봤음
00:22:576 (8,1) - 둘을 콤보로 묶으세요. 00:23:033 (2) 이거를 뉴콤 그리고 네넹
00:24:556 (1) - 이 점프도 안어울리는듯 점프는 점프지만 거리를 줄여봤음
00:30:343 (2) - 뉴콤 상당히 어색함
00:39:175 (2) - ctrlG 하드인데,, 음에도 잘 어울리고 그렇게 치기 힘든정도는 아닌거같으니 유지할께요
00:41:916 (4) - 이상한 점프인듯요 앙 T_T.
00:43:135 - 두드러지는 박자가 있으니 클랩 상태의 노트 추가 niceu~
00:46:789 (6) - 이상한 점프인듯요 ㅇ.ㅇ.
00:55:013 (3,4) - 이 둘도 (1,2)와 같은 커브를 넣으면 좋을듯 음. 일부러 이랬긴 합니다만, 여러번 지적온 걸 보니, 많이 어색한가보군요.
01:05:520 (6) - 1칸 밑으로? 넹
01:08:871 - 노트 추가? 이것은 쿨타임
01:09:632 (3,1) - 별로 흐름이 좋지 못한듯 해요 음. 고친거도 흐름이 그렇게 좋다고 말 할 수는 없습니다만, 고쳤음
01:13:439 (1) - 이상한 점프인듯 거리를 줄였어요
01:23:033 (3,4) - 각각 ctrl+G하면 좋을듯 good
01:32:475 (1,2,3) - (96,268)이 좋을듯요 다른 곳으로 옮김
01:49:530 - 노트 추가 좀 더 생각해볼께요.
02:16:789 (1) - 이상한 점프인듯 앙 T_T
02:19:683 (1) - ....? 변속을 넣으셨다 하더라도 0.7은 너무 느린듯 하네요 예상도 못했고,, x1.0으로 늘림
03:01:713 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - .. 랜덤 스페이싱 orz 몇 번 더 지적오면 고칠께요
03:06:586 (1,1,1,1,1) - ^ ~
03:18:160 - 노트 추가. 오예 보컬 빼고는 소리가 다 음소거 되있어서 어색한듯 싶음
03:37:500 (3) - 1칸 왼쪽 네넹
03:49:074 (8) - (6) 끝을 지나게 해주세요 okayy ~
03:52:272 (1,2) - 03:54:708 (1,2) 처럼 하면 좋을듯 다르게 바꿔봤어요

Insane:

-- 틱2. 00:21:358 (6) 이런 것들 때문에 비피엠도 비피엠인지라 많이 시끄러움 1이 더 나은듯
-- 으음 AR 9는 너무 높은 듯한 갠적인 생각입니다 비피엠 180 이하면 생각해보겠습니다만, 점프도 나름대로 있고하니 유지

00:32:627 (4) - (248,48) 넵
00:57:754 (1,2) - ctrl+G?? 어색한듯
01:00:190 (1,2) - ^ 마찬가지.
01:13:135 - 노트 추가 좀 더 생각해볼께요.
01:58:668 (4) - ctrl+G. 흐름 네넹
02:20:596 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - (270,206) 스택 때문에 보기가 좋지 않네요 very niceu
02:50:749 (1) - 느린 슬라보다는 앞부분을 진동 처리한 빠른 슬라가 좋을듯요 모양은 엄청 이상하지만, 고침
03:18:160 - 노트 추가 오예 하드와 마찬가지.
03:26:383 (4) - 뭐 쉬어가는 부분인듯 하니 ctrl+G로 점프는 빼주세요 네넹

감사감사 ~~

scanter wrote:

자고 인나서 답글 쓸께요