First mod, so might be a few mistakes. Hello from my Mod Queue!
SPOILER
Hard
AR rate should be 5-7, not 8 as per Ranking Criteria guidelines
00:03:090 (3) - Hit sounding is a bit odd, Here as well 00:04:827 (2,3) - I'm not sure what you were going for, seeing as its a piano sound. You also have this sound on a sliderend which stresses a weak sound. I recommend just making it similar to the rest of the notes for this section of the song.
00:41:300 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Not only are these two stacks a bit hard to read, but don't fit the music too well. 00:41:300 (1,2,3,4,5) - An alternative like this might be better. The same applies later in the song here 01:36:248 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Having them in a more controlled direction would be better, though be wary of keeping streams only 5 notes long. Here too 01:46:985 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - Repeating sliders might work better. That's all I'll list for that problem
02:43:526 (1) - I get what you were going for, but this is very easy to sliderbreak on when sight reading and considering how late into the song it is, it's pretty unfair. I would recommend lowering the tick rate significantly. This also does break ranking criteria guidelines. This slider in general isn't on a long note either. It might be worth just mapping the entire section of this as several slow sliders instead of one very long one.
03:23:795 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Stream is longer then 5 notes, and a pretty extreme difficulty spike. Very out of place compared to the rest of the map. Try using repeating sliders?
Thats all I can find worth noting for the hard difficulty. Its generally well timed and I like the use of the repeating sliders with vocals.
Insane
02:43:526 (1) - Same thing as before, slider tick rate + low slider velocity = Slider break when sightreading. I know you do this elsewhere, but the music does a mini buildup here that makes this feel like a high slider velocity, and it feels like a massive betrayal when it isn't. As before it also does go through a few instruments playing.
02:57:736 (4) - Out of place double in a stream of singles?
03:32:424 (2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3) - You seem undeciding on how you want to vocalize this pattern, sometimes you use repeating sliders and other times you use stacks on top of the slider of a stream leading to the slider. Going for a more consistent approach like in hard might result in a better representation of the fact that this occurs a lot in the music
Insane generally felt much more solid then Hard. Good luck on getting ranked, and sorry for being unable to mod the other difficulties.
I looked at them very briefly. In the first Extra you express the back and forth pitch vocals with 01:04:984 (6,1,1) - , which is significantly easier then how you expressed in Insane, just seems odd?
AR rate should be 5-7, not 8 as per Ranking Criteria guidelines
00:03:090 (3) - Hit sounding is a bit odd, Here as well 00:04:827 (2,3) - I'm not sure what you were going for, seeing as its a piano sound. You also have this sound on a sliderend which stresses a weak sound. I recommend just making it similar to the rest of the notes for this section of the song.
00:41:300 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - Not only are these two stacks a bit hard to read, but don't fit the music too well. 00:41:300 (1,2,3,4,5) - An alternative like this might be better. The same applies later in the song here 01:36:248 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - Having them in a more controlled direction would be better, though be wary of keeping streams only 5 notes long. Here too 01:46:985 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - Repeating sliders might work better. That's all I'll list for that problem
02:43:526 (1) - I get what you were going for, but this is very easy to sliderbreak on when sight reading and considering how late into the song it is, it's pretty unfair. I would recommend lowering the tick rate significantly. This also does break ranking criteria guidelines. This slider in general isn't on a long note either. It might be worth just mapping the entire section of this as several slow sliders instead of one very long one.
03:23:795 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Stream is longer then 5 notes, and a pretty extreme difficulty spike. Very out of place compared to the rest of the map. Try using repeating sliders?
Thats all I can find worth noting for the hard difficulty. Its generally well timed and I like the use of the repeating sliders with vocals.
Insane
02:43:526 (1) - Same thing as before, slider tick rate + low slider velocity = Slider break when sightreading. I know you do this elsewhere, but the music does a mini buildup here that makes this feel like a high slider velocity, and it feels like a massive betrayal when it isn't. As before it also does go through a few instruments playing.
02:57:736 (4) - Out of place double in a stream of singles?
03:32:424 (2,3,4,1,2,1,2,3) - You seem undeciding on how you want to vocalize this pattern, sometimes you use repeating sliders and other times you use stacks on top of the slider of a stream leading to the slider. Going for a more consistent approach like in hard might result in a better representation of the fact that this occurs a lot in the music
Insane generally felt much more solid then Hard. Good luck on getting ranked, and sorry for being unable to mod the other difficulties.
I looked at them very briefly. In the first Extra you express the back and forth pitch vocals with 01:04:984 (6,1,1) - , which is significantly easier then how you expressed in Insane, just seems odd?