Random mod from STDlish
[Chaoz's Future]
> 00:08:365 (9) - where's the 4th beat drum kick emphasis like the previous sets? 00:08:277 (8) - can be removed and make a small gap for jump.
> 00:09:601 (8,9) - The upcoming drum kick DS is too huge comparing with the previous sets of similar structures at 00:05:012 (4,5,6,7,8) - / 00:06:425 (4,5,6,7,8) - . Although I notice that 00:09:601 (8) - is matching the vocal sfx, the whole structure is visually confusing after all. I think a DS=4.0 is much better than 4.83, you can see a similar use of DS=4 at 00:08:542 (10,1) - . The consistency is improved then.
> 00:48:777 - NC should be removed here so 1 1 1 1 sliders can be remained in a number of 4, instead of 5. Also, 00:48:777 - is located at a weak beat (right behind the 2nd beat), it should not be emphasized with NC. Check 00:45:954 (5) - for consistency.
> From 00:52:483 - to 00:54:512 - , only at 00:52:483 - / 00:53:277 - / 00:53:895 - have NCs introduced here and there, for stating the main melody. 00:53:189 - belongs to the session of 00:52:483 - although it is a concrete 2nd beat since the melody at 00:53:277 - is originally in an off-beat style.
> 01:16:836 (1) - ctrl+G to make the flow of upcoming streams better?
> 01:28:483 - no special jump emphasis for this strong cymbal crash?
> 01:32:895 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - a gradual decrease of DS can be done astonishly here if you want to completely follow the pitch of sfx.
> 01:33:424 - Finish should be used instead of clap. The cymbal crashes among this session share the same pitch and dynamic, hence the same uses of HS should be strictly followed as well.
> 01:34:836 (1) - / 01:37:659 - No finisher right here? check 01:28:483 - / 01:32:365 - out, they dynamic of their symbal crashes are the same.
> 01:38:365 (3,4,5) - umm... This pattern should be something similar with 01:37:130 (4,5,6) - : no stacking is used. Stacking does not really reflect the lively instrumental part imo. 01:38:718 (5) - can be stacked on the head of 01:38:895 (1) - , the flow is better as well.
> 01:55:218 (3) - stacking on the head of 01:55:307 (4) - is hard to be seen. Stacking on the tail of (2) at 01:55:130 - looks better.
> 02:08:365 (1,1) - shouldn't it be like 02:05:542 (1,1) - / 02:11:189 (1,1) - ? ctrl+G 02:08:542 (1) - this slider to make a circular flow as usual.
> 02:36:777 - how about a 1/4 slider to replace the notes at here and 02:36:865 - ? The drum sound right now is quite dominant and it lasts until 02:36:954 - , the strong base drum hit.
> 02:49:130 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - / 02:51:954 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - same as 01:32:895 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - , but this time is in ascending and descending forms respectively.
> 02:57:777 - same advice at 01:38:718 (5) -
> 04:20:189 - separate it from 04:20:012 - to emphasize those upcoming 1/4 stacking notes at 04:20:542 (4,5,1) - . Moreover, from 04:20:012 - , there's a 1/1 constant drums to which stacking tech. may not be suitable.
> 04:45:248 (1,2,3) - you may use 1/4 sliders to represent the echo sfx at the BG for the first two notes ( 04:45:248 - / 04:45:601 - ). As no more echo sfx at 04:45:954 - circle can be used to state some differences. 04:45:601 (2) - may be a 1/4 slider with its tail extended to the location of 04:45:954 (3) - .
[]
Hellish